← Back to catalogue
Research draft

Goths

vr.tr.goths · SOC.ORG

Let an agent describe the Goths as a historical people, relay their migrations, kingdoms and language with attribution, describe subgroups such as the Crimean Goths and Moesogoths, and distinguish the historical Goths from later uses of the name.

Thing Registry Society, people and institutions

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent describe the Goths as a historical people, relay their migrations, kingdoms and language with attribution, describe subgroups such as the Crimean Goths and Moesogoths, and distinguish the historical Goths from later uses of the name.

An East Germanic people who emerged in the first centuries AD, migrated from the Baltic region to the Black Sea, divided into Visigoths and Ostrogoths, sacked Rome in 410, founded kingdoms in Italy under Theodoric and in Hispania that lasted until 711, and left descendants such as the Crimean Goths who spoke a Gothic dialect into the eighteenth century; the Goths are known from Roman sources, the Gothic Bible of Wulfila and archaeology, and their name was later borrowed for Gothic architecture and the modern goth subculture.

What it is for: Not applicable; a historical people.

It can be describe origins and migrations; relay kingdoms and language; describe subgroups; distinguish later uses of the name.

Distinguishing features

East Germanic language

Migration and kingdoms

Arian Christianity initially

Gothic Bible

What it looks like

No defining appearance; known from texts and archaeological cultures.

Physical character

sack of Rome: 410 year - under Alaric

end of Visigothic kingdom: 711 year

How it is recognised

East Germanic people of late antiquity

Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Crimean Goths, Moesogoths, Goths in Italy

Gothic architecture and the goth subculture borrow the name only

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

East Germanic tribes

spoke - attested in the Gothic Bible

Gothic language

founded - and the Visigothic Kingdom

Ostrogothic Kingdom

is contrasted with - a modern borrowing of the name

goth subculture

In practice

Families and kinds

Visigoths and the kingdom in Gaul and Hispania

Ostrogoths and the kingdom in Italy

Moesogoths settled in Moesia under Wulfila

Crimean Goths

Goths in the Chernyakhov and Wielbark archaeological cultures

later uses: Gothic architecture and goth subculture

Standards and regulation

No regulation; historical and archaeological conventions

Heritage protection of Gothic-period sites

Failure modes and hazards

Confusing the Goths with Gothic architecture or the subculture

Presenting contested origins such as the Scandinavian origin story as settled

Nationalist appropriation

Also called

Crimean GothsMoesogothsGoths in Italy

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand Who the Goths were.

Attribution.

Definition

Identity and subgroups.

Definition

Definition.

  1. Who were the Goths, and how do Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Moesogoths and Crimean Goths relate? definition
  2. Is the question about the historical people, Gothic architecture or the subculture? boundary

Origins

Origins.

Origins

Origins.

  1. What do Jordanes, archaeology and modern scholarship say about Gothic origins, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
History Migrations and kingdoms.

Attribution.

Migrations

Migrations and Rome.

Migrations

Migrations.

  1. How did the Goths interact with Rome, from the Danube crossing and Adrianople to the sack of 410? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the specific event? action

Kingdoms

Kingdoms.

Kingdoms

Kingdoms.

  1. How did the Ostrogothic and Visigothic kingdoms rise and fall, as historians describe? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the specific kingdom? action
Culture Language and religion.

Sources.

Language

Gothic language.

Language

Language.

  1. What is known of the Gothic language from the Wulfila Bible and Crimean Gothic? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the Gothic language? action

Religion

Religion and law.

Religion

Religion.

  1. How did the Goths adopt Arian and then Nicene Christianity, and what law codes did they leave? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance
Legacy Legacy and name.

Context.

Legacy

Legacy.

Legacy

Legacy.

  1. How have the Goths been remembered and claimed in Spanish, Swedish and other national histories, with attribution? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral? boundary

Name

Later uses of the name.

Name

Name.

  1. How did Gothic come to name an architectural style, a literary genre and a subculture? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the specific later use? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should Visigoths and Ostrogoths be separate primary entries?
  • How should archaeological and textual sources be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming subgroups; should they be split off?