← Back to catalogue
Research draft

research

vr.tr.research · ACT.ACT

Let an agent support research by explaining methods, ethics, integrity, publication and funding, and help people find and evaluate sources.

Thing Registry Activities and processes

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent support research by explaining methods, ethics, integrity, publication and funding, and help people find and evaluate sources.

Systematic investigation to establish facts, test hypotheses, develop theories or create new knowledge and applications, carried out in science, humanities, industry and other fields, and governed by methods, ethics and integrity standards.

What it is for: Creating and testing knowledge.

It can be plan a research question and method; find and evaluate sources; understand ethics approval and consent; find funding and publication routes.

Distinguishing features

Systematic method

Aims at new knowledge

Subject to peer review

Governed by ethics

What it looks like

Activities in labs, archives, fields and offices, producing data, papers and reports.

How it is recognised

Peer-reviewed publications

Research protocols and ethics approvals

Opinion pieces are not research

Related models

is a kind of - category

inquiry

produces - output

scientific publication

is governed by - rules

research ethics

is funded by - funding

research funder

In practice

Families and kinds

basic research

applied research

experimental research

qualitative and quantitative research

humanities and archival research

Standards and regulation

Declaration of Helsinki for medical research

European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity

Data protection law for personal data

Failure modes and hazards

Fabrication, falsification and plagiarism

Harm to participants

Irreproducible results

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Also registered as vr.tr.research

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Design Planning.

Questions drive methods.

Question

Research question.

Question

Research question.

  1. What is the research question, and is it answerable? definition
  2. What is already known? provenance

Method

Methods.

Method

Methods.

  1. Which method fits the question? definition
  2. What sample size or data is needed? measurement
Ethics Approval.

Participants need protection.

Approval

Ethics review.

Approval

Ethics review.

  1. Does the study need ethics committee approval? boundary
  2. How is informed consent obtained? provenance

Integrity

Misconduct.

Integrity

Research integrity.

  1. Is there a concern about misconduct? boundary
  2. How can it be reported to the institution? action
Sources Evidence.

Sources vary in quality.

Find

Searching.

Find

Finding sources.

  1. Which databases and archives hold relevant sources? provenance
  2. Is there open access? provenance

Evaluate

Quality.

Evaluate

Evaluating sources.

  1. Is the study peer reviewed, and are there retractions or corrections? provenance
  2. How strong is the evidence? boundary
Outputs Publishing and funding.

Research is shared.

Publish

Publication.

Publish

Publication.

  1. Which journals or repositories suit this work? provenance
  2. Is the journal legitimate rather than predatory? boundary

Funding

Grants.

Funding

Funding.

  1. Which funders support this field? provenance
  2. What are the deadlines and conditions? provenance

What the second pass must settle

  • Should research types be separate entries?
  • How should integrity codes be linked?
  • How should research outputs be identified?