{ "model": { "rank": 4632, "code": "thing-q426", "model_id": "vr.tr.animal-rights", "name": "animal rights", "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify and compare animal-rights claims, assess their justification and recognition, and determine what actions they support or constrain.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.KNW", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q426/", "tier": 2, "score": 73, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "great ape personhood", "abolitionism", "animal welfare and rights in Japan" ], "aliasCount": 3, "merged": 3, "knownIn": 73, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q426", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q426", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T20:40:03Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 20.4, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087e5-31d7-7f52-a192-8f66d281e4ab\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: animal rights\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.KNW\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 005: 1001 r", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 64, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087e5-31cc-7c80-8eee-a05ae5e9c35b\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: animal rights\nRegistry id: vr.tr.animal-rights\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.KNW\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q426", "registryId": "vr.tr.animal-rights", "name": "animal rights", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.KNW" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q426/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.animal-rights", "name": "animal rights", "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify and compare animal-rights claims, assess their justification and recognition, and determine what actions they support or constrain.", "definition": "Animal rights is the ethical position that at least some nonhuman animals possess moral rights that constrain how humans may treat them, together with the philosophical inquiry and advocacy concerned with recognizing those rights.", "scope_statement": "This model owns animal rights as a body of normative claims and associated inquiry concerning rights attributed to nonhuman animals, including proposed rights, their grounds, duty bearers and practical implications; it distinguishes moral proposals from legally recognised rights.", "in_scope": [ "Definitions of animal rights and boundaries with animal welfare, animal ethics and conservation", "Grounds for attributing rights and criteria for identifying rights holders", "Content, strength and limits of proposed animal rights", "Duties, representation and remedies associated with animal-rights claims", "Arguments, research methods and institutional conventions used to examine animal rights", "Application of rights claims to human uses of animals and interventions affecting them" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Animals' biological classification, physiology and individual medical histories", "Animal welfare assessment protocols except where they inform a rights claim", "Conservation management and ecosystem valuation independent of individual rights", "Animal advocacy organisations, campaigns and activists as entities", "Complete legislation, court proceedings and jurisdictional legal systems", "Human rights except where a specified comparison or conflict is being examined" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "A claim must identify an entitlement attributed to animals or explain its rights terminology; concern about suffering alone does not establish a rights claim.", "The account must identify who holds the right: individual animals, a specified class or another explicitly defended bearer; species preservation is not automatically an individual animal right.", "The account must distinguish a moral entitlement being advocated from a legal entitlement recognised by an identified authority.", "Restrictions on ownership, killing or exploitation must be stated separately from requirements to improve treatment.", "Animal rights as an object of inquiry must be distinguished from the people, organisations and publications that study or advocate it." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Sense of animal rights", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Moral doctrine; legal entitlement; research topic; advocacy usage; explicitly mixed usage", "why_it_matters": "Prevents a philosophical claim, a legal rule and a movement slogan from being treated as interchangeable." }, { "name": "Rights-holder criterion", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Stated criterion such as sentience, subjecthood or another defended basis; disputed; unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Determines which animals the account includes and how uncertain cases are handled." }, { "name": "Claimed entitlement", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Account-specific rights concerning life, bodily integrity, liberty, habitat, care or other explicitly named interests", "why_it_matters": "Makes the proposed protection concrete without assuming that every animal-rights account endorses the same rights." }, { "name": "Duty bearer", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Named relationship to individuals, keepers, businesses, public authorities or other responsible actors", "why_it_matters": "Connects an animal's proposed entitlement to someone expected to respect, protect or fulfil it." }, { "name": "Permitted exceptions", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "None asserted; specified overriding conditions; balancing rule; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Determines how the account treats necessity, competing rights and unavoidable harm." }, { "name": "Recognition status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Proposed moral right; asserted legal right; verified legal recognition with jurisdiction, authority and date; disputed; unknown", "why_it_matters": "Prevents advocacy or interpretation from being presented as established law." }, { "name": "Argument and evidence provenance", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Attributed author or institution, source passage, date, supporting evidence and recorded objections", "why_it_matters": "Allows an agent to evaluate a position without presenting contested premises as consensus." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify a statement as a rights claim, welfare concern, conservation objective or mixed position.", "Compare animal-rights accounts by their inclusion criteria, entitlements, duties and exceptions.", "Identify which additional evidence or normative premise is needed to assess a disputed animal's inclusion.", "Trace a proposed action involving animals to the rights and duties it would affect.", "Separate moral recommendations from verified legal permissions, obligations and remedies.", "Expose unresolved conflicts and formulate focused research questions before recommending action." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "meaning-and-inquiry", "name": "Meaning and inquiry", "description": "Establishes the sense of animal rights being modelled and the conventions used to study it.", "rationale": "Animal rights can name a normative position, a legal claim or an advocacy objective, and those senses require different judgments.", "layers": [ { "id": "rights-language", "name": "Rights language", "description": "Examines what an account means when it attributes rights to animals.", "findings": [ { "id": "entitlement-versus-concern", "name": "Entitlement versus concern", "description": "Record the account's definition of a right and whether it establishes a claim on others beyond a general concern for animal well-being.", "questions": [ { "text": "What entitlement does this account attribute to animals, and what corresponding conduct does it require?", "kind": "definition", "id": "entitlement-versus-concern-q01" }, { "text": "What distinguishes this account from a welfare position that permits animal use subject to improved treatment?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "entitlement-versus-concern-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "scholarly-location", "name": "Scholarly location", "description": "Locates inquiry into animal rights within explicitly identified disciplinary and institutional conventions.", "findings": [ { "id": "methods-and-field-boundaries", "name": "Methods and field boundaries", "description": "Record how a source situates animal-rights inquiry and which philosophical, legal or empirical methods it uses.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which handbook, classification scheme, journal, programme or scholarly society places animal rights within a named field?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "methods-and-field-boundaries-q01" }, { "text": "Which conclusions depend on ethical argument, legal interpretation or empirical evidence about animals?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "methods-and-field-boundaries-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "grounds-and-rights-holders", "name": "Grounds and rights holders", "description": "Identifies why rights are attributed and which animals qualify under the account.", "rationale": "An agent cannot apply an animal-rights position without knowing its inclusion rule and the uncertainty surrounding that rule.", "layers": [ { "id": "normative-foundations", "name": "Normative foundations", "description": "Separates the grounds offered for rights from the conclusions those grounds are intended to support.", "findings": [ { "id": "basis-of-entitlement", "name": "Basis of entitlement", "description": "Record the premises connecting an animal's interests, capacities, relationships or status to a proposed right.", "questions": [ { "text": "Why does the account treat the relevant animal characteristic or relationship as a ground for rights?", "kind": "definition", "id": "basis-of-entitlement-q01" }, { "text": "Which source develops that argument, and which objections or limitations does it acknowledge?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "basis-of-entitlement-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "inclusion-and-uncertainty", "name": "Inclusion and uncertainty", "description": "Makes inclusion criteria explicit without assuming that all accounts cover the same animals.", "findings": [ { "id": "uncertain-animal-inclusion", "name": "Uncertain animal inclusion", "description": "Record the evidence and decision rule used when an animal's qualifying capacities or status are uncertain.", "questions": [ { "text": "What observations or studies support inclusion or exclusion of the animal group under the stated criterion?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "uncertain-animal-inclusion-q01" }, { "text": "What precaution, if any, does the account require when evidence about sentience or another qualifying capacity is inconclusive?", "kind": "action", "id": "uncertain-animal-inclusion-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "entitlements-and-conflicts", "name": "Entitlements and conflicts", "description": "Specifies the interests protected as rights and the rules governing exceptions or competing claims.", "rationale": "Agreement that animals have rights does not settle whether killing, confinement, ownership or intervention is permissible.", "layers": [ { "id": "protected-interests", "name": "Protected interests", "description": "Describes each claimed entitlement and the conduct it protects against or requires.", "findings": [ { "id": "life-liberty-and-integrity", "name": "Life, liberty and bodily integrity", "description": "Record separately any claimed rights against killing, confinement, injury, reproductive control or treatment as property.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which of these entitlements does the account endorse, and how does it define a violation of each?", "kind": "definition", "id": "life-liberty-and-integrity-q01" }, { "text": "Would painless killing, comfortable confinement or ownership still violate a claimed right under this account?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "life-liberty-and-integrity-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "exceptions-and-collisions", "name": "Exceptions and collisions", "description": "Examines how the account handles competing interests, duties and rights.", "findings": [ { "id": "necessity-and-competing-rights", "name": "Necessity and competing rights", "description": "Record any rule for conflicts involving animal life, human safety, ecological protection or the rights of other animals.", "questions": [ { "text": "What conditions, if any, permit overriding a claimed animal right in self-defence, disease control or ecological intervention?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "necessity-and-competing-rights-q01" }, { "text": "What alternatives, evidence of necessity and limits on harm must be considered before acting?", "kind": "action", "id": "necessity-and-competing-rights-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "duties-and-representation", "name": "Duties and representation", "description": "Connects rights to responsible actors, decision-making arrangements and routes for addressing violations.", "rationale": "A right's practical meaning depends on who owes the duty and who can advance the animal's claim.", "layers": [ { "id": "responsibility-and-care", "name": "Responsibility and care", "description": "Distinguishes duties to avoid interference from duties to provide protection or assistance.", "findings": [ { "id": "relationship-dependent-duties", "name": "Relationship-dependent duties", "description": "Record whether captivity, domestication, dependency or human-caused harm creates additional obligations.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which duties arise specifically from keeping, breeding, displacing or making an animal dependent on humans?", "kind": "definition", "id": "relationship-dependent-duties-q01" }, { "text": "How does the account distinguish duties toward dependent animals from duties toward free-living animals?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "relationship-dependent-duties-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "recognition-and-voice", "name": "Recognition and voice", "description": "Separates proposed representation from legally established authority and remedies.", "findings": [ { "id": "representation-and-enforceability", "name": "Representation and enforceability", "description": "Record who may speak or act for an animal, how the animal's interests are assessed and whether an identified legal mechanism supports the claim.", "questions": [ { "text": "What source establishes the claimed legal recognition, representative authority or remedy, in which jurisdiction and at what date?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "representation-and-enforceability-q01" }, { "text": "How should a representative identify the animal's interests and manage conflicts with the representative's own interests?", "kind": "action", "id": "representation-and-enforceability-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "practice-and-change", "name": "Practice and change", "description": "Applies stated rights to animal-use practices and evaluates proposed changes against those rights.", "rationale": "An agent needs to distinguish improvements in treatment from changes that satisfy the particular entitlement being claimed.", "layers": [ { "id": "animal-use-assessment", "name": "Animal-use assessment", "description": "Examines the implications of rights claims for food production, research, entertainment, work and companionship.", "findings": [ { "id": "practice-specific-permissibility", "name": "Practice-specific permissibility", "description": "Record which features of a practice trigger the account's objections and whether any form of that practice is considered permissible.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the objection concern suffering, killing, confinement, commodification, lack of consent or another specified feature?", "kind": "definition", "id": "practice-specific-permissibility-q01" }, { "text": "Under the account's stated rights, must the practice end, change its conditions or satisfy a specified exception?", "kind": "action", "id": "practice-specific-permissibility-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "reform-and-transition", "name": "Reform and transition", "description": "Examines proposed pathways from present practices to the account's preferred arrangements.", "findings": [ { "id": "rights-consistent-transition", "name": "Rights-consistent transition", "description": "Record how a proposal handles existing dependent animals, interim welfare improvements and continuing rights violations.", "questions": [ { "text": "How would the proposed transition provide for animals already dependent on the practice being changed?", "kind": "action", "id": "rights-consistent-transition-q01" }, { "text": "What observable changes would demonstrate fulfilment of the claimed right, separately from a reduction in suffering?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "rights-consistent-transition-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The name can denote a normative position, a subject of scholarship or a social movement; this entry centers the position and its associated inquiry and advocacy.", "The listed kinds overlap rather than form a standardized taxonomy; theories disagree about which animals hold which rights and why.", "No universally accepted quantitative measure or dedicated classification identifier is supplied; specific legal recognition requires jurisdiction-specific research." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of animal rights this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Moral animal rights", "Legal animal rights", "Abolitionist approaches", "Political and citizenship-based approaches" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of animal rights this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Evaluating the permissibility of animal experimentation, farming, hunting and entertainment.", "Supporting advocacy for ending practices considered incompatible with animals' rights.", "Developing arguments for legal protections or legal personhood for nonhuman animals.", "Informing individual choices about food, clothing and other animal-derived products.", "Examining human responsibilities toward companion animals, captive animals and wildlife." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of animal rights this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Conflating rights with welfare improvements, although better treatment does not necessarily satisfy a rights-based objection to animal use.", "Treating all concern for animals as rights-based, including consequentialist positions that do not posit individual rights.", "Assuming that recognizing some rights entails identical rights for humans and all other animals.", "Confusing proposed moral rights with rights recognized and enforceable in a particular legal system.", "Ignoring conflicts among individual animal rights, human interests and conservation objectives." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of animal rights this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The language and reception of animal-rights arguments vary with religious, philosophical and cultural understandings of human-animal relationships.", "Legal recognition, routes for advocacy and enforcement arrangements vary by jurisdiction; animal-protection provisions do not necessarily establish animal rights." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of animal rights this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Animal welfare", "difference": "Concerns animals' well-being and treatment; it can permit uses that animal-rights positions reject even when suffering is reduced." }, { "name": "Animal ethics", "difference": "The broader field examining moral relations with animals; animal-rights theories are one family of positions within it." }, { "name": "Animal law", "difference": "Studies and practices law concerning animals, including rules that do not recognize animals as rights holders." }, { "name": "Conservation", "difference": "Typically prioritizes species, populations or ecosystems, whereas animal-rights theories primarily concern individual rights holders." }, { "name": "Veganism", "difference": "A philosophy and practice of avoiding animal exploitation; it can express animal-rights commitments but is not synonymous with the theory of animal rights." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of animal rights this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry intend animal rights primarily as a normative doctrine, an interdisciplinary research topic or a broader concept encompassing legal and advocacy usage?", "Which existing Vercy world model, if any, already owns this concept and should serve as its single publication?", "Which primary accounts should establish the range of rights-holder criteria, proposed entitlements and disagreements represented here?", "Which legal examples can be verified as recognising animal rights, and which instead impose protective duties without establishing animals as rights holders?", "Which scholarly classification and institutional sources support treating animal rights as a distinct field rather than a topic within neighbouring fields?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 16, "questions": 26 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "discipline or field of knowledge", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a animal rights, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to identify and compare animal-rights claims, assess their justification and recognition, and determine what actions they support or constrain.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: great ape personhood, abolitionism, animal welfare and rights in Japan.", "3 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 73 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a animal rights, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says" ], "howItIsRecognised": [], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "great ape personhood", "abolitionism", "animal welfare and rights in Japan" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 73 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 3 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one animal rights from another, and a animal rights from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a animal rights, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a animal rights, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a animal rights is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a animal rights, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a animal rights, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a animal rights is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a animal rights sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a animal rights, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a animal rights, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a animal rights is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a animal rights from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a animal rights, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a animal rights, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a animal rights is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a animal rights passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a animal rights between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a animal rights, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a animal rights, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a animal rights is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a animal rights, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a animal rights is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a animal rights, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a animal rights, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a animal rights is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a animal rights says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a animal rights contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a animal rights, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a animal rights, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a animal rights is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a animal rights and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a animal rights, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a animal rights, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a animal rights is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "subject-and-method", "name": "Subject matter and method", "description": "What animal rights studies and how it establishes anything.", "rationale": "A field is identified by its questions and its methods, and those are what distinguish it from the fields next to it.", "layers": [ { "id": "subject", "name": "Subject matter", "description": "The questions it takes as its own.", "findings": [ { "id": "subject-record", "name": "Questions and objects of study", "description": "What it is about, stated so a neighbouring field can be told apart.", "questions": [ { "id": "subject-record-q01", "text": "What questions and objects does animal rights take as its own?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "subject-record-q02", "text": "Which questions does it share with a neighbouring field, and who claims them?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "method", "name": "Method and evidence", "description": "How claims are established and what counts as evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "method-record", "name": "Methods and standards of evidence", "description": "The methods used and what they are taken to establish.", "questions": [ { "id": "method-record-q01", "text": "By what methods does animal rights establish claims, and what counts as sufficient evidence?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "method-record-q02", "text": "What kind of claim can this field not settle, and where should an agent look instead?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "institutions-and-classification", "name": "Institutions and classification", "description": "Where animal rights is practised and how catalogues place it.", "rationale": "The institutional footprint is the evidence that a field exists as a field rather than as a topic.", "layers": [ { "id": "institutions", "name": "Institutional markers", "description": "Societies, journals, degrees and departments.", "findings": [ { "id": "institution-record", "name": "Bodies and venues", "description": "Where the field organises itself.", "questions": [ { "id": "institution-record-q01", "text": "Which societies, journals or degrees mark animal rights as an established field?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "institution-record-q02", "text": "What would show that it is emerging or dissolving rather than established?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification", "name": "Classification schemes", "description": "Where library and research classifications put it.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-record", "name": "Codes and their disagreements", "description": "The classification codes that place it, and where they differ.", "questions": [ { "id": "classification-record-q01", "text": "Which classification schemes place animal rights, under what codes?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "classification-record-q02", "text": "Where do those schemes disagree about its scope?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a animal rights came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a animal rights and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a animal rights, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a animal rights, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a animal rights is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a animal rights is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a animal rights, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a animal rights, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a animal rights is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }