{ "model": { "rank": 5874, "code": "thing-q42759", "model_id": "vr.tr.mujahid", "name": "mujahid", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a contextually supported mujahid attribution to a person, assess its meaning and current applicability, and decide which representations or follow-up actions the evidence supports.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Society, people and institutions", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "SOC", "domain": "SOC.PER", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q42759/", "tier": 2, "score": 64, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "Mujahideen of Saturday", "Islamic Unity of Afghanistan Mujahideen", "Barbary pirates" ], "aliasCount": 3, "merged": 3, "knownIn": 64, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": "vr.tr.mujahid", "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q42759", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q42759", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T09:51:47Z", "providers": [ "Codex", "Grok" ], "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "usd": 0.01284112, "turns": 1, "seconds": 156.8, "error": null }, "codex": { "seconds": 92, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07b43-308c-7032-983a-3767959e3c89\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: mujahid\nRegistry id: vr.tr.mujahid\nPlane / domain: SOC / SOC.PER\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\nA Vercy m" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q42759", "registryId": "vr.tr.mujahid", "name": "mujahid", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "SOC.PER" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q42759/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.mujahid", "name": "mujahid", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a contextually supported mujahid attribution to a person, assess its meaning and current applicability, and decide which representations or follow-up actions the evidence supports.", "definition": "A mujahid (Arabic mujāhid, plural mujāhidūn/mujāhidīn) is a person who undertakes jihād - striving in the path of God - which in Islamic law and in most historical political usage names a combatant in a religiously framed armed struggle, and which in several modern states is also a legal or honorific status for veterans of a named war or members of a named paramilitary.", "scope_statement": "For vr.tr.mujahid in SOC / SOC.PER, this model owns the contextual relationship between a person, the designation mujahid, and the activity understood by the relevant speaker as jihad; it provisionally treats the designation as a situated role or attribution pending clarification of the registry's intended meaning.", "in_scope": [ "Whether mujahid designates a person's role, self-understanding, attributed status, or commemorative identity.", "Who applies or contests the designation, using which wording and supporting evidence.", "The meaning of jihad invoked in that particular attribution.", "The person's evidenced participation, relevant affiliations, and changes over time.", "Limits on conclusions and actions that an agent may derive from the designation." ], "out_of_scope": [ "The person's complete biography and general identity record.", "A comprehensive model of jihad as a religious, ethical, or jurisprudential concept.", "The internal structure and full history of organisations called mujahideen.", "Military campaign planning, weapons capabilities, and operational targeting.", "Independent determinations of criminal liability, terrorist designation, or status under the law of armed conflict." ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Require evidence that mujahid is being used as a designation of the person; an occurrence as a personal name, surname, or quoted word is insufficient.", "Require an identifiable connection to what the attributing source understands as jihad; being Muslim, politically active, or involved in fighting does not independently establish the designation.", "Resolve the referent to an individual; mention of a collective called mujahideen does not automatically establish the designation for every associated person.", "Distinguish self-identification, community recognition, hostile labelling, and analytical description rather than treating them as interchangeable evidence.", "Distinguish present participation from a former role or retrospective honour; a continuing title does not by itself establish continuing activity." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Designation use", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "role claim | attributed role | honorific | commemorative designation | personal name only | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether the mention belongs in this model and what it actually asserts." }, { "name": "Attribution relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "person linked to an attributing speaker or source, original wording, date, and context", "why_it_matters": "Makes the designation accountable to a particular claim rather than an unqualified property of the person." }, { "name": "Invoked meaning of jihad", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "source-defined meaning, provisionally classified as armed | non-armed | mixed | unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Prevents one interpretation of the term from being imposed on every occurrence." }, { "name": "Participation relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "person linked to an evidenced activity, role, episode, and supporting source", "why_it_matters": "Separates what the person is reported to do from what a designation suggests." }, { "name": "Relevant affiliation", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "organisation or community, relationship type, applicable interval, and evidence status", "why_it_matters": "Provides context without equating association, membership, and participation." }, { "name": "Role applicability", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "claimed current | evidenced current | former | retrospective only | disputed | unknown", "why_it_matters": "Allows historical identity and current activity to be assessed separately." }, { "name": "Evidence agreement", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "single attribution | independently corroborated | conflicting | retracted | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Controls how confidently the agent can describe the person using the designation." }, { "name": "Time since supporting observation", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "days since the latest dated observation supporting a current-role claim; unknown where undated", "why_it_matters": "Flags potentially stale current-role claims without treating elapsed time as proof of departure." } ], "affordances": [ "Record a sourced mujahid attribution while preserving the speaker's wording and intended meaning.", "Distinguish a role designation from a personal name, collective reference, or retrospective honour.", "Compare conflicting attributions without converting disagreement into a single categorical identity.", "Link evidenced participation and affiliation to neighbouring person, activity, organisation, and conflict models.", "Revise or qualify current applicability when new evidence establishes withdrawal, changed participation, or mistaken identity.", "Produce an attributed description or defer a consequential classification when the designation alone provides insufficient evidence." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "ei2-djihad", "title": "Djihād (and related lemma mudjāhid) - Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd ed., Brill", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Classical legal and lexical sense: mujāhid as the person who undertakes jihād, and the conditions under which armed struggle is treated as a religious-legal category." }, { "id": "britannica-mujahideen", "title": "Mujahideen - Encyclopaedia Britannica", "url": "https://www.britannica.com/topic/mujahideen", "what_it_supports": "The modern political-historical sense, especially the Afghan mujahideen against the Soviet intervention, and the word's use for other named guerrilla forces.", "url_status": "blocked" }, { "id": "peters-jihad", "title": "Jihad in Classical and Modern Islam: A Reader - Rudolph Peters, Markus Wiener Publishers", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "How jurists distinguished lawful jihad from unsanctioned fighting, and how the title mujahid moved from fiqh into modern political movements." }, { "id": "quran-4-95", "title": "Qur'an 4:95 and 9:19-22 - the received Arabic text (English often cited from Abdel Haleem, Oxford World's Classics)", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Scriptural distinction between those who strive (al-mujāhidūn) and those who stay behind, which later legal and honorific uses rest on." } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "designation-and-referent", "name": "Designation and referent", "description": "Establish whether an occurrence of mujahid denotes the modelled role and identifies an individual.", "rationale": "The registry supplies no definition, so name matching cannot establish that a person instantiates this concept.", "layers": [ { "id": "term-in-context", "name": "Term in context", "description": "Preserve the original expression and determine its function in the source.", "findings": [ { "id": "role-bearing-usage", "name": "Role-bearing usage", "description": "Record whether the expression asserts a role or merely supplies a name or title. A lexical starting point connects singular mujahid with participation in jihad, but does not settle the registry's scope: [Oxford Learner's Dictionaries](https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/mujahideen).", "questions": [ { "text": "Does this occurrence describe participation or status, or is Mujahid only part of the person's name?", "kind": "definition", "id": "role-bearing-usage-q01" }, { "text": "What original wording and surrounding passage establish how the expression is being used?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "role-bearing-usage-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "individual-resolution", "name": "Individual resolution", "description": "Distinguish the person from collective references and similarly named people.", "findings": [ { "id": "person-specific-attribution", "name": "Person-specific attribution", "description": "Require evidence connecting the designation to this individual rather than inheriting it from a group name or an ambiguous mention.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which details identify the individual to whom the designation applies?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "person-specific-attribution-q01" }, { "text": "Does the evidence designate this person, or only mention a collective called mujahideen?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "person-specific-attribution-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "jihad-meaning-and-recognition", "name": "Jihad meaning and recognition", "description": "Capture the interpretation and standpoint under which the person is designated a mujahid.", "rationale": "Recognition depends on the meaning and perspective attached to the designation, not merely its spelling.", "layers": [ { "id": "invoked-struggle", "name": "Invoked struggle", "description": "Represent the particular activity or commitment described as jihad.", "findings": [ { "id": "source-defined-jihad", "name": "Source-defined jihad", "description": "Retain the source's account of the struggle and leave its character unresolved where the account is insufficient.", "questions": [ { "text": "What activity, commitment, or struggle does the source mean by jihad in this attribution?", "kind": "definition", "id": "source-defined-jihad-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence supports interpreting this usage as armed, non-armed, mixed, or unspecified?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "source-defined-jihad-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "recognising-standpoint", "name": "Recognising standpoint", "description": "Separate personal identification from recognition or labelling by others.", "findings": [ { "id": "attribution-and-contestation", "name": "Attribution and contestation", "description": "Record who accepts, rejects, or qualifies the designation without making the agent an arbiter of religious authenticity.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the designation self-applied, conferred by a community, or assigned by an outside observer?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attribution-and-contestation-q01" }, { "text": "Whose disagreement changes how the attribution should be represented, and what exactly do they contest?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "attribution-and-contestation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "participation-and-affiliation", "name": "Participation and affiliation", "description": "Connect the mujahid attribution to evidenced conduct and relevant social relationships.", "rationale": "A label does not establish what a person did, whether they fought, or which organisation they belonged to.", "layers": [ { "id": "participation-basis", "name": "Participation basis", "description": "Identify the activity offered as the basis of the designation.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidenced-role-in-struggle", "name": "Evidenced role in the struggle", "description": "Describe the person's supported role in the invoked struggle while separating observed conduct, reported conduct, and rhetorical praise.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which specific participation is offered as the basis for calling this person a mujahid?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "evidenced-role-in-struggle-q01" }, { "text": "Does the evidence establish personal participation, support for others, or only an expression of approval?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "evidenced-role-in-struggle-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "affiliation-basis", "name": "Affiliation basis", "description": "Represent relevant organisational or community ties without deriving them from the designation.", "findings": [ { "id": "qualified-affiliation", "name": "Qualified affiliation", "description": "Keep membership, allegiance, temporary cooperation, and external association distinct and permit no established affiliation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which relationship to a named organisation or community is directly supported, and during what interval?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "qualified-affiliation-q01" }, { "text": "Would the affiliation still be supported if the word mujahid were removed from the evidence?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "qualified-affiliation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "role-over-time", "name": "Role over time", "description": "Track the difference between dated participation, continuing designation, and retrospective identity.", "rationale": "A historically valid mujahid attribution may persist after the activity that originally supported it.", "layers": [ { "id": "participation-interval", "name": "Participation interval", "description": "Locate the attributed role in time without turning publication dates into activity dates.", "findings": [ { "id": "dated-applicability", "name": "Dated applicability", "description": "Distinguish when participation occurred, when it was observed, and when the attribution was published.", "questions": [ { "text": "What earliest and latest dates of relevant participation are supported, and how uncertain are those bounds?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "dated-applicability-q01" }, { "text": "Does the latest source describe current participation or repeat an account of an earlier period?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "dated-applicability-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "departure-and-remembrance", "name": "Departure and remembrance", "description": "Represent changes in activity separately from the persistence of a title.", "findings": [ { "id": "role-transition", "name": "Role transition", "description": "Record supported withdrawal, disavowal, changed participation, or commemorative use without inferring any transition from silence.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence establishes a change in participation or the person's acceptance of the designation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "role-transition-q01" }, { "text": "Should the agent represent the designation as current, former, retrospective, disputed, or unknown?", "kind": "action", "id": "role-transition-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-inference-limits", "name": "Evidence and inference limits", "description": "Determine which descriptions and downstream conclusions the mujahid evidence supports.", "rationale": "The designation may carry strong implications that exceed what a particular source actually establishes.", "layers": [ { "id": "attribution-quality", "name": "Attribution quality", "description": "Assess whether repeated descriptions provide independent support or reproduce a single claim.", "findings": [ { "id": "independent-support-and-conflict", "name": "Independent support and conflict", "description": "Preserve source dependencies, translation uncertainty, corrections, and disagreements relevant to the attribution.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which sources independently support the designation, and which repeat the same originating claim?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "independent-support-and-conflict-q01" }, { "text": "Does conflicting wording reflect a translation difference, a changed role, or substantive disagreement about this person?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "independent-support-and-conflict-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "permitted-conclusions", "name": "Permitted conclusions", "description": "Keep descriptions supported by this model separate from classifications requiring other evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "designation-is-not-disposition", "name": "Designation is not disposition", "description": "Do not infer violent intent, dangerousness, criminality, terrorist affiliation, or permission for coercive treatment from the mujahid designation alone.", "questions": [ { "text": "Can the agent use an attributed description, or does the evidence support an unqualified role description within a specified context?", "kind": "action", "id": "designation-is-not-disposition-q01" }, { "text": "Which proposed downstream decision requires independent conduct evidence or a determination owned by another model?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "designation-is-not-disposition-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Classical combatant under the fiqh of siyar: a person fighting fi sabīl Allāh under conditions of cause, authority, and conduct set by Islamic law of war", "Anti-Soviet Afghan mujahideen (late 1970s-early 1990s), including the named parties of the Peshawar Seven and related fronts", "Anti-colonial or independence-war mujahid, especially the Algerian moudjahid of 1954-1962", "Member of a state force that uses the word as an official designation, notably Pakistan's Mujahid Force (National Guard)", "Participant in later wars who claims the title (Bosnia, Chechnya, and other 1990s-2000s theatres)", "Theological 'greater jihad' usage: a person striving against the self (nafs), without an armed role", "Given name or honorific Mujahid/Mojahed/Moudjahid borne by someone with no combat function" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of mujahid this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Arabic lemma", "value_or_pattern": "مجاهد (sg.); مجاهدون / مجاهدين (pl.)", "note": "Root j-h-d 'to strive'; English, French, Persian and Turkish forms are transliterations of this lemma, not separate legal codes." }, { "scheme": "LCSH", "value_or_pattern": "Mujahideen", "note": "Library of Congress Subject Headings class for the fighters as a bibliographic topic; does not identify an individual." }, { "scheme": "transliteration cluster", "value_or_pattern": "mujahid | mujahed | moudjahid | mojahed | mücahit", "note": "French Maghrebi moudjahid, Persian mojahed, Turkish mücahit; the same person-type under different orthographies." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of mujahid this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Classical fiqh of siyar (Islamic law of war), Sunni and Shi'i schools - no single issuing body; sets when armed jihad is lawful and who counts as a mujahid.", "Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (Protocol I, 1977), Arts. 43-44 - Diplomatic Conference / ICRC depositary: combatant and prisoner-of-war status when a mujahid is a combatant in an international armed conflict.", "UN Security Council Resolution 2178 (2014) - United Nations Security Council: foreign terrorist fighters, frequently applied to people who self-describe as mujahidin.", "Algerian national law on the status of the moudjahid and the shahid - People's Democratic Republic of Algeria: veterans' status, proofs of participation, and pensions for the War of Independence.", "Pakistan Mujahid Force under the National Guard / Ministry of Defence - Government of Pakistan: a named paramilitary with service regulations, not a generic religious category." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of mujahid this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "As a religious-legal label for a combatant in a jihad framed by scholars or a polity (historical empires, 20th-century resistance wars).", "As the ordinary name, in Afghanistan and in Western reporting, for the guerrilla parties that fought the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan and Soviet forces from 1979 into the early 1990s.", "As a state veterans' status in Algeria (moudjahid), with cards, pensions, and political organisations of former independence fighters.", "As the official name of a Pakistani paramilitary (Mujahid Force) used for rear-area and civil-armed-force tasks.", "As a self-description by volunteer fighters who travel to other countries' wars, which states then treat under ordinary criminal, immigration, or terrorism law.", "As a male given name and as an honorific in speeches, obituaries, and mosque usage with no implication of current arms." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of mujahid this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Recognised service window for Algerian moudjahid status", "typical_range": "1 Nov 1954-5 Jul 1962 (the named war)", "unit": "calendar date of participation" }, { "quantity": "Estimated active strength of the Afghan mujahideen as a whole in the mid-1980s", "typical_range": "on the order of 10^4-10^5 (commonly cited around 80,000-150,000, varying by season and source)", "unit": "persons under arms" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of mujahid this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "The title is claimed by groups that do not meet classical conditions of authority, cause, or conduct, which collapses the legal category into a slogan.", "After a shared war, named mujahideen parties have split into civil war (Afghanistan after 1992 is the type case).", "Self-description as mujahid is used in some jurisdictions as evidence of terrorism or foreign-fighter activity, including against people whose only use is honorific or historical.", "Conversely, the title is invoked to claim impunity or combatant privilege that international humanitarian law does not grant to civilians or to fighters in a non-international conflict who fail its tests.", "Child recruitment and targeting of civilians have occurred in conflicts whose fighters use the name.", "Intelligence and media mislabelling: a veteran, a namesake, or a paramilitary conscript treated as a militant, or a militant treated as a lawful combatant." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of mujahid this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Afghanistan and Pakistan: in ordinary speech 'mujahideen' still primarily means the anti-Soviet (and often anti-PDPA) fighters and their successor factions.", "Algeria and the wider Maghreb: moudjahid is first a War of Independence veteran with state status; militant reuse of the word is secondary and contested.", "Iran: mojahedin in political talk is dominated by the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (MEK/PMOI), a specific organisation, not the generic noun.", "Turkey: mücahit is intelligible as a religious-warrior word but everyday honour-language more often uses gazi.", "Western journalism: mujahid/mujahideen is often treated as a synonym of 'jihadist', which erases the Afghan, Algerian, and paramilitary senses.", "Southeast Asia: used both as a pious honorific and in the names of militant groups; local law treats the latter under ordinary security statutes." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of mujahid this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "name": "shahid (martyr)", "difference": "A shahid is one who has died in the cause; a mujahid is one who strives and may still be alive. Algerian law treats the two as distinct statuses." }, { "name": "ghazi / gazi", "difference": "A historically Turkic-Ottoman frontier warrior-for-the-faith and later a veterans' honorific; overlapping piety, different imperial and legal history from Arabic mujāhid." }, { "name": "fedayeen", "difference": "Self-sacrificing militants, typically nationalist rather than framed as jihad; the test is the justifying discourse and organisational lineage, not the tactic." }, { "name": "jihadist (Salafi-jihadist militant)", "difference": "A modern ideological current; Afghan 1980s mujahideen, Algerian moudjahidine, and Pakistan Mujahid Force members are not jihadists by that test unless they adopt that programme." }, { "name": "guerrilla / partisan", "difference": "A method of irregular war; 'mujahid' is a religious-legal or honorific status. Same person can be both; the terms answer different questions." }, { "name": "People's Mojahedin of Iran (MEK/PMOI)", "difference": "A named organisation with its own history, ideology, and designations; membership is an organisational fact, not the generic Arabic noun." }, { "name": "Pakistan Mujahid Force soldier", "difference": "A state paramilitary enlistment under the Ministry of Defence; service papers, not a fatwa or a party shura, establish the status." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of mujahid this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does vr.tr.mujahid intend a broad religious role, an armed participant role, a historically situated designation, or several contextual senses within one entry?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already own this concept, requiring a registry link instead of a separate publication?", "Which linguistic, regional, and historical sources are needed to settle the treatment of honorific, non-armed, and commemorative uses?", "What evidence should distinguish a recorded attribution from an established role when self-description and external accounts conflict?", "How should context-specific veteran or officially recognised statuses be linked without treating those statuses as universal meanings of mujahid?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 18, "questions": 28 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "occupation or role", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a mujahid, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a contextually supported mujahid attribution to a person, assess its meaning and current applicability, and decide which representations or follow-up actions the evidence supports.", "characteristics": { "substance": "social", "origin": "natural", "agency": "autonomous", "mobility": "self-moving" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: Mujahideen of Saturday, Islamic Unity of Afghanistan Mujahideen, Barbary pirates.", "3 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 64 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a mujahid, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "a social arrangement between people", "physicalCharacter": [ "Moves under its own power or of its own accord.", "Acts on its own behalf.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Not recognisable by appearance, and guessing from dress or setting is how an agent gets this wrong. Recognised by qualification, licence or engagement." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "Mujahideen of Saturday", "Islamic Unity of Afghanistan Mujahideen", "Barbary pirates" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 64 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 3 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one mujahid from another, and a mujahid from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a mujahid, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a mujahid, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a mujahid is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a mujahid, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a mujahid, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a mujahid is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a mujahid sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a mujahid, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a mujahid, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a mujahid is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a mujahid from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a mujahid, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a mujahid, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a mujahid is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "place-and-movement", "name": "Place and movement", "description": "Where a mujahid is, how it got there and where it may go (self-moving).", "rationale": "A thing that can move needs its position recorded with a time, or every later claim about it is about a place it has left.", "layers": [ { "id": "location-and-placement", "name": "Location and placement", "description": "Position, containment and the reference frame the position is given in.", "findings": [ { "id": "position-and-frame", "name": "Position, container and reference frame", "description": "Where a mujahid is, and what that position is measured against.", "questions": [ { "id": "position-and-frame-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the location of a mujahid, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "position-and-frame-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the location of a mujahid, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "position-and-frame-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the location of a mujahid is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "movement-and-transfer", "name": "Movement and transfer", "description": "How a mujahid moves on its own.", "findings": [ { "id": "movement-events", "name": "Movement events and constraints", "description": "What counts as a movement, what records it and what limits it.", "questions": [ { "id": "movement-events-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the movement of a mujahid, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "movement-events-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the movement of a mujahid, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "movement-events-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the movement of a mujahid is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a mujahid passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a mujahid between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a mujahid, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a mujahid, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a mujahid is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a mujahid, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a mujahid is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a mujahid, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a mujahid, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a mujahid is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "people-and-responsibility", "name": "People, roles and responsibility", "description": "Who stands in what relation to a mujahid.", "rationale": "Social things are defined by the relations people hold to them, and those relations change without the thing changing.", "layers": [ { "id": "roles-and-parties", "name": "Roles and parties", "description": "The roles that exist around a mujahid and who fills them.", "findings": [ { "id": "role-assignments", "name": "Role assignments and their validity", "description": "Who holds which role over a mujahid, from when, and on whose authority.", "questions": [ { "id": "role-assignments-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a role over a mujahid, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "role-assignments-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a role over a mujahid, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "role-assignments-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a role over a mujahid is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "ownership-and-accountability", "name": "Ownership and accountability", "description": "Who answers for a mujahid and who may decide about it.", "findings": [ { "id": "accountability", "name": "Accountability and decision rights", "description": "Where responsibility for a mujahid sits when something goes wrong.", "questions": [ { "id": "accountability-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes responsibility for a mujahid, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "accountability-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about responsibility for a mujahid, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "accountability-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once responsibility for a mujahid is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "competence-and-licence", "name": "Competence, qualification and licence", "description": "What someone must be able to do, and be permitted to do, as mujahid.", "rationale": "The permission is jurisdictional and the competence is not, and conflating them is how an agent concludes someone may practise when they may not.", "layers": [ { "id": "competences", "name": "Competences and qualifications", "description": "Skills and credentials the role assumes.", "findings": [ { "id": "qualification-record", "name": "Qualifications and how they are evidenced", "description": "What counts as qualified, and what proves it.", "questions": [ { "id": "qualification-record-q01", "text": "What competences and qualifications does mujahid require, and how is each evidenced?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "qualification-record-q02", "text": "Which qualifications transfer between jurisdictions and which do not?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "licensing", "name": "Licensing and the right to practise", "description": "Who grants permission, where it holds, and when it lapses.", "findings": [ { "id": "licence-record", "name": "Licence, issuer and validity", "description": "The permission, its issuer, its territory and its expiry.", "questions": [ { "id": "licence-record-q01", "text": "Who licenses mujahid, in which territory, and for how long?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "licence-record-q02", "text": "What may an unlicensed person not do, and what must an agent refuse to assume?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "tasks-and-accountability", "name": "Tasks, employment and accountability", "description": "What mujahid actually does and who answers for it.", "rationale": "A role is filled by people under an arrangement, and the arrangement decides liability, supervision and who may instruct whom.", "layers": [ { "id": "tasks", "name": "Tasks and typical duties", "description": "The work itself, and how it differs by setting.", "findings": [ { "id": "duty-record", "name": "Duties and setting", "description": "What the role does and where the work varies.", "questions": [ { "id": "duty-record-q01", "text": "What tasks define mujahid, and how do they differ between settings or seniority?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "duty-record-q02", "text": "Which tasks may only be done by this role, and which are shared with neighbouring roles?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "accountability", "name": "Employment and accountability", "description": "The relation under which the work is done and where responsibility sits.", "findings": [ { "id": "responsibility", "name": "Responsibility and supervision", "description": "Who instructs, who supervises, who is liable.", "questions": [ { "id": "responsibility-q01", "text": "Under what arrangement does someone act as mujahid, and who supervises or is liable?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "responsibility-q02", "text": "When something goes wrong, what does the model need to have recorded to answer who was responsible?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a mujahid came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a mujahid and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a mujahid, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a mujahid, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a mujahid is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a mujahid is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a mujahid, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a mujahid, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a mujahid is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 7, "layers": 14, "findings": 16, "questions": 44 } } } }