{ "model": { "rank": 11756, "code": "thing-q4488757", "model_id": "vr.tr.intelligence-assessment", "name": "intelligence assessment", "purpose": "Let an agent explain intelligence assessment as a process and its disciplines, relay how agencies and oversight are organised from public and academic sources with attribution, describe police and criminal intelligence, present controversies about state intelligence activities neutrally, and decline operational tradecraft or guidance for conducting intelligence operations.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q4488757/", "tier": 2, "score": 41, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "Chinese intelligence activity abroad", "human intelligence", "United States intelligence operations abroad", "measurement and signature intelligence", "Police intelligence", "Criminal intelligence", "deep cover intelligence", "Political intelligence", "Chinese espionage in the United Kingdom", "Chinese espionage in Australia", "Chinese espionage in France", "Chinese espionage in Germany", "Chinese espionage in Poland", "Chinese espionage in Singapore", "Chinese espionage in New Zealand", "Chinese espionage in Japan", "Chinese espionage in India", "Chinese espionage in Indonesia", "Chinese espionage in Europe", "Chinese espionage in the Philippines", "Chinese espionage in South Korea", "Chinese espionage in Taiwan", "Chinese espionage in Belgium", "Chinese espionage in Estonia", "Chinese espionage in Norway", "Chinese espionage in Russia", "Chinese espionage in Turkey", "Chinese espionage in Sweden", "Chinese espionage in Holy See", "Chinese espionage in Lithuania", "Chinese espionage in Finland", "Chinese espionage in Denmark", "Chinese espionage in Switzerland", "Chinese espionage in Vatican City", "Chinese espionage in Malaysia", "Chinese espionage in Kazakhstan", "Chinese espionage in Cambodia", "Chinese espionage in Hong Kong", "Chinese espionage in Sri Lanka", "Chinese espionage in the United States" ], "aliasCount": 43, "merged": 43, "knownIn": 41, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q4488757", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4488757", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-13T05:51:18Z", "providers": [ "Claude" ], "breadth": "written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify", "pass": 2, "wave": 3, "engine": "claude" }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q4488757", "registryId": "vr.tr.intelligence-assessment", "name": "intelligence assessment", "version": "0.2.0-wave.3", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q4488757/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.intelligence-assessment", "name": "intelligence assessment", "purpose": "Let an agent explain intelligence assessment as a process and its disciplines, relay how agencies and oversight are organised from public and academic sources with attribution, describe police and criminal intelligence, present controversies about state intelligence activities neutrally, and decline operational tradecraft or guidance for conducting intelligence operations.", "definition": "The process by which governments, militaries and police collect, evaluate and analyse information to produce assessments for decision-makers, drawing on disciplines such as human intelligence from sources and informants, signals intelligence, imagery, open sources and measurement and signature intelligence, and applied in fields such as criminal and police intelligence and in the foreign intelligence activities of states, which are the subject of public reporting and controversy; intelligence assessment is described here at the level of public reference sources without operational tradecraft.", "what_it_is_for": "Informing decisions with evaluated information.", "affordances": [ "explain the process and disciplines", "relay organisation and oversight", "describe police intelligence", "decline operational detail" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Evaluated information", "Multiple disciplines", "Decision support", "Secrecy and oversight" ], "appearance": "Not a visible object; analytical products and reports.", "visual_identification": [ "Collection and analysis of information for decision-makers", "Human intelligence, measurement and signature intelligence, police and criminal intelligence, foreign intelligence activities of states", "Journalism informs the public; research is open; espionage is one collection method, not the whole process" ], "physical_properties": [ { "quantity": "intelligence cycle stages", "typical_range": "direction, collection, processing, analysis, dissemination", "unit": "list", "note": "" }, { "quantity": "US intelligence community members", "typical_range": "18", "unit": "count", "note": "" }, { "quantity": "main disciplines", "typical_range": "HUMINT, SIGINT, GEOINT, MASINT, OSINT", "unit": "list", "note": "" } ], "families_and_kinds": [ "strategic and national intelligence assessment", "military intelligence", "human intelligence and other collection disciplines including measurement and signature intelligence", "police and criminal intelligence", "foreign intelligence activities of states such as the United States and China, as publicly reported", "private and competitive intelligence as related fields" ], "related_models": [ { "relation": "is a kind of", "target": "information provision", "why": "in registry terms" }, { "relation": "is a kind of", "target": "military activity", "why": "in registry terms, in part" }, { "relation": "is a kind of", "target": "occupational activity", "why": "in registry terms" }, { "relation": "is overseen by", "target": "legislative oversight", "why": "in democratic states" } ], "identifiers": [], "standards_and_regulation": [ "National intelligence laws and oversight bodies", "Analytic standards such as ICD 203 in the United States", "International law and human rights constraints, which are contested", "Police intelligence and data protection rules" ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Agents providing tradecraft or operational guidance", "Politicisation and analytic failure", "Presenting one state s account of another s activities as fact", "Human rights abuses documented in some programmes, which should be attributed" ], "in_scope": [], "out_of_scope": [], "characteristics": [] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "understand", "name": "Understand", "description": "What intelligence assessment is.", "rationale": "Attribution.", "layers": [ { "id": "definition", "name": "Definition", "description": "Definition and cycle.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-finding", "name": "Definition", "description": "Definition.", "questions": [ { "text": "What is intelligence assessment, and how does the intelligence cycle work in public descriptions?", "kind": "definition" }, { "text": "Is the question about the process and its public study, or about operational tradecraft the model does not cover?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "disciplines", "name": "Disciplines", "description": "Disciplines.", "findings": [ { "id": "disciplines-finding", "name": "Disciplines", "description": "Disciplines.", "questions": [ { "text": "What are human intelligence, signals, imagery, open source and measurement and signature intelligence, in general terms?", "kind": "definition" }, { "text": "Which entry fits the specific discipline?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "organisation", "name": "Organisation", "description": "Agencies and oversight.", "rationale": "Attribution.", "layers": [ { "id": "agencies", "name": "Agencies", "description": "Agencies.", "findings": [ { "id": "agencies-finding", "name": "Agencies", "description": "Agencies.", "questions": [ { "text": "How are intelligence communities organised in different countries, according to public sources?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Which references are standard?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] }, { "id": "oversight", "name": "Oversight", "description": "Oversight and law.", "findings": [ { "id": "oversight-finding", "name": "Oversight", "description": "Oversight.", "questions": [ { "text": "How are intelligence activities overseen and constrained by law, and what debates exist, with positions attributed?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Is the presentation neutral?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "fields", "name": "Fields", "description": "Police and foreign intelligence.", "rationale": "Attribution.", "layers": [ { "id": "police", "name": "Police", "description": "Police and criminal intelligence.", "findings": [ { "id": "police-finding", "name": "Police", "description": "Police.", "questions": [ { "text": "How do police use intelligence-led policing and criminal intelligence, and what safeguards apply?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Which sources are cited?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] }, { "id": "foreign", "name": "Foreign", "description": "Foreign intelligence activities.", "findings": [ { "id": "foreign-finding", "name": "Foreign", "description": "Foreign.", "questions": [ { "text": "What is publicly reported about the foreign intelligence activities of states such as the United States and China, with claims attributed to their sources?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Is the presentation attributed and free of unverified claims?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "context", "name": "Context", "description": "Analysis and history.", "rationale": "Context.", "layers": [ { "id": "analysis", "name": "Analysis", "description": "Analytic methods.", "findings": [ { "id": "analysis-finding", "name": "Analysis", "description": "Analysis.", "questions": [ { "text": "What analytic methods and standards address bias and uncertainty, as the literature describes?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Which entry fits intelligence analysis?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] }, { "id": "history", "name": "History", "description": "History.", "findings": [ { "id": "history-finding", "name": "History", "description": "History.", "questions": [ { "text": "How did intelligence assessment develop, and what notable successes and failures have historians documented?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Which entry fits the history of intelligence?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Should human intelligence and criminal intelligence be separate primary entries?", "How should public and academic sources be linked?", "The registry entry has merged aliases naming specific states activities; should they be split off?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 4, "layers": 8, "findings": 8, "questions": 16 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a intelligence assessment, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Let an agent explain intelligence assessment as a process and its disciplines, relay how agencies and oversight are organised from public and academic sources with attribution, describe police and criminal intelligence, present controversies about state intelligence activities neutrally, and decline operational tradecraft or guidance for conducting intelligence operations.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: Chinese intelligence activity abroad, human intelligence, United States intelligence operations abroad, measurement and signature intelligence, Police intelligence, Criminal intelligence, deep cover intelligence, Political intelligence, Chinese espionage in the United Kingdom, Chinese espionage in Australia, Chinese espionage in France, Chinese espionage in Germany.", "43 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 41 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a intelligence assessment, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "Chinese intelligence activity abroad", "human intelligence", "United States intelligence operations abroad", "measurement and signature intelligence", "Police intelligence", "Criminal intelligence", "deep cover intelligence", "Political intelligence", "Chinese espionage in the United Kingdom", "Chinese espionage in Australia", "Chinese espionage in France", "Chinese espionage in Germany" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 41 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 43 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one intelligence assessment from another, and a intelligence assessment from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a intelligence assessment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a intelligence assessment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a intelligence assessment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a intelligence assessment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a intelligence assessment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a intelligence assessment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a intelligence assessment sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a intelligence assessment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a intelligence assessment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a intelligence assessment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a intelligence assessment from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a intelligence assessment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a intelligence assessment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a intelligence assessment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a intelligence assessment passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a intelligence assessment between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a intelligence assessment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a intelligence assessment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a intelligence assessment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a intelligence assessment, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a intelligence assessment is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a intelligence assessment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a intelligence assessment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a intelligence assessment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a intelligence assessment proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a intelligence assessment, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a intelligence assessment and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a intelligence assessment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a intelligence assessment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a intelligence assessment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a intelligence assessment consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a intelligence assessment takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a intelligence assessment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a intelligence assessment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a intelligence assessment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What intelligence assessment is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of intelligence assessment are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is intelligence assessment operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of intelligence assessment and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of intelligence assessment?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as intelligence assessment?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a intelligence assessment came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a intelligence assessment and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a intelligence assessment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a intelligence assessment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a intelligence assessment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a intelligence assessment is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a intelligence assessment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a intelligence assessment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a intelligence assessment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }