history of technology
Let an agent describe the history of technology as a field, relay periodisations, major developments and interpretations with attribution to historians, distinguish it from the history of science and from technology itself, and point to museums, archives and references.
Research draft, second pass
A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.
written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify
Researched by: Claude
Purpose and description
Let an agent describe the history of technology as a field, relay periodisations, major developments and interpretations with attribution to historians, distinguish it from the history of science and from technology itself, and point to museums, archives and references.
The study of how tools, techniques, machines, materials and technical systems developed over time, from stone tools and agriculture through metallurgy, printing and industrialisation to electronics and computing, and of how technologies relate to societies, economies and knowledge; a field of history with its own journals, museums and methods.
What it is for: Understanding how technologies developed and shaped societies.
It can be outline periods and major developments; relay interpretations with attribution; distinguish from history of science and from technology itself; point to museums, archives and references.
Distinguishing features
Historical discipline
Covers artefacts, techniques and systems
Attends to social and economic context
Debates over determinism and diffusion
What it looks like
Not visible; found in books, journals, museums and artefacts.
How it is recognised
Historical study of technologies and their contexts
Field with societies, journals and museums
The history of science and individual technologies are separate entries
Related models
is a kind of - the wider field
is contrasted with - a related but distinct field
studies - the subject
is related to - a neighbouring field
In practice
Families and kinds
history by period: prehistoric, ancient, medieval, early modern, industrial, modern
history by domain: agriculture, communication, transport, computing, materials
industrial history and business history
history of engineering
national and regional histories of technology
Standards and regulation
No regulation; scholarly standards of history and heritage bodies
Failure modes and hazards
Whig narratives of inevitable progress
Attributing inventions to single heroes
Ignoring non-Western technologies
Confusing the field with technology itself
Also called
+10
Where this came from
wikidata · CC0 1.0
Drafted structure
Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.
Field What the field is.
Definition.
Scope
Scope and methods.
Scope
Scope.
- What does the history of technology study, and with which methods and sources? definition
- Is the question about the history of technology, the history of science or a technology itself? boundary
Institutions
Societies and journals.
Institutions
Institutions.
- Which societies, journals and museums define the field? provenance
- Which entry fits a specific museum? action
Narrative Periods and developments.
Content.
Periods
Periodisation.
Periods
Periods.
- What are the main periods and turning points, and how do historians divide them? provenance
- Which entry fits a specific period or technology? action
Developments
Major developments.
Developments
Developments.
- What are the major developments in a given domain, with dates and sources? provenance
- Which references are standard? provenance
Interpret Interpretations.
Attribution.
Debates
Historiographical debates.
Debates
Debates.
- What debates exist on determinism, diffusion, innovation and social shaping, with positions attributed? provenance
- Is the presentation neutral? boundary
Global
Global perspectives.
Global
Global.
- How do global and non-Western perspectives change the narrative? provenance
- Is the presentation free of Eurocentric framing? boundary
Resources Sources and teaching.
Resources.
Sources
Archives and artefacts.
Sources
Sources.
- Where are primary sources, artefacts and archives found? provenance
- Which entry fits industrial heritage? action
Teach
Teaching.
Teach
Teaching.
- How is the history of technology taught, and which texts are standard? provenance
- Which misconceptions arise? provenance
What the second pass must settle
- Should histories of specific technologies be separate entries?
- How should museums and archives be linked?
- The registry entry has merged aliases for histories of specific materials and regions; should they be split off?