{ "model": { "rank": 4076, "code": "thing-q47217", "model_id": "vr.tr.civil-disobedience", "name": "civil disobedience", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a claimed instance of civil disobedience, assess its contested classification and current state, and identify appropriate documentation, interpretation and response.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.MED", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q47217/", "tier": 2, "score": 78, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "sit-in", "street blockade", "Beit Sahour tax strike", "tax resistance", "electronic civil disobedience", "poaching" ], "aliasCount": 6, "merged": 6, "knownIn": 78, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q47217", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q47217", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T19:25:24Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 21.4, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087a0-c5ee-7330-9b8c-5e38c04e231b\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: civil disobedience\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 695 things:\n# Batch 004: 10", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 68.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087a0-c5fb-79f1-a203-79e2ab3c9370\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: civil disobedience\nRegistry id: vr.tr.civil-disobedience\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this en" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q47217", "registryId": "vr.tr.civil-disobedience", "name": "civil disobedience", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q47217/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.civil-disobedience", "name": "civil disobedience", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a claimed instance of civil disobedience, assess its contested classification and current state, and identify appropriate documentation, interpretation and response.", "definition": "Civil disobedience is a conscientious breach of law undertaken to challenge a law, policy, or institutional practice, typically through public, nonviolent action, although its defining conditions remain contested.", "scope_statement": "This model owns civil disobedience as a form of conscientious, communicative resistance involving deliberate noncompliance with a law or binding public requirement, including disputed boundaries around publicity, nonviolence and acceptance of consequences; it covers the practice and its instances, not a creative work about them.", "in_scope": [ "The deliberate act or omission and the requirement participants understand themselves to be breaching", "The injustice alleged, the reasons offered and the change sought", "Participants, affected parties, intended audiences and claims of representation", "Publicity, communication, restraint and contested classification as civil disobedience", "Institutional responses, participant exposure, third-party effects and unresolved outcomes" ], "out_of_scope": [ "General protest and lawful advocacy without deliberate noncompliance", "The full organisation, resources and history of a social movement", "Comprehensive models of legislation, courts, policing or criminal procedure", "Armed rebellion and programmes for seizing governmental power", "Books, speeches, recordings and other works discussing civil disobedience", "Individual conscience and moral philosophy beyond reasons relevant to the disobedient act" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Identify a deliberately breached requirement or a disputed claim of breach; opposition expressed entirely through lawful conduct does not establish civil disobedience.", "Identify a conscientious objection and an intended social or political address; accidental noncompliance or private advantage alone does not establish the classification.", "Separate the rule breached from the injustice challenged: the act may contest that same rule or breach another rule to address a different policy.", "Assess publicity, nonviolence and willingness to face sanctions separately, because making any one an absolute requirement selects a contested definition.", "Distinguish a particular disobedient act from the wider campaign, which may also contain lawful advocacy or actions classified differently." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Classification status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "claimed | provisionally supported | contested | unsupported under stated criteria", "why_it_matters": "Prevents participant self-description or an authority's label from becoming an unqualified classification." }, { "name": "Requirement deliberately breached", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Act or omission → identified law, order or public requirement, with jurisdiction and applicable date", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes deliberate disobedience from lawful protest and accidental violation." }, { "name": "Breach assessment", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "intended | alleged | disputed | adjudicated | not established; attributed to an assessor and date", "why_it_matters": "An intention to break a rule, an accusation and an adjudicated violation are different claims." }, { "name": "Relationship between breach and grievance", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "direct challenge to breached requirement | indirect challenge to another policy or practice | mixed | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Explains why the act targets a requirement that may not itself be considered unjust." }, { "name": "Conscientious justification", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Attributed moral, political, religious or other conscientious reasons; multiple values permitted", "why_it_matters": "Records the participant's reasons without treating sincerity or moral validity as already established." }, { "name": "Communicative openness", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "For each of act, identity and justification: public | selectively disclosed | concealed | disclosed later | unknown", "why_it_matters": "Public explanation, advance notice and disclosure of identity need not coincide." }, { "name": "Conduct and harm profile", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Separately attributed observations of force, threats, property interference, obstruction, injury and protective measures", "why_it_matters": "Supports an explicit assessment of nonviolence rather than relying on a single disputed label." }, { "name": "Stance toward sanctions", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "accepts | challenges | seeks to avoid | mixed | unstated; specific to sanction and participant", "why_it_matters": "Avoids inferring consent to punishment from participation or arrest." }, { "name": "Episode duration", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Elapsed hours or days between stated episode boundaries; ongoing or uncertain when applicable", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes a completed refusal from continuing noncompliance and supports assessment of cumulative effects." }, { "name": "Episode state", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "announced | underway | suspended | concluded | disputed; proceedings and policy outcomes tracked separately", "why_it_matters": "The act can end while sanctions, negotiations or demands remain unresolved." } ], "affordances": [ "Evaluate a claimed instance against an explicitly selected definition and explain which criteria remain disputed.", "Map the deliberate breach to its stated grievance, intended audience and requested change.", "Compare participant, authority and affected-party accounts without collapsing their disagreements.", "Identify missing evidence about conduct, representation, consequences and classification.", "Track institutional responses and third-party effects separately from achievement of the stated demands.", "Produce a contextual account of the episode with attributed claims and explicit limits on certainty." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "disobedience-and-boundaries", "name": "Disobedience and boundaries", "description": "Establish what was deliberately refused or violated and why the episode is being classified as civil disobedience.", "rationale": "Neither opposition nor illegality alone identifies civil disobedience.", "layers": [ { "id": "deliberate-noncompliance", "name": "Deliberate noncompliance", "description": "Connect the conduct to a specific requirement and evidence of intentional departure from it.", "findings": [ { "id": "breach-and-intention", "name": "Breach and intention", "description": "Record the act or omission, the applicable requirement and separate accounts of intended, alleged and established breach.", "questions": [ { "text": "What requirement did participants deliberately refuse, and what conduct constituted the refusal?", "kind": "definition", "id": "breach-and-intention-q01" }, { "text": "Which evidence supports intention and applicability, and who disputes that a breach occurred?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "breach-and-intention-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-boundary", "name": "Classification boundary", "description": "Make the chosen definition and its treatment of neighbouring forms of resistance explicit.", "findings": [ { "id": "criteria-and-counterclassification", "name": "Criteria and counterclassification", "description": "Treat classification as an assessment under declared criteria, allowing competing accounts.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which definition is being applied, and does it require publicity, nonviolence or acceptance of sanctions?", "kind": "definition", "id": "criteria-and-counterclassification-q01" }, { "text": "What distinguishes this episode from lawful protest, conscientious objection without a public appeal, ordinary offending or rebellion?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "criteria-and-counterclassification-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "grievance-and-public-appeal", "name": "Grievance and public appeal", "description": "Represent the injustice alleged and the communicative relationship between breach, audience and demand.", "rationale": "The meaning of disobedience depends on the reasons and appeal attached to the conduct.", "layers": [ { "id": "conscientious-claim", "name": "Conscientious claim", "description": "Record participants' reasons and the relationship between the breached requirement and the grievance.", "findings": [ { "id": "injustice-and-remedy", "name": "Injustice and remedy", "description": "Distinguish the stated wrong, its supporting account and the requested remedy without endorsing them by default.", "questions": [ { "text": "What injustice do participants allege, and what change would address it in their account?", "kind": "definition", "id": "injustice-and-remedy-q01" }, { "text": "Does the act challenge the breached requirement itself or use its breach to contest a different policy or practice?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "injustice-and-remedy-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "address-and-disclosure", "name": "Address and disclosure", "description": "Identify whom the act addresses and how its meaning becomes accessible.", "findings": [ { "id": "audience-and-publicity", "name": "Audience and publicity", "description": "Separate intended audiences, actual reception and disclosure of the act, identity and justification.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who is being asked to reconsider or change something, and how is that appeal communicated?", "kind": "definition", "id": "audience-and-publicity-q01" }, { "text": "What was disclosed before, during or after the act, and which evidence shows that the intended audience received the explanation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "audience-and-publicity-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "participants-and-representation", "name": "Participants and representation", "description": "Distinguish people undertaking disobedience from supporters, represented constituencies and involuntarily affected parties.", "rationale": "Collective action does not establish shared consent, shared motives or authority to speak for everyone affected.", "layers": [ { "id": "participation-and-consent", "name": "Participation and consent", "description": "Represent roles and voluntary involvement in the particular episode.", "findings": [ { "id": "role-and-voluntary-involvement", "name": "Role and voluntary involvement", "description": "Separate deliberate participants from organisers, observers, supporters and people affected without choosing involvement.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who undertook the deliberate breach, and who only organised, supported, observed or experienced its effects?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "role-and-voluntary-involvement-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence establishes voluntary participation and awareness of the intended noncompliance?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "role-and-voluntary-involvement-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "representative-standing", "name": "Representative standing", "description": "Examine claims to speak for a community or movement and differences within it.", "findings": [ { "id": "mandate-and-internal-disagreement", "name": "Mandate and internal disagreement", "description": "Attribute demands to their actual proponents and record contested representation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Whom do participants claim to represent, and what authorisation or relationship supports that claim?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "mandate-and-internal-disagreement-q01" }, { "text": "Which participants or affected constituencies reject the demands, methods or claim of representation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "mandate-and-internal-disagreement-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "conduct-restraint-and-effects", "name": "Conduct, restraint and effects", "description": "Describe what the disobedience does, how participants constrain it and how others experience it.", "rationale": "Labels such as peaceful, disruptive or coercive require evidence about conduct and effects.", "layers": [ { "id": "conduct-and-nonviolence", "name": "Conduct and nonviolence", "description": "Assess concrete behaviour against an explicit account of nonviolence.", "findings": [ { "id": "observed-conduct-and-restraint", "name": "Observed conduct and restraint", "description": "Separate declared commitments from observed force, threats, obstruction, property interference and protective conduct.", "questions": [ { "text": "What conduct is documented, and how does it compare with participants' stated commitments to restraint?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "observed-conduct-and-restraint-q01" }, { "text": "Under the definition being used, which documented behaviours support or challenge classification as nonviolent civil disobedience?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "observed-conduct-and-restraint-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "third-party-burdens", "name": "Third-party burdens", "description": "Record disruption and harm without assuming that all effects were intended or borne by the policy target.", "findings": [ { "id": "distribution-of-effects", "name": "Distribution of effects", "description": "Distinguish intended pressure, incidental burdens and observed harm across affected groups.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who experienced interrupted access, lost time, material loss or injury, and what evidence establishes extent and duration?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "distribution-of-effects-q01" }, { "text": "What measures were taken to reduce burdens on uninvolved people, and what effects remained unresolved?", "kind": "action", "id": "distribution-of-effects-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "response-and-resolution", "name": "Response and resolution", "description": "Track reactions to the disobedience and distinguish the end of an episode from resolution of its demands.", "rationale": "Punishment, public attention and policy change are different outcomes and may develop on different timelines.", "layers": [ { "id": "institutional-response", "name": "Institutional response", "description": "Record enforcement, accommodation and participants' responses without equating arrest with guilt or moral judgement.", "findings": [ { "id": "sanctions-and-contestation", "name": "Sanctions and contestation", "description": "Separate threatened and imposed sanctions, procedural status and participant attitudes toward them.", "questions": [ { "text": "What enforcement, sanction, negotiation or accommodation occurred, according to which dated records?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "sanctions-and-contestation-q01" }, { "text": "Do participants accept, contest or seek to avoid particular consequences, and how does that affect classification under the stated criteria?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "sanctions-and-contestation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "demands-and-outcomes", "name": "Demands and outcomes", "description": "Assess what changed while preserving uncertainty about causation and completion.", "findings": [ { "id": "episode-completion-and-change", "name": "Episode completion and change", "description": "Track cessation of noncompliance, response to demands and remaining proceedings as separate states.", "questions": [ { "text": "Has the disobedient act ended, and which demands, sanctions or negotiations remain unresolved?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "episode-completion-and-change-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence links any policy or public-response change to this episode rather than merely placing it afterward?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "episode-completion-and-change-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The supplied domain and batch context may indicate a work rather than a political concept; verify whether the registry means Thoreau's essay.", "Publicity, nonviolence, fidelity to the legal order, and willingness to accept punishment are disputed defining conditions rather than universally accepted requirements.", "Historical campaigns combine lawful protest, civil disobedience, and other tactics; classify particular actions rather than labeling every campaign activity civil disobedience." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of civil disobedience this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Direct civil disobedience: violating the law being challenged", "Indirect civil disobedience: violating another law to challenge a policy or practice", "Individual civil disobedience", "Collective civil disobedience" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of civil disobedience this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Challenging racial segregation through sit-ins and other deliberate breaches of discriminatory rules", "Resisting colonial rule, as in the Indian independence movement's Salt March", "Opposing military conscription or war through deliberate noncompliance", "Pressuring governments over environmental policy through unlawful occupations or blockades", "Drawing public attention to perceived injustice when ordinary political channels are considered inadequate" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of civil disobedience this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Participants may face arrest, prosecution, financial penalties, or imprisonment", "Police responses or confrontations with opponents may cause injury or escalation", "Disruption may harm third parties or undermine public support", "Actions may communicate their demands poorly or produce unintended political effects", "Unequal exposure to legal, employment, and immigration consequences may concentrate risks among vulnerable participants" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of civil disobedience this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Legal treatment depends on the jurisdiction and the specific conduct; describing an act as civil disobedience does not itself establish a legal exemption", "Historical traditions differ, including Gandhian satyagraha, United States civil rights activism, and European antiwar and environmental movements", "Political freedoms, policing practices, and access to courts shape the forms, visibility, and risks of civil disobedience" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of civil disobedience this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Lawful protest", "difference": "Civil disobedience involves a breach of law; lawful protest does not." }, { "name": "Conscientious objection", "difference": "Conscientious objection centers on refusing participation for reasons of conscience and may be legally accommodated; civil disobedience involves unlawful action directed toward challenging a law, policy, or practice." }, { "name": "Civil resistance", "difference": "Civil resistance is a broader category of nonviolent struggle that includes both lawful activities and civil disobedience." }, { "name": "Revolution", "difference": "Revolution seeks fundamental transformation or replacement of a political order; civil disobedience can pursue limited reforms without that objective." }, { "name": "Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau", "difference": "The essay is a particular authored work; this description concerns the political practice and concept." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of civil disobedience this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which definition should govern the registry entry, particularly where publicity, nonviolence and acceptance of sanctions are disputed?", "Should deliberate breach of private institutional rules qualify when it addresses a public injustice, and where should the boundary be drawn?", "How should intended lawbreaking be classified when the conduct is later found lawful or the requirement invalid?", "How should anonymous or digital acts be assessed when the justification is public but participant identities remain concealed?", "Does the authoritative catalogue already contain a world model covering this concept, and how should the assigned INF / INF.MED placement relate to civil disobedience as an enacted practice?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 16, "questions": 26 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "work, medium or creative form", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a civil disobedience, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a claimed instance of civil disobedience, assess its contested classification and current state, and identify appropriate documentation, interpretation and response.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted", "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: sit-in, street blockade, Beit Sahour tax strike, tax resistance, electronic civil disobedience, poaching.", "6 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 78 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a civil disobedience, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says", "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "What is seen is a copy or a performance, not the work. Recognising the work means recognising the content through whatever is carrying it." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "sit-in", "street blockade", "Beit Sahour tax strike", "tax resistance", "electronic civil disobedience", "poaching" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 78 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 6 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one civil disobedience from another, and a civil disobedience from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a civil disobedience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a civil disobedience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a civil disobedience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a civil disobedience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a civil disobedience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a civil disobedience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a civil disobedience sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a civil disobedience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a civil disobedience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a civil disobedience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a civil disobedience from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a civil disobedience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a civil disobedience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a civil disobedience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a civil disobedience passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a civil disobedience between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a civil disobedience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a civil disobedience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a civil disobedience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a civil disobedience, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a civil disobedience is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a civil disobedience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a civil disobedience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a civil disobedience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a civil disobedience says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a civil disobedience contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a civil disobedience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a civil disobedience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a civil disobedience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a civil disobedience and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a civil disobedience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a civil disobedience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a civil disobedience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "work-and-manifestation", "name": "Work, version and copy", "description": "Which level of civil disobedience a statement is about.", "rationale": "The work, the edition, the file and the copy in hand are four things; rights and content attach to different ones.", "layers": [ { "id": "levels", "name": "Levels of the thing", "description": "Work, expression, manifestation and item, in plain terms.", "findings": [ { "id": "level-rules", "name": "What belongs at each level", "description": "Which facts hold for the work and which only for one copy.", "questions": [ { "id": "level-rules-q01", "text": "For civil disobedience, which facts belong to the work itself, which to a version, and which to a single copy?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "level-rules-q02", "text": "What identifier exists at each level, and which one is being cited?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "versions", "name": "Versions, editions and variants", "description": "How versions differ and which is canonical to whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "version-record", "name": "Versions and canonicity", "description": "Differences that matter and who calls one authoritative.", "questions": [ { "id": "version-record-q01", "text": "Which versions or editions of civil disobedience exist, and how do they differ substantively?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "version-record-q02", "text": "Who treats which version as authoritative, and for what purpose?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "authorship-and-rights", "name": "Authorship, rights and permitted use", "description": "Who made civil disobedience and what may be done with it.", "rationale": "Rights are jurisdictional, time-limited and attached to a level, and an agent that ignores that will copy what it may not.", "layers": [ { "id": "authorship", "name": "Authorship and contribution", "description": "Who contributed what, and in what capacity.", "findings": [ { "id": "contribution-record", "name": "Contributors and roles", "description": "The people and bodies behind it, with their roles.", "questions": [ { "id": "contribution-record-q01", "text": "Who authored or contributed to civil disobedience, in what roles, and how is that attested?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "contribution-record-q02", "text": "Where authorship is disputed or anonymous, what is recorded instead?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "rights", "name": "Rights and permissions", "description": "Which rights subsist, where, until when, and what they permit.", "findings": [ { "id": "rights-record", "name": "Rights, term and permitted acts", "description": "The regime in force and what it allows.", "questions": [ { "id": "rights-record-q01", "text": "What rights subsist in civil disobedience, in which jurisdictions, and until when?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "rights-record-q02", "text": "Which acts are permitted without further permission, and which must an agent refuse?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a civil disobedience came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a civil disobedience and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a civil disobedience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a civil disobedience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a civil disobedience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a civil disobedience is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a civil disobedience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a civil disobedience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a civil disobedience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }