{ "model": { "rank": 4594, "code": "thing-q47555", "model_id": "vr.tr.political-economics", "name": "political economics", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise political economics as a field of knowledge, assess the scope and evidential standing of its approaches, and judge their suitability for explaining interactions between political power and economic activity.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.KNW", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q47555/", "tier": 2, "score": 74, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "Political Economy of Natural Resources", "Symbolic economy", "classical economics", "New political economy", "Marxian economics", "neo-Marxian economics", "temporal single-system interpretation" ], "aliasCount": 7, "merged": 7, "knownIn": 74, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q47555", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q47555", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T20:34:52Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 22.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087e0-5ce7-7be1-a844-521303d402fc\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: political economics\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.KNW\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 005: ", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 69.2, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087e0-5cd7-7c81-8896-d3ebb2b90c8e\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: political economics\nRegistry id: vr.tr.political-economics\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.KNW\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this " } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q47555", "registryId": "vr.tr.political-economics", "name": "political economics", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.KNW" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q47555/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.political-economics", "name": "political economics", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise political economics as a field of knowledge, assess the scope and evidential standing of its approaches, and judge their suitability for explaining interactions between political power and economic activity.", "definition": "Political economics, understood here as political economy, is the field that studies how political power, institutions and collective decisions shape economic activity and distribution, and how economic conditions and interests shape politics.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the disciplinary identity, subject matter, explanatory approaches, methods, and institutional recognition of political economics under vr.tr.political-economics, treating its relationship to political economy as an unresolved naming convention rather than assuming a separate discipline.", "in_scope": [ "Reciprocal relationships between political authority, economic organisation, and the distribution of resources", "Explanations of how institutions, interests, and power shape economic policy and outcomes", "Traditions and approaches associated with political economics, with their naming conventions and assumptions", "Methods for investigating political and economic mechanisms together", "Institutional and bibliographic evidence establishing the field's recognition and boundaries" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Individual economists, political scientists, and their professional biographies", "Individual publications, datasets, journals, and academic organisations as independently managed entities", "The operational state of particular economies, governments, parties, or markets", "Economic theories whose stated scope excludes political institutions and power", "Political ideologies and policy programmes as commitments to be adopted", "Implementation of particular fiscal, regulatory, or electoral interventions" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "A proposed contribution explicitly connects political authority, institutions, collective decisions, or power to economic organisation or outcomes; merely discussing government expenditure is insufficient.", "The model represents an organised field of inquiry, rather than an economy's political arrangements or a government's economic programme.", "Explanatory claims can run from politics to economics, economics to politics, or through feedback between them; the direction must be recorded.", "The label political economics is interpreted through an identified author, institution, or classification convention before it is equated with political economy.", "Descriptive explanations, causal claims, and normative evaluations are distinguished so that a preferred distribution is not mistaken for an empirical result." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Naming convention", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Political economy synonym; narrower programme; institution-specific usage; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an unsupported disciplinary split or conflation." }, { "name": "Political-economic explanandum", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Policy selection; institutional formation; production and exchange; distribution; development; political-economic feedback; other specified outcome", "why_it_matters": "Identifies what an approach seeks to explain rather than inferring scope from its label." }, { "name": "Political-economic causal direction", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Political conditions influence economic outcomes; economic conditions influence political outcomes; reciprocal influence; constitutive relationship", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes competing explanatory structures and highlights feedback." }, { "name": "Representation of power", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Formal authority; voting influence; bargaining resources; ownership and class relations; agenda control; structural dependence; other explicitly defined form", "why_it_matters": "Makes visible what an analysis counts as power and which mechanisms it may omit." }, { "name": "Analytical scale", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Individual; household; organisation; class or social group; jurisdiction; national economy; international system; linked scales", "why_it_matters": "Constrains comparisons and prevents transferring conclusions between incompatible levels." }, { "name": "Explanatory approach", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Links to named traditions or programmes, with attributed membership and disputed classifications", "why_it_matters": "Preserves differences in assumptions without presenting one tradition as the whole field." }, { "name": "Evidence and inference status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Conceptual proposal; formal implication; descriptive association; causal inference under stated assumptions; contested interpretation; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Determines how strongly an agent may use a claim." }, { "name": "Normative standpoint", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Explicit evaluative criterion; multiple compared criteria; descriptive scope only; implicit or unresolved criterion", "why_it_matters": "Exposes the value judgments underlying assessments of institutions and policies." }, { "name": "Institutional recognition", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Dated links to programmes, journals, societies, handbooks, or classification entries using an evidenced field designation", "why_it_matters": "Supports recognition of the field while separating it from its institutional carriers." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify a research question by its political-economic mechanism, analytical scale, and disciplinary convention.", "Compare explanations of the same outcome across approaches with different accounts of institutions, interests, and power.", "Identify evidence needed to distinguish a causal mechanism from correlation or theoretical possibility.", "Trace whether a policy conclusion follows from empirical findings, modelling assumptions, or normative criteria.", "Route neighbouring concepts and institutional records to their own models while preserving relevant links.", "Flag when an explanation is being transferred beyond the institutions, populations, or historical conditions supporting it." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "disciplinary-identity-and-boundaries", "name": "Disciplinary identity and boundaries", "description": "Establishes which meaning of political economics is represented and how it relates to neighbouring fields.", "rationale": "The registry supplies no definition, and the name alone cannot establish a distinct scope from political economy.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-sense", "name": "Naming and sense", "description": "Records attributed uses of the field's name and their intended extensions.", "findings": [ { "id": "political-economics-name-convention", "name": "Political economics name convention", "description": "Record whether a source uses political economics as a synonym, a narrower programme, or another explicitly defined designation.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does the defining source include under political economics?", "kind": "definition", "id": "political-economics-name-convention-q01" }, { "text": "Does that source distinguish political economics from political economy, and on what grounds?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "political-economics-name-convention-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "neighbouring-fields", "name": "Neighbouring fields", "description": "Locates overlaps without treating shared subject matter as disciplinary identity.", "findings": [ { "id": "economics-politics-boundary", "name": "Boundary with economics and political science", "description": "Record the convention used to distinguish political economics from economics, political science, public policy, and economic sociology.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which explicit connection between political processes and economic activity makes a question belong within this field?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "economics-politics-boundary-q01" }, { "text": "Which handbook, programme, or classification authority supports the proposed disciplinary placement?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "economics-politics-boundary-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "power-institutions-and-distribution", "name": "Power, institutions, and distribution", "description": "Organises the substantive relationships that political-economic explanations investigate.", "rationale": "Recognition requires more than mentioning politics and economics together; the model must expose their proposed connection.", "layers": [ { "id": "institutional-mechanisms", "name": "Institutional mechanisms", "description": "Connects rules and authority to incentives, constraints, and economic coordination.", "findings": [ { "id": "rules-authority-and-allocation", "name": "Rules, authority, and allocation", "description": "Record how an approach connects institutions such as property rights, electoral arrangements, or regulatory authority to economic behaviour.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which institution changes whose feasible actions, incentives, or bargaining position?", "kind": "definition", "id": "rules-authority-and-allocation-q01" }, { "text": "What observations would show that the proposed institutional mechanism operates?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "rules-authority-and-allocation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "distribution-and-political-feedback", "name": "Distribution and political feedback", "description": "Tracks how economic advantages and disadvantages may affect political influence and subsequent economic arrangements.", "findings": [ { "id": "resources-influence-feedback", "name": "Resources and influence feedback", "description": "Record proposed links among resource distribution, organisation, political access, and the reproduction or alteration of economic rules.", "questions": [ { "text": "Through what mechanism are economic resources proposed to become political influence?", "kind": "definition", "id": "resources-influence-feedback-q01" }, { "text": "How are resource concentration and political influence measured separately so that one is not assumed from the other?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "resources-influence-feedback-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "explanatory-traditions-and-assumptions", "name": "Explanatory traditions and assumptions", "description": "Makes competing accounts of actors, power, institutions, and historical change comparable.", "rationale": "Different approaches can share a research topic while disagreeing about what exists, what causes change, and what counts as explanation.", "layers": [ { "id": "actors-and-social-structure", "name": "Actors and social structure", "description": "Records explanatory units and assumptions about interests, agency, and collective organisation.", "findings": [ { "id": "agency-interests-and-power", "name": "Agency, interests, and power", "description": "Record whether an approach explains outcomes through individuals, organisations, classes, institutional positions, or combinations of these.", "questions": [ { "text": "Whose actions or structural positions explain the outcome, and how are their interests established?", "kind": "definition", "id": "agency-interests-and-power-q01" }, { "text": "Which forms of power or collective agency fall outside the approach's assumptions?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "agency-interests-and-power-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "traditions-and-change", "name": "Traditions and change", "description": "Records attributed intellectual affiliations and accounts of stability or transformation.", "findings": [ { "id": "approach-membership-and-dynamics", "name": "Approach membership and dynamics", "description": "Record named affiliations and whether an explanation emphasises equilibrium, conflict, institutional evolution, historical sequence, or another specified process.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which sources identify this approach with the field, and is that affiliation self-described or assigned by others?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "approach-membership-and-dynamics-q01" }, { "text": "What mechanism explains persistence or change in political-economic arrangements?", "kind": "definition", "id": "approach-membership-and-dynamics-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-inference", "name": "Evidence and inference", "description": "Determines what different methods establish about political-economic relationships.", "rationale": "Political and economic variables may influence each other, making causal direction, institutional context, and inference assumptions central.", "layers": [ { "id": "method-and-claim-fit", "name": "Method and claim fit", "description": "Matches formal, quantitative, comparative, historical, and interpretive methods to the claims they support.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-support-and-identification", "name": "Claim support and identification", "description": "Record whether a result is a model implication, an observed pattern, a causal estimate, or an interpretation, with its supporting evidence.", "questions": [ { "text": "What kind of claim does the method warrant, and which assumptions are required?", "kind": "definition", "id": "claim-support-and-identification-q01" }, { "text": "How does the analysis address reverse causation, selection, or shared causes between political and economic variables?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "claim-support-and-identification-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "historical-and-institutional-validity", "name": "Historical and institutional validity", "description": "Records the conditions under which evidence and explanations may travel across settings.", "findings": [ { "id": "context-and-transferability", "name": "Context and transferability", "description": "Specify the jurisdictions, periods, populations, and institutional conditions that bound a claim's applicability.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which institutional or historical conditions are necessary for the proposed mechanism?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "context-and-transferability-q01" }, { "text": "What additional evidence is needed before applying the explanation in a different political-economic setting?", "kind": "action", "id": "context-and-transferability-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "recognition-and-responsible-application", "name": "Recognition and responsible application", "description": "Connects evidence of disciplinary organisation to justified uses of political-economic knowledge.", "rationale": "An agent must distinguish a recognised field designation from an incidental label and distinguish explanatory insight from a policy recommendation.", "layers": [ { "id": "institutional-and-classification-markers", "name": "Institutional and classification markers", "description": "Records external markers of disciplinary recognition without absorbing those entities into the field model.", "findings": [ { "id": "verified-field-markers", "name": "Verified field markers", "description": "Link to verified journals, degree programmes, societies, handbooks, and classification entries, retaining their exact terminology and coverage.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which institutional records explicitly use this designation, and what subject scope do they assign to it?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "verified-field-markers-q01" }, { "text": "Which classification system and edition place the subject, and does the entry cover political economics specifically or a broader category?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "verified-field-markers-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "normative-criteria-and-policy-use", "name": "Normative criteria and policy use", "description": "Separates explanations of political-economic outcomes from judgments about desirable outcomes and feasible interventions.", "findings": [ { "id": "policy-conclusion-warrant", "name": "Policy conclusion warrant", "description": "Record the evaluative criteria, distributional judgments, and political feasibility assumptions needed to move from analysis to a proposed action.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which criterion makes an outcome desirable, and how are gains, losses, rights, or power shifts across groups evaluated?", "kind": "definition", "id": "policy-conclusion-warrant-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence about implementation, political response, and institutional capacity is required before using the analysis to recommend an intervention?", "kind": "action", "id": "policy-conclusion-warrant-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "No sense is recorded: verify whether the registry intends broad political economy or the narrower contemporary economics usage of political economics.", "The listed kinds overlap and represent recognized traditions or specializations, not a single standardized taxonomy.", "The field has no universal measurement unit or governing technical standard; this account is based on recall, without sources consulted." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of political economics this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Classical political economy", "Marxian political economy", "Institutionalist political economy", "International political economy", "Public choice", "Constitutional political economy" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of political economics this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) classification", "value_or_pattern": "D72", "note": "The American Economic Association's classification for political processes covers a major part of political economics, rather than the entire field." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of political economics this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Explaining how elections, lobbying and institutional arrangements influence economic policy.", "Analysing taxation, redistribution and the political sustainability of reforms.", "Studying relationships among property rights, state capacity and economic development.", "Investigating how trade and finance interact with domestic interests and international power.", "Comparing economic systems and their governing institutions." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of political economics this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Confusing normative preferences about economic arrangements with empirical explanations.", "Inferring causation from correlations when political institutions and economic outcomes influence each other.", "Treating interests, institutions or political behaviour as identical across historical and regional settings.", "Using aggregate economic outcomes that conceal differences among social groups.", "Assuming formal institutional rules fully describe informal power and actual enforcement." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of political economics this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "In many economics departments, the term emphasizes formal modelling and empirical analysis of political incentives; other social-science settings often emphasize historical institutions, class and power.", "International political economy includes American and British intellectual traditions, conventionally distinguished by differences in methodological and theoretical emphasis rather than strict geographic boundaries." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of political economics this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Economics", "difference": "Political economics makes political power, institutions or collective decision-making central to explaining economic arrangements; economics encompasses many questions without that focus." }, { "name": "Political science", "difference": "Political science studies politics broadly; political economics concentrates on interactions between political and economic processes." }, { "name": "Economic policy", "difference": "Economic policy consists of proposed or implemented interventions; political economics studies how such interventions are selected, constrained and distributed." }, { "name": "Public economics", "difference": "Public economics studies government revenue, spending and intervention; political economics additionally explains the political incentives and processes determining government choices." }, { "name": "Economic sociology", "difference": "Economic sociology foregrounds social relations and the social organization of economic activity; political economics foregrounds political power and governing institutions, with substantial overlap." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of political economics this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry intend political economics as a synonym for political economy or as a narrower research programme, and what source establishes that intent?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already cover the intended concept, requiring a link rather than a second publication?", "Which intellectual traditions belong within the intended scope, and where do authoritative sources disagree about their inclusion?", "Which verified classification entries, handbooks, journals, societies, and degree programmes recognise the intended sense of the field?", "Should international political economy and historical political economy be represented as internal specialisations or linked neighbouring fields under the chosen convention?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 17, "questions": 27 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "discipline or field of knowledge", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a political economics, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to recognise political economics as a field of knowledge, assess the scope and evidential standing of its approaches, and judge their suitability for explaining interactions between political power and economic activity.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: Political Economy of Natural Resources, Symbolic economy, classical economics, New political economy, Marxian economics, neo-Marxian economics, temporal single-system interpretation.", "7 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 74 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a political economics, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says" ], "howItIsRecognised": [], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "Political Economy of Natural Resources", "Symbolic economy", "classical economics", "New political economy", "Marxian economics", "neo-Marxian economics", "temporal single-system interpretation" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 74 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 7 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one political economics from another, and a political economics from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a political economics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a political economics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a political economics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a political economics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a political economics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a political economics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a political economics sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a political economics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a political economics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a political economics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a political economics from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a political economics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a political economics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a political economics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a political economics passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a political economics between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a political economics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a political economics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a political economics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a political economics, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a political economics is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a political economics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a political economics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a political economics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a political economics says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a political economics contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a political economics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a political economics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a political economics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a political economics and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a political economics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a political economics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a political economics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "subject-and-method", "name": "Subject matter and method", "description": "What political economics studies and how it establishes anything.", "rationale": "A field is identified by its questions and its methods, and those are what distinguish it from the fields next to it.", "layers": [ { "id": "subject", "name": "Subject matter", "description": "The questions it takes as its own.", "findings": [ { "id": "subject-record", "name": "Questions and objects of study", "description": "What it is about, stated so a neighbouring field can be told apart.", "questions": [ { "id": "subject-record-q01", "text": "What questions and objects does political economics take as its own?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "subject-record-q02", "text": "Which questions does it share with a neighbouring field, and who claims them?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "method", "name": "Method and evidence", "description": "How claims are established and what counts as evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "method-record", "name": "Methods and standards of evidence", "description": "The methods used and what they are taken to establish.", "questions": [ { "id": "method-record-q01", "text": "By what methods does political economics establish claims, and what counts as sufficient evidence?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "method-record-q02", "text": "What kind of claim can this field not settle, and where should an agent look instead?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "institutions-and-classification", "name": "Institutions and classification", "description": "Where political economics is practised and how catalogues place it.", "rationale": "The institutional footprint is the evidence that a field exists as a field rather than as a topic.", "layers": [ { "id": "institutions", "name": "Institutional markers", "description": "Societies, journals, degrees and departments.", "findings": [ { "id": "institution-record", "name": "Bodies and venues", "description": "Where the field organises itself.", "questions": [ { "id": "institution-record-q01", "text": "Which societies, journals or degrees mark political economics as an established field?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "institution-record-q02", "text": "What would show that it is emerging or dissolving rather than established?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification", "name": "Classification schemes", "description": "Where library and research classifications put it.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-record", "name": "Codes and their disagreements", "description": "The classification codes that place it, and where they differ.", "questions": [ { "id": "classification-record-q01", "text": "Which classification schemes place political economics, under what codes?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "classification-record-q02", "text": "Where do those schemes disagree about its scope?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a political economics came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a political economics and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a political economics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a political economics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a political economics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a political economics is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a political economics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a political economics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a political economics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }