autonomy
Let an agent handle autonomy by holder, scope, legal basis and limits, neutrally across personal, political and technical senses.
Research draft, second pass
A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.
written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify
Researched by: Claude
Purpose and description
Let an agent handle autonomy by holder, scope, legal basis and limits, neutrally across personal, political and technical senses.
The capacity of an agent, group or territory to govern itself: for individuals, self-determination in decisions; for territories, self-governance within a larger state, as in autonomous regions.
What it is for: Protecting self-determination of people, communities and territories.
It can be respect personal autonomy in decisions; describe territorial autonomy arrangements; assess the scope of self-governance; support autonomy in care and rehabilitation.
Distinguishing features
Self-governance or self-determination
Personal, political and technical senses
Territorial autonomy is not independence
Limits set by law or capacity
What it looks like
A status or capacity, not an appearance.
How it is recognised
Autonomy statutes for territories
Consent and capacity in personal decisions
Autonomous vehicles use a technical sense
Related models
is a kind of - category
is protected by - law
is contrasted with - sovereignty
is related to - personal decisions
In practice
Families and kinds
personal autonomy
territorial autonomy
cultural and minority autonomy
institutional autonomy such as universities
autonomy in rehabilitation models
Standards and regulation
Territorial autonomy statutes such as the Aland Autonomy Act
Medical consent law
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Article 12
Failure modes and hazards
Conflating autonomy with independence
Overriding personal choices without lawful basis
Partisan framing of territorial disputes
Also called
Where this came from
wikidata · CC0 1.0
Drafted structure
Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.
Sense Which autonomy.
Senses differ.
Holder
Person, community, territory.
Holder
Autonomy holder.
- Whose autonomy is meant? definition
- Which specific entry fits? action
Scope
What is self-governed.
Scope
Scope.
- Over which matters does the holder decide? definition
- Where are the limits? boundary
Territorial Self-governing areas.
Territorial autonomy is legal.
Statute
Legal basis.
Statute
Legal basis.
- Which law or treaty grants the autonomy? provenance
- Which powers are devolved? definition
Neutrality
Disputes.
Neutrality
Balanced account.
- Is the description neutral where status is disputed? boundary
- Are positions attributed? boundary
Personal Self-determination.
Personal autonomy is a right.
Decisions
Consent.
Decisions
Personal decisions.
- Is the person able and supported to make this decision? boundary
- Has consent been given? boundary
Supported decisions
Disability rights.
Support
Supported decision-making.
- What supported decision-making is available? action
- Under which law? provenance
Institutional Organisations.
Institutions have autonomy too.
Bodies
Universities, agencies.
Bodies
Institutional autonomy.
- How autonomous is this institution? measurement
- Who can override it? provenance
Technical
Autonomous systems.
Technical
Technical sense.
- Is autonomy of machines or vehicles meant instead? boundary
- Which entry fits? action
What the second pass must settle
- Should personal and territorial autonomy be separate entries?
- How should autonomy statutes be linked?
- How should technical autonomy be split off?