{ "model": { "rank": 6842, "code": "thing-q488085", "model_id": "vr.tr.kindness", "name": "kindness", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise, assess and support kindness while distinguishing benevolent intent, respectful conduct and effects on those concerned.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q488085/", "tier": 2, "score": 58, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "benefaction", "random act of kindness", "age appropriateness", "kindness in Islam" ], "aliasCount": 4, "merged": 4, "knownIn": 58, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": "vr.tr.kindness-act", "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q488085", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q488085", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T23:37:11Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 20.7, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08887-7cd5-7e82-a123-b2954ec77fec\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: kindness\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 007: 1001 regist", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 56.1, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08887-7cc7-7e13-b831-37b59d41c0fe\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: kindness\nRegistry id: vr.tr.kindness\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContex" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q488085", "registryId": "vr.tr.kindness", "name": "kindness", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q488085/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.kindness", "name": "kindness", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise, assess and support kindness while distinguishing benevolent intent, respectful conduct and effects on those concerned.", "definition": "Kindness is a disposition or action expressing benevolent concern for others through considerate or helpful treatment, with accounts differing over the relative importance of intention, conduct, and benefit to the recipient.", "scope_statement": "This model owns kindness as enacted consideration for another's welfare and, where evidence supports it, as a disposition expressed across actions; it records the interpretive basis for calling conduct kind without assuming that intent, benefit or social approval alone settles the judgment.", "in_scope": [ "Acts and omissions proposed as instances of kindness, including help, restraint, attention and considerate refusal", "Concern for another's welfare, alongside mixed or uncertain motives", "Recipient needs, preferences, dignity and experience of the conduct", "Contextual interpretations and disagreements about what counts as kind", "Patterns of kindness over time, distinguished from isolated acts and reputational claims", "Proportionate opportunities to act kindly within consent, capacity and competing obligations" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Empathy as an ability to understand or share another's experience", "Compassion as an emotional or motivational response to suffering", "Altruism as a separate account of other-directed motivation or costly helping", "Politeness and etiquette as systems of socially expected manners", "Justice, rights and professional duties as independent grounds for evaluating conduct", "Charitable organisations, donations and volunteering as activities that may or may not express kindness" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Identify whose welfare or dignity the conduct attends to; compliance with manners alone is insufficient evidence of kindness.", "Separate feeling concern from expressing it: an enacted instance requires conduct or deliberate restraint, while a disposition requires evidence across occasions.", "Test whether offered help responds to the recipient's situation and preferences; an unwanted intervention can be benevolently intended yet experienced as intrusive.", "Record benefit and intention separately: accidental benefit does not establish kind motivation, and kind motivation does not establish a beneficial result.", "Check for demands, coercion or humiliation attached to assistance; giving something valuable does not by itself establish kindness." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Basis of the kindness judgment", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Intent-focused, conduct-focused, outcome-focused, disposition-focused, combined or unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Makes competing interpretations explicit rather than hiding them within one verdict." }, { "name": "Welfare or dignity addressed", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Practical need, emotional support, inclusion, comfort, protection from avoidable harm, dignity or other stated concern", "why_it_matters": "Identifies what the proposed kindness is meant to respond to." }, { "name": "Evidence of benevolent motivation", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Unknown, self-reported, supported by contextual evidence, mixed or contradicted", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an agent from treating observable help as direct access to private motives." }, { "name": "Recipient response", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Unknown, welcomed, conditionally welcomed, declined, experienced as intrusive or disputed", "why_it_matters": "Keeps the recipient's experience visible without treating gratitude as an obligation." }, { "name": "Consent and power relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Actor-recipient relationship, relevant dependency or authority, and whether the recipient can freely refuse", "why_it_matters": "The same offer can have different significance when refusal carries consequences." }, { "name": "Observed effects", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Beneficial, neutral, harmful, mixed or unknown, with affected party and observation period specified", "why_it_matters": "Allows a judgment to change when effects differ from expectations." }, { "name": "Observed recurrence", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Count of supported instances within a stated observation period and opportunity set; no universal kindness score", "why_it_matters": "Supports cautious assessment of a disposition while exposing gaps in observation." } ], "affordances": [ "Identify a concrete opportunity for considerate assistance, attention, restraint or refusal", "Compare candidate actions against recipient preferences, dignity and likely effects", "Explain why an act is judged kind, disputed or insufficiently evidenced under a stated interpretation", "Offer help in a form the recipient can decline without penalty", "Revise or repair a benevolent intervention after unwelcome or harmful effects become apparent", "Assess recurring conduct without equating publicity, gratitude or a single incident with character" ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "meanings-and-instances", "name": "Meanings and instances of kindness", "description": "Makes explicit the interpretation under which an action or disposition is being called kind.", "rationale": "Kindness judgments can turn on different combinations of concern, conduct, effects and character.", "layers": [ { "id": "interpretive-basis", "name": "Interpretive basis", "description": "Records candidate definitions and the people or sources advancing them.", "findings": [ { "id": "grounds-for-calling-conduct-kind", "name": "Grounds for calling conduct kind", "description": "Distinguish interpretations that prioritise benevolent intention, considerate treatment, beneficial effects or a recurring disposition; do not assign these positions to a school without research.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does kindness require under the interpretation being used, and what would disqualify an apparent instance?", "kind": "definition", "id": "grounds-for-calling-conduct-kind-q01" }, { "text": "Who advances this interpretation, and where is their account documented?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "grounds-for-calling-conduct-kind-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "act-and-disposition", "name": "Act and disposition", "description": "Separates a particular expression of kindness from a claim about enduring character.", "findings": [ { "id": "unit-of-kindness-assessment", "name": "Unit of kindness assessment", "description": "Anchor an assessment to a particular act, deliberate omission or pattern; retain attention and restraint as candidate expressions alongside material assistance.", "questions": [ { "text": "What specific conduct expresses consideration here, including any deliberate decision not to intervene?", "kind": "definition", "id": "unit-of-kindness-assessment-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence across situations would justify moving from 'this act was kind' to 'this actor shows a kind disposition'?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "unit-of-kindness-assessment-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "concern-and-recipient-fit", "name": "Concern and recipient fit", "description": "Examines the concern behind an act and whether its form fits the recipient's circumstances.", "rationale": "An act intended as kindness can miss a need, impose an unwanted solution or mistake the actor's preferences for the recipient's.", "layers": [ { "id": "benevolent-and-mixed-motives", "name": "Benevolent and mixed motives", "description": "Records evidence of other-directed concern while allowing uncertainty and multiple motives.", "findings": [ { "id": "concern-without-mind-reading", "name": "Concern without mind-reading", "description": "Keep expressed intentions, observable conduct and inferred motives distinct, including possible reward, reputation or reciprocity motives.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence supports concern for the recipient, and which motive claims are only inferred or self-reported?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "concern-without-mind-reading-q01" }, { "text": "Under the stated interpretation, does an accompanying personal benefit alter the kindness judgment, and why?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "concern-without-mind-reading-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "needs-and-preferences", "name": "Needs and preferences", "description": "Connects proposed help or consideration to what is known about the intended recipient.", "findings": [ { "id": "help-that-fits-the-recipient", "name": "Help that fits the recipient", "description": "Record the need being addressed, how it became known and whether assistance, listening, privacy or non-interference would fit better.", "questions": [ { "text": "Was the relevant need or preference expressed by the recipient, observed in context or assumed by the actor?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "help-that-fits-the-recipient-q01" }, { "text": "How can the agent establish what would be welcome without burdening the recipient or demanding disclosure?", "kind": "action", "id": "help-that-fits-the-recipient-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "dignity-consent-and-limits", "name": "Dignity, consent and limits", "description": "Evaluates how kindness is offered and when consideration calls for limits.", "rationale": "Kindness must be assessable in situations involving dependence, unwanted help, refusal and obligations to others.", "layers": [ { "id": "freely-received-assistance", "name": "Freely received assistance", "description": "Examines whether help preserves agency and avoids humiliation or concealed demands.", "findings": [ { "id": "agency-preserving-offers", "name": "Agency-preserving offers", "description": "Record permission, freedom to refuse, exposure of private needs and any expectation of gratitude, loyalty or repayment.", "questions": [ { "text": "Can the recipient decline or modify the offer without losing standing, access or safety?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "agency-preserving-offers-q01" }, { "text": "How should the offer be changed to preserve privacy, dignity and meaningful choice?", "kind": "action", "id": "agency-preserving-offers-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "considerate-refusal-and-restraint", "name": "Considerate refusal and restraint", "description": "Addresses cases where saying yes or continuing to help may harm the recipient, the actor or others.", "findings": [ { "id": "limits-compatible-with-kindness", "name": "Limits compatible with kindness", "description": "Treat refusal, correction and withdrawal as candidates for considerate conduct when their reasons and manner support that interpretation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Would complying with this request undermine someone's welfare, a relevant obligation or the actor's sustainable capacity to help?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "limits-compatible-with-kindness-q01" }, { "text": "What refusal, alternative or boundary would communicate care while addressing the identified concern?", "kind": "action", "id": "limits-compatible-with-kindness-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "effects-evidence-and-revision", "name": "Effects, evidence and revision", "description": "Tracks what happened, how kindness was assessed and what should change in light of experience.", "rationale": "A model needs to distinguish intended kindness from experienced effects and avoid turning limited observations into a definitive score.", "layers": [ { "id": "experienced-and-distributed-effects", "name": "Experienced and distributed effects", "description": "Records recipient experience, practical consequences and effects on others over a stated period.", "findings": [ { "id": "benefit-harm-and-repair", "name": "Benefit, harm and repair", "description": "Keep the recipient's account alongside observable outcomes and third-party effects; allow intended kindness to require apology, adjustment or repair.", "questions": [ { "text": "What benefits, burdens or harms are reported or observed, by whom and over what period?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "benefit-harm-and-repair-q01" }, { "text": "If the act was unwelcome or harmful, what acknowledgment, repair or change would respond to the recipient's account?", "kind": "action", "id": "benefit-harm-and-repair-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "assessment-and-observation-limits", "name": "Assessment and observation limits", "description": "Makes operational definitions, observation coverage and disagreement visible.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-without-a-universal-score", "name": "Evidence without a universal score", "description": "Separate self-report, recipient report and observed conduct; specify qualifying criteria and opportunities before interpreting counts or patterns.", "questions": [ { "text": "What counts as a kind instance for this assessment, and which opportunities or less visible expressions does the method miss?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "evidence-without-a-universal-score-q01" }, { "text": "Where do actor, recipient and observer judgments disagree, and what additional evidence could clarify rather than erase that disagreement?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "evidence-without-a-universal-score-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "No sense is recorded: the ACT.ACT placement suggests conduct, but ordinary and scholarly usage also includes a character disposition.", "The VIA classification of character strengths includes kindness; researchers should check the specific instrument and scoring before adopting an operational definition.", "The varieties listed are overlapping usages, not a standardized taxonomy; the role of intention, recipient experience, and actual benefit remains definition-dependent." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of kindness this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Kindness as a character disposition", "Individual acts of kindness", "Kindness toward oneself", "Kindness toward strangers" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of kindness this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Character education uses kindness to encourage considerate conduct and practical help.", "Psychological research studies deliberate acts of kindness as interventions and forms of prosocial behaviour.", "Caregiving and service settings use kindness to describe attentive, respectful treatment.", "Virtue ethics examines kindness as a quality of character." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of kindness this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Frequency of reported or observed acts of kindness", "typical_range": "No universal range; depends on the observation period and criteria for counting an act", "unit": "acts per observation period" }, { "quantity": "Self-reported kindness as a character strength", "typical_range": "Instrument-dependent questionnaire scores; no universal threshold", "unit": "scale score" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of kindness this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Unsolicited help can undermine autonomy or misjudge what a recipient needs.", "Kind intentions can produce harmful outcomes when assistance is poorly informed.", "Selective kindness can favour an in-group while neglecting others.", "Pressure to be kind can discourage necessary boundaries or criticism.", "Self-report measures can reflect social desirability and differences in what respondents count as kindness." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of kindness this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Cultural expectations differ over whether kindness is best expressed through direct help, restraint, hospitality, gifts, or respect for privacy.", "Norms governing obligations to relatives, neighbours, and strangers influence which actions are expected and which are regarded as unusually kind." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of kindness this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Compassion", "difference": "Compassion specifically concerns suffering and a motivation to alleviate it; kindness also includes considerate actions where suffering is not salient." }, { "name": "Altruism", "difference": "Altruism concerns other-directed motivation or, in some fields, a cost-benefit relation; kindness does not necessarily require self-sacrifice." }, { "name": "Empathy", "difference": "Empathy involves understanding or sharing another's experience; kindness concerns benevolent treatment and can occur without sharing that experience." }, { "name": "Politeness", "difference": "Politeness follows conventions of courteous interaction; kindness requires concern that courteous behaviour alone does not establish." }, { "name": "Prosocial behaviour", "difference": "Prosocial behaviour is a broader category of conduct intended to benefit others; kindness commonly also implies a considerate manner or benevolent disposition." }, { "name": "Generosity", "difference": "Generosity emphasizes giving resources, time, or attention freely; kindness also includes restraint, patience, and avoiding unnecessary hurt." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of kindness this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which reference works and research traditions provide defensible competing definitions of kindness, and how do they weight intention, conduct, outcomes and disposition?", "Which operational measures distinguish kindness from agreeableness, politeness, compassion and general prosocial behaviour, and for which populations have they been evaluated?", "How should judgments weigh recipient refusal or negative experience when an actor claims that intervention protects the recipient's welfare?", "Does this registry entry include self-kindness, kindness toward nonhuman beings and collective or institutional kindness, or should those uses be related to neighbouring models?", "What evidence supports interpreting kindness across cultural expectations and unequal relationships without treating one group's preferred expression as universal?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 15, "questions": 23 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a kindness, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to recognise, assess and support kindness while distinguishing benevolent intent, respectful conduct and effects on those concerned.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: benefaction, random act of kindness, age appropriateness, kindness in Islam.", "4 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 58 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a kindness, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "benefaction", "random act of kindness", "age appropriateness", "kindness in Islam" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 58 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 4 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one kindness from another, and a kindness from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a kindness, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a kindness, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a kindness is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a kindness, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a kindness, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a kindness is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a kindness sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a kindness, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a kindness, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a kindness is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a kindness from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a kindness, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a kindness, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a kindness is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a kindness passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a kindness between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a kindness, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a kindness, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a kindness is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a kindness, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a kindness is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a kindness, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a kindness, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a kindness is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a kindness proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a kindness, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a kindness and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a kindness, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a kindness, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a kindness is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a kindness consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a kindness takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a kindness, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a kindness, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a kindness is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What kindness is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of kindness are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is kindness operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of kindness and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of kindness?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as kindness?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a kindness came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a kindness and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a kindness, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a kindness, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a kindness is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a kindness is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a kindness, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a kindness, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a kindness is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }