← Back to catalogue
Research draft

forensic science

vr.tr.forensic-science · INF.KNW

Let an agent explain forensic science and its disciplines, relay methods, standards and the role of expert evidence from scientific and legal sources with attribution, describe reliability debates neutrally, and distinguish forensic science from criminal investigation in general, from forensic medicine as a clinical field and from fictional portrayals.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain forensic science and its disciplines, relay methods, standards and the role of expert evidence from scientific and legal sources with attribution, describe reliability debates neutrally, and distinguish forensic science from criminal investigation in general, from forensic medicine as a clinical field and from fictional portrayals.

The application of scientific methods and techniques to matters of law, especially criminal investigation and litigation, encompassing disciplines such as forensic pathology, toxicology, serology, DNA analysis, microbiology, fingerprinting, ballistics, digital and audio forensics, forensic nursing and accounting, and producing forensic reports and expert testimony for courts; forensic science is governed by standards for evidence handling and validity and has faced scrutiny over the reliability of some methods.

What it is for: Applying science to legal questions.

It can be explain disciplines; relay methods and standards; describe reliability debates; distinguish related fields.

Distinguishing features

Legal application

Many disciplines

Evidence chain of custody

Expert testimony

What it looks like

Not a visible object; laboratory and scene work.

Physical character

DNA profiling introduced: 1984 year - Alec Jeffreys

US NAS report on forensic science: 2009 year - Strengthening Forensic Science

key standards body: ISO 17025 accreditation note - for laboratories

How it is recognised

Science applied to law

Forensic serology, microbiology, audio forensics, forensic nursing, forensic reports, forensic activity

Detectives investigate; forensic medicine is clinical; television portrayals are dramatised

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

science

serves - and civil litigation

criminal justice

produces - testimony

expert witness

is exemplified by - a core method

DNA profiling

In practice

Families and kinds

forensic pathology and forensic medicine

forensic biology including serology and DNA

forensic chemistry and toxicology

forensic microbiology

digital, audio and video forensics

forensic nursing, accounting, anthropology and other specialties

Standards and regulation

ISO 17025 laboratory accreditation

Admissibility standards such as Daubert and Frye in the United States

Forensic science regulator codes such as in England and Wales

Chain of custody rules

Failure modes and hazards

Unreliable methods such as bite mark analysis, as reviews have found

Contamination and chain of custody failures

Overstated testimony

The CSI effect on juries

Also called

forensic reportforensic serologyforensic microbiologyaudio forensicsforensic nursingforensic activityforensic medicinebloodstain pattern analysisforensic firearm examinationdigital forensicsforensic video analysisdetection of fire accelerantsforensic archaeologyforensic genealogylie detectiondactylographymarine forensicsforensic linguisticsIoT Forensicsdigital trace researchmobile device forensicspersonality computing

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What forensic science is.

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is forensic science, and how does it differ from investigation, forensic medicine and fiction? definition
  2. Is the question about the field, a discipline, a specific case or a legal matter needing a lawyer? boundary

Disciplines

Disciplines.

Disciplines

Disciplines.

  1. What are forensic pathology, serology, DNA, toxicology, microbiology, digital and audio forensics and forensic nursing? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific discipline? action
Practice Practice.

Regulation.

Process

Evidence process.

Process

Process.

  1. How is evidence collected, preserved, analysed and reported, and what is a forensic report? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Court

In court.

Court

Court.

  1. How do admissibility rules and expert testimony work, in general terms? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
Reliability Reliability.

Attribution.

Reviews

Reviews.

Reviews

Reviews.

  1. What did the 2009 NAS and 2016 PCAST reports find about forensic methods, with findings attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral? boundary

Reform

Reform.

Reform

Reform.

  1. How are standards, accreditation and error rate research improving forensic science? provenance
  2. Which entry fits forensic science reform? action
Context History and culture.

Context.

History

History.

History

History.

  1. How did forensic science develop from Bertillon and fingerprints to DNA? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the history of forensic science? action

Culture

Culture.

Culture

Culture.

  1. How do television and fiction portray forensic science, and what is the CSI effect? provenance
  2. Which entry fits CSI effect? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should DNA profiling and digital forensics be separate primary entries?
  • How should scientific and legal sources be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming subdisciplines and outputs; should they be split off?