← Back to catalogue
Research draft

insanity

vr.tr.insanity · ACT.PRC

Let an agent explain insanity as a historical medical and current legal concept, describe legal tests of criminal responsibility and capacity across jurisdictions in general terms, note why the term is avoided clinically, and route people in crisis to emergency services and helplines first.

Thing Registry Activities and processes

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain insanity as a historical medical and current legal concept, describe legal tests of criminal responsibility and capacity across jurisdictions in general terms, note why the term is avoided clinically, and route people in crisis to emergency services and helplines first.

A historical and legal term for severe mental disturbance, formerly used in medicine for conditions now described as psychiatric disorders and now largely confined to law, where insanity denotes a mental state that removes criminal responsibility or legal capacity under tests such as the McNaughton rules, and to everyday and figurative speech; the term is considered outdated and stigmatising in clinical contexts, and people in mental health crisis should be directed to emergency and support services.

What it is for: Historical and legal concept of severe mental disturbance.

It can be explain historical and legal senses; describe legal tests generally; note stigma and terminology; route crises first.

Distinguishing features

Legal rather than clinical

Historical baggage

Jurisdiction-specific tests

Stigmatising in clinical use

What it looks like

Not physical; a legal and historical category.

How it is recognised

Legal term for a mental state removing responsibility

Historical medical term, figurative usage

Psychiatric diagnoses are clinical; capacity and fitness to plead are related legal concepts

Related models

is a kind of - category

biological process

is related to - a clinical condition sometimes relevant to legal insanity

psychosis

is related to - a condition relevant to capacity

dementia

is related to - judicial roles applying legal tests

magistrate

In practice

Families and kinds

insanity in criminal law

insanity and civil capacity

historical medical concepts of insanity

figurative and everyday uses

terms in other languages and legal systems

Standards and regulation

Criminal law tests of insanity and responsibility

Mental capacity legislation

Clinical terminology guidelines

Failure modes and hazards

Failing to route people in crisis to help

Using the term for people with mental illness

Agents giving legal or clinical advice

Also called

mental alienationGila-gila

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Also registered as vr.tr.insanity

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Safety Safety first.

Crisis routing.

Crisis

Crisis.

Crisis

Crisis.

  1. Is the user or someone else in mental health crisis or at risk, requiring emergency services or a helpline now? boundary
  2. Which entry fits crisis helplines for the user country? action

Terminology

Terminology.

Terminology

Terminology.

  1. Why is insanity avoided in clinical contexts, and what language do health organisations recommend? provenance
  2. Is the presentation respectful and non-stigmatising? boundary
Law Legal concept.

General information.

Criminal

Criminal responsibility.

Criminal

Criminal.

  1. How do legal tests such as the McNaughton rules define insanity for criminal responsibility, in general terms across jurisdictions? provenance
  2. Is the user asking about a specific case, which needs a lawyer? boundary

Capacity

Capacity and civil law.

Capacity

Capacity.

  1. How do capacity and fitness to plead differ from the insanity defence? provenance
  2. Which entry fits mental capacity law? action
History History of the concept.

Scholarship.

Medical

Historical medicine.

Medical

Medical.

  1. How was insanity understood and treated historically, and how did psychiatry replace the term? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the history of psychiatry? action

Debates

Debates.

Debates

Debates.

  1. What debates exist about the insanity defence and its reform, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral? boundary
Learn Culture and teaching.

Education.

Culture

In culture and language.

Culture

Culture.

  1. How is the term used figuratively and in culture, and how does this affect stigma? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Teach

Teaching.

Teach

Teaching.

  1. How can the legal concept be taught alongside modern mental health understanding? action
  2. Which misconceptions arise? provenance

What the second pass must settle

  • Should the insanity defence be a separate entry?
  • How should crisis services be linked by country?
  • How should terminology guidance be linked?