{ "model": { "rank": 3216, "code": "thing-q51501", "model_id": "vr.tr.maxwell-s-equations", "name": "Maxwell's equations", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognize formulations of Maxwell's equations, assess their physical and mathematical applicability, and determine what additional information is needed to use them reliably.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.MED", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q51501/", "tier": 2, "score": 89, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [], "aliasCount": 0, "merged": 0, "knownIn": 89, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q51501", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q51501", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T14:10:09Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 20.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c33-42bc-7461-a897-9688cec23305\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Maxwell's equations\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 546 things:\n# Batch 003: 1", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 80.6, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c33-42ce-70e0-88aa-17041834346d\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Maxwell's equations\nRegistry id: vr.tr.maxwell-s-equations\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this " } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q51501", "registryId": "vr.tr.maxwell-s-equations", "name": "Maxwell's equations", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q51501/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.maxwell-s-equations", "name": "Maxwell's equations", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognize formulations of Maxwell's equations, assess their physical and mathematical applicability, and determine what additional information is needed to use them reliably.", "definition": "Maxwell's equations are the four coupled laws of classical electromagnetism that relate electric and magnetic fields to electric charge and current and describe how those fields vary in space and time.", "scope_statement": "This model owns Maxwell's equations as a mathematical expression of classical electromagnetism, registered as vr.tr.maxwell-s-equations in INF / INF.MED, including equivalent formulations, conventions, source terms, closure requirements and validity conditions; it does not treat the equations as a particular authored publication or physical field configuration.", "in_scope": [ "The four electromagnetic field laws and the roles of their source and induction terms", "Differential, integral and relativistic formulations with their conventions", "Microscopic and macroscopic descriptions and their relationship", "Constitutive, initial and boundary information required for a specified application", "Consistency conditions, limiting approximations and applicability assessments" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Electromagnetic fields and waves as particular physical phenomena", "Complete models of antennas, circuits, optical components or other devices", "Material-specific constitutive theories and measured material datasets", "Charged-particle dynamics, including the Lorentz force law as a separate dynamical law", "Quantum electrodynamics and proposed extensions involving magnetic charges", "Individual textbooks, historical papers, editions and their publication rights" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "A complete standard formulation accounts for electric flux and charge, vanishing magnetic divergence, Faraday induction and the Ampère-Maxwell law.", "The equations constrain electromagnetic fields and their sources; the Lorentz force law instead specifies the force on a charged particle.", "An electromagnetic wave equation is a derived description whose assumptions and accompanying constraints must be checked before treating it as equivalent to the full system.", "Electrostatic, magnetostatic and quasistatic equations are restricted or approximate forms, rather than automatically interchangeable presentations of the full time-dependent system.", "A macroscopic formulation using D and H requires a stated relationship to E, B and material response; changing symbols alone does not establish equivalence to a microscopic formulation." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Mathematical formulation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Differential vector; integral; tensor; differential forms", "why_it_matters": "Determines the notation, regularity assumptions and transformations needed to interpret or compare an expression." }, { "name": "Unit and sign conventions", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "SI, Gaussian or other declared unit system; orientation, metric signature and time-dependence conventions where relevant", "why_it_matters": "Prevents apparent disagreements caused by different constants, signs or definitions." }, { "name": "Field-description level", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Microscopic; macroscopic; explicitly specified averaging scheme", "why_it_matters": "Establishes what the fields and source densities represent." }, { "name": "Source interpretation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Total charge and current; free charge and current with bound contributions represented through material response", "why_it_matters": "Avoids omitting or double-counting polarization and magnetization contributions." }, { "name": "Constitutive closure", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Links to specified vacuum relations or material-response models", "why_it_matters": "Identifies the additional relations needed to solve a macroscopic field problem." }, { "name": "Temporal approximation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Full time-dependent; electrostatic; magnetostatic; electroquasistatic; magnetoquasistatic; other justified reduction", "why_it_matters": "Records which terms are retained and what supports neglecting others." }, { "name": "Problem-specification completeness", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Unspecified; partial; specified with compatibility checks pending; compatibility assessed", "why_it_matters": "Separates possession of the equations from possession of a usable field problem." }, { "name": "Characteristic propagation ratio", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Dimensionless L/(vT), with characteristic length L, time T and applicable propagation speed v explicitly defined", "why_it_matters": "Helps assess retardation effects, while not alone establishing the validity of a particular quasistatic approximation." } ], "affordances": [ "Identify which electromagnetic laws a candidate equation set contains or omits.", "Translate between compatible formulations while preserving units, orientations and source meanings.", "Check dimensional consistency, charge continuity and divergence constraints.", "Determine which constitutive relations and initial or boundary data an application still needs.", "Derive a restricted formulation or wave equation while recording its assumptions and retained constraints.", "Assess whether a proposed analytical or numerical solution satisfies the specified equations and conditions." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "equation-system-identity", "name": "Equation system identity", "description": "Recognizes the four laws and distinguishes the full system from incomplete or derived descriptions.", "rationale": "An agent must establish that an expression represents Maxwell's equations before interpreting or applying it.", "layers": [ { "id": "electric-and-magnetic-flux", "name": "Electric and magnetic flux", "description": "Identifies the two divergence laws in the chosen formulation.", "findings": [ { "id": "gauss-law-identification", "name": "Gauss law identification", "description": "Record how electric flux is related to charge and how the standard system expresses vanishing magnetic divergence.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which expressions represent electric Gauss law and the absence of magnetic monopole sources?", "kind": "definition", "id": "gauss-law-identification-q01" }, { "text": "Does the electric source denote total charge or free charge, and is the selected electric field variable consistent with that choice?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "gauss-law-identification-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "induction-and-current", "name": "Induction and current", "description": "Identifies the two curl laws and their time-dependent coupling.", "findings": [ { "id": "dynamic-coupling-completeness", "name": "Dynamic coupling completeness", "description": "Record Faraday induction and the Ampère-Maxwell law, including whether displacement current or other time-dependent terms have been removed.", "questions": [ { "text": "How are magnetic induction, electric current and the displacement-current term represented?", "kind": "definition", "id": "dynamic-coupling-completeness-q01" }, { "text": "If a time-dependent term is absent, what approximation or restricted regime justifies its removal?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "dynamic-coupling-completeness-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "representations-and-conventions", "name": "Representations and conventions", "description": "Makes alternative expressions comparable without losing mathematical or physical meaning.", "rationale": "Equivalent equations can look different because of units, geometry, notation or sign conventions.", "layers": [ { "id": "local-and-integral-forms", "name": "Local and integral forms", "description": "Relates pointwise equations to flux and circulation statements.", "findings": [ { "id": "form-conversion-conditions", "name": "Form conversion conditions", "description": "Record the regularity, domain and surface-motion assumptions needed when converting differential and integral forms.", "questions": [ { "text": "Are the fields smooth, piecewise smooth or distributional, and how does the formulation handle interfaces or singular sources?", "kind": "definition", "id": "form-conversion-conditions-q01" }, { "text": "Are integration surfaces and contours fixed or moving, and what transport terms are required when differentiating their fluxes?", "kind": "action", "id": "form-conversion-conditions-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "units-and-relativistic-notation", "name": "Units and relativistic notation", "description": "Records constants, orientations and spacetime conventions that control interpretation.", "findings": [ { "id": "convention-preserving-translation", "name": "Convention-preserving translation", "description": "Make the chosen unit system and any tensor, dual, coordinate or harmonic-time conventions explicit before comparing formulations.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which unit system, field definitions and orientation conventions determine the constants and signs?", "kind": "definition", "id": "convention-preserving-translation-q01" }, { "text": "For a relativistic or frequency-domain presentation, which metric, tensor-component or time-dependence conventions must a translation preserve?", "kind": "action", "id": "convention-preserving-translation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "sources-and-material-closure", "name": "Sources and material closure", "description": "Separates source accounting from the additional physical relations needed to close an application.", "rationale": "The same field laws can be misapplied when source definitions or material assumptions are left implicit.", "layers": [ { "id": "microscopic-and-macroscopic-accounting", "name": "Microscopic and macroscopic accounting", "description": "Tracks the meaning of charge, current, polarization and magnetization.", "findings": [ { "id": "source-partition-consistency", "name": "Source partition consistency", "description": "Record whether charge and current are total or partitioned into free and bound contributions, and how that partition enters D and H.", "questions": [ { "text": "What averaging and free-versus-bound source definitions support the selected macroscopic description?", "kind": "definition", "id": "source-partition-consistency-q01" }, { "text": "Are polarization or magnetization effects counted both in explicit sources and in constitutive relations?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "source-partition-consistency-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "response-and-source-dynamics", "name": "Response and source dynamics", "description": "Identifies constitutive response and any coupled equations governing unknown sources.", "findings": [ { "id": "closure-requirements", "name": "Closure requirements", "description": "Record how material response relates the field variables and whether source motion or transport must be solved alongside the fields.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which constitutive relations apply, and do they include anisotropy, dispersion, nonlinearity or spatially nonlocal response?", "kind": "definition", "id": "closure-requirements-q01" }, { "text": "Are charge and current prescribed, or which additional transport, motion or continuity equations are required to determine them?", "kind": "action", "id": "closure-requirements-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "field-problem-specification", "name": "Field problem specification", "description": "Determines whether equations, domain and supplied data define an actionable electromagnetic problem.", "rationale": "Maxwell's equations alone do not select a particular solution.", "layers": [ { "id": "initial-data-and-constraints", "name": "Initial data and constraints", "description": "Records the initial fields and their compatibility with source and divergence constraints.", "findings": [ { "id": "constraint-compatible-initialization", "name": "Constraint-compatible initialization", "description": "Assess whether initial data satisfy the relevant Gauss laws and whether source evolution respects charge continuity.", "questions": [ { "text": "Do the initial electric and magnetic fields satisfy the divergence constraints for the supplied sources?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "constraint-compatible-initialization-q01" }, { "text": "Does the prescribed or computed source evolution satisfy charge continuity consistently with the field equations?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "constraint-compatible-initialization-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "interfaces-and-domain-boundaries", "name": "Interfaces and domain boundaries", "description": "Distinguishes physical interface conditions from external-domain and computational boundary choices.", "findings": [ { "id": "boundary-condition-adequacy", "name": "Boundary condition adequacy", "description": "Record interface jumps, surface sources, conductor idealizations and radiation or incoming-field conditions relevant to the problem.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which field components are constrained at each interface, and which surface charges or currents support the specified jumps?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "boundary-condition-adequacy-q01" }, { "text": "What external boundary, radiation or incoming-field conditions are required, and are the supplied conditions compatible with the chosen problem formulation?", "kind": "action", "id": "boundary-condition-adequacy-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "validity-and-solution-assessment", "name": "Validity and solution assessment", "description": "Evaluates reductions, derived predictions and evidence that a solution meets the intended electromagnetic model.", "rationale": "A formally recognizable equation set may still be inappropriate for an application or inadequately satisfied by a proposed solution.", "layers": [ { "id": "regimes-and-reductions", "name": "Regimes and reductions", "description": "Records the scale arguments and physical assumptions behind approximations.", "findings": [ { "id": "approximation-justification", "name": "Approximation justification", "description": "Distinguish full time-dependent behavior from static or quasistatic reductions and document where the selected classical description becomes insufficient.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which length, time, frequency and material-response scales justify the retained and neglected terms?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "approximation-justification-q01" }, { "text": "What features of the intended application require a different material description, quantum treatment or other extension beyond this formulation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "approximation-justification-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "derived-results-and-verification", "name": "Derived results and verification", "description": "Checks derived equations and candidate solutions against the parent field system.", "findings": [ { "id": "solution-consistency-evidence", "name": "Solution consistency evidence", "description": "Assess field-equation residuals, constraints, boundary satisfaction and the applicable energy balance; retain assumptions when deriving wave or potential formulations.", "questions": [ { "text": "What residuals, boundary checks and applicable energy-balance checks demonstrate that the proposed solution satisfies the specified problem?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "solution-consistency-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "If solving through wave equations or potentials, which source assumptions, divergence constraints and gauge conditions must be retained or checked?", "kind": "action", "id": "solution-consistency-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This entry covers the physical laws in their modern sense, not a historical publication; the supplied domain classification should be checked.", "The modern four-equation vector presentation should not be identified without qualification with Maxwell's original notation and equation count.", "These are recalled distinctions, not researched findings; no sources or identifiers have been verified." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Maxwell's equations this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Microscopic formulation in terms of electric and magnetic fields and total charge and current", "Macroscopic formulation using electric displacement, magnetic field strength, and free charge and current", "Differential formulation", "Integral formulation", "Relativistically covariant tensor formulation" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of Maxwell's equations this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Designing antennas, waveguides, and radio communication systems", "Calculating electromagnetic fields in motors, generators, and transformers", "Modelling light propagation, diffraction, and optical devices", "Simulating electromagnetic compatibility and interference", "Modelling electromagnetic fields in medical imaging equipment" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Maxwell's equations this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Macroscopic problems require appropriate material constitutive relations; the equations alone do not specify a material's response.", "Incorrect boundary conditions or inconsistent initial fields can produce invalid solutions.", "Mixing SI and Gaussian unit conventions introduces incorrect factors and physical dimensions.", "Numerical approximations can introduce instability, artificial dispersion, or violations of the divergence constraints.", "Classical Maxwell theory alone does not describe quantum phenomena such as discrete photon detection or spontaneous emission." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Maxwell's equations this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Lorentz force law", "difference": "It specifies the force electromagnetic fields exert on a charge; Maxwell's equations specify the fields' relationships to sources and their evolution." }, { "name": "Electromagnetic wave equation", "difference": "It is derived from Maxwell's equations under specified assumptions and does not independently express all their source and constraint relations." }, { "name": "Quantum electrodynamics", "difference": "It is a quantum theory of electromagnetic interactions, whereas Maxwell's equations describe classical electromagnetic fields." }, { "name": "Constitutive relations", "difference": "They describe material responses, such as polarization and magnetization, needed to close macroscopic electromagnetic models." }, { "name": "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field", "difference": "It is a historical publication by Maxwell; Maxwell's equations denotes the physical laws rather than a particular paper, edition, or copy." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Maxwell's equations this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does an existing Vercy world model already own Maxwell's equations or an equivalent concept, requiring this registry entry to link to it?", "Which authoritative references should anchor each formulation, convention and applicability claim in the researched publication?", "Should the first publication cover curved-spacetime formulations explicitly, or link them to a neighbouring relativistic field-theory model?", "How should the catalogue divide ownership of constitutive response and free-versus-bound source conventions between this model and material models?", "Which application-specific error tolerances and scale criteria should govern acceptance of quasistatic reductions and numerical solutions?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 15, "questions": 25 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "work, medium or creative form", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a Maxwell's equations, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to recognize formulations of Maxwell's equations, assess their physical and mathematical applicability, and determine what additional information is needed to use them reliably.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted", "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Described in 89 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a Maxwell's equations, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says", "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "What is seen is a copy or a performance, not the work. Recognising the work means recognising the content through whatever is carrying it." ], "relatedModels": [], "standing": "Described in 89 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one Maxwell's equations from another, and a Maxwell's equations from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a Maxwell's equations, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a Maxwell's equations, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a Maxwell's equations is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a Maxwell's equations, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a Maxwell's equations, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a Maxwell's equations is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a Maxwell's equations sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a Maxwell's equations, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a Maxwell's equations, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a Maxwell's equations is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a Maxwell's equations from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a Maxwell's equations, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a Maxwell's equations, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a Maxwell's equations is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a Maxwell's equations passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a Maxwell's equations between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a Maxwell's equations, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a Maxwell's equations, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a Maxwell's equations is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a Maxwell's equations, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a Maxwell's equations is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a Maxwell's equations, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a Maxwell's equations, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a Maxwell's equations is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a Maxwell's equations says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a Maxwell's equations contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a Maxwell's equations, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a Maxwell's equations, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a Maxwell's equations is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a Maxwell's equations and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a Maxwell's equations, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a Maxwell's equations, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a Maxwell's equations is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "work-and-manifestation", "name": "Work, version and copy", "description": "Which level of Maxwell's equations a statement is about.", "rationale": "The work, the edition, the file and the copy in hand are four things; rights and content attach to different ones.", "layers": [ { "id": "levels", "name": "Levels of the thing", "description": "Work, expression, manifestation and item, in plain terms.", "findings": [ { "id": "level-rules", "name": "What belongs at each level", "description": "Which facts hold for the work and which only for one copy.", "questions": [ { "id": "level-rules-q01", "text": "For Maxwell's equations, which facts belong to the work itself, which to a version, and which to a single copy?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "level-rules-q02", "text": "What identifier exists at each level, and which one is being cited?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "versions", "name": "Versions, editions and variants", "description": "How versions differ and which is canonical to whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "version-record", "name": "Versions and canonicity", "description": "Differences that matter and who calls one authoritative.", "questions": [ { "id": "version-record-q01", "text": "Which versions or editions of Maxwell's equations exist, and how do they differ substantively?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "version-record-q02", "text": "Who treats which version as authoritative, and for what purpose?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "authorship-and-rights", "name": "Authorship, rights and permitted use", "description": "Who made Maxwell's equations and what may be done with it.", "rationale": "Rights are jurisdictional, time-limited and attached to a level, and an agent that ignores that will copy what it may not.", "layers": [ { "id": "authorship", "name": "Authorship and contribution", "description": "Who contributed what, and in what capacity.", "findings": [ { "id": "contribution-record", "name": "Contributors and roles", "description": "The people and bodies behind it, with their roles.", "questions": [ { "id": "contribution-record-q01", "text": "Who authored or contributed to Maxwell's equations, in what roles, and how is that attested?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "contribution-record-q02", "text": "Where authorship is disputed or anonymous, what is recorded instead?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "rights", "name": "Rights and permissions", "description": "Which rights subsist, where, until when, and what they permit.", "findings": [ { "id": "rights-record", "name": "Rights, term and permitted acts", "description": "The regime in force and what it allows.", "questions": [ { "id": "rights-record-q01", "text": "What rights subsist in Maxwell's equations, in which jurisdictions, and until when?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "rights-record-q02", "text": "Which acts are permitted without further permission, and which must an agent refuse?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a Maxwell's equations came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a Maxwell's equations and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a Maxwell's equations, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a Maxwell's equations, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a Maxwell's equations is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a Maxwell's equations is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a Maxwell's equations, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a Maxwell's equations, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a Maxwell's equations is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }