← Back to catalogue
Published

tardigrade

vr.tr.tardigrade · thing-q5194

Enable an AI agent to recognise a tardigrade, assess its observed condition without confusing inactivity with death, and choose evidence-supported observation, care or experimental actions.

Thing Registry Physical world and living systems PHY.LIV

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

6 bundles · 11 layers · 18 findings · 28 questions

Recognition and identification Establish that the observed organism is a tardigrade and bound the precision of its identification.

Tardigrade recognition

Assess the whole-body evidence needed to distinguish the specimen from lookalikes.

Diagnostic body plan

Record visible limb arrangement, body form and competing identifications without treating obscured anatomy as absent.

  1. Which resolved anatomical features support identification as a tardigrade rather than a rotifer, nematode or mite? definition
  2. Does contraction, orientation or image resolution prevent a reliable distinction? boundary

Taxonomic resolution

Connect the assigned taxon to diagnostic evidence and an identification method.

Supported taxon assignment

Record which terminal structures, cuticle features, mouth structures or other evidence justify the identification.

  1. Which identification reference or specialist assessment was used, and which specimen features matched it? provenance
  2. What is the finest defensible taxonomic assignment, and what missing evidence prevents a narrower one? boundary
Body function and life stage Describe the animal's physical condition, functional observations and developmental context.

Integrity and locomotion

Observe body dimensions, limb function and visible damage.

Physical condition

Tie measurements and locomotor observations to posture and preparation conditions.

  1. What are the calibrated body dimensions and posture, and is movement coordinated across the visible limbs? measurement
  2. Could apparent flattening, impaired movement or injury have resulted from mounting pressure or transfer? provenance

Development and moulting

Assess life stage and evidence of a moult.

Developmental context

Separate supported stage assignments and moulting observations from size-based guesses.

  1. What observations support the assigned life stage or a current or recent moult? definition
  2. Is an apparent empty body an exuvium, a dead animal or unresolved material, and what evidence distinguishes them? boundary
Hydration, inactivity and recovery Track moisture context, contraction, inactivity and subsequent signs of life.

Inactivity assessment

Distinguish direct observations from interpretations of physiological state.

Inactive-state evidence

Record posture and observation conditions before assigning a dormancy or viability interpretation.

  1. During what observation interval and moisture and temperature conditions was no movement detected? measurement
  2. What evidence supports suspected dormancy, and which alternatives such as moulting, injury or death remain unresolved? boundary

Rehydration and follow-up

Record justified recovery procedures and time-resolved outcomes.

Recovery evidence

Distinguish initial movement from sustained functional recovery and keep negative observations bounded by the monitoring period.

  1. Which rehydration medium, temperature, timing and handling procedure are supported for this specimen's identified taxon or habitat? action
  2. When did movement, coordinated locomotion or feeding resume, and how long was subsequent function observed? measurement
Habitat, feeding and reproduction Connect the individual to its source environment and observed resource and reproductive relationships.

Microhabitat and food

Preserve source conditions and assess feeding opportunities.

Maintenance context

Link habitat evidence and observed feeding to proposed holding conditions.

  1. From which substrate or water sample was the animal recovered, and what environmental conditions were measured there? provenance
  2. What evidence supports the proposed holding medium and food, and has ingestion actually been observed? action

Reproductive associations

Record reproductive events and relationships to eggs or shed cuticle.

Egg and parent association

Maintain the distinction between observed production and simple spatial association.

  1. Was egg production directly observed, or were eggs merely found nearby or within associated shed cuticle? provenance
  2. Which reproductive conclusions can be supported for this individual, and which require observations beyond egg presence? boundary
Handling, exposure and action limits Assess proposed manipulations and preserve the context needed to interpret their consequences.

Observation and transfer

Choose preparation and transfer methods appropriate to the intended observation and specimen use.

Preparation consequences

Record whether an observation requires a live, recoverable animal or a permanently prepared specimen.

  1. Must the animal remain viable after observation, and which preparation method supports that requirement? action
  2. What mounting medium, confinement, illumination and transfer events could affect its subsequent condition? provenance

Stress exposure interpretation

Evaluate exposure evidence at the level of taxon, state, intensity, duration and outcome.

Bounded tolerance evidence

Require a documented match between relevant evidence and the proposed intervention, with explicit outcome criteria.

  1. Does the evidence for the proposed exposure match this animal's taxon, life stage, hydration state and exposure duration? boundary
  2. Which exposure parameters, stopping criteria and follow-up observations will distinguish transient movement from sustained recovery? action
Evidence and external alignment What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.

Reported evidence

Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.

Kinds and varieties

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of tardigrade this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Identifiers and schemes

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of tardigrade this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Standards and regulation

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of tardigrade this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Real-world use

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of tardigrade this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Typical measurements

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of tardigrade this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Failure modes and hazards

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of tardigrade this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Regional variation

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of tardigrade this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of tardigrade this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Classifiers Filled

Family
Thing Registry
Category
Physical world and living systems
Entry kind
thing
Plane
PHY
Domain
PHY.LIV

What it is Filled

A phylum (Tardigrada) of microscopic panarthropod ecdysozoans with a compact, five-region body, four pairs of unjointed lobopodous legs ending in claws or adhesive digits, a piercing-sucking buccal apparatus with paired stylets, and, in many limno-terrestrial species, reversible cryptobiosis (notably the anhydrobiotic tun).

In scope

  • Specimen-level identification and evidence distinguishing tardigrades from similar microscopic animals
  • Body integrity, locomotion, feeding and other observable signs of condition
  • Life stage, reproductive observations and relationships to associated eggs
  • Hydration, inactivity, suspected dormancy and recovery observations
  • Immediate habitat conditions, handling history and suitability for proposed actions

Out of scope

  • Taxonomic nomenclature and authoritative revision of Tardigrada
  • Moss, lichen, sediment or other substrate as an ecosystem or physical sample
  • Population abundance, community composition and ecosystem function
  • Microscope, imaging system and environmental chamber operation
  • Experimental protocol governance and laboratory collection management
  • Independent development and condition of an egg or embryo

Why it exists Filled

Enable an AI agent to recognise a tardigrade, assess its observed condition without confusing inactivity with death, and choose evidence-supported observation, care or experimental actions.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • In a sufficiently resolved specimen, look for a compact body with four pairs of short, unjointed limbs; distinguish this arrangement from the unsegmented, limbless outline of a nematode.
  • Resolve the limbs rather than relying on apparent leg count: distinguish tardigrade limb form and body organisation from those of a mite.
  • Check for rotifer-like anterior ciliation and a posterior foot when an indistinct specimen could be a rotifer; apparent crawling alone is insufficient for identification.
  • Where visible, combine terminal claw or digit configuration with the buccopharyngeal apparatus and cuticle features; treat an image lacking these details as limited identification evidence.
  • Do not identify a contracted particle as a tardigrade solely because it resembles a tun; require anatomical evidence, continuity from an identified animal or documented recovery.

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Overstate tardigrade survival abilities as invulnerability or proof of claims they do not support.
  • Release samples containing non-native organisms into new environments, including beyond Earth.
  • Collect from protected habitats without permission.

Only with a human decision

  • Sending living organisms on space missions or releasing them in new places.

May

  • Describe tardigrades, their biology and habitats, citing scientific sources.
  • Collect moss or water samples for observation where collecting is permitted.

Moral aspects Filled

  • Even microscopic animals raise questions of planetary protection when carried off Earth.
  • Popular myths about tardigrades can mislead students.

Who is affected

  • Researchers
  • Students
  • Ecosystems

Owners Filled

Steward

Nobody: wild animals.

Master systems

  • Taxonomic and species databases

Links to other meta-models Filled

parent

  • Q16977725 - registry parent class
  • Q43806 - registry parent class

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Vercy registry: vr.tr.tardigrade
  • Wikidata: Q5194 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5194)

Direct properties required Filled

  • Identification resolution: suspected tardigrade | confirmed tardigrade | higher taxon assigned | species assigned; confidence and evidence required
  • Body length: µm, with posture, endpoint definition and calibration
  • Diagnostic anatomy visibility: For limbs, terminal structures, mouth apparatus and cuticle: resolved | partly resolved | not resolved
  • Body integrity: apparently intact | visibly injured | deformed | obscured | indeterminate
  • Observed activity: locomoting | appendage movement only | feeding observed | no movement observed | not assessed; timestamp and observation duration
  • Hydration and posture: External moisture context plus extended | contracted | tun-like | indeterminate posture
  • Viability assessment: evidence of life observed | viability unresolved | death supported by stated assessment
  • Life stage and moulting condition: juvenile | adult | unresolved; moulting evidence recorded separately
  • Immediate environmental conditions: Temperature in °C; salinity, pH and moisture measurements where relevant, with methods and timestamps
  • Source habitat: Link to collection sample, substrate or culture, including aquatic or terrestrial context
  • Exposure history: Ordered events recording agent or stressor, intensity, duration, hydration context and recovery observations
  • Associated eggs or exuviae: Observed association | directly observed production | uncertain association; linked evidence

Recognition required Filled

  • Under magnification, the body is compact and bears four pairs of short, unjointed legs.
  • The final pair of legs points toward the rear, unlike the preceding pairs.
  • The feet bear claws or adhesive digits that can be examined with suitable microscopy.
  • Paired piercing stylets in the feeding apparatus provide an additional microscopic identification cue.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Locate, image and measure the specimen using preparation conditions that preserve the observations needed.
  • Assign a provisional identification and request additional views or specialist review when diagnostic anatomy is unresolved.
  • Transfer or maintain the specimen under conditions supported for its taxon and source habitat.
  • Monitor inactivity and, where justified, apply a documented rehydration procedure while tracking recovery.
  • Offer a supported food source and record feeding evidence rather than assuming suitability.
  • Evaluate a proposed exposure against specimen-specific evidence and record its conditions and outcome.

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • Mistaking a dormant animal for a dead one can lead to specimen loss and incorrect experimental conclusions.
  • Assuming that all species tolerate extreme conditions can cause avoidable mortality during observation or research.
  • Transporting untreated habitat material can introduce associated organisms into other cultures or environments.

Standards and interfaces required Filled

  • The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, issued by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, governs the scientific naming of tardigrade species and genera.

Context of use required Filled

  • Tardigrades are encountered in freshwater, marine sediments and moist terrestrial microhabitats such as mosses and lichens.
  • They are studied in microscopy, biodiversity research and investigations of dormancy and environmental stress tolerance.
  • Responses to drying and other stresses vary by species and life stage.

Sources Filled

  1. Phylum Tardigrada, in Thorp and Covich's Freshwater Invertebrates - Body plan, classes, habitats, and the cryptobiosis account used in the definition and kinds
  2. Actual checklist of Tardigrada species (continuously updated taxonomic list) - Described-species scale and the living class/family practice (Heterotardigrada, Eutardigrada; Mesotardigrada doubtful)
  3. Tardigrades survive exposure to space in low Earth orbit - Documented space-exposure use and the limits of tun survival under vacuum and radiation
  4. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 4th edition - That tardigrade scientific names are governed by ICZN, not by a separate product or ISO code
  5. NCBI Taxonomy Browser: Tardigrada (taxon 42241) - NCBI Taxonomy identifier for the phylum
  6. Tardigrade - Vernacular names, Wikidata linkage, and a cross-check of size, habitat and popular claims versus specialist limits
  7. Wikidata item Q5194: tardigrade - identity and sense of the item

Open questions

  • Which current identification references and diagnostic character sets should govern assignments across the tardigrade groups encountered in this registry?
  • What evidence is sufficient to distinguish tun-like contraction from a supported cryptobiotic-state assessment without destructive testing?
  • Which taxon-specific rehydration procedures and observation periods justify interpreting continued inactivity as evidence of death?
  • Which maintenance media, environmental ranges and foods are supported for specimens whose identification remains above species level?
  • Which validated endpoints and follow-up durations should distinguish survival, sustained functional recovery and retained reproductive capacity after an exposure?

Machine files

Provenance

thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed

Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q5194/spec.json