← Back to catalogue
Published

Long March 2A

vr.tr.long-march-2a · thing-q53700

Enable an AI agent to identify Long March 2A records, distinguish their historical configuration from neighbouring launch vehicles, and assess claims about capability, flight outcomes and surviving hardware.

Thing Registry Physical world and living systems PHY.OBJ

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

6 bundles · 11 layers · 17 findings · 27 questions

Designation and lineage Resolve what the registry name Long March 2A denotes in historical records.

Historical names

Preserve original terminology and distinguish it from later catalogue labels.

CZ-2A name boundary

CNSA describes the early vehicle as CZ-2 and assigns four launches to that designation; this does not independently resolve the registry's CZ-2A boundary. [CNSA: Long March 2](https://www.cnsa.gov.cn/n6758824/n6759008/n6759011/c6794032/content.html)

  1. Does CZ-2A denote a contemporary formal variant, a modification baseline or a retrospective catalogue label? definition
  2. Which original records connect the name CZ-2A to specific configurations and vehicle serials? provenance

Related vehicle boundaries

Locate this type within its technical lineage without merging neighbouring types.

Variant transition evidence

Require documented modifications and naming decisions before assigning predecessor or successor relationships.

  1. Which documented changes separate the original CZ-2, the vehicle called CZ-2A and CZ-2C? boundary
  2. Which lineage statements are supported by manufacturer records rather than inferred from shared components? provenance
Vehicle configuration Establish the physical baseline attributable to Long March 2A.

Stages and propulsion

Record the propulsion arrangement and its evidential connection to this designation.

Propulsion baseline

CNSA describes the Long March 2 series as using two-stage architecture and nitrogen tetroxide with unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine; exact CZ-2A engine revisions still require configuration-specific evidence. [CNSA: Long March launch-vehicle family](https://www.cnsa.gov.cn/n6758968/n6758973/c6771770/content.html)

  1. Which stage arrangement and engine revisions are documented for vehicles explicitly identified as CZ-2A? provenance
  2. Which propellant, thrust and burn-duration values belong to each stage, and under what reference conditions? measurement

Geometry and mass

Define dimensions and mass values with their configuration boundaries.

Comparable physical specifications

Keep overall vehicle dimensions and liftoff mass separate from stage-only measurements and later variant data.

  1. What are the verified length, core diameter and liftoff mass for the attributed CZ-2A configuration? measurement
  2. Do the reported measurements include the payload, adapter, fairing and loaded consumables? boundary
Payload and orbit Connect launch capability to recoverable-satellite missions and their interface requirements.

Historical mission role

Use identified satellite missions as evidence while preserving launcher-name uncertainty.

Recoverable-satellite association

CNSA records a Long March 2 launch from Jiuquan on 26 November 1975 placing China's first recoverable remote-sensing satellite into its intended orbit; the source uses Long March 2 rather than settling the CZ-2A designation. [CNSA: 1975 launch anniversary](https://www.cnsa.gov.cn/n6758968/n6758972/c6798636/content.html)

  1. Which recoverable-satellite missions can be assigned specifically to CZ-2A under the adopted naming boundary? provenance
  2. Where does launcher delivery end and the satellite's independent orbital and recovery mission begin? boundary

Capacity and accommodation

Express capability as a payload-orbit-interface combination.

Qualified payload envelope

Distinguish demonstrated payload delivery from rated capacity and account for adapter and fairing constraints.

  1. What payload mass is supported at a specified orbit and inclination, and is it demonstrated or calculated? measurement
  2. What evidence establishes the CZ-2A fairing envelope, adapter interface and separation compatibility for a proposed historical payload? action
Control and assurance Capture evidence needed to understand flight control, separation and launch readiness.

Guidance and sequencing

Identify the control chain and event sequence at a functional level.

Control-chain evidence

Associate guidance sensors, electrical power, control links and separation functions with a documented vehicle baseline.

  1. Which guidance, attitude-control and electrical-power arrangements are established for CZ-2A? provenance
  2. Which documented event confirmations distinguish stage separation, upper-stage operation and payload release? definition

Historical acceptance

Locate the actual acceptance and ground-support requirements applicable to this vehicle.

Readiness and hazard evidence

Require period-specific evidence for acceptance tests, ground interfaces and safety provisions rather than assigning modern certification marks.

  1. Which organizations issued the applicable CZ-2A acceptance requirements, and what surviving documents identify their scope? provenance
  2. What documented evidence would support a claim that a surviving article has been drained, depressurized and rendered inert? action
Flight record and legacy Make historical outcomes and surviving-object claims auditable.

Outcome accounting

Build statistics from individually attributed launches and defined outcome criteria.

Attribution-sensitive flight record

Keep launch success, orbital insertion and satellite recovery separate, and retain alternative variant assignments where evidence conflicts.

  1. Does the adopted CZ-2A boundary include the November 1974 launch attempt, and which evidence justifies that decision? boundary
  2. For each included flight, what evidence establishes its date, vehicle identity and launcher outcome independently of payload recovery? provenance

Retirement and survivors

Separate the end of the vehicle programme from the condition of any remaining hardware.

Legacy object authentication

Distinguish original flight or test hardware, composite exhibits and replicas before transferring type-level properties to a physical object.

  1. Which records establish the final CZ-2A production and flight dates under the adopted designation boundary? provenance
  2. What serial, construction or custody evidence is required to classify an exhibit as authentic CZ-2A hardware? action
Evidence and external alignment What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.

Reported evidence

Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.

Check these first

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Long March 2A this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Identifiers and schemes

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Long March 2A this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Real-world use

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Long March 2A this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Typical measurements

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of Long March 2A this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Failure modes and hazards

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Long March 2A this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Regional variation

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Long March 2A this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Long March 2A this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Classifiers Filled

Family
Thing Registry
Category
Physical world and living systems
Entry kind
thing
Plane
PHY
Domain
PHY.OBJ

What it is Filled

Long March 2A is an early Chinese two-stage expendable orbital launch vehicle in the Long March 2 family, developed from the DF-5 ballistic missile and used to launch recoverable reconnaissance satellites into low Earth orbit.

In scope

  • Long March 2A designation, aliases and configuration attribution
  • Stage architecture, propulsion and vehicle dimensions tied to the attributed configuration
  • Payload accommodation and orbit-dependent launch capability
  • Guidance, separation and ground-interface assurance requirements
  • Flight attribution, retirement evidence and identification of surviving examples

Out of scope

  • The entire Long March launch-vehicle family
  • Separate Long March 2C, 2E and 2F vehicle models
  • DF-5 missile capabilities and military employment
  • Recoverable satellite imaging, re-entry and recovery systems
  • Jiuquan launch-centre infrastructure and operations as independent subjects
  • Individual launch events and physical vehicle inventories, except as linked evidence

Why it exists Filled

Enable an AI agent to identify Long March 2A records, distinguish their historical configuration from neighbouring launch vehicles, and assess claims about capability, flight outcomes and surviving hardware.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • Require documentary attribution to Long March 2A, Chang Zheng 2A, CZ-2A or LM-2A; a record saying only Long March 2 does not settle the variant.
  • Check stage arrangement, engine revision and dated drawings together when distinguishing an early CZ-2 configuration from one labelled CZ-2A.
  • Distinguish CZ-2A from CZ-2C through configuration and production evidence; shared family names or similar silhouettes are insufficient.
  • Treat a recoverable-satellite launch from Jiuquan as contextual evidence, not unique identification of the launcher variant.
  • Separate the expendable launch vehicle from its recoverable payload; payload recovery does not establish launcher reusability.

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Assist in developing or improving ballistic missiles.
  • Present uncertain launch claims as fact.
  • Downplay harm to people from falling stages or failed launches.

Only with a human decision

  • Publishing analysis that ties civil launch technology to weapons programmes.

May

  • Identify launches and vehicles of this type from official records.
  • Describe its history and relation to its missile ancestor from reliable sources.
  • Report launch outcomes, including failures, accurately.

Moral aspects Filled

  • Launches from inland sites drop spent stages near communities.
  • Launch technology and missile technology overlap, raising security concerns.

Who is affected

  • People living under flight paths
  • Launch crews
  • Satellite operators

Owners Filled

Steward

The state space programme that operated it.

Master systems

  • United Nations Register of Objects Launched into Outer Space

Links to other meta-models Filled

parent

  • Q174706 - registry parent class

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Vercy registry: vr.tr.long-march-2a
  • Wikidata: Q53700 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q53700)

Direct properties required Filled

  • Designation attribution: Explicit CZ-2A attribution; CZ-2 attribution only; conflicting attribution; unresolved
  • Configuration lineage: Documented predecessor, modification baseline and successor, with source and date
  • Stage and engine configuration: Stage count, engine designations and revisions, auxiliary propulsion and booster presence
  • Propellant assignment: Fuel and oxidizer identity by stage; exact configuration attribution required
  • Vehicle envelope: Length and diameter in m; specify fairing, adapter and measurement boundaries
  • Mass accounting: kg; distinguish liftoff, dry, propellant and payload mass
  • Payload capability: kg at stated perigee and apogee in km and inclination in degrees
  • Flight attribution and outcome: Launch record, assigned variant, payload, insertion outcome and attribution confidence
  • Lifecycle and specimen condition: Type: development, operational, retired or unresolved; specimen: flight article, test article, replica or unidentified

Recognition required Filled

  • Two-stage rocket of the early Long March 2 family.
  • Launch records and mission names settle a particular flight.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Classify a document or object as CZ-2A, another variant or unresolved using explicit evidence.
  • Compare competing specifications while preserving their configuration and measurement assumptions.
  • Assess a historical payload-capability claim against its orbit and interface requirements.
  • Reconcile launch lists without silently assigning all early CZ-2 flights to CZ-2A.
  • Identify missing provenance or condition evidence before describing a surviving article as authentic, inert or suitable for handling.

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • Toxic hypergolic propellants harm people near launch and impact sites.
  • Launch failure and falling debris.
  • Spent stages landing near inhabited areas.

Standards and interfaces required Filled

  • Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space (Outer Space Treaty), United Nations.
  • Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space, United Nations.

Context of use required Filled

  • This early Chinese orbital launch vehicle was used to place recoverable reconnaissance satellites into low Earth orbit.
  • It is encountered today chiefly in historical launch records, technical histories and accounts of Chinese launch vehicle development.
  • Its designation and configuration matter when distinguishing individual missions from those flown by related vehicles.

Sources Filled

  1. Wikidata item Q53700: Long March 2A - identity and sense of the item
  2. Wikipedia: Long March 2A - general description of the item

Open questions

  • Was CZ-2A a formal contemporary designation, and does this registry entry include the original CZ-2 flight attempt of November 1974?
  • Which primary records establish the exact engine revisions, dimensions and mass breakdown without importing CZ-2C specifications?
  • What reference orbit, payload accounting and interface limits support the capacity figures attributed to CZ-2A?
  • Which original failure-investigation and acceptance documents substantiate control-system changes and applicable safety requirements?
  • What evidence establishes retirement dates and the existence, authenticity and inert condition of surviving CZ-2A hardware?

Machine files

Provenance

thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed

Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q53700/spec.json