public policy
Let an agent handle public policies by domain, content, evidence, process and debate, citing official documents and presenting positions neutrally.
Research draft, second pass
A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.
written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify
Researched by: Claude
Purpose and description
Let an agent handle public policies by domain, content, evidence, process and debate, citing official documents and presenting positions neutrally.
A course of action, law, regulation or funding priority adopted by a government or public body to address public issues, in domains such as health, education, economy, environment and defence; developed through agenda-setting, formulation, implementation and evaluation.
What it is for: Governing and addressing public problems.
It can be find official policy documents; summarise policy content accurately; find evaluations and evidence; present debates with attribution.
Distinguishing features
Adopted by public bodies
Follows a policy cycle
Evidence and values both matter
Contested
What it looks like
Not physical; laws, strategies, white papers and programmes.
How it is recognised
Policy papers and strategies
Policy domains
Insurance or company policies are different senses
Related models
is a kind of - category
is made by - actor
is implemented through - instruments
is evaluated by - process
In practice
Families and kinds
health policy
economic and fiscal policy
education policy
environmental policy
social policy
Standards and regulation
Legislative procedures
Consultation and impact assessment requirements
Failure modes and hazards
Partisan framing
Outdated policy information
Confusing proposals with enacted policy
Also called
+135
Where this came from
wikidata · CC0 1.0
Drafted structure
Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.
Policy Which policy.
Official documents identify.
Identity
Name and status.
Identity
Policy identity.
- Which policy is meant, and is it proposed, enacted or repealed? provenance
- Which body adopted it? provenance
Content
Provisions.
Content
Content.
- What does the policy actually provide, according to the official text? provenance
- When does it take effect? provenance
Evidence Evaluation.
Evidence informs policy.
Evaluation
Results.
Evaluation
Evaluation.
- What do independent evaluations find? provenance
- How strong is the evidence? boundary
Impact
Assessment.
Impact
Impact assessment.
- What impacts were assessed before adoption? provenance
- Who is affected? definition
Process Participation.
Citizens can take part.
Consultation
Having a say.
Consultation
Consultation.
- Is there an open consultation, and how can people respond? action
- What is the deadline? provenance
Cycle
Stages.
Cycle
Policy cycle.
- At which stage of the policy cycle is it? definition
- What happens next? provenance
Debate Positions.
Neutrality is essential.
Positions
Supporters and critics.
Positions
Positions.
- What do supporters and critics argue, and who are they? provenance
- Are views attributed rather than endorsed? boundary
Senses
Disambiguation.
Senses
Other senses.
- Is an insurance or organisational policy meant? boundary
- Which entry fits? action
What the second pass must settle
- Should policy domains be separate entries?
- How should official documents be linked?
- How should evaluations be sourced?