Grass
Let an agent handle the Grass languages by classification, member languages, speakers and documentation, respectfully and with sourced data.
Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled
4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions
Classification Family.
Family
Ramu branch.
Family
Classification.
- How is the Grass group classified, according to which source? provenance
- Is the grouping disputed? boundary
Members
Languages.
Members
Member languages.
- Which languages belong to the group? provenance
- What are their ISO codes? provenance
Speakers Communities.
Numbers
Speaker counts.
Numbers
Speakers.
- How many speakers does each language have, according to which survey? measurement
- Are children learning them? boundary
Location
Villages.
Location
Location.
- Where are the languages spoken? provenance
- Which communities? provenance
Documentation Records.
Archives
Recordings and texts.
Archives
Archives.
- Which archives hold recordings or grammars? provenance
- Who created them? provenance
Rights
Consent.
Rights
Community rights.
- Did communities consent to use of materials? boundary
- Which protocols apply? provenance
Senses Disambiguation.
Plant
Grass.
Plant
Plant sense.
- Is the plant grass meant instead? boundary
- Which entry fits? action
Names
Autonyms.
Names
Names.
- What do speakers call their languages? provenance
- Is the family name used locally? boundary
Classifiers Filled
- Family
- Thing Registry
- Category
- Information and virtual systems
- Entry kind
- thing
- Plane
- INF
- Domain
- INF.MED
What it is Filled
The Grass languages, a small family of Papuan languages spoken in the Ramu River basin of Papua New Guinea, classified within the Ramu branch of the Ramu-Lower Sepik family.
Why it exists Filled
Let an agent handle the Grass languages by classification, member languages, speakers and documentation, respectfully and with sourced data.
Distinguishing features Filled
- Small Papuan language family
- Part of Ramu-Lower Sepik
- Few speakers per language
- Documentation is limited
What robots and AI may and may not do Filled
Must not
- Publish recordings or cultural knowledge of speakers without their consent.
- Present a disputed classification of the languages as settled.
- Describe the languages or their speakers in demeaning terms.
- Invent words or grammar for these languages.
Only with a human decision
- Making recordings or texts of a community publicly available.
May
- Describe the Grass languages, where they are spoken and their classification, with sources.
- Support documentation work led by or agreed with speaker communities.
Moral aspects Filled
- Small languages are endangered; documentation should serve their speakers.
- Communities have rights over their language materials and knowledge.
Who is affected
- Speaker communities in Papua New Guinea
- Linguists and archives
Owners Filled
Steward
The speaker communities who keep the languages; archives hold recordings under their terms.
Master systems
- Glottolog
- ISO 639-3 language code registry
Links to other meta-models Filled
parent
- Q3217471 - registry parent class
- Q3442808 - registry parent class
related
- Ramu-Lower Sepik languages - family
- Papua New Guinea - country
- language family - category
- grass (plant) - another sense
What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled
Identity and identifiers required Filled
- Vercy registry: vr.tr.grass-q5597487
- Wikidata: Q5597487 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5597487)
- Glottocode: Glottolog family id classification
Direct properties not applicable Not applicable
Not applicable
Plane INF: no invented physical properties.
Recognition optional Filled
- Classification: Ramu, Ramu-Lower Sepik
- Glottolog family entry
- Not related to the plant grass
- Spoken languages; the name is a scholarly label, not a description.
Capabilities and actions required Filled
- look up classification and member languages
- find documentation and archives
- support community language work
- use ISO 639-3 and Glottolog codes
Hazards and failure modes required Filled
- Treating the family label as a language name
- Unsourced speaker numbers
- Confusing with the plant
Standards and interfaces required Filled
- UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Article 13
Context of use required Filled
- A language family of communities in Papua New Guinea.
- member languages of the Grass group (per Glottolog and Ethnologue)
Sources Filled
- Wikidata item Q5597487: Grass - identity and sense of the item
- Wikipedia: Grass languages - general description of the item
Open questions
- Should member languages be separate entries?
- How should Glottolog ids be linked?
- How should community names be recorded?
Machine files
Provenance
thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed
Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q5597487/spec.json