{ "model": { "rank": 6698, "code": "thing-q598929", "model_id": "vr.tr.post-punk", "name": "post-punk", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise and qualify post-punk classifications, compare musical and scene evidence, and distinguish historical affiliation from later stylistic resemblance.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.MED", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q598929/", "tier": 2, "score": 59, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "no wave", "no wave revival", "Russian post-punk", "coldwave", "Windmill scene", "reggae punk", "dance-punk revival", "Neue Deutsche Todeskunst", "little band scene", "new musick", "crank wave", "dance-punk", "ethereal wave", "dark wave", "neoclassical dark wave" ], "aliasCount": 15, "merged": 15, "knownIn": 59, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q598929", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q598929", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T23:18:37Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 19.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08876-511c-7020-b02f-6288c3f0ba19\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: post-punk\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 007: 1001 regis", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 67, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08876-510b-7260-aff5-a572c6446627\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: post-punk\nRegistry id: vr.tr.post-punk\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nCont" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q598929", "registryId": "vr.tr.post-punk", "name": "post-punk", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q598929/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.post-punk", "name": "post-punk", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise and qualify post-punk classifications, compare musical and scene evidence, and distinguish historical affiliation from later stylistic resemblance.", "definition": "Post-punk is a heterogeneous musical movement that emerged in the late 1970s from punk rock, retaining its experimental and independent ethos while expanding its musical vocabulary through approaches drawn from art rock, electronic music, dub, funk and other traditions.", "scope_statement": "This model owns post-punk as a contested musical category and cultural formation, including its sonic practices, relationships to punk, scene histories, circulation and subsequent reinterpretations; it does not own individual works, recordings, performers or physical carriers.", "in_scope": [ "Definitions of post-punk and the contexts in which those definitions apply", "Musical practices that support or complicate post-punk attribution", "Historical scenes, affiliations and relationships to punk", "Critical, industry, audience and artist uses of the label", "Relationships to neighbouring genres and later revivals" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Complete biographies and membership histories of bands", "Composition, recording, release and physical-copy identity records", "Copyright ownership, licensing terms and recording identifiers", "The full histories of punk rock, new wave, gothic rock and experimental rock", "Playback equipment and audio-carrier specifications" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "A post-punk attribution should establish a relationship to punk's musical or cultural aftermath; merely appearing chronologically after punk is insufficient.", "Stylistic assessment should examine a combination of rhythmic organisation, instrumental roles, vocal delivery and production, rather than treating angular guitar or prominent bass as a decisive marker.", "Distinction from punk rock should examine how a particular act or recording reworks punk conventions; speed, aggression and a do-it-yourself approach alone do not resolve the boundary.", "Distinction from new wave and gothic rock should preserve overlapping classifications and identify the source, period and local meaning of each label.", "Historical scene participation and later sonic resemblance are separate tests: a revival recording may resemble earlier post-punk without belonging to its original networks." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Classification target", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "track | recording | release | artist-period | scene | critical category", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an attribution for one recording or career phase from automatically covering an artist's entire output." }, { "name": "Attribution basis", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "artist self-description | contemporary criticism | retrospective scholarship | industry label | audience usage | analytical inference; multiple allowed", "why_it_matters": "Separates evidence of label usage from an agent's own stylistic judgment." }, { "name": "Attribution status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "proposed | supported in a specified context | contested | rejected by a specified source | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Allows disagreement without turning a contextual classification into a universal fact." }, { "name": "Historical positioning", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "historical formation | later continuation | revival | retrospective association | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes participation in a formation from subsequent adoption of its practices." }, { "name": "Rhythmic organisation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Described combination of pulse, repetition, syncopation, groove and rhythmic disruption, with listening evidence", "why_it_matters": "Supports comparisons beyond a generic rock instrumentation checklist." }, { "name": "Instrumental and production profile", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Evidence-backed descriptions of bass, guitar, percussion, voice, electronics, spatial effects and arrangement", "why_it_matters": "Records how parts function together without imposing a mandatory post-punk sound." }, { "name": "Scene affiliation", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Dated, sourced links to local scenes, venues, labels, collaborators and publications", "why_it_matters": "Provides historical context that sonic resemblance alone cannot establish." }, { "name": "Neighbouring-category relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "overlap | influence | divergence | retrospective regrouping | disputed equivalence, with a named category and source", "why_it_matters": "Prevents related categories from being collapsed into synonyms." }, { "name": "Evidence coverage", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "listening evidence only | documentary evidence only | combined evidence | conflicting evidence | insufficient evidence", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether an agent can support an attribution or should leave it provisional." } ], "affordances": [ "Propose a post-punk attribution for a specified recording, artist-period or scene with explicit supporting evidence.", "Compare recordings by rhythmic, instrumental and production practices without assuming a single essential sound.", "Trace documented relationships among scenes, releases, labels and critical uses of the term.", "Explain overlapping or conflicting classifications involving punk rock, new wave, gothic rock and related categories.", "Distinguish historical affiliation, documented influence and later resemblance.", "Revise a classification when new listening or documentary evidence changes its basis." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "category-and-attribution", "name": "Category and attribution", "description": "Establishes what a post-punk claim classifies and whose understanding of the category it uses.", "rationale": "Post-punk can name a historical formation, a stylistic grouping or a retrospective category, and those uses require different evidence.", "layers": [ { "id": "meaning-and-target", "name": "Meaning and target", "description": "Separates uses of the label and fixes the entity and period under assessment.", "findings": [ { "id": "bounded-post-punk-claim", "name": "Bounded post-punk claim", "description": "Record the intended meaning of post-punk alongside the specific recording, artist-period or scene to which the claim applies.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does post-punk here denote a historical formation, a musical style, a scene affiliation or a retrospective grouping?", "kind": "definition", "id": "bounded-post-punk-claim-q01" }, { "text": "Does the attribution apply to a particular recording or period, and what evidence would justify extending it further?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "bounded-post-punk-claim-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "attribution-provenance", "name": "Attribution provenance", "description": "Preserves the origin, date and disagreement surrounding genre claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "situated-label-use", "name": "Situated label use", "description": "Treat each attribution as a claim made by an identifiable party in a particular context.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who used the term post-punk for this target, when, and in which accessible source?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "situated-label-use-q01" }, { "text": "Do artist accounts, contemporary reviews and retrospective accounts agree, and how should any disagreement qualify the attribution?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "situated-label-use-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "musical-practices", "name": "Musical practices", "description": "Examines the organisation of sound that supports a post-punk reading.", "rationale": "Musical evidence must describe combinations of practices rather than reduce the category to a single instrument, mood or production effect.", "layers": [ { "id": "rhythm-and-instrumental-roles", "name": "Rhythm and instrumental roles", "description": "Examines how bass, percussion, guitar and other parts distribute pulse, melody and texture.", "findings": [ { "id": "ensemble-organisation", "name": "Ensemble organisation", "description": "Record audible relationships among groove, repetition, instrumental prominence and disruption.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which passages demonstrate the roles of bass, drums and guitar, and how do those roles change across the recording?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "ensemble-organisation-q01" }, { "text": "What combination of rhythmic and instrumental practices supports the post-punk reading, and where does that same combination occur in neighbouring genres?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "ensemble-organisation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "voice-form-and-studio", "name": "Voice, form and studio", "description": "Examines vocal address, song construction and the treatment of recorded space.", "findings": [ { "id": "expressive-and-production-choices", "name": "Expressive and production choices", "description": "Describe how vocal delivery, repetition, fragmentation, timbre and studio effects contribute to the classification.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which audible passages establish the vocal approach, formal organisation and use of space, noise or electronics?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "expressive-and-production-choices-q01" }, { "text": "Are these features characteristic of the assessed material or confined to one track, mix or performance?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "expressive-and-production-choices-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "historical-and-scene-position", "name": "Historical and scene position", "description": "Situates post-punk claims within dated relationships, local networks and responses to punk.", "rationale": "A stylistic resemblance cannot by itself establish participation in the historical formation.", "layers": [ { "id": "relationship-to-punk", "name": "Relationship to punk", "description": "Investigates continuity, departure and disputed connections with punk practices.", "findings": [ { "id": "documented-continuity-and-departure", "name": "Documented continuity and departure", "description": "Record how participants or reliable accounts connect the assessed material to punk and describe any departures.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence links this act, recording or scene to punk participants, institutions, practices or debates?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "documented-continuity-and-departure-q01" }, { "text": "Which departures from punk conventions are documented, and which are only inferred from listening?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "documented-continuity-and-departure-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "local-networks", "name": "Local networks", "description": "Records geographically and temporally bounded connections through which music and ideas circulated.", "findings": [ { "id": "scene-membership-and-contact", "name": "Scene membership and contact", "description": "Support scene affiliation with dated connections rather than shared nationality or retrospective playlist inclusion.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which venues, labels, publications, collaborations or shared performances substantiate this scene affiliation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "scene-membership-and-contact-q01" }, { "text": "Did participants recognise this grouping at the time, or was it assembled retrospectively under the post-punk label?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "scene-membership-and-contact-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "cultural-practice-and-mediation", "name": "Cultural practice and mediation", "description": "Examines the relationship between musical classification, artistic presentation and routes of circulation.", "rationale": "Post-punk assessments may involve visual, textual and organisational practices, but these need evidence and must not become compulsory traits.", "layers": [ { "id": "artistic-and-social-positioning", "name": "Artistic and social positioning", "description": "Relates lyrics, performance, artwork and stated artistic or political commitments to the music.", "findings": [ { "id": "contextual-expression", "name": "Contextual expression", "description": "Record documented connections between musical practice and wider artistic or social concerns without assigning a uniform ideology.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which lyrics, artworks, performances or participant statements support the proposed artistic or political interpretation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "contextual-expression-q01" }, { "text": "Does that interpretation explain this particular post-punk attribution, or merely describe a theme shared with many other forms of music?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "contextual-expression-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "circulation-and-framing", "name": "Circulation and framing", "description": "Examines how release networks and cultural intermediaries frame the category.", "findings": [ { "id": "distribution-and-critical-framing", "name": "Distribution and critical framing", "description": "Distinguish evidence of how music circulated from evidence of how intermediaries classified it.", "questions": [ { "text": "How did labels, distributors, radio, music publications or later platforms present this material as post-punk?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "distribution-and-critical-framing-q01" }, { "text": "When independent release practices or visual presentation inform the classification, what additional musical or historical evidence supports it?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "distribution-and-critical-framing-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "boundaries-and-afterlives", "name": "Boundaries and afterlives", "description": "Handles adjacent classifications, later continuations and revision of the post-punk category.", "rationale": "An agent needs to preserve overlap while distinguishing historical connections from revival marketing and stylistic resemblance.", "layers": [ { "id": "neighbouring-genres", "name": "Neighbouring genres", "description": "Compares post-punk claims with context-specific uses of related genre labels.", "findings": [ { "id": "overlap-without-equivalence", "name": "Overlap without equivalence", "description": "Represent co-classification with new wave, gothic rock, art punk or other categories without assuming fixed universal boundaries.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which neighbouring label offers a competing or complementary account of this material, and according to which sources?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "overlap-without-equivalence-q01" }, { "text": "Should the agent retain multiple labels, qualify post-punk by period or scene, or leave the classification unresolved?", "kind": "action", "id": "overlap-without-equivalence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "continuation-and-revival", "name": "Continuation and revival", "description": "Separates later participation, claimed influence and perceived resemblance.", "findings": [ { "id": "historical-distance-and-influence", "name": "Historical distance and influence", "description": "Record the basis for calling later material a continuation, revival or reinterpretation of post-punk.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the connection supported by participant statements, collaborations or cited influences, or solely by a listener's comparison?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "historical-distance-and-influence-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence justifies describing this material as post-punk revival rather than continuation or independent stylistic resemblance?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "historical-distance-and-influence-q02" }, { "text": "How should the attribution change if new evidence contradicts the claimed influence or historical connection?", "kind": "action", "id": "historical-distance-and-influence-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Genre boundaries, historical endpoints and artist membership are contested; classifications should be checked at the recording and period level.", "The listed kinds are descriptive tendencies or overlapping styles, not a standardized taxonomy.", "No authoritative genre identifier, technical standard or characteristic numerical measurement is asserted; work and recording identifiers apply to individual musical entities." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of post-punk this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Gothic post-punk", "Dance-punk", "Experimental post-punk" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of post-punk this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Genre classification in music catalogues, criticism and historical scholarship.", "Programming concerts, radio shows and curated playlists.", "Describing artistic influences and relationships among bands, recordings and music scenes." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of post-punk this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating all music made after punk rock as post-punk.", "Assuming a uniform sound despite substantial differences between artists and scenes.", "Applying a genre label to an artist's entire catalogue when it fits only particular recordings or periods.", "Confusing the original movement with later post-punk revival scenes." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of post-punk this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Britain was a major centre of the original movement, with distinct local scenes and independent-label networks.", "American developments overlapped with art punk and New York no wave, although these labels are not interchangeable.", "Continental European and Australasian scenes developed local forms that complicate accounts centred exclusively on Britain." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of post-punk this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "punk rock", "difference": "Post-punk developed from punk but is distinguished principally by its expansion and experimentation beyond punk rock conventions, rather than simply by its date." }, { "name": "new wave", "difference": "The terms historically overlapped; new wave often denotes more pop-oriented developments, while post-punk usually foregrounds experimentation, with no universally accepted boundary." }, { "name": "gothic rock", "difference": "Gothic rock emerged partly from post-punk and developed a more specific dark musical aesthetic and associated subculture; much post-punk is not gothic." }, { "name": "no wave", "difference": "No wave identifies a narrower, particularly New York-associated experimental scene, rather than the full international range of post-punk." }, { "name": "post-punk revival", "difference": "The revival describes later artists and scenes consciously drawing on earlier post-punk sounds, especially those prominent from the late 1990s and 2000s." }, { "name": "sound recording", "difference": "Post-punk is a genre or movement classification; an individual recording can exemplify it and carry recording identifiers and rights." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of post-punk this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which researched accounts should anchor the working definition, and how do their chronological and geographical boundaries differ?", "How was the term used in contemporary sources across different regions, compared with its later retrospective use?", "Which musical features remain informative across diverse post-punk scenes, and which mainly reflect a narrow selection of frequently cited recordings?", "How should the model represent local categories and participant descriptions that do not map cleanly onto the English-language post-punk label?", "What evidence threshold should distinguish a historical affiliation, a later continuation and a revival when sources disagree?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 16, "questions": 27 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "work, medium or creative form", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a post-punk, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to recognise and qualify post-punk classifications, compare musical and scene evidence, and distinguish historical affiliation from later stylistic resemblance.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted", "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: no wave, no wave revival, Russian post-punk, coldwave, Windmill scene, reggae punk, dance-punk revival, Neue Deutsche Todeskunst, little band scene, new musick, crank wave, dance-punk.", "15 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 59 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a post-punk, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says", "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "What is seen is a copy or a performance, not the work. Recognising the work means recognising the content through whatever is carrying it." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "no wave", "no wave revival", "Russian post-punk", "coldwave", "Windmill scene", "reggae punk", "dance-punk revival", "Neue Deutsche Todeskunst", "little band scene", "new musick", "crank wave", "dance-punk" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 59 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 15 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one post-punk from another, and a post-punk from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a post-punk, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a post-punk, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a post-punk is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a post-punk, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a post-punk, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a post-punk is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a post-punk sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a post-punk, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a post-punk, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a post-punk is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a post-punk from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a post-punk, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a post-punk, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a post-punk is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a post-punk passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a post-punk between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a post-punk, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a post-punk, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a post-punk is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a post-punk, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a post-punk is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a post-punk, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a post-punk, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a post-punk is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a post-punk says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a post-punk contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a post-punk, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a post-punk, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a post-punk is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a post-punk and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a post-punk, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a post-punk, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a post-punk is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "work-and-manifestation", "name": "Work, version and copy", "description": "Which level of post-punk a statement is about.", "rationale": "The work, the edition, the file and the copy in hand are four things; rights and content attach to different ones.", "layers": [ { "id": "levels", "name": "Levels of the thing", "description": "Work, expression, manifestation and item, in plain terms.", "findings": [ { "id": "level-rules", "name": "What belongs at each level", "description": "Which facts hold for the work and which only for one copy.", "questions": [ { "id": "level-rules-q01", "text": "For post-punk, which facts belong to the work itself, which to a version, and which to a single copy?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "level-rules-q02", "text": "What identifier exists at each level, and which one is being cited?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "versions", "name": "Versions, editions and variants", "description": "How versions differ and which is canonical to whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "version-record", "name": "Versions and canonicity", "description": "Differences that matter and who calls one authoritative.", "questions": [ { "id": "version-record-q01", "text": "Which versions or editions of post-punk exist, and how do they differ substantively?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "version-record-q02", "text": "Who treats which version as authoritative, and for what purpose?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "authorship-and-rights", "name": "Authorship, rights and permitted use", "description": "Who made post-punk and what may be done with it.", "rationale": "Rights are jurisdictional, time-limited and attached to a level, and an agent that ignores that will copy what it may not.", "layers": [ { "id": "authorship", "name": "Authorship and contribution", "description": "Who contributed what, and in what capacity.", "findings": [ { "id": "contribution-record", "name": "Contributors and roles", "description": "The people and bodies behind it, with their roles.", "questions": [ { "id": "contribution-record-q01", "text": "Who authored or contributed to post-punk, in what roles, and how is that attested?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "contribution-record-q02", "text": "Where authorship is disputed or anonymous, what is recorded instead?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "rights", "name": "Rights and permissions", "description": "Which rights subsist, where, until when, and what they permit.", "findings": [ { "id": "rights-record", "name": "Rights, term and permitted acts", "description": "The regime in force and what it allows.", "questions": [ { "id": "rights-record-q01", "text": "What rights subsist in post-punk, in which jurisdictions, and until when?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "rights-record-q02", "text": "Which acts are permitted without further permission, and which must an agent refuse?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a post-punk came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a post-punk and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a post-punk, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a post-punk, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a post-punk is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a post-punk is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a post-punk, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a post-punk, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a post-punk is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }