← Back to catalogue
Generated draft

aponeurosis

vr.tr.aponeurosis · PHY.OBJ
Thing Registry Physical world and living systems

Generated draft, first pass

This model was drafted by rule from what the registry knows about the thing. It proposes which bundles a real model will need and which questions research must answer. It is not researched and no sentence in it is sourced.

Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.

Generator: vr.draft.v3

Purpose and description

Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a aponeurosis, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.

A physical thing registered under PHY.OBJ. The registry names it; this draft has not been given a definition yet.

It can be observed and measured.

Distinguishing features

Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: plantar fascia, right plantar aponeurosis, left plantar aponeurosis, thoracolumbar aponeurosis, palmar aponeurosis, galea aponeurotica, bicipital aponeurosis, aponeurosis of external oblique, aponeurosis of transversus abdominis, aponeurosis of internal oblique, aponeurosis of coccygeus, aponeurosis of quadratus lumborum.

43 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.

Described in 34 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is.

Physical character

Made of: matter you can touch.

Mobility varies between examples.

Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.

These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing.

How it is recognised

Recognised by criteria applied to signs and findings, not by appearance. Two conditions can look identical and be distinguished only by test.

Related models

covers - Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.

plantar fasciaright plantar aponeurosisleft plantar aponeurosisthoracolumbar aponeurosispalmar aponeurosisgalea aponeuroticabicipital aponeurosisaponeurosis of external obliqueaponeurosis of transversus abdominisaponeurosis of internal obliqueaponeurosis of coccygeusaponeurosis of quadratus lumborum

Described in 34 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 43 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.

Also called

plantar fasciaright plantar aponeurosisleft plantar aponeurosisthoracolumbar aponeurosispalmar aponeurosisgalea aponeuroticabicipital aponeurosisaponeurosis of external obliqueaponeurosis of transversus abdominisaponeurosis of internal obliqueaponeurosis of coccygeusaponeurosis of quadratus lumborumaponeurosis of trapeziusaponeurosis of sternocleidomastoidaponeurosis of ischiocavernosusaponeurosis of procerusaponeurosis of nasalisaponeurosis of serratus posterior superioraponeurosis of serratus posterior inferioraponeurosis of subscapularisaponeurosis of pronator quadratusaponeurosis of extensor carpi radialis brevisaponeurosis of extensor carpi ulnarisaponeurosis of bulbospongiosusaponeurosis of sartoriusaponeurosis of semitendinosusaponeurosis of semimembranosusaponeurosis of gracilisaponeurosis of adductor brevisaponeurosis of adductor magnusaponeurosis of gastrocnemiusaponeurosis of soleusaponeurosis of gluteus minimusaponeurosis of rectus femorisaponeurosis of masseterlingual aponeurosissubdivision of aponeurosis of epicraniuspalatine aponeurosispharyngobasilar fasciaright palmar aponeurosis

+3

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Source repository Registry entry point

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 8 bundles · 17 layers · 19 findings · 53 questions.

Identity, naming and classification How an agent tells one aponeurosis from another, and a aponeurosis from things that resemble it.

Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.

Names and identifiers

The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.

Preferred name, aliases and local names

Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.

  1. What identifies and describes the name of a aponeurosis, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the name of a aponeurosis, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the name of a aponeurosis is known, and what must it refuse? action

Stable identifiers and external keys

Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.

  1. What identifies and describes an identifier for a aponeurosis, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a aponeurosis, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a aponeurosis is known, and what must it refuse? action

Classification and granularity

Where a aponeurosis sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.

Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds

The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.

  1. What identifies and describes the kind of a aponeurosis, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the kind of a aponeurosis, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a aponeurosis is known, and what must it refuse? action

Distinguishing features

What separates a aponeurosis from the things most often confused with it.

  1. What identifies and describes what distinguishes a aponeurosis, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a aponeurosis, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a aponeurosis is known, and what must it refuse? action
Form, composition and condition What a aponeurosis is made of, what shape and size it takes, and what state it is in.

A physical thing can be measured, and a model that cannot record its measurements cannot support any decision that depends on them.

Form and dimensions

Shape, size, mass and the ranges these take across examples.

Measurable dimensions and their units

The quantities worth recording and the units they are recorded in.

  1. What identifies and describes the dimensions of a aponeurosis, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the dimensions of a aponeurosis, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the dimensions of a aponeurosis is known, and what must it refuse? action

Material and composition

Materials, parts and how they are put together.

Parts and materials

What a aponeurosis is built from and which parts are replaceable.

  1. What identifies and describes the composition of a aponeurosis, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the composition of a aponeurosis, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the composition of a aponeurosis is known, and what must it refuse? action

Condition and integrity

Wear, damage, health and the difference between working and broken.

Condition, damage and health

How the condition of a aponeurosis is judged and by whom.

  1. What identifies and describes the condition of a aponeurosis, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the condition of a aponeurosis, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the condition of a aponeurosis is known, and what must it refuse? action
Place and movement Where a aponeurosis is, how it got there and where it may go (varies).

A thing that can move needs its position recorded with a time, or every later claim about it is about a place it has left.

Location and placement

Position, containment and the reference frame the position is given in.

Position, container and reference frame

Where a aponeurosis is, and what that position is measured against.

  1. What identifies and describes the location of a aponeurosis, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the location of a aponeurosis, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the location of a aponeurosis is known, and what must it refuse? action

Movement and transfer

How a aponeurosis is carried, installed or relocated.

Movement events and constraints

What counts as a movement, what records it and what limits it.

  1. What identifies and describes the movement of a aponeurosis, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the movement of a aponeurosis, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the movement of a aponeurosis is known, and what must it refuse? action
State and lifecycle The states a aponeurosis passes through and the events that move it between them.

Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.

Lifecycle stages

From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.

Stages and transitions

The stages worth naming and what moves a aponeurosis between them.

  1. What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a aponeurosis, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a aponeurosis, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a aponeurosis is known, and what must it refuse? action

Observations and current status

What is observed about a aponeurosis, how often and by whom.

Observation record

How an observation of a aponeurosis is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.

  1. What identifies and describes an observation of a aponeurosis, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about an observation of a aponeurosis, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a aponeurosis is known, and what must it refuse? action
Use and operation What can be done with a aponeurosis and what it takes to do it.

An agent that can recognise a thing but not act on it has only half a model.

Intended use and function

What a aponeurosis is for, and what it is used for anyway.

Function, purpose and misuse

The function a aponeurosis performs and the uses that fall outside it.

  1. What identifies and describes the use of a aponeurosis, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the use of a aponeurosis, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the use of a aponeurosis is known, and what must it refuse? action

Handling and procedure

The steps, skills and tools involved in using a aponeurosis.

Procedures, skills and required tools

What an agent needs before it can act on a aponeurosis at all.

  1. What identifies and describes handling a aponeurosis, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about handling a aponeurosis, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once handling a aponeurosis is known, and what must it refuse? action
Diagnosis, criteria and coding What makes a case of aponeurosis a case, and under which revision.

Criteria change between revisions, so a diagnosis without its coding revision cannot be compared with a later one.

Diagnostic criteria

The criteria in force and who issues them.

Criteria, issuer and revision

What must be true for a diagnosis, according to whom.

  1. What criteria define aponeurosis, issued by which body, in which revision? definition
  2. What changed between revisions that would reclassify existing cases? boundary

Coding and terminology

The codes used to record it and their mapping.

Codes and mappings

Which classification codes apply and how they map.

  1. Which classification and terminology codes cover aponeurosis, and how do they map to each other? definition
  2. What is lost when a case is mapped from one scheme to another? boundary
Course, population and care How aponeurosis develops, whom it affects, and what is done about it.

The condition, the diagnosis and the episode of care are three different things, and an agent must not merge them.

Course and stages

Onset, progression, remission and outcome.

Stages and transitions

The stages recorded and what moves a case between them.

  1. What course does aponeurosis typically take, and what marks each stage? definition
  2. What separates the condition itself from an episode of care for it? boundary

Affected populations

Who is affected, how often, and on what evidence.

Prevalence and its basis

Rates with their population, period and source.

  1. What prevalence or incidence is reported for aponeurosis, in which population and period? measurement
  2. What may an agent not conclude about an individual from a population rate? action
Provenance, evidence and time Where every claim about a aponeurosis came from and when it held.

A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.

Source and authority

Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.

Claim provenance and confidence

The authority behind each claim about a aponeurosis and how confident it is.

  1. What identifies and describes a claim about a aponeurosis, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about a claim about a aponeurosis, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a aponeurosis is known, and what must it refuse? action

Time, versions and supersession

When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.

Validity period and supersession

How an old claim about a aponeurosis is retired without being erased.

  1. What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a aponeurosis, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a aponeurosis, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a aponeurosis is known, and what must it refuse? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?
  • What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?
  • Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a aponeurosis, and on what evidence are they told apart?
Draft as JSON