deism
Let an agent explain deism as a philosophy and historical movement with attribution, distinguish it from theism, atheism and pantheism, relay its history and key figures, and describe related concepts such as ceremonial deism and the Cult of the Supreme Being neutrally.
Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled
4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions
Concept What deism is.
Definition
Definition and distinctions.
Definition
Definition.
- What is deism, and how does it differ from theism, pantheism and atheism? definition
- Is the question about deism, ceremonial deism or a related concept? boundary
Variants
Variants.
Variants
Variants.
- What variants of deism exist, historically and today? definition
- Which entry fits the specific variant? action
History History and figures.
Enlightenment
Enlightenment deism.
Enlightenment
Enlightenment.
- Who were the main deist thinkers, and what did they argue, with attribution? provenance
- Which entry fits a specific thinker? action
Founders
Deism and political founders.
Founders
Founders.
- How do historians assess the deism of figures such as Jefferson, Franklin and Paine, with positions attributed? provenance
- Is the presentation attributed and neutral? boundary
Related Related concepts.
Ceremonial
Ceremonial deism.
Ceremonial
Ceremonial.
- What is ceremonial deism in United States law, and how have courts used it? provenance
- Which entry fits establishment clause? action
Cult
Cult of the Supreme Being.
Cult
Cult.
- What was the Cult of the Supreme Being, and how do historians interpret it? provenance
- Which references are standard? provenance
Today Deism today.
Modern
Modern deism.
Modern
Modern.
- How is deism organised and expressed today, and how many identify with it, with sources? provenance
- Which sources are cited? provenance
Philosophy
Philosophical debate.
Philosophy
Philosophy.
- What arguments for and against deism do philosophers make, with positions attributed? provenance
- Is the presentation neutral? boundary
Classifiers Filled
- Family
- Thing Registry
- Category
- Society, people and institutions
- Entry kind
- thing
- Plane
- SOC
- Domain
- SOC.ORG
- Other names and narrower kinds
- Cult of the Supreme Being, ceremonial deism, Christian deism, Higher Power, occasionalism
What it is Filled
A religious philosophy holding that a creator God exists and can be known through reason and observation of nature, but does not intervene in the world through revelation or miracles; deism flourished among Enlightenment thinkers in Britain, France and America, influenced founding figures and documents, and appears today in forms including Christian deism; ceremonial deism recognised in United States law and the non-specific Higher Power of recovery programmes are distinct concepts that do not necessarily express deist belief.
Why it exists Filled
Let an agent explain deism as a philosophy and historical movement with attribution, distinguish it from theism, atheism and pantheism, relay its history and key figures, and describe related concepts such as ceremonial deism and the Cult of the Supreme Being neutrally.
Distinguishing features Filled
- Natural religion by reason
- Rejection of revelation and miracles
- Enlightenment associations
- Diverse modern forms
What robots and AI may and may not do Filled
Must not
- Label a historical figure a deist without evidence from their own writings.
- Present contested attributions as fact.
- Conflate deism with atheism or with conventional theism.
- Mock the beliefs of deists or others.
Only with a human decision
- Stating a living person's religious beliefs in published material.
May
- Explain the beliefs of deism and its history, citing sources.
- Distinguish deism from theism, atheism and pantheism.
- Note where a historical figure's deism is disputed.
Moral aspects Filled
- Religious labels applied to founders are used in political debates; accuracy matters.
- Beliefs deserve respectful description, whatever the writer's own view.
Who is affected
- Believers
- Historians
- Readers
Owners Filled
Steward
Nobody: a religious philosophy held in common.
Links to other meta-models Filled
parent
- Q9174 - registry parent class
related
- religion - in registry terms, a religious philosophy
- theism - which accepts revelation
- natural theology - its method
- Enlightenment - thought and politics
What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled
Identity and identifiers required Filled
- Vercy registry: vr.tr.deism
- Wikidata: Q620629 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q620629)
Direct properties not applicable Not applicable
- flourished: about 1650-1800 years - Enlightenment era
Plane SOC: no invented physical properties.
Recognition optional Filled
- Creator God known by reason, no revelation or intervention
- Enlightenment origin, modern variants
- Theism accepts revelation; pantheism identifies God with nature; atheism denies God
- Not a visible object; a position held in writings and, historically, in some organised cults.
Capabilities and actions required Filled
- explain the philosophy and its variants
- distinguish from related positions
- relay history and figures with attribution
- describe related legal and cultural uses
Hazards and failure modes required Filled
- Overstating deism among historical figures
- Conflating deism with atheism or theism
- Presenting contested attributions as fact
Standards and interfaces required Filled
- No regulation; freedom of religion protections
- Ceremonial deism as a doctrine in United States establishment clause cases
Context of use required Filled
- Not applicable; a religious philosophy.
- classical Enlightenment deism
- Christian deism
- the Cult of the Supreme Being of the French Revolution
- modern and organised deism
- ceremonial deism as a legal concept
- the Higher Power concept in recovery programmes, a related non-specific idea
- occasionalism, a distinct philosophical doctrine listed as an alias
Sources Filled
- Wikidata item Q620629: deism - identity and sense of the item
- Wikipedia: Deism - general description of the item
Open questions
- Should ceremonial deism and the Cult of the Supreme Being be separate entries?
- How should primary texts be linked?
- The registry entry has merged aliases naming distinct doctrines; should they be split off?
Machine files
Provenance
thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed
Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q620629/spec.json