{ "model": { "rank": 5994, "code": "thing-q625510", "model_id": "vr.tr.indology", "name": "Indology", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise an Indological research activity, assess the adequacy and limits of its evidence and methods, and determine justified next research or reuse actions.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.KNW", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q625510/", "tier": 2, "score": 63, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "Tamilology", "Dravidian studies", "Bangla studies", "Pakistan studies" ], "aliasCount": 4, "merged": 4, "knownIn": 63, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q625510", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q625510", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T10:32:50Z", "providers": [ "Codex", "Grok" ], "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "usd": 0.00544442, "turns": 1, "seconds": 27.4, "error": null }, "codex": { "seconds": 125.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07b6b-9eea-7183-be87-f3b030056bf0\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Indology\nRegistry id: vr.tr.indology\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.KNW\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\nA Vercy" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q625510", "registryId": "vr.tr.indology", "name": "Indology", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.KNW" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q625510/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.indology", "name": "Indology", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise an Indological research activity, assess the adequacy and limits of its evidence and methods, and determine justified next research or reuse actions.", "definition": "Indology is the academic study of the Indian subcontinent's languages, literatures, religions, history, and material culture, typically grounded in philology of Sanskrit and related Indo-Aryan and Dravidian sources.", "scope_statement": "This model owns Indology as a field of inquiry and as a declared research orientation: its boundaries, linguistic and source competencies, methods of interpretation, scholarly positioning, and conditions for responsible investigation of the Indian subcontinent and connected cultural traditions.", "in_scope": [ "The grounds for identifying a research programme, project, or contribution as Indological", "Geographical, chronological, linguistic, and thematic boundaries of an Indological inquiry", "Relationships between research claims, textual witnesses, material evidence, and interpretive methods", "Competence and mediation involved in reading, editing, translating, and contextualising sources", "Scholarly traditions, contested categories, and conditions governing access and reuse" ], "out_of_scope": [ "The Indian subcontinent, its societies, or its history as independently modelled subjects", "Individual manuscripts, inscriptions, artefacts, and archaeological sites as collection objects", "Languages and writing systems as linguistic entities", "Religious traditions, philosophical systems, and literary works as independently modelled subjects", "Universities, archives, researchers, and publications as organisational or bibliographic entities", "South Asian studies and adjacent disciplines except where their boundaries with Indology require explicit comparison" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "An inquiry must have an explicit or evidenced relationship to Indological scholarship; a topic located in India alone does not establish that classification.", "The model must distinguish the studied region and period from the present-day Indian state, recording rather than assuming their alignment.", "The inquiry must make its dependence on original-language sources, translations, editions, or other evidence explicit; neither Sanskrit competence nor textual work should be assumed from the label alone.", "Work on a religious or philosophical tradition qualifies through its research framing and scholarly methods, not merely through that tradition's association with India.", "Where the same inquiry could be called South Asian studies, classical philology, religious studies, or history, the model must record the reason for retaining, combining, or rejecting the Indology label." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Indological identification", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "self-described; institutionally classified; externally attributed; disputed; unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an agent from assigning disciplinary identity solely from a subject name or location." }, { "name": "Research coverage", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Explicit relationships to regions, periods, communities, traditions, and connected areas", "why_it_matters": "Makes the reach of an inquiry visible and prevents conclusions about selected sources from becoming claims about all of India." }, { "name": "Language and script competence", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Language and script linked to the relevant contributor, assessed task, and evidence of competence", "why_it_matters": "Reading a manuscript, interpreting an inscription, and evaluating a translation may require different demonstrated abilities." }, { "name": "Source mediation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Direct object examination; facsimile; transcription; critical edition; translation; secondary account; mixed; unknown", "why_it_matters": "Shows which features of the evidence an interpretation can inspect and which depend on intermediaries." }, { "name": "Evidence triangulation", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Single evidence stream; multiple dependent streams; independently corroborated; conflicting; unassessed", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes corroboration from repeated reliance on the same edition, translation, or inherited claim." }, { "name": "Interpretive contestation", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Alternatives unexamined; alternatives documented; preferred reading justified; unresolved disagreement", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether an agent can advance an interpretation or should preserve competing readings." }, { "name": "Source-use conditions", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Evidence item linked to access terms, reuse permissions, attribution requirements, and relevant community protocols", "why_it_matters": "Allows research access, quotation, image reproduction, and automated processing to be assessed separately." } ], "affordances": [ "Assess and explain whether an inquiry should be identified as Indological, including overlap with neighbouring fields.", "Locate linguistic, geographical, chronological, or social gaps that limit a proposed interpretation.", "Trace a claim through translations, editions, and witnesses to identify where further examination is needed.", "Compare competing readings and select the next useful action, such as witness collation, translation review, or material corroboration.", "Qualify conclusions when a corpus represents particular genres, institutions, or communities rather than an entire society.", "Determine whether a source may be consulted, quoted, reproduced, or processed under its recorded conditions." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "placeholder", "title": "Pending research", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Will be replaced after lookups" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "indological-remit", "name": "Indological remit", "description": "Records why the inquiry belongs to Indology and what its chosen boundaries permit it to address.", "rationale": "The field label alone does not establish a single geographical extent, historical period, source tradition, or method.", "layers": [ { "id": "disciplinary-identification", "name": "Disciplinary identification", "description": "Establishes who applies the Indology label and on what grounds.", "findings": [ { "id": "basis-of-indological-identification", "name": "Basis of Indological identification", "description": "Record the inquiry's stated disciplinary affiliation, the evidence supporting it, and any competing classification.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who identifies this inquiry as Indological, and which research commitments or scholarly affiliations support that identification?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "basis-of-indological-identification-q01" }, { "text": "What would be obscured or clarified by classifying it instead, or additionally, as South Asian studies, philology, religious studies, or history?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "basis-of-indological-identification-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "regional-and-historical-reach", "name": "Regional and historical reach", "description": "Makes the inquiry's use of India, the subcontinent, and connected traditions explicit.", "findings": [ { "id": "declared-research-horizon", "name": "Declared research horizon", "description": "Record the regions, periods, communities, and transregional connections included, together with the reasons for exclusions.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which geographical and chronological meanings of India or the Indian subcontinent does this inquiry use?", "kind": "definition", "id": "declared-research-horizon-q01" }, { "text": "Which connected traditions or regions are included, and where must the inquiry stop generalising beyond its evidence?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "declared-research-horizon-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "languages-and-transmission", "name": "Languages and transmission", "description": "Records how linguistic competence and the transmission of texts affect access to evidence.", "rationale": "An interpretation may depend on choices made by readers, scribes, editors, translators, and digital transcription systems.", "layers": [ { "id": "linguistic-access", "name": "Linguistic access", "description": "Identifies the languages, scripts, registers, and specialist reading abilities required by the selected sources.", "findings": [ { "id": "competence-and-mediation", "name": "Competence and mediation", "description": "Record who can evaluate each source in its relevant linguistic form and where the inquiry relies on mediation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which languages, scripts, historical registers, and technical vocabularies must be understood to evaluate the selected evidence?", "kind": "definition", "id": "competence-and-mediation-q01" }, { "text": "Where does the inquiry rely on a translation, transliteration, transcription, or automated reading, and who can check the consequential choices?", "kind": "action", "id": "competence-and-mediation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "textual-witnesses", "name": "Textual witnesses", "description": "Distinguishes a work or attributed teaching from the surviving forms through which it is studied.", "findings": [ { "id": "witness-to-edition-chain", "name": "Witness-to-edition chain", "description": "Record relevant manuscripts, recensions, quotations, commentaries, and editorial decisions without treating an edition as an unmediated original.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which witnesses and editorial decisions underlie the passage or reading used by this inquiry?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "witness-to-edition-chain-q01" }, { "text": "Could a variant reading, interpolation, attribution dispute, or difference between recensions change the conclusion, and what comparison would test it?", "kind": "action", "id": "witness-to-edition-chain-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "corpus-and-evidential-reach", "name": "Corpus and evidential reach", "description": "Records how sources were selected and what kinds of claims they can support.", "rationale": "A selected textual or material corpus cannot be assumed to represent every community, practice, or period within its geographical setting.", "layers": [ { "id": "corpus-composition", "name": "Corpus composition", "description": "Examines the distribution and selection of textual, oral, visual, epigraphic, and archaeological evidence where relevant.", "findings": [ { "id": "representation-and-absence", "name": "Representation and absence", "description": "Record whose perspectives survive in the corpus, how they entered it, and which absences constrain the inquiry.", "questions": [ { "text": "How is the selected corpus distributed across language, date, region, genre, and identifiable social or institutional position?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "representation-and-absence-q01" }, { "text": "Which absences reflect the research selection, and which may reflect preservation, collection, access, or uncertain attribution?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "representation-and-absence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "cross-evidence-inference", "name": "Cross-evidence inference", "description": "Assesses how different source types support or challenge interpretations.", "findings": [ { "id": "prescription-practice-and-corroboration", "name": "Prescription, practice, and corroboration", "description": "Record whether evidence describes ideals, arguments, representations, reported events, or observed practices, and how that distinction limits inference.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the cited evidence prescribe conduct, narrate an event, advance an argument, or document a practice, and which claim can it therefore support?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "prescription-practice-and-corroboration-q01" }, { "text": "What independent textual, epigraphic, archaeological, or other relevant evidence could corroborate or challenge the proposed inference?", "kind": "action", "id": "prescription-practice-and-corroboration-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "interpretation-and-conceptual-translation", "name": "Interpretation and conceptual translation", "description": "Records the methods and category choices that connect source material to scholarly claims.", "rationale": "The translation of terms and the use of analytical categories can determine a conclusion before the evidence is fully compared.", "layers": [ { "id": "terms-and-categories", "name": "Terms and categories", "description": "Distinguishes source-language concepts, historical classifications, and the researcher's analytical vocabulary.", "findings": [ { "id": "conceptual-equivalence", "name": "Conceptual equivalence", "description": "Record consequential translations and category mappings, including contexts in which their equivalence breaks down.", "questions": [ { "text": "How are terms such as dharma, when present, interpreted in this particular passage, genre, period, and commentary tradition?", "kind": "definition", "id": "conceptual-equivalence-q01" }, { "text": "Where do categories such as religion, philosophy, caste, or nation introduce assumptions that the source itself does not establish?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "conceptual-equivalence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "interpretive-warrant", "name": "Interpretive warrant", "description": "Links conclusions to the methods and assumptions needed to derive them.", "findings": [ { "id": "competing-readings-and-tests", "name": "Competing readings and tests", "description": "Record alternative interpretations and the evidence that could discriminate between them.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which linguistic, chronological, comparative, or contextual assumptions connect the evidence to the preferred interpretation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "competing-readings-and-tests-q01" }, { "text": "Which competing reading remains viable, and what additional source examination or method would distinguish it from the preferred reading?", "kind": "action", "id": "competing-readings-and-tests-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "scholarly-position-and-source-stewardship", "name": "Scholarly position and source stewardship", "description": "Records the inquiry's relationship to inherited scholarship, knowledge holders, and the conditions attached to its evidence.", "rationale": "Assessing an Indological inquiry requires visibility into how scholarly authority, collections, and access arrangements shape what can be known and used.", "layers": [ { "id": "historiographical-position", "name": "Historiographical position", "description": "Examines inherited interpretations and the inclusion of relevant scholarly and interpretive traditions.", "findings": [ { "id": "inherited-authority-and-dialogue", "name": "Inherited authority and dialogue", "description": "Record which earlier classifications and interpretations the inquiry adopts, revises, or contests, and which relevant voices it engages.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which inherited editions, chronologies, or classifications shape the inquiry, and has their evidential basis been re-examined?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "inherited-authority-and-dialogue-q01" }, { "text": "Which relevant regional-language scholarship, commentary traditions, and living knowledge holders have been considered, and what limits any claims made on their behalf?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "inherited-authority-and-dialogue-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-reuse", "name": "Access and reuse", "description": "Establishes the conditions for using manuscripts, recordings, images, and other source materials.", "findings": [ { "id": "permitted-source-actions", "name": "Permitted source actions", "description": "Record source custody and applicable access, reproduction, attribution, and community-use conditions.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who holds or supplied the material, what is known about its acquisition history, and which conditions accompanied access?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "permitted-source-actions-q01" }, { "text": "Do the recorded conditions permit quotation, image publication, translation, redistribution, and automated processing, or does a proposed action require clarification?", "kind": "action", "id": "permitted-source-actions-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "classical philological Indology", "South Asian studies (area-studies Indology)", "Buddhist and Jain studies within Indology", "Islamic and Persianate South Asia studies", "art-historical and archaeological Indology", "colonial and postcolonial Indology", "digital and computational Indology" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of Indology this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Should this registry entry primarily model Indology as a discipline, an institutional designation, or a research orientation instantiated by individual inquiries?", "How do uses of the Indology label vary across institutions and scholarly communities, and which variations should recognition accommodate?", "What boundary should this model adopt with South Asian studies, especially for modern, contemporary, diasporic, and primarily non-textual research?", "Which relevant source traditions and research methods remain insufficiently represented by the proposed emphasis on linguistic and textual mediation?", "What evidence is sufficient to assess task-specific language competence and meaningful engagement with relevant knowledge holders without substituting credentials or consultation counts for demonstrated adequacy?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 11, "questions": 21 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "discipline or field of knowledge", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a Indology, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to recognise an Indological research activity, assess the adequacy and limits of its evidence and methods, and determine justified next research or reuse actions.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: Tamilology, Dravidian studies, Bangla studies, Pakistan studies.", "4 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 63 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a Indology, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says" ], "howItIsRecognised": [], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "Tamilology", "Dravidian studies", "Bangla studies", "Pakistan studies" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 63 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 4 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one Indology from another, and a Indology from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a Indology, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a Indology, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a Indology is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a Indology, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a Indology, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a Indology is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a Indology sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a Indology, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a Indology, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a Indology is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a Indology from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a Indology, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a Indology, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a Indology is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a Indology passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a Indology between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a Indology, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a Indology, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a Indology is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a Indology, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a Indology is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a Indology, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a Indology, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a Indology is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a Indology says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a Indology contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a Indology, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a Indology, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a Indology is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a Indology and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a Indology, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a Indology, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a Indology is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "subject-and-method", "name": "Subject matter and method", "description": "What Indology studies and how it establishes anything.", "rationale": "A field is identified by its questions and its methods, and those are what distinguish it from the fields next to it.", "layers": [ { "id": "subject", "name": "Subject matter", "description": "The questions it takes as its own.", "findings": [ { "id": "subject-record", "name": "Questions and objects of study", "description": "What it is about, stated so a neighbouring field can be told apart.", "questions": [ { "id": "subject-record-q01", "text": "What questions and objects does Indology take as its own?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "subject-record-q02", "text": "Which questions does it share with a neighbouring field, and who claims them?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "method", "name": "Method and evidence", "description": "How claims are established and what counts as evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "method-record", "name": "Methods and standards of evidence", "description": "The methods used and what they are taken to establish.", "questions": [ { "id": "method-record-q01", "text": "By what methods does Indology establish claims, and what counts as sufficient evidence?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "method-record-q02", "text": "What kind of claim can this field not settle, and where should an agent look instead?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "institutions-and-classification", "name": "Institutions and classification", "description": "Where Indology is practised and how catalogues place it.", "rationale": "The institutional footprint is the evidence that a field exists as a field rather than as a topic.", "layers": [ { "id": "institutions", "name": "Institutional markers", "description": "Societies, journals, degrees and departments.", "findings": [ { "id": "institution-record", "name": "Bodies and venues", "description": "Where the field organises itself.", "questions": [ { "id": "institution-record-q01", "text": "Which societies, journals or degrees mark Indology as an established field?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "institution-record-q02", "text": "What would show that it is emerging or dissolving rather than established?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification", "name": "Classification schemes", "description": "Where library and research classifications put it.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-record", "name": "Codes and their disagreements", "description": "The classification codes that place it, and where they differ.", "questions": [ { "id": "classification-record-q01", "text": "Which classification schemes place Indology, under what codes?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "classification-record-q02", "text": "Where do those schemes disagree about its scope?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a Indology came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a Indology and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a Indology, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a Indology, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a Indology is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a Indology is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a Indology, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a Indology, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a Indology is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }