cheating in chess

Assistance permission boundary

Record permission by resource, user, timing and playing format, including any unresolved interpretation.

1. Which engines, books, databases, notes or human communications were permitted during this game? boundary
2. Which dated competition or platform provision establishes each permission or prohibition? provenance

Conduct classification

Identify the alleged act and rule elements without assuming every chess infringement establishes deliberate cheating.

1. Is the alleged act prohibited assistance, deceptive conduct, result manipulation or a procedural infringement? definition
2. Does the cited provision require intent, actual use of assistance, possession of a device or another specified condition? boundary

Assistance use link

Record the alleged source and timing of assistance and the evidence linking it to play, without equating access with use.

1. What evidence links an engine, reference source or other person to the player's decisions during the game? provenance
2. Which affected moves and assistance opportunities can be placed on the same timeline? measurement

Identity and control

Separate account ownership, actual control during play and any authorised participation arrangement.

1. Who controlled the account or made the moves during the disputed game, and what supports that attribution? provenance
2. Was any substitution, shared participation or account arrangement authorised under the applicable rules? boundary

Prearrangement versus permitted draw

Record the alleged agreement, its timing and rule basis while separating it from permitted draw agreements and independent strategic choices.

1. What evidence indicates an agreement to predetermine the result rather than a decision made during legitimate play? provenance
2. How do the applicable rules distinguish a permitted draw agreement from prohibited result prearrangement? boundary

Rating and qualification target

Link alleged manipulation to the rating, pairing, prize, title or qualification outcome it could affect.

1. Which rating or competition outcome could the alleged deliberate losses or coordinated results change? measurement
2. What supports deliberate manipulation rather than poor form, fatigue, experimental play or ordinary variance? boundary

Contextualised performance signal

Record engine agreement and timing patterns with their analytical settings, comparison population and alternative explanations.

1. Which engine version, search settings, eligible positions and move-matching criteria produced the reported signal? measurement
2. How were forced moves, opening preparation, time control, player strength and sample selection accounted for? measurement
3. What conclusions does the analysis support, and which claims about assistance or intent remain unsupported? boundary

Evidence chain and alternatives

Preserve provenance for game scores, clock records, observations and relevant technical evidence, including contradictory material.

1. Who collected each record, when was it collected, and has it been altered or selectively excerpted? provenance
2. Which evidence independently corroborates the allegation, and which items merely repeat the same underlying signal? boundary
3. What missing or contradictory evidence could materially change the assessment? action

Reasoned case disposition

Track the allegation separately from interim restrictions, findings, sanctions and subsequent review.

1. Which arbiter, organiser, platform or governing body has authority to determine this allegation, and under what evidentiary standard? action
2. What was decided, on which evidence, and what opportunity existed to respond or appeal? provenance
3. Which games, ratings, standings or prizes does the decision authorise changing? action

Proportionate integrity control

Select authorised controls for devices, communication, identity or supervision while accounting for accessibility, privacy and enforceability.

1. Which permitted control directly addresses the identified assistance, substitution or manipulation opportunity? action
2. How will its effectiveness, mistaken interventions and effects on legitimate participation be assessed? measurement

Check these first

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these check these first hold for the sense of cheating in chess this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Kinds and varieties

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of cheating in chess this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Standards and regulation

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of cheating in chess this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Real-world use

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of cheating in chess this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Typical measurements

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of cheating in chess this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Failure modes and hazards

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of cheating in chess this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Regional variation

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of cheating in chess this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of cheating in chess this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance