← Back to catalogue
Research draft

history of literature

vr.tr.history-of-literature · INF.KNW

Let an agent explain literary history, relay approaches, periods, national and regional traditions and debates from literary studies sources with positions attributed, describe the named histories and flag the related encyclopedia alias, and distinguish literary history from literary criticism, book history, history of language and comparative literature.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain literary history, relay approaches, periods, national and regional traditions and debates from literary studies sources with positions attributed, describe the named histories and flag the related encyclopedia alias, and distinguish literary history from literary criticism, book history, history of language and comparative literature.

The study and narrative of the development of literature over time, covering oral traditions and storytelling, written literatures from ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt to modern global literatures, periods, movements, genres and canons, including national and regional histories such as the history of Hindi, Taiwanese, Italian and Australian literature; the registry alias history of encyclopedias names a related field of reference works and book history. Literary historians debate canon formation, periodisation and whose works are included, with positions attributed.

What it is for: Understanding how literature developed.

It can be explain approaches and periods; relay national and regional traditions; describe named histories; present canon debates with attribution.

Distinguishing features

Chronological scope

Periods and movements

National and global frames

Canon debates

What it looks like

Not a physical object; studied through texts, anthologies and scholarly histories.

Physical character

Epic of Gilgamesh: about 2100-1200 BC note - versions

Weltliteratur concept: Goethe, 1827 note

registry parents: literary studies, cultural history note

How it is recognised

Study of literature s development over time

History of encyclopedias, history of Hindi literature, history of Taiwanese literature, history of storytelling, history of literature in Italy, history of Australian literature

Criticism evaluates works; book history studies production; language history studies change; comparative literature crosses traditions

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

literary studies

includes -

history of Australian literature

is contrasted with -

literary criticism

is contrasted with - related alias

history of encyclopedias

In practice

Families and kinds

oral literature and storytelling

ancient literatures

national literary histories

world literature

histories of genres

Standards and regulation

No regulation

Failure modes and hazards

Eurocentric framing

Presenting one canon as universal

Partisan national narratives

Also called

history of encyclopediashistory of Hindi literaturehistory of Taiwanese literaturehistory of storytellinghistory of literature in Italyhistory of Australian literaturehistory of Hungarian literaturehistory of French poetryhistory of comicsliterary historiographySkaryna studieshistory of science fictionencyclopedia in Turkey

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What literary history is.

Attribution.

Definition

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is the history of literature, and how does it differ from criticism, book history, language history and comparative literature? definition
  2. Is the question about a period, a national literature or methods? boundary

Histories

Named histories.

Histories

Histories.

  1. What do the histories of Hindi, Taiwanese, Italian and Australian literature and of storytelling cover, and why is encyclopedias history different? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific history? action
Periods Periods.

Sources.

Ancient

Ancient literatures.

Ancient

Ancient.

  1. What are the earliest known literary works? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Modern

Modern movements.

Modern

Modern.

  1. How are movements such as Romanticism and Modernism defined? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
Debates Debates.

Attribution.

Canon

Canon formation.

Canon

Canon.

  1. What do scholars argue about the literary canon and inclusion, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral and attributed? boundary

World literature

World literature.

World literature

World literature.

  1. How have ideas of world literature evolved since Goethe? provenance
  2. Which entry fits world literature? action
Context Traditions.

Context.

Oral traditions

Oral traditions.

Oral traditions

Oral traditions.

  1. How do literary histories include oral storytelling traditions? provenance
  2. Which entry fits oral literature? action

Taiwan

Taiwanese literature.

Taiwan

Taiwan.

  1. How is Taiwanese literary history periodised, with debates attributed? provenance
  2. Which entry fits Taiwanese literature? action

What the second pass must settle

  • The registry alias history of encyclopedias should be moved to book history entries
  • Should each national literature history be a separate entry?
  • How should canon debates be presented?