← Back to catalogue
Research draft

Tour Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes

vr.tr.tour-auvergne-rh-ne-alpes · ACT.EVT

Let an agent describe the Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes stage race as recorded in the registry, relay its format, history and winners from official sources on the assumption that it is the Criterium du Dauphine, flag the labelling uncertainty, and route current edition information to the organiser and the UCI.

Thing Registry Activities and processes

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent describe the Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes stage race as recorded in the registry, relay its format, history and winners from official sources on the assumption that it is the Criterium du Dauphine, flag the labelling uncertainty, and route current edition information to the organiser and the UCI.

A professional road cycling stage race in the Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes region of France registered under UCI categories 2.PT, 2.HC and 2.UWT, which the registry labels Tour Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes and which by its categories corresponds to the region WorldTour stage race, the Criterium du Dauphine held in June as a preparation race for the Tour de France; the identification of the registry label with the Dauphine is noted as a point to verify.

What it is for: Not applicable; a cycling race.

It can be explain format and route; relay history and winners; flag identification uncertainty; route results to official data.

Distinguishing features

Tour de France preparation race

Alpine mountain stages

WorldTour status

Registry label needs verification

What it looks like

Not a physical object; a stage race through the Alps and Massif Central.

Physical character

Dauphine first held: 1947 year

stages: 8 count - typical

How it is recognised

WorldTour stage race in Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes

June, eight stages, Alpine finishes

The Rhone-Alpes Isere Tour is a separate lower-category race

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms, category 2.UWT

UCI WorldTour race

is a kind of - in cycling terms

stage race

is held in - the region

Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes

is organised by - for the Dauphine

Amaury Sport Organisation

In practice

Families and kinds

editions by year

stages and classifications

winners including riders who went on to win the Tour de France

the Rhone-Alpes Isere Tour as a possible source of the registry label

Identifiers

UCI category 2.UWT current, if the Dauphine

Standards and regulation

UCI regulations for WorldTour races

Anti-doping rules

Road closure and safety rules

Failure modes and hazards

Misidentifying the race behind the registry label

Stale results and routes

Confusing with lower-category regional races

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Identity What the race is.

Identity.

What

The race.

What

What.

  1. What race does the registry label refer to, and how is it organised? definition
  2. Is the question about the Dauphine, the Rhone-Alpes Isere Tour or another regional race? boundary

Format

Format and route.

Format

Format.

  1. How many stages are raced, and what terrain does the route cover? definition
  2. Where is the current route published? provenance
Current Current edition.

Data.

Edition

Dates and route.

Edition

Edition.

  1. When is the current or next edition, from the organiser? provenance
  2. Is the information current? boundary

Results

Results.

Results

Results.

  1. What are the results and classifications, from official sources? measurement
  2. Which entry fits a specific rider? action
History Winners and history.

Records.

Winners

Winners.

Winners

Winners.

  1. Who has won the race, and how often did winners go on to win the Tour, with sources? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Development

Development.

Development

Development.

  1. How did the race develop, including its names and sponsors? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the history of French cycling? action
Context Governance and media.

Context.

Governance

Governance.

Governance

Governance.

  1. How do the UCI and the organiser govern the race? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the UCI WorldTour? action

Media

Broadcast and following.

Media

Media.

  1. Where is the race broadcast and followed? provenance
  2. Is the question about betting, which the model does not handle? boundary

What the second pass must settle

  • Does the registry label refer to the Criterium du Dauphine or another race?
  • How should official results be linked?
  • How should renamings of regional races be recorded?