theorem
Let an agent explain theorems by statement, proof, history and use, distinguish related terms, and point to formal verification resources.
Research draft, second pass
A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.
written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify
Researched by: Claude
Purpose and description
Let an agent explain theorems by statement, proof, history and use, distinguish related terms, and point to formal verification resources.
A mathematical statement proved true by logical deduction from axioms and previously established results, such as the Pythagorean theorem or the fundamental theorem of arithmetic; related terms include lemma, corollary and proposition.
What it is for: Building mathematical knowledge.
It can be state and explain a theorem; outline or check a proof; distinguish lemma, corollary and conjecture; find formalised proofs.
Distinguishing features
Proved statement
Depends on axioms
Builds on earlier results
Can be formally verified
What it looks like
Not physical; statements and proofs in texts and formal libraries.
How it is recognised
Named results with proofs
Lemmas and corollaries
Conjectures are unproved
Related models
is a kind of - category
is established by - method
is contrasted with - unproved statement
is related to - foundation
In practice
Families and kinds
major named theorems
lemmas
corollaries
existence and classification theorems
formally verified theorems
Standards and regulation
No specific regulation
Failure modes and hazards
Misstating hypotheses
Misattributing theorems
Treating conjectures as proved
Also called
+17
Where this came from
wikidata · CC0 1.0
Also registered as vr.tr.theorem
Drafted structure
Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.
Statement What it says.
Hypotheses matter.
State
Precise statement.
State
Statement.
- What exactly does the theorem state, including all hypotheses? definition
- What happens if a hypothesis is dropped? boundary
Meaning
Intuition.
Meaning
Intuition.
- How can the theorem be explained intuitively? action
- Which example illustrates it? action
Proof Why it is true.
Proofs justify.
Outline
Proof sketch.
Outline
Proof outline.
- What are the main steps of a standard proof? definition
- Which earlier results does it use? provenance
Check
Verifying.
Check
Checking proofs.
- Is this proposed proof correct, and where might it fail? boundary
- Is there a formalised proof in a proof assistant? provenance
Terms Related terms.
Terminology differs.
Lemma
Lemmas and corollaries.
Lemma
Lemmas and corollaries.
- Is this result a lemma, corollary or main theorem? definition
- Why is it labelled that way? definition
Conjecture
Unproved statements.
Conjecture
Conjectures.
- Has this statement actually been proved, or is it still a conjecture? provenance
- Which source confirms its status? provenance
History Origins.
Attribution matters.
Who
Discoverers.
Who
Attribution.
- Who first proved the theorem, according to historians of mathematics? provenance
- Is the naming historically accurate? boundary
Uses
Applications.
Uses
Applications.
- Where is the theorem used in mathematics or applications? provenance
- Which fields depend on it? provenance
What the second pass must settle
- Should each theorem be a separate entry?
- How should formal libraries be linked?
- How should naming disputes be recorded?