{ "model": { "rank": 6599, "code": "thing-q660567", "model_id": "vr.tr.child-pornography", "name": "child pornography", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognize suspected child sexual abuse material, record uncertainty and harm, and select protective actions within an explicitly identified policy and legal context.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q660567/", "tier": 2, "score": 59, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "Child pornography in Japan", "Lolita video", "Self-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Material", "simulated child pornography" ], "aliasCount": 4, "merged": 4, "knownIn": 59, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q660567", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q660567", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T23:06:09Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 22.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0886b-245f-7e00-afce-eae05321234a\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: child pornography\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 007: 10", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 51.7, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0886b-245f-7252-9277-961ea41e3614\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: child pornography\nRegistry id: vr.tr.child-pornography\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entr" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q660567", "registryId": "vr.tr.child-pornography", "name": "child pornography", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q660567/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.child-pornography", "name": "child pornography", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognize suspected child sexual abuse material, record uncertainty and harm, and select protective actions within an explicitly identified policy and legal context.", "definition": "Child pornography is a legal and historical term for material depicting the sexual exploitation or abuse of children, often termed child sexual abuse material (CSAM), with jurisdiction-dependent boundaries concerning fictional, simulated and digitally generated depictions.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the recognition, classification, harm assessment and protective handling of material registered as child pornography, using child sexual abuse material (CSAM) where appropriate while preserving distinctions between terminology, depicted abuse, associated conduct and jurisdiction-dependent classifications.", "in_scope": [ "Criteria for classifying suspected material without reproducing explicit content", "Evidence and uncertainty concerning depicted age, sexual content and whether an actual child is represented", "Distinctions between recorded abuse, manipulated depictions and wholly synthetic material", "Separate assessment of creation, possession, access and distribution as associated conduct", "Victim protection, restricted handling, reporting and removal decisions" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Child sexual abuse incidents beyond their relationship to a depiction", "Grooming and sexual exploitation processes beyond links needed for safeguarding", "Adult sexual material without evidence of child involvement or representation", "Nonsexual depictions of children and legitimate health or educational material absent qualifying evidence", "General criminal procedure, offender diagnosis and platform moderation architecture" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Classification requires an articulated basis concerning both child involvement or representation and qualifying sexual content; nudity alone must not function as a conclusive test.", "A depiction and the conduct involving it are recorded separately: classifying material does not establish who created, possessed or distributed it.", "Recorded abuse of an actual child is distinguished from manipulated or wholly synthetic depictions without assuming that these categories have identical legal treatment.", "Uncertain age remains uncertain unless supported by appropriate evidence; apparent youth alone does not establish chronological age.", "A registry label, automated detection result or report initiates assessment rather than establishing a verified legal classification." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Classification framework", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Named legal instrument or safeguarding policy, jurisdiction, version and effective date", "why_it_matters": "Makes the basis of a classification explicit and allows different frameworks to produce different assessments." }, { "name": "Assessment status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Unassessed | suspected | assessed under a named framework | inconclusive | excluded under a named framework", "why_it_matters": "Prevents suspicion from being presented as an established finding." }, { "name": "Depicted age evidence", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Documented age at creation | contextual evidence | appearance-based estimate | unavailable | conflicting", "why_it_matters": "Separates evidence about age at depiction from current age and uncertain visual inference." }, { "name": "Depiction origin", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Recorded actual person | manipulated actual-person imagery | wholly synthetic | mixed | unknown", "why_it_matters": "Supports distinct assessments of victim linkage, authenticity and applicable classification." }, { "name": "Sexual-content criterion", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Applicable criterion, non-graphic assessment rationale and evidence reference", "why_it_matters": "Requires a reasoned classification without embedding explicit descriptions or material." }, { "name": "Associated conduct", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Suspected creation | access | possession | distribution | solicitation | unknown; each assessed separately", "why_it_matters": "Prevents the material's classification from being treated as proof of a person's actions." }, { "name": "Safeguarding urgency", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Unknown | concern requiring review | evidence of ongoing harm | evidence of immediate danger", "why_it_matters": "Prioritizes protective escalation according to documented evidence." }, { "name": "Handling authority", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Authorized role, permitted operation, approved system and governing procedure", "why_it_matters": "Constrains access, preservation and reporting to an established protective purpose." } ], "affordances": [ "Record a non-graphic concern with its evidence basis and unresolved uncertainties.", "Compare an assessment against named legal and safeguarding definitions.", "Route suspected material to an authorized specialist without requesting additional copies.", "Escalate evidence of immediate danger through an established safeguarding channel.", "Initiate authorized restriction, removal or preservation procedures and track their outcomes.", "Correct mistaken classifications while maintaining an appropriate decision audit." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "definition-and-boundaries", "name": "Definition and boundaries", "description": "Establishes what the registry term denotes and which framework governs each assessment.", "rationale": "The historical label, safeguarding terminology and legal categories must not be assumed to have identical boundaries.", "layers": [ { "id": "terminology-and-authority", "name": "Terminology and authority", "description": "Connects terminology to a named definition and its authority.", "findings": [ { "id": "framework-specific-definition", "name": "Framework-specific definition", "description": "Record the governing definition before treating the registry label as a classification.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does the selected authority include under child pornography or child sexual abuse material?", "kind": "definition", "id": "framework-specific-definition-q01" }, { "text": "Which source, jurisdiction and effective date establish that definition?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "framework-specific-definition-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-boundaries", "name": "Content boundaries", "description": "Separates qualifying material from superficially similar or contextual depictions.", "findings": [ { "id": "qualifying-content-test", "name": "Qualifying content test", "description": "Require a framework-specific, non-graphic rationale addressing sexual content and relevant context.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which criterion distinguishes the suspected material from nonsexual nudity, medical imagery or educational content?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "qualifying-content-test-q01" }, { "text": "What contextual evidence supports or weakens that classification without reproducing the depiction?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "qualifying-content-test-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "child-representation-and-origin", "name": "Child representation and origin", "description": "Addresses age evidence and the relationship between a depiction and an actual child.", "rationale": "Age uncertainty and synthetic or manipulated imagery require separate reasoning rather than a single visual judgment.", "layers": [ { "id": "age-at-depiction", "name": "Age at depiction", "description": "Records evidence concerning age when the material was created.", "findings": [ { "id": "age-evidence-and-limits", "name": "Age evidence and limits", "description": "Distinguish documented age from estimates, claims and unavailable evidence.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence establishes or constrains the person's age at the time of depiction?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "age-evidence-and-limits-q01" }, { "text": "How should unresolved age uncertainty affect classification and specialist review?", "kind": "action", "id": "age-evidence-and-limits-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "actual-and-synthetic-depictions", "name": "Actual and synthetic depictions", "description": "Separates recorded persons, manipulated imagery and synthetic representations.", "findings": [ { "id": "origin-and-person-linkage", "name": "Origin and person linkage", "description": "Assess origin and any actual-person linkage independently of whether a selected framework prohibits the material.", "questions": [ { "text": "What reliable evidence indicates recorded, manipulated, synthetic or mixed origin?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "origin-and-person-linkage-q01" }, { "text": "How does the selected definition treat synthetic depictions and imagery manipulated from an actual child's likeness?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "origin-and-person-linkage-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "abuse-harm-and-associated-conduct", "name": "Abuse, harm and associated conduct", "description": "Connects material to safeguarding concerns while keeping attribution of conduct evidence-based.", "rationale": "Protecting a child and determining what someone did are distinct tasks with different evidentiary needs.", "layers": [ { "id": "victim-safeguarding", "name": "Victim safeguarding", "description": "Identifies evidence of present danger and protective needs without unnecessary identification.", "findings": [ { "id": "current-danger-and-victim-linkage", "name": "Current danger and victim linkage", "description": "Record whether available information supports ongoing harm, immediate danger or linkage to an identified victim.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence indicates immediate danger or ongoing abuse rather than an assumption based solely on discovery?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "current-danger-and-victim-linkage-q01" }, { "text": "Which authorized safeguarding route can act on that evidence while minimizing disclosure of identifying information?", "kind": "action", "id": "current-danger-and-victim-linkage-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "conduct-and-attribution", "name": "Conduct and attribution", "description": "Separates material assessment from claims about creation, access, possession or distribution.", "findings": [ { "id": "conduct-specific-evidence", "name": "Conduct-specific evidence", "description": "Record each alleged action with its own evidence and uncertainty, including the possibility of unsolicited receipt.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence supports each claimed action rather than merely the presence of material in a system?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "conduct-specific-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Which distinctions between unsolicited receipt, deliberate access and redistribution matter under the selected framework?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "conduct-specific-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "protective-handling-and-review", "name": "Protective handling and review", "description": "Defines controlled responses to suspected material and mechanisms for reassessment.", "rationale": "Assessment must lead to protective action without unnecessary copying, exposure or unsupported final judgments.", "layers": [ { "id": "restricted-response", "name": "Restricted response", "description": "Binds reporting, restriction, preservation and removal to authorized procedures.", "findings": [ { "id": "authorized-handling-path", "name": "Authorized handling path", "description": "Record permitted actions and accountable recipients without storing the material in the meta-model.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which approved procedure governs reporting, access restriction, preservation and removal in this setting?", "kind": "action", "id": "authorized-handling-path-q01" }, { "text": "What minimum non-graphic information can support the response without acquiring or transmitting additional copies?", "kind": "action", "id": "authorized-handling-path-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "assessment-quality-and-correction", "name": "Assessment quality and correction", "description": "Makes detection uncertainty, specialist review and correction visible.", "findings": [ { "id": "reviewable-classification", "name": "Reviewable classification", "description": "Separate automated signals and initial reports from accountable review outcomes.", "questions": [ { "text": "What validation evidence and known limitations apply to the detection signal used in this assessment?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "reviewable-classification-q01" }, { "text": "Who can resolve an inconclusive assessment or correct a false positive, and how is that decision recorded?", "kind": "action", "id": "reviewable-classification-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This is a recall-based description; the named instruments have not been consulted for this response, and their current status and precise scope require verification.", "The supplied ACT.ACT classification warrants review because the label commonly denotes material, while production, distribution and possession denote activities.", "No sense was recorded; legal and safeguarding terminology overlap without having universally identical boundaries." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of child pornography this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Photographic or audiovisual records of actual child sexual abuse", "Live-streamed child sexual abuse", "Manipulated imagery depicting an identifiable child", "Wholly synthetic or computer-generated depictions", "Drawn or animated depictions, where included in the relevant definition" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of child pornography this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "United Nations: Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography", "International Labour Organization: Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182)", "Council of Europe: Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse, known as the Lanzarote Convention", "Council of Europe: Convention on Cybercrime, known as the Budapest Convention", "European Parliament and Council: Directive 2011/93/EU on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of child pornography this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Legal classification of prohibited material and related conduct", "Victim identification and safeguarding investigations", "Platform detection, reporting and removal of abusive material", "Digital forensic evidence classification", "Research on exploitation patterns and prevention using controlled, ethically governed data" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of child pornography this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Reported suspected incidents within a defined reporting system and period", "typical_range": "No universal range; reports may overlap and do not establish confirmed offences or unique victims", "unit": "reports per reporting period" }, { "quantity": "Time between detection and removal", "typical_range": "Varies by service, reporting pathway and operational definition", "unit": "hours" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of child pornography this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Abuse and exploitation of children during production", "Repeated victimisation through continued circulation and viewing", "Coercion, grooming and sexual extortion involving imagery", "False positives or missed detections in automated classification", "Confusing counts of files, reports, incidents and victims when estimating prevalence" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of child pornography this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Legal treatment of fictional, simulated and wholly synthetic depictions varies across jurisdictions.", "Treatment of self-generated imagery involving minors, including safeguarding responses and criminal liability, varies.", "Definitions, reporting obligations and rules governing possession, access and distribution differ across legal systems." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of child pornography this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Child sexual abuse material", "difference": "Often refers to the same material using terminology that foregrounds abuse; its scope does not necessarily match every statutory definition of child pornography." }, { "name": "Child sexual abuse", "difference": "The abusive conduct itself; it can occur without any recording or depiction." }, { "name": "Child sexual exploitation", "difference": "A broader category of exploitation that can include production or circulation of material but does not require it." }, { "name": "Adult pornography", "difference": "Depicts adults; adulthood alone does not establish consent or lawful production." }, { "name": "Nonsexual imagery of children", "difference": "The presence of a child, including nudity in some contexts, does not by itself establish sexual abuse material; content and applicable definitions matter." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of child pornography this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which authoritative definitions should anchor this registry entry, and where do their boundaries differ?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already cover this concept and require this entry to link to it?", "How should the ACT classification connect depiction-level assessment to associated activities without creating a duplicate registered thing?", "Which validated methods adequately support age and origin assessments, and when must those attributes remain unknown?", "Which jurisdiction-specific and institution-specific procedures govern reporting, preservation, removal and survivor privacy?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 16, "questions": 24 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a child pornography, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to recognize suspected child sexual abuse material, record uncertainty and harm, and select protective actions within an explicitly identified policy and legal context.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: Child pornography in Japan, Lolita video, Self-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Material, simulated child pornography.", "4 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 59 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a child pornography, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "Child pornography in Japan", "Lolita video", "Self-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Material", "simulated child pornography" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 59 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 4 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one child pornography from another, and a child pornography from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a child pornography, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a child pornography, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a child pornography is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a child pornography, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a child pornography, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a child pornography is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a child pornography sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a child pornography, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a child pornography, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a child pornography is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a child pornography from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a child pornography, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a child pornography, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a child pornography is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a child pornography passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a child pornography between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a child pornography, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a child pornography, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a child pornography is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a child pornography, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a child pornography is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a child pornography, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a child pornography, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a child pornography is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a child pornography proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a child pornography, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a child pornography and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a child pornography, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a child pornography, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a child pornography is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a child pornography consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a child pornography takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a child pornography, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a child pornography, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a child pornography is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What child pornography is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of child pornography are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is child pornography operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of child pornography and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of child pornography?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as child pornography?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a child pornography came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a child pornography and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a child pornography, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a child pornography, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a child pornography is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a child pornography is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a child pornography, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a child pornography, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a child pornography is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }