{ "model": { "rank": 6633, "code": "thing-q713414", "model_id": "vr.tr.history-of-korea", "name": "history of Korea", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise, assess and responsibly use accounts of Korea's past while preserving the boundaries, evidence and competing interpretations behind their claims.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.KNW", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q713414/", "tier": 2, "score": 59, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "military history of Korea", "military history of Goguryeo", "history of Korean Buddhism", "history of Silla", "history of Goryeo", "Manchuria and Korea as One" ], "aliasCount": 6, "merged": 6, "knownIn": 59, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q713414", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q713414", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T23:10:48Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 15.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0886f-2c63-7892-a1e6-88b47d56f686\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: history of Korea\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 007: 100", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 66.7, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0886f-2c54-7bb3-b0a1-20d20949ea5d\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: history of Korea\nRegistry id: vr.tr.history-of-korea\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry:" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q713414", "registryId": "vr.tr.history-of-korea", "name": "history of Korea", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q713414/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.history-of-korea", "name": "history of Korea", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise, assess and responsibly use accounts of Korea's past while preserving the boundaries, evidence and competing interpretations behind their claims.", "definition": "The history of Korea encompasses the past of the Korean Peninsula and historically connected populations and polities, together with the scholarly reconstruction and interpretation of that past.", "scope_statement": "This model owns history of Korea as a historical knowledge domain registered as vr.tr.history-of-korea in INF / INF.MED: its coverage, periodisation, evidence, interpretations and conditions for responsible synthesis, rather than any single historical work or the past events themselves.", "in_scope": [ "Temporal and geographical boundaries used to organise accounts of Korea's past", "Relationships among historical polities, populations and changing meanings of Korean identity", "Evidence and interpretations supporting historical claims", "Political, social, economic and cultural processes across periods", "Differences among scholarly, official, public and diaspora historical narratives", "Coverage gaps, disputed claims and revision conditions" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Individual historical events and people as independently modelled entities", "Contemporary Korean geography and territorial administration", "The Korean language as a linguistic system", "Individual books, documentaries, editions and physical copies", "Archives, museums and archaeological sites as institutions or places", "Present-day policy advice and forecasts about either Korean state" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "The subject organises knowledge about Korea's past across sources; an individual history book is a work that expresses part of that knowledge.", "Coverage must state whether Korea denotes a peninsula, particular polities, populations or cultural connections at the time being discussed.", "An account limited to the Republic of Korea or the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is identified as narrower coverage rather than assumed to represent the whole domain.", "Modern national categories cannot establish the identity or territorial extent of earlier populations without an explicit historical argument.", "Historical assertions are distinguishable from origin traditions, commemorative narratives and interpretations by their stated evidence and claim type." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Temporal coverage", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Start and end dates or intervals, with calendar, precision and uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Shows which parts of Korea's past an account covers and prevents precise dates from being inferred from broad period labels." }, { "name": "Periodisation framework", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Named framework with boundaries and rationale; dynastic, archaeological, social-economic or other explicitly described scheme", "why_it_matters": "Allows comparison when accounts divide Korean history differently." }, { "name": "Historical spatial frame", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Time-qualified links to regions, settlements, polities, borderlands and diaspora locations", "why_it_matters": "Prevents present-day borders from silently determining historical coverage." }, { "name": "Evidence basis", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Textual, archaeological, epigraphic, material, oral, visual, quantitative or mixed", "why_it_matters": "Makes clear what can support a claim and which kinds of corroboration remain possible." }, { "name": "Claim assessment", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Unassessed, supported within a stated source set, contested, insufficiently evidenced or superseded", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether an agent can present a claim directly, qualify it or leave it unresolved." }, { "name": "Narrative standpoint", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Links to authors, institutions, intended audiences and publication contexts; unknown when undocumented", "why_it_matters": "Supports comparison of interpretations without treating institutional affiliation as proof or disproof." }, { "name": "Thematic coverage", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Governance, warfare, diplomacy, livelihood, hierarchy, gender, migration, religion, language, knowledge, environment or other specified theme", "why_it_matters": "Reveals whether a purported general history covers more than political succession." } ], "affordances": [ "Construct a source-qualified chronology using explicitly chosen Korean historical periods.", "Compare accounts of the same development while preserving differences in territory, terminology and interpretation.", "Trace a historical claim through translations and scholarship to its underlying evidence.", "Identify periods, regions and populations missing from an account's stated coverage.", "Generate a bounded historical synthesis that labels disputed claims and evidence gaps.", "Revise an assessment when new evidence or a documented reinterpretation changes its basis." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "chronology-and-periodisation", "name": "Chronology and periodisation", "description": "How accounts locate and divide Korea's past without treating one sequence of period labels as universal.", "rationale": "An agent needs to align dates and period boundaries before combining historical accounts.", "layers": [ { "id": "period-frameworks", "name": "Period frameworks", "description": "The organising periods selected by an account and the historical arguments behind their boundaries.", "findings": [ { "id": "explicit-period-boundaries", "name": "Explicit period boundaries", "description": "Record how an account uses labels such as Three Kingdoms, Goryeo, Joseon, colonial rule and division, including overlaps and alternative boundaries.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which period labels organise this account, and what changes justify each boundary?", "kind": "definition", "id": "explicit-period-boundaries-q01" }, { "text": "Where would an archaeological, social or regional chronology divide the same span differently?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "explicit-period-boundaries-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "historical-date-alignment", "name": "Historical date alignment", "description": "Original dating expressions, conversions and uncertainty in the chronology.", "findings": [ { "id": "traceable-date-conversion", "name": "Traceable date conversion", "description": "Preserve original calendar or reign-year references alongside normalised dates and distinguish event dates from dates of surviving accounts.", "questions": [ { "text": "What calendar or reign-year system supplies this date, and how was it converted?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "traceable-date-conversion-q01" }, { "text": "Does the date describe the occurrence, the recording of it or a later reconstruction?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "traceable-date-conversion-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "territories-polities-and-belonging", "name": "Territories, polities and belonging", "description": "The changing spatial and collective referents included under history of Korea.", "rationale": "Historical coverage becomes misleading when modern borders or identities are projected onto earlier settings.", "layers": [ { "id": "historical-geographies", "name": "Historical geographies", "description": "Time-specific locations, political reach and cross-border connections.", "findings": [ { "id": "time-qualified-spatial-claims", "name": "Time-qualified spatial claims", "description": "Distinguish settlement, administration, military presence, claimed territory and cultural contact when describing the peninsula and adjacent regions.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does this map or statement represent administration, settlement, influence or a territorial claim at the stated time?", "kind": "definition", "id": "time-qualified-spatial-claims-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence warrants including a locality beyond the peninsula in this account of Korean history?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "time-qualified-spatial-claims-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "historical-identities", "name": "Historical identities", "description": "Names and affiliations used by historical actors and by subsequent interpreters.", "findings": [ { "id": "attributed-identity-and-succession", "name": "Attributed identity and succession", "description": "Keep contemporary self-descriptions, external labels and later claims of Korean continuity or political succession distinguishable.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who applied the identity or succession label, when, and using what terminology?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attributed-identity-and-succession-q01" }, { "text": "What supports connecting this polity or population to Korean history without equating it with a modern nation-state?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "attributed-identity-and-succession-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-interpretation", "name": "Evidence and interpretation", "description": "How historical assertions are supported, transmitted, translated and disputed.", "rationale": "The agent must assess claims individually instead of treating a historical narrative as uniformly established.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-transmission", "name": "Source transmission", "description": "The relationship between surviving evidence and the period or occurrence it describes.", "findings": [ { "id": "source-distance-and-mediation", "name": "Source distance and mediation", "description": "Assess records such as chronicles, annals and inscriptions alongside archaeological evidence, recording composition, survival, editorial intervention and translation.", "questions": [ { "text": "How far removed is this source from the occurrence, and what earlier material does it claim to preserve?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "source-distance-and-mediation-q01" }, { "text": "Which edition, passage, object record or excavation report was actually examined, and through which translation if any?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "source-distance-and-mediation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "claim-evaluation", "name": "Claim evaluation", "description": "Support and disagreement at the level of specific historical assertions.", "findings": [ { "id": "bounded-corroboration", "name": "Bounded corroboration", "description": "Separate origin traditions, observations and interpretive conclusions; assess whether apparent corroboration comes from independent evidence.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is this assertion an origin tradition, a reported occurrence or an interpretation, and what evidence bears on that classification?", "kind": "definition", "id": "bounded-corroboration-q01" }, { "text": "Should the agent state, qualify or withhold the assertion given source dependence and documented disagreement?", "kind": "action", "id": "bounded-corroboration-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "institutions-and-lived-experience", "name": "Institutions and lived experience", "description": "Processes connecting political organisation with livelihoods, hierarchy and cultural practice.", "rationale": "A model of Korean history needs to detect the omissions and causal shortcuts of accounts organised only around rulers and wars.", "layers": [ { "id": "governance-and-livelihood", "name": "Governance and livelihood", "description": "Relationships among state institutions, land, labour, taxation and social position.", "findings": [ { "id": "institutions-in-practice", "name": "Institutions in practice", "description": "Record how an account connects institutions and categories, including yangban or nobi where relevant, to documented practices in a particular period and locality.", "questions": [ { "text": "What did this institutional or status term mean in the period examined, and how did its meaning change?", "kind": "definition", "id": "institutions-in-practice-q01" }, { "text": "Which evidence distinguishes prescribed rules from actual landholding, labour obligations or social mobility?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "institutions-in-practice-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "cultural-and-social-change", "name": "Cultural and social change", "description": "Changes in religion, writing, education, family life and cultural exchange across different communities.", "findings": [ { "id": "uneven-cultural-change", "name": "Uneven cultural change", "description": "Assess claims about Buddhism, Confucian traditions, vernacular writing and other practices through evidence of adoption, coexistence and regional or social variation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which communities and practices support the claimed cultural change, and which remain outside the evidence?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "uneven-cultural-change-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence distinguishes an official endorsement or textual innovation from its use in everyday life?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "uneven-cultural-change-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "modern-ruptures-and-historical-memory", "name": "Modern ruptures and historical memory", "description": "Interpretation of colonial rule, liberation, division, war and subsequent trajectories, together with their public remembrance.", "rationale": "An agent must preserve the distinction between historical evidence and later political or commemorative uses of Korea's past.", "layers": [ { "id": "colonial-and-divided-trajectories", "name": "Colonial and divided trajectories", "description": "Connected accounts of colonial institutions, independence movements, division, the Korean War and developments in both Korean states.", "findings": [ { "id": "comparably-bounded-modern-accounts", "name": "Comparably bounded modern accounts", "description": "Make scope, causal arguments and evidence access explicit when relating experiences across colonial and postcolonial settings.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which populations, territories and institutions are covered by this account of colonial rule, division or war?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "comparably-bounded-modern-accounts-q01" }, { "text": "How do differences in archival access and source production constrain comparisons between northern and southern trajectories?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "comparably-bounded-modern-accounts-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "historiography-and-remembrance", "name": "Historiography and remembrance", "description": "Relationships among scholarship, education, commemoration and claims made about the past.", "findings": [ { "id": "attributed-memory-narratives", "name": "Attributed memory narratives", "description": "Record who advances an interpretation in scholarship, textbooks, museums, monuments or diaspora settings and distinguish its public role from its evidentiary support.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who produced this narrative, for which audience, and in what institutional and historical context?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attributed-memory-narratives-q01" }, { "text": "How should the agent explain a disagreement while distinguishing evidence quality from political prominence?", "kind": "action", "id": "attributed-memory-narratives-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The name is interpreted as a historical subject, not a specific creative work; the INF.MED classification alone does not establish a titled work.", "Early chronology, territorial boundaries and claims of continuity require source-specific checking.", "No sources were consulted; no identifier or bibliographic standard is assigned to the subject itself." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of history of Korea this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Political and institutional history", "Social history", "Economic history", "Cultural and intellectual history", "Military history", "Transnational and diaspora history" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of history of Korea this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Historical research and teaching", "Interpretation of archaeological sites, museum collections and cultural heritage", "Contextualizing Korea's division and inter-Korean relations", "Studying migration, colonialism and state formation in East Asia", "Evaluating public historical narratives against documentary and material evidence" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of history of Korea this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating legendary foundation accounts as independently verified chronology", "Projecting present-day national borders and identities onto ancient polities", "Treating North Korean, South Korean or colonial-era narratives as interchangeable or politically neutral", "Mistaking the survival of elite written records for representative evidence about the whole population", "Confusing the historical subject with a particular book, edition or documentary bearing the same title" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of history of Korea this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "North Korean and South Korean historiographies differ in periodization, terminology and interpretations of political legitimacy.", "Korean, Chinese and Japanese historiographies dispute aspects of ancient polities, territorial relationships and colonial history.", "Diaspora histories extend the subject beyond the peninsula and emphasize migration, community formation and changing citizenship." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of history of Korea this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Korean historiography", "difference": "Studies how Korean history has been researched and written, rather than primarily reconstructing the past itself." }, { "name": "Korean studies", "difference": "Includes language, literature, society and other subjects alongside history." }, { "name": "History of South Korea", "difference": "Focuses on the southern state's formation and development rather than the full historical scope of Korea." }, { "name": "History of North Korea", "difference": "Focuses on the northern state's formation and development rather than the full historical scope of Korea." }, { "name": "Korean archaeology", "difference": "Investigates the past primarily through material remains; Korean history also draws extensively on written and oral evidence." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of history of Korea this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry intend history of Korea as a knowledge domain, a corpus of historical representations or another information object, given the missing definition?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already own this domain and require this registry entry to link to it?", "Which periodisation frameworks and multilingual reference sources should anchor initial coverage without making one national narrative the default?", "How should coverage of ancient polities, adjacent regions and diaspora histories be bounded and justified for this entry?", "Which archival access gaps, translation dependencies and historiographical disputes must remain explicitly unresolved after research?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 16, "questions": 26 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "discipline or field of knowledge", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a history of Korea, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to recognise, assess and responsibly use accounts of Korea's past while preserving the boundaries, evidence and competing interpretations behind their claims.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: military history of Korea, military history of Goguryeo, history of Korean Buddhism, history of Silla, history of Goryeo, Manchuria and Korea as One.", "6 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 59 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a history of Korea, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says" ], "howItIsRecognised": [], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "military history of Korea", "military history of Goguryeo", "history of Korean Buddhism", "history of Silla", "history of Goryeo", "Manchuria and Korea as One" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 59 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 6 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one history of Korea from another, and a history of Korea from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a history of Korea, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a history of Korea, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a history of Korea is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a history of Korea, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a history of Korea, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a history of Korea is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a history of Korea sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a history of Korea, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a history of Korea, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a history of Korea is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a history of Korea from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a history of Korea, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a history of Korea, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a history of Korea is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a history of Korea passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a history of Korea between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a history of Korea, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a history of Korea, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a history of Korea is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a history of Korea, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a history of Korea is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a history of Korea, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a history of Korea, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a history of Korea is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a history of Korea says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a history of Korea contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a history of Korea, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a history of Korea, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a history of Korea is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a history of Korea and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a history of Korea, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a history of Korea, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a history of Korea is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "subject-and-method", "name": "Subject matter and method", "description": "What history of Korea studies and how it establishes anything.", "rationale": "A field is identified by its questions and its methods, and those are what distinguish it from the fields next to it.", "layers": [ { "id": "subject", "name": "Subject matter", "description": "The questions it takes as its own.", "findings": [ { "id": "subject-record", "name": "Questions and objects of study", "description": "What it is about, stated so a neighbouring field can be told apart.", "questions": [ { "id": "subject-record-q01", "text": "What questions and objects does history of Korea take as its own?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "subject-record-q02", "text": "Which questions does it share with a neighbouring field, and who claims them?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "method", "name": "Method and evidence", "description": "How claims are established and what counts as evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "method-record", "name": "Methods and standards of evidence", "description": "The methods used and what they are taken to establish.", "questions": [ { "id": "method-record-q01", "text": "By what methods does history of Korea establish claims, and what counts as sufficient evidence?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "method-record-q02", "text": "What kind of claim can this field not settle, and where should an agent look instead?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "institutions-and-classification", "name": "Institutions and classification", "description": "Where history of Korea is practised and how catalogues place it.", "rationale": "The institutional footprint is the evidence that a field exists as a field rather than as a topic.", "layers": [ { "id": "institutions", "name": "Institutional markers", "description": "Societies, journals, degrees and departments.", "findings": [ { "id": "institution-record", "name": "Bodies and venues", "description": "Where the field organises itself.", "questions": [ { "id": "institution-record-q01", "text": "Which societies, journals or degrees mark history of Korea as an established field?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "institution-record-q02", "text": "What would show that it is emerging or dissolving rather than established?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification", "name": "Classification schemes", "description": "Where library and research classifications put it.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-record", "name": "Codes and their disagreements", "description": "The classification codes that place it, and where they differ.", "questions": [ { "id": "classification-record-q01", "text": "Which classification schemes place history of Korea, under what codes?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "classification-record-q02", "text": "Where do those schemes disagree about its scope?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a history of Korea came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a history of Korea and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a history of Korea, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a history of Korea, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a history of Korea is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a history of Korea is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a history of Korea, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a history of Korea, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a history of Korea is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }