{ "model": { "rank": 4238, "code": "thing-q715625", "model_id": "vr.tr.martial-law", "name": "martial law", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a claimed or operating martial-law regime, assess its authority and effects, and identify which actions require jurisdiction-specific verification.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.MED", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q715625/", "tier": 2, "score": 77, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "emergency martial law", "2022 Russian martial law", "martial law in Russia", "Martial law in Ukraine" ], "aliasCount": 4, "merged": 4, "knownIn": 77, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q715625", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q715625", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T19:46:51Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 20.6, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087b4-763c-7191-9c1d-157cdf1e148b\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: martial law\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 695 things:\n# Batch 004: 1001 regi", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 65.7, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087b4-764e-77e1-802a-8c5e28cba855\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: martial law\nRegistry id: vr.tr.martial-law\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\n" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q715625", "registryId": "vr.tr.martial-law", "name": "martial law", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q715625/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.martial-law", "name": "martial law", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a claimed or operating martial-law regime, assess its authority and effects, and identify which actions require jurisdiction-specific verification.", "definition": "Martial law is an exceptional regime in which military authorities exercise governmental powers ordinarily exercised by civilian authorities, with its legal basis, scope and limits varying by jurisdiction.", "scope_statement": "This model owns martial law as an exceptional arrangement of public authority involving military assumption or exercise of governmental powers over civilians, including its declaration, actual operation, limits and termination; it does not treat martial law as a work or medium despite the registry's INF / INF.MED placement.", "in_scope": [ "Declared martial law and military governance arrangements whose classification as martial law remains disputed", "Legal basis, triggering conditions, territorial reach and affected civilian populations", "Allocation of powers between military command, civilian government and courts", "Orders, enforcement practices, rights restrictions and safeguards attributable to the regime", "Review, extension, termination and restoration of ordinary civilian authority" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Military law governing service members in their military capacity", "States of emergency that do not involve the relevant military governmental powers", "Military occupation as a separate legal status arising from control of foreign territory", "Coups, wars and insurgencies as events that may precede or accompany martial law", "Individual military operations, prosecutions and detention cases beyond their relationship to the regime" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Identify which governmental powers the military exercises over civilians; military presence or logistical support alone does not establish martial law.", "Separate the authority's use of the label 'martial law' from the regime's verified legal status and observed practices.", "Determine whether civilian institutions remain authoritative, operate under military direction or have been displaced.", "Distinguish domestic exceptional military governance from military discipline and from occupation; overlapping circumstances require separate classifications.", "Test each claimed consequence against the applicable jurisdiction: the label alone does not establish suspension of a constitution, closure of civilian courts or unlimited military power." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Classification status", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Formally designated martial law; alleged de facto martial law; disputed classification; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an official label or an observer's description from becoming an unqualified legal conclusion." }, { "name": "Authority basis", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Links to applicable constitutional provisions, statutes, declarations, orders and interpreting decisions", "why_it_matters": "Allows each claimed power to be traced to the authority invoked for it." }, { "name": "Operational lifecycle", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Proposed; declared but not effective; operating; suspended; expired; revoked; disputed", "why_it_matters": "Separates announcement, legal effect and actual exercise of military authority." }, { "name": "Territorial and personal reach", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Specified areas, civilian populations, exceptions and effective intervals", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether a person, place or proposed action falls within an order's reach." }, { "name": "Military governmental role", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "For each governmental function: civilian control; military support; shared control; military direction; military substitution; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Makes the actual redistribution of authority visible without assuming all civilian government has ceased." }, { "name": "Duration and review intervals", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Elapsed days; specified expiry timestamps; days between required reviews; unspecified where unsupported", "why_it_matters": "Supports checks for expiry, overdue review and unsupported continuation." }, { "name": "Restriction and safeguard profile", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Links between each measure, affected rights, asserted justification, exceptions, remedies and review outcomes", "why_it_matters": "Supports assessment of particular measures rather than treating martial law as blanket permission." }, { "name": "Evidence status", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "For each assertion: official claim; independently corroborated practice; judicial finding; contested report; unknown", "why_it_matters": "Keeps asserted authority, observed conduct and authoritative determinations distinct." } ], "affordances": [ "Compare a declaration and observed military powers to assess whether martial law is the appropriate classification.", "Trace a proposed exercise of power to its asserted authority, scope, effective period and recorded challenges.", "Identify which civilian or military institution claims responsibility for a governmental function.", "Flag measures that exceed recorded limits, lack supporting authority or require unresolved legal interpretation.", "Track access to courts, review mechanisms and remedies for affected civilians.", "Monitor expiry, renewal and transfer of powers back to civilian institutions." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "classification-and-boundaries", "name": "Classification and boundaries", "description": "Establish what is being called martial law and whether that description fits the authority exercised.", "rationale": "The term can conceal materially different arrangements, and the registry's media classification should not determine the substantive model.", "layers": [ { "id": "claimed-and-observed-status", "name": "Claimed and observed status", "description": "Separate formal designation from descriptions of military governance in practice.", "findings": [ { "id": "martial-law-classification", "name": "Martial-law classification", "description": "Record who applies the label, their definition and the evidence supporting or challenging its application.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does an authoritative instrument expressly declare martial law, or is the classification supplied by courts, researchers or affected communities?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "martial-law-classification-q01" }, { "text": "Which military powers over civilians support this classification, and which aspects remain disputed?", "kind": "definition", "id": "martial-law-classification-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "neighbouring-regimes", "name": "Neighbouring regimes", "description": "Locate the arrangement relative to emergency government, military discipline and occupation.", "findings": [ { "id": "regime-boundary-test", "name": "Regime boundary test", "description": "Identify the additional governmental role that distinguishes the arrangement from military assistance or another exceptional legal regime.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the military merely assist civilian authorities, or can it direct or replace them in specified functions?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "regime-boundary-test-q01" }, { "text": "Are emergency powers, military occupation or military service law separately applicable, and which effects belong to each?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "regime-boundary-test-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "activation-and-legal-reach", "name": "Activation and legal reach", "description": "Connect the regime to its asserted legal basis, activation procedure and limits of application.", "rationale": "An agent must distinguish a declaration's existence from its validity and determine where and when its provisions purport to apply.", "layers": [ { "id": "authority-and-trigger", "name": "Authority and trigger", "description": "Examine the declaring actor, enabling provisions and conditions invoked.", "findings": [ { "id": "declaration-authority", "name": "Declaration authority", "description": "Record the declaration's provenance, claimed competence and evidence for required triggering conditions without presuming validity.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which actor issued the declaration, and which provisions are cited as empowering that actor to do so?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "declaration-authority-q01" }, { "text": "What triggering conditions and procedural approvals are required, and what evidence establishes or contests their satisfaction?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "declaration-authority-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "territory-population-and-time", "name": "Territory, population and time", "description": "Resolve the declaration's geographic, personal and temporal application.", "findings": [ { "id": "effective-reach", "name": "Effective reach", "description": "Record boundaries, commencement, expiry and exceptions separately from the area of actual enforcement.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which territories and categories of persons are covered or excluded by the operative instruments?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "effective-reach-q01" }, { "text": "When does the regime take effect and expire, and where does observed enforcement differ from its stated reach?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "effective-reach-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "military-and-civilian-authority", "name": "Military and civilian authority", "description": "Describe who governs, issues binding orders and adjudicates disputes during the regime.", "rationale": "The redistribution of governmental functions is central to recognising martial law and determining which instructions an agent can rely on.", "layers": [ { "id": "governmental-command", "name": "Governmental command", "description": "Map the military command structure onto the civilian functions it claims or exercises.", "findings": [ { "id": "allocation-of-functions", "name": "Allocation of functions", "description": "Identify authority over policing, administration and rulemaking, including surviving civilian powers and contested command relationships.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which civilian functions are retained, shared, subordinated or assumed by military authorities?", "kind": "definition", "id": "allocation-of-functions-q01" }, { "text": "Who may issue, amend or countermand an order affecting civilians, and how can that authority be verified?", "kind": "action", "id": "allocation-of-functions-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "courts-and-jurisdiction", "name": "Courts and jurisdiction", "description": "Establish the roles of civilian courts and military tribunals.", "findings": [ { "id": "civilian-adjudication", "name": "Civilian adjudication", "description": "Record court availability, claimed tribunal jurisdiction over civilians and decisions limiting or rejecting that jurisdiction.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which civilian courts remain legally competent and practically accessible during the regime?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "civilian-adjudication-q01" }, { "text": "On what asserted basis may military tribunals hear civilian cases, and what authoritative decisions accept or limit that claim?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "civilian-adjudication-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "measures-rights-and-remedies", "name": "Measures, rights and remedies", "description": "Connect concrete restrictions and enforcement practices to their asserted limits and available safeguards.", "rationale": "The martial-law label cannot establish whether a particular detention, restriction or use of force is authorised.", "layers": [ { "id": "orders-and-enforcement", "name": "Orders and enforcement", "description": "Examine measures imposed on civilians and how they are implemented.", "findings": [ { "id": "specific-coercive-measures", "name": "Specific coercive measures", "description": "Record any curfews, movement controls, searches, detentions, censorship or requisitions actually ordered or reported, without assuming these accompany every regime.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which measures have identifiable operative orders, and which are reported practices without a verified order?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "specific-coercive-measures-q01" }, { "text": "For a contemplated enforcement action, what authority, conditions, exceptions and limits must be checked?", "kind": "action", "id": "specific-coercive-measures-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "rights-and-contestation", "name": "Rights and contestation", "description": "Identify applicable rights protections and routes for challenging measures.", "findings": [ { "id": "safeguards-and-remedies", "name": "Safeguards and remedies", "description": "Connect affected rights to applicable domestic and international obligations, claimed derogations and remedies available in practice.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which rights protections and limits apply to each measure, and has any claimed derogation been documented and reviewed?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "safeguards-and-remedies-q01" }, { "text": "How can an affected civilian challenge detention or another order, and what evidence shows whether the remedy is accessible and effective?", "kind": "action", "id": "safeguards-and-remedies-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "review-and-civilian-restoration", "name": "Review and civilian restoration", "description": "Track scrutiny, continuation and the actual return of governmental powers to ordinary institutions.", "rationale": "Formal expiry or revocation may not resolve continuing military control, outstanding orders or accountability for actions taken.", "layers": [ { "id": "review-and-extension", "name": "Review and extension", "description": "Identify who may scrutinise or continue the regime and under what conditions.", "findings": [ { "id": "continuation-controls", "name": "Continuation controls", "description": "Record review deadlines, renewal requirements, challenges and decisions affecting continued operation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which institutions can review, invalidate or extend martial law, and what procedures must they follow?", "kind": "definition", "id": "continuation-controls-q01" }, { "text": "Which review or renewal deadlines have passed, and what verified decisions determine the current status?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "continuation-controls-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "termination-and-residual-effects", "name": "Termination and residual effects", "description": "Distinguish legal termination from practical restoration and unresolved consequences.", "findings": [ { "id": "restoration-of-ordinary-authority", "name": "Restoration of ordinary authority", "description": "Record the ending instrument, transfer of functions and treatment of continuing orders, detention and claims for redress.", "questions": [ { "text": "What event or instrument ends the regime, and what evidence confirms that civilian institutions have resumed the affected functions?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "restoration-of-ordinary-authority-q01" }, { "text": "Which orders, detentions, proceedings or redress claims require further action after termination, and which institution is responsible?", "kind": "action", "id": "restoration-of-ordinary-authority-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This describes the political and legal concept, not a creative work titled Martial Law; the supplied INF.MED domain and batch context make sense verification a priority.", "Recalled general knowledge only; no sources were consulted.", "Any jurisdiction-specific account must verify declaration procedures, permitted powers, rights protections and termination requirements." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of martial law this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "National constitutions and legislation, adopted by the relevant constitutional and legislative authorities, may govern declaration, oversight and termination.", "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly: Article 4 governs emergency derogations by states parties; martial law does not itself remove treaty obligations." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of martial law this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Establishing military administration during war, invasion or severe internal disorder.", "Assigning military authorities exceptional responsibilities for public order.", "Providing a framework for emergency restrictions such as curfews and movement controls, where legally authorized." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of martial law this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Duration in force", "typical_range": "No universal typical range", "unit": "days" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of martial law this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Indefinite continuation of exceptional military powers.", "Arbitrary detention and suppression of political opposition.", "Restrictions on expression, assembly and movement beyond lawful limits.", "Displacement of civilian courts or denial of fair-trial protections.", "Unclear chains of authority and weakened civilian accountability." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of martial law this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Some jurisdictions explicitly regulate martial law; others use different emergency arrangements or provide no equivalent constitutional category.", "Authority to declare it, legislative oversight and judicial review differ between jurisdictions.", "The term has been applied to substantially different arrangements, so the label alone does not establish which powers are available." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of martial law this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "state of emergency", "difference": "Emergency powers can remain under civilian administration; martial law involves military exercise of ordinarily civilian governmental powers." }, { "name": "military law", "difference": "Military law ordinarily governs armed forces and their discipline; martial law concerns exceptional military authority over civilian governance." }, { "name": "military occupation", "difference": "Occupation concerns territory placed under the authority of a hostile army; martial law need not involve foreign territory or a hostile army." }, { "name": "military dictatorship", "difference": "Military dictatorship describes who holds political power; martial law describes an exceptional governing regime that can also be declared under civilian leadership." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of martial law this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "What cross-jurisdictional definition best distinguishes martial law from other emergency regimes while preserving materially different domestic meanings?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already cover this concept, and should this registry entry link to it as the single source of truth?", "Is INF / INF.MED an erroneous registry placement, and which authoritative classification should replace it?", "What evidentiary threshold should support an alleged de facto martial-law classification when no formal declaration exists?", "Which jurisdiction-specific sources establish the rules for civilian trial by military tribunals, rights restrictions, review and termination in each modelled instance?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 17, "questions": 27 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "work, medium or creative form", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a martial law, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a claimed or operating martial-law regime, assess its authority and effects, and identify which actions require jurisdiction-specific verification.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted", "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: emergency martial law, 2022 Russian martial law, martial law in Russia, Martial law in Ukraine.", "4 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 77 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a martial law, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says", "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "What is seen is a copy or a performance, not the work. Recognising the work means recognising the content through whatever is carrying it." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "emergency martial law", "2022 Russian martial law", "martial law in Russia", "Martial law in Ukraine" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 77 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 4 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one martial law from another, and a martial law from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a martial law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a martial law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a martial law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a martial law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a martial law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a martial law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a martial law sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a martial law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a martial law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a martial law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a martial law from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a martial law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a martial law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a martial law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a martial law passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a martial law between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a martial law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a martial law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a martial law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a martial law, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a martial law is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a martial law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a martial law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a martial law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a martial law says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a martial law contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a martial law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a martial law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a martial law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a martial law and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a martial law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a martial law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a martial law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "work-and-manifestation", "name": "Work, version and copy", "description": "Which level of martial law a statement is about.", "rationale": "The work, the edition, the file and the copy in hand are four things; rights and content attach to different ones.", "layers": [ { "id": "levels", "name": "Levels of the thing", "description": "Work, expression, manifestation and item, in plain terms.", "findings": [ { "id": "level-rules", "name": "What belongs at each level", "description": "Which facts hold for the work and which only for one copy.", "questions": [ { "id": "level-rules-q01", "text": "For martial law, which facts belong to the work itself, which to a version, and which to a single copy?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "level-rules-q02", "text": "What identifier exists at each level, and which one is being cited?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "versions", "name": "Versions, editions and variants", "description": "How versions differ and which is canonical to whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "version-record", "name": "Versions and canonicity", "description": "Differences that matter and who calls one authoritative.", "questions": [ { "id": "version-record-q01", "text": "Which versions or editions of martial law exist, and how do they differ substantively?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "version-record-q02", "text": "Who treats which version as authoritative, and for what purpose?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "authorship-and-rights", "name": "Authorship, rights and permitted use", "description": "Who made martial law and what may be done with it.", "rationale": "Rights are jurisdictional, time-limited and attached to a level, and an agent that ignores that will copy what it may not.", "layers": [ { "id": "authorship", "name": "Authorship and contribution", "description": "Who contributed what, and in what capacity.", "findings": [ { "id": "contribution-record", "name": "Contributors and roles", "description": "The people and bodies behind it, with their roles.", "questions": [ { "id": "contribution-record-q01", "text": "Who authored or contributed to martial law, in what roles, and how is that attested?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "contribution-record-q02", "text": "Where authorship is disputed or anonymous, what is recorded instead?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "rights", "name": "Rights and permissions", "description": "Which rights subsist, where, until when, and what they permit.", "findings": [ { "id": "rights-record", "name": "Rights, term and permitted acts", "description": "The regime in force and what it allows.", "questions": [ { "id": "rights-record-q01", "text": "What rights subsist in martial law, in which jurisdictions, and until when?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "rights-record-q02", "text": "Which acts are permitted without further permission, and which must an agent refuse?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a martial law came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a martial law and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a martial law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a martial law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a martial law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a martial law is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a martial law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a martial law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a martial law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }