{ "model": { "rank": 3187, "code": "thing-q724351", "model_id": "vr.tr.asexuality", "name": "asexuality", "purpose": "Enable an agent to represent asexuality accurately, distinguish attraction from identity and behaviour, and choose respectful actions without assigning an orientation to someone.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q724351/", "tier": 2, "score": 89, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "non-binary asexual", "aroace", "apothisexuality", "aegosexuality", "strict asexuality", "gray asexuality", "averse asexual", "fraysexuality", "greyromantic" ], "aliasCount": 9, "merged": 9, "knownIn": 89, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": "vr.tr.asexuality", "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q724351", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q724351", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T14:05:05Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 24.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c2e-c9ca-78c1-bd14-b5babb4e486c\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: asexuality\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 546 things:\n# Batch 003: 1001 regis", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 69.4, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c2e-c9c3-76e2-9007-eed3e4c3b2ff\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: asexuality\nRegistry id: vr.tr.asexuality\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nCo" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q724351", "registryId": "vr.tr.asexuality", "name": "asexuality", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q724351/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.asexuality", "name": "asexuality", "purpose": "Enable an agent to represent asexuality accurately, distinguish attraction from identity and behaviour, and choose respectful actions without assigning an orientation to someone.", "definition": "Asexuality is a sexual orientation characterized by little or no sexual attraction to others, also used as an identity and an umbrella term for related experiences of limited or conditional sexual attraction.", "scope_statement": "This model owns asexuality as a human sexual-orientation concept, including competing definitions, asexual-spectrum usage, voluntary self-description, research operationalisations, and implications for recognition and support; it does not cover biological asexual reproduction.", "in_scope": [ "Definitions centred on absent, low, rare, or conditional sexual attraction and the boundaries between them", "Relationships between asexuality, asexual-spectrum terminology, and personal identity", "Distinctions among sexual attraction, romantic attraction, libido, arousal, behaviour, and attitudes toward sex", "Operational definitions used to identify asexuality in research", "Consent, disclosure, recognition, and support relevant to asexual people" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Asexual reproduction and reproductive biology", "Sexual-orientation classification beyond its relationship to asexuality", "Aromanticism as an independently modelled orientation", "Diagnosis and treatment of sexual-function concerns", "Celibacy, abstinence, and relationship arrangements as independent practices", "General sexuality education and relationship counselling" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "A description concerns sexual attraction or an explicitly stated asexual identity; absence of sexual activity alone does not establish asexuality.", "Celibacy describes a practice or commitment, whereas asexuality concerns orientation or identity; record them separately even when they coexist.", "A claim about libido or physiological arousal does not by itself answer whether someone experiences sexual attraction.", "A claim about romantic attraction does not determine asexuality; romantic and sexual self-descriptions require separate records.", "Distinguish asexuality used narrowly from asexuality used as a spectrum umbrella, and preserve the speaker's intended meaning." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Definition and attribution", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Definition text linked to its author, community, publication, date, and intended context", "why_it_matters": "Different definitions cannot be treated as interchangeable without examining their boundaries." }, { "name": "Scope of terminology", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Narrow asexuality; asexual-spectrum umbrella; another explicitly defined usage; unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Establishes whether rare or conditional attraction is included in a particular claim." }, { "name": "Voluntary identity description", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Person's own wording, optionally dated; questioning; no label; not disclosed", "why_it_matters": "Separates personal identification from classifications imposed by observers or instruments." }, { "name": "Reported sexual attraction pattern", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Absent; low; rare; conditional; another self-described pattern; uncertain; not disclosed, with timeframe", "why_it_matters": "Records the experience addressed by attraction-based definitions without inventing numerical thresholds." }, { "name": "Romantic self-description", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Optional self-described romantic orientation or experience, recorded independently of sexual orientation", "why_it_matters": "Prevents assumptions about romance, partnership, or attachment." }, { "name": "Attitude toward personal sexual participation", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Person's own description, with context and date; variable; uncertain; not disclosed", "why_it_matters": "An orientation label does not establish willingness to participate in any sexual activity." }, { "name": "Research classification method", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Self-identification; attraction question; instrument-based classification; combined rule; other documented method", "why_it_matters": "Makes study populations and classification disagreements interpretable." }, { "name": "Disclosure permission", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Not provided; permitted for a specified purpose and audience; withdrawn", "why_it_matters": "Guides whether sensitive identity information may be retained or shared." } ], "affordances": [ "Compare definitions while retaining their sources, intended populations, and inclusion boundaries.", "Record a person's chosen terminology without requiring intimate details or inferring an identity.", "Identify when a claim confuses attraction with behaviour, libido, arousal, or romantic orientation.", "Evaluate whether research estimates use sufficiently comparable definitions and recruitment methods.", "Offer requested terminology explanations or support resources while respecting disclosure preferences.", "Ask about specific consent and relationship preferences when relevant instead of deriving them from orientation." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "definitions-and-spectrum-boundaries", "name": "Definitions and spectrum boundaries", "description": "Represent how asexuality is defined and how each definition handles neighbouring spectrum terms.", "rationale": "The model must preserve definitional disagreements rather than silently selecting one meaning.", "layers": [ { "id": "attributed-definitions", "name": "Attributed definitions", "description": "Separate definitions by source and intended use.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-inclusion-rule", "name": "Definition inclusion rule", "description": "Record whether a source defines asexuality through attraction, identity, or a combination, including its qualifiers.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does this definition require absent sexual attraction, include little attraction, or use another criterion?", "kind": "definition", "id": "definition-inclusion-rule-q01" }, { "text": "Who uses this definition, in which source, and for what community or research purpose?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "definition-inclusion-rule-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "umbrella-and-neighbouring-terms", "name": "Umbrella and neighbouring terms", "description": "Track relationships among narrow asexuality, spectrum usage, grey-asexuality, and demisexuality.", "findings": [ { "id": "spectrum-membership-boundary", "name": "Spectrum membership boundary", "description": "Represent inclusion relationships as attributed usage rather than a universally fixed taxonomy.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does this source use asexuality as a specific orientation or as an umbrella that includes grey-asexuality and demisexuality?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "spectrum-membership-boundary-q01" }, { "text": "How does the source distinguish rare attraction from attraction conditional on an emotional bond?", "kind": "definition", "id": "spectrum-membership-boundary-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "attraction-and-associated-experiences", "name": "Attraction and associated experiences", "description": "Distinguish sexual attraction from experiences and behaviours that may otherwise be used as proxies.", "rationale": "Recognition fails when sexual activity, desire, arousal, or romance is substituted for attraction.", "layers": [ { "id": "sexual-experience-dimensions", "name": "Sexual experience dimensions", "description": "Keep attraction, libido, arousal, and behaviour independently describable.", "findings": [ { "id": "attraction-proxy-check", "name": "Attraction proxy check", "description": "Determine which experience a statement actually reports before using it in an asexuality classification.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the report about attraction toward someone, general sexual desire, physiological arousal, or sexual behaviour?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "attraction-proxy-check-q01" }, { "text": "Would the proposed classification change solely because the person has sex, masturbates, or abstains, and what definition justifies that change?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "attraction-proxy-check-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "romance-and-sex-attitudes", "name": "Romance and sex attitudes", "description": "Represent romantic experience and attitudes toward sexual participation without deriving them from orientation.", "findings": [ { "id": "independent-preferences", "name": "Independent preferences", "description": "Preserve optional descriptions of romance, intimacy, and sex-related preferences as separate from the asexual label.", "questions": [ { "text": "Has the person independently described romantic attraction or desired forms of intimacy?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "independent-preferences-q01" }, { "text": "Does an expressed attitude concern personal sexual participation, a particular situation, or general views about other people's sexual activity?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "independent-preferences-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "identity-and-personal-history", "name": "Identity and personal history", "description": "Represent self-identification, uncertainty, and changes in descriptions without imposing a developmental narrative.", "rationale": "An agent needs to distinguish a person's current account from external interpretation and historical labels.", "layers": [ { "id": "self-description-authority", "name": "Self-description authority", "description": "Identify who supplied an orientation label and what the person intends it to mean.", "findings": [ { "id": "chosen-versus-assigned-label", "name": "Chosen versus assigned label", "description": "Keep voluntary identity statements distinct from observer assignments and research classifications.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is asexual the person's chosen description, a research classification, or someone else's attribution?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "chosen-versus-assigned-label-q01" }, { "text": "If the person uses no label or is questioning, how can the agent preserve that position without assigning one?", "kind": "action", "id": "chosen-versus-assigned-label-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-reinterpretation", "name": "Time and reinterpretation", "description": "Distinguish changes in attraction, terminology, understanding, and willingness to disclose.", "findings": [ { "id": "dated-personal-account", "name": "Dated personal account", "description": "Attach time and context to accounts without assuming that different accounts invalidate each other.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does a reported change concern attraction, the chosen label, understanding of past experience, or disclosure?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "dated-personal-account-q01" }, { "text": "Which description does the person want used now, and is retaining earlier descriptions necessary and permitted?", "kind": "action", "id": "dated-personal-account-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "research-and-operationalisation", "name": "Research and operationalisation", "description": "Represent how studies turn asexuality into inclusion criteria and interpret resulting evidence.", "rationale": "Evidence about asexuality is only interpretable alongside the definitions, questions, and sampling methods that produced it.", "layers": [ { "id": "classification-procedure", "name": "Classification procedure", "description": "Capture the actual items and rules used to include participants.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-definition", "name": "Operational definition", "description": "Record wording, response choices, timeframe, and any instrument threshold separately from identity.", "questions": [ { "text": "What exact questions and decision rules classify a participant as asexual or asexual-spectrum?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "operational-definition-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence supports interpreting this instrument in the language and population studied?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "operational-definition-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "sampling-and-comparability", "name": "Sampling and comparability", "description": "Assess what study recruitment and definition choices allow a result to describe.", "findings": [ { "id": "population-claim-limits", "name": "Population claim limits", "description": "Tie prevalence estimates and group comparisons to recruitment, eligibility, and uncertainty.", "questions": [ { "text": "Were participants recruited through asexual communities, a general population sample, or another route, and who could be missed?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "population-claim-limits-q01" }, { "text": "Do the compared studies include the same attraction patterns and identity groups over comparable timeframes?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "population-claim-limits-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "recognition-consent-and-support", "name": "Recognition, consent, and support", "description": "Guide respectful action where asexuality is relevant to disclosure, relationships, or requests for help.", "rationale": "Recognition should support the person's stated needs without exposing identity, assuming consent, or treating an orientation label as a diagnosis.", "layers": [ { "id": "disclosure-and-interpersonal-boundaries", "name": "Disclosure and interpersonal boundaries", "description": "Connect sensitive information handling and interpersonal actions to explicit preferences.", "findings": [ { "id": "permission-and-consent", "name": "Permission and consent", "description": "Record disclosure limits and obtain situation-specific consent independently of orientation.", "questions": [ { "text": "For what purpose and audience has the person permitted their asexual identity information to be used?", "kind": "action", "id": "permission-and-consent-q01" }, { "text": "What explicit preferences or consent apply to the proposed interaction, independently of the person's orientation?", "kind": "action", "id": "permission-and-consent-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "support-and-clinical-boundaries", "name": "Support and clinical boundaries", "description": "Distinguish identity recognition from separately reported distress, unwanted changes, and requests for clinical help.", "findings": [ { "id": "person-defined-support-need", "name": "Person-defined support need", "description": "Identify the actual request for help without inferring pathology or a need to change orientation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the person seeking identity information, help with stigma or relationship pressure, or assessment of a separately reported concern?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "person-defined-support-need-q01" }, { "text": "What assistance does the person request, and which concerns require a separate model or qualified professional?", "kind": "action", "id": "person-defined-support-need-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The intended sense is inferred to be human sexual orientation; the registry supplied no definition.", "Definitions differ between strict absence of sexual attraction and broader spectrum usage; identity, attraction, and behavior are not interchangeable operationalizations.", "This account is recalled knowledge, not source-verified research; terminology and measurement instruments should be checked before publication." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of asexuality this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Aromantic asexuality: little or no sexual attraction and little or no romantic attraction", "Romantic asexuality: little or no sexual attraction alongside romantic attraction", "Gray-asexuality: sexual attraction experienced rarely, weakly, or under limited circumstances, commonly included within the asexual spectrum", "Demisexuality: sexual attraction experienced only after a strong emotional bond develops, commonly included within the asexual spectrum" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of asexuality this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Self-identification and finding communities with shared experiences", "Communicating attraction, relationship expectations, and personal boundaries", "Sexual-orientation research using self-identification and reported attraction", "Education and counseling that distinguish attraction, desire, behavior, and identity" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of asexuality this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Frequency or intensity of self-reported sexual attraction", "typical_range": "Absent, infrequent, weak, or conditional; no universally accepted numerical boundary", "unit": "Questionnaire-dependent response categories or scores" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of asexuality this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Conflating sexual attraction with libido, sexual behavior, physiological arousal, or reproductive capacity", "Treating asexuality itself as a disorder or assuming that it requires treatment", "Assuming asexual people cannot experience romantic love, form partnerships, or consent to sex", "Stigma, invalidation, and pressure to engage in unwanted sexual activity", "Estimating prevalence without distinguishing identity-based, attraction-based, and behavior-based definitions" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of asexuality this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Availability and meanings of asexual identity labels vary across languages and cultural settings", "Social recognition and willingness to disclose an asexual identity vary, complicating comparisons between populations" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of asexuality this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Celibacy or sexual abstinence", "difference": "Describes refraining from sexual activity; asexuality concerns attraction and does not prescribe behavior." }, { "name": "Aromanticism", "difference": "Concerns little or no romantic attraction rather than sexual attraction; either can occur without the other." }, { "name": "Low libido", "difference": "Concerns the level of sexual drive or desire; asexuality concerns attraction to others, and libido varies among asexual people." }, { "name": "Sexual aversion", "difference": "Concerns negative responses to sexual activity or stimuli; asexual people may be favorable, indifferent, or averse toward sex." }, { "name": "Asexual reproduction", "difference": "Describes reproduction without fusion of gametes, rather than a human sexual orientation." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of asexuality this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "How do community, reference, and research sources differ in their use of absent versus little sexual attraction, and which disagreements remain unresolved?", "How consistently do sources and self-identifying people include grey-asexuality and demisexuality within the term asexuality itself?", "Which measures distinguish sexual attraction from libido and behaviour across languages and cultural contexts, and where is validation insufficient?", "How much do recruitment methods and inclusion rules account for differences among published prevalence estimates?", "What longitudinal evidence distinguishes changes in attraction from changes in labels, self-understanding, and disclosure?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 17, "questions": 27 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a asexuality, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to represent asexuality accurately, distinguish attraction from identity and behaviour, and choose respectful actions without assigning an orientation to someone.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: non-binary asexual, aroace, apothisexuality, aegosexuality, strict asexuality, gray asexuality, averse asexual, fraysexuality, greyromantic.", "9 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 89 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a asexuality, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "non-binary asexual", "aroace", "apothisexuality", "aegosexuality", "strict asexuality", "gray asexuality", "averse asexual", "fraysexuality", "greyromantic" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 89 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 9 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one asexuality from another, and a asexuality from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a asexuality, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a asexuality, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a asexuality is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a asexuality, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a asexuality, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a asexuality is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a asexuality sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a asexuality, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a asexuality, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a asexuality is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a asexuality from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a asexuality, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a asexuality, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a asexuality is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a asexuality passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a asexuality between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a asexuality, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a asexuality, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a asexuality is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a asexuality, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a asexuality is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a asexuality, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a asexuality, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a asexuality is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a asexuality proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a asexuality, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a asexuality and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a asexuality, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a asexuality, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a asexuality is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a asexuality consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a asexuality takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a asexuality, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a asexuality, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a asexuality is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What asexuality is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of asexuality are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is asexuality operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of asexuality and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of asexuality?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as asexuality?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a asexuality came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a asexuality and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a asexuality, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a asexuality, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a asexuality is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a asexuality is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a asexuality, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a asexuality, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a asexuality is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }