{ "model": { "rank": 3295, "code": "thing-q80130", "model_id": "vr.tr.nuremberg-trials", "name": "Nuremberg trials", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to identify the Nuremberg trials, distinguish their constituent proceedings, assess claims against their records, and present legally and historically qualified accounts.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.MED", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q80130/", "tier": 2, "score": 88, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [], "aliasCount": 0, "merged": 0, "knownIn": 88, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q80130", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q80130", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T14:23:41Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 24.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c3f-576c-7cc0-b252-5654e6a15763\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Nuremberg trials\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 546 things:\n# Batch 003: 1001", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 100.6, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c3f-5758-7520-9592-b3d0947559d9\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Nuremberg trials\nRegistry id: vr.tr.nuremberg-trials\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry:" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q80130", "registryId": "vr.tr.nuremberg-trials", "name": "Nuremberg trials", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q80130/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.nuremberg-trials", "name": "Nuremberg trials", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to identify the Nuremberg trials, distinguish their constituent proceedings, assess claims against their records, and present legally and historically qualified accounts.", "definition": "The Nuremberg trials were postwar proceedings held in Nuremberg, Germany, in which the International Military Tribunal and subsequent United States military tribunals prosecuted leading officials and other participants in Nazi crimes between 1945 and 1949.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the historical proceeding complex identified by vr.tr.nuremberg-trials, provisionally encompassing the International Military Tribunal trial and the twelve subsequent United States proceedings at Nuremberg, with their records treated as evidence of those events rather than as the events themselves; the assigned INF / INF.MED classification requires review.", "in_scope": [ "Membership and boundaries of the Nuremberg proceeding complex", "Tribunal authority, applicable instruments, charges and procedural differences", "Case-specific defendants, institutional roles and organizational determinations", "Evidence, testimony, translations and traceable judicial records", "Judgments, sentences, subsequent modifications and documented legal reception" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Comprehensive histories of Nazi Germany, the Holocaust and the Second World War", "Other postwar prosecutions, including the Tokyo trial and trials held elsewhere", "Complete biographies of defendants, witnesses, prosecutors and judges", "Standalone models of the Nuremberg Code and Nuremberg Principles", "Bibliographic editions, archival collections, films and books about the trials as independent works", "The city of Nuremberg, its courthouse and the Nuremberg Laws" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "The referent is a historical set of judicial proceedings, not a film, publication or archive sharing its name.", "A constituent proceeding must be attributable to the International Military Tribunal trial or an identified subsequent Nuremberg case, rather than merely to postwar prosecution of Nazi crimes.", "The international tribunal and the subsequent United States military tribunals must remain distinguishable within the aggregate. [USHMM account](https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/subsequent-nuremberg-proceedings?series=29)", "An indictment, a prosecution allegation, admitted evidence and a judicial finding have different statuses and cannot substitute for one another.", "Later statements of Nuremberg principles are reception of the trials and must be distinguished from the original charter and judgments. [UN International Law Commission](https://untreaty.un.org/ilc/texts/7_1.shtml)" ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Referent type", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "proceeding complex | constituent trial | associated record | later representation", "why_it_matters": "Prevents the INF.MED assignment from turning a historical event into a media work." }, { "name": "Proceeding identity", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Tribunal, official case designation, case number where applicable, and documented aliases", "why_it_matters": "Keeps similarly named proceedings and their records distinguishable." }, { "name": "Temporal extent", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Calendar dates with precision and event type: indictment, hearing, judgment, sentencing or enforcement", "why_it_matters": "A single date range can obscure which part of a proceeding is being described." }, { "name": "Jurisdictional basis", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Applicable charter, occupation law or tribunal instrument, with article and version", "why_it_matters": "Allows charges and procedural powers to be interpreted under the authority of the particular tribunal." }, { "name": "Defendant participation", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Indicted | tried in person | tried in absentia | not tried, with documented reason", "why_it_matters": "Prevents indictment totals from being reported as numbers of people actually tried." }, { "name": "Claim status", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Allegation | testimony | exhibit content | judicial finding | later interpretation", "why_it_matters": "Controls how strongly an agent may state a proposition." }, { "name": "Disposition by defendant and count", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Conviction | acquittal | other documented disposition | unresolved in available sources", "why_it_matters": "Avoids reducing mixed verdicts to an unqualified guilty or innocent label." }, { "name": "Sentence and enforcement history", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Original sentence linked to dated execution, custody, commutation, release or other documented events", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes what a tribunal ordered from what was subsequently carried out." }, { "name": "Record traceability", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Located and checked | partially checked | translation-dependent | conflicting | not located", "why_it_matters": "Makes evidential limitations visible before an agent quotes or summarizes the record." } ], "affordances": [ "Resolve a reference to the trial complex, a particular case or an associated publication.", "Build a case-specific chronology linking participants, charges, hearings and outcomes.", "Trace a historical assertion to an exhibit, transcript passage or judgment and label its evidential status.", "Compare tribunal authorities and outcomes without merging their legal categories.", "Produce citations and qualified summaries that preserve translation and source limitations.", "Flag ambiguous counts, unsupported quotations and retrospective legal terminology for review." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "proceeding-identity-and-boundaries", "name": "Proceeding identity and boundaries", "description": "Establish what the registry name denotes and how its constituent cases belong together.", "rationale": "Nuremberg trials can denote the principal international trial or a broader proceeding complex; that ambiguity changes every aggregate claim.", "layers": [ { "id": "registered-referent", "name": "Registered referent", "description": "Separate the historical proceedings from similarly named records and representations.", "findings": [ { "id": "event-versus-media", "name": "Event versus media", "description": "Treat the historical proceeding complex as the provisional referent and retain the registry classification mismatch as an unresolved modeling issue.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the originating registry record identify the historical trials or a particular work titled Nuremberg trials?", "kind": "definition", "id": "event-versus-media-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence supports retaining or correcting INF / INF.MED for this entry?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "event-versus-media-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "constituent-proceedings", "name": "Constituent proceedings", "description": "Identify the cases included under the aggregate name.", "findings": [ { "id": "international-and-subsequent-cases", "name": "International and subsequent cases", "description": "Maintain the international trial and the twelve subsequent United States trials as separately identifiable components of the provisional aggregate. [USHMM account](https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/subsequent-nuremberg-proceedings?series=29)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which official case designations and aliases establish membership in this proceeding complex?", "kind": "definition", "id": "international-and-subsequent-cases-q01" }, { "text": "Does a cited total or date range cover the international trial, the subsequent proceedings or both?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "international-and-subsequent-cases-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "authority-and-charges", "name": "Authority and charges", "description": "Represent each tribunal's legal basis and the charges it could adjudicate.", "rationale": "A shared location and historical purpose do not make the tribunals' jurisdictional instruments interchangeable.", "layers": [ { "id": "constituting-authority", "name": "Constituting authority", "description": "Connect each proceeding to its governing legal instruments.", "findings": [ { "id": "case-specific-legal-basis", "name": "Case-specific legal basis", "description": "Record the instrument and provision authorizing each tribunal; the IMT Charter provides a primary reference for the international tribunal. [IMT Charter](https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.2_Charter%20of%20IMT%201945.pdf)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which instrument and articles established this tribunal's jurisdiction over the charged conduct and defendants?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "case-specific-legal-basis-q01" }, { "text": "Which procedural powers and review mechanisms applied to this case?", "kind": "definition", "id": "case-specific-legal-basis-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "charges-and-liability", "name": "Charges and liability", "description": "Keep indictment categories, alleged conduct and adjudicated responsibility distinct.", "findings": [ { "id": "historically-specific-counts", "name": "Historically specific counts", "description": "Preserve the count wording and legal theory used in the particular proceeding before mapping them to later terminology.", "questions": [ { "text": "What exact counts and theories of responsibility were alleged against each defendant?", "kind": "definition", "id": "historically-specific-counts-q01" }, { "text": "When terms such as genocide appear, are they indictment language, judicial reasoning or retrospective classification?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "historically-specific-counts-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "participants-and-procedure", "name": "Participants and procedure", "description": "Capture who participated, in what capacity, and how the proceeding developed.", "rationale": "Counts and narratives become misleading when indictment, attendance, organizational status and courtroom roles are conflated.", "layers": [ { "id": "persons-and-organizations", "name": "Persons and organizations", "description": "Represent participation and distinguish individual adjudication from organizational determinations.", "findings": [ { "id": "participation-and-subject-status", "name": "Participation and subject status", "description": "Associate each person or organization with its precise procedural status rather than inferring culpability from affiliation or appearance in the record.", "questions": [ { "text": "Was this person a defendant, witness, counsel, prosecutor, judge or another participant in this specific case?", "kind": "definition", "id": "participation-and-subject-status-q01" }, { "text": "Was an organization subject to a criminality determination, and what limits did the judgment place on that determination?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "participation-and-subject-status-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "procedural-sequence", "name": "Procedural sequence", "description": "Track milestones and exceptions affecting participation or adjudication.", "findings": [ { "id": "milestones-and-exceptions", "name": "Milestones and exceptions", "description": "Keep indictments, appearances, hearings, rulings and judgments as separate dated events, including documented interruptions and absent defendants.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which dates mark indictment, opening hearings, judgment and sentencing for this case?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "milestones-and-exceptions-q01" }, { "text": "Which defendants did not stand trial or were tried in absentia, and what record establishes that status?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "milestones-and-exceptions-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-records", "name": "Evidence and records", "description": "Support reliable movement from historical claims to identifiable trial materials.", "rationale": "The trials generated multilingual evidentiary and judicial records whose contents have different legal statuses and publication histories.", "layers": [ { "id": "evidentiary-status", "name": "Evidentiary status", "description": "Track how documents, testimony and audiovisual materials entered and were treated in a proceeding.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-to-record-trace", "name": "Claim-to-record trace", "description": "Require a case-specific locator and procedural status before treating an evidentiary assertion as a judicially established fact.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which exhibit identifier, transcript passage or judgment section supports this assertion?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "claim-to-record-trace-q01" }, { "text": "Was the material offered, admitted, challenged or expressly relied upon in the judgment?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "claim-to-record-trace-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "languages-and-surrogates", "name": "Languages and surrogates", "description": "Distinguish courtroom records from translations, edited publications and digital copies.", "findings": [ { "id": "quotation-and-version-integrity", "name": "Quotation and version integrity", "description": "Link quotations to their language, edition and location, recording whether the agent checked an image, transcription or translation.", "questions": [ { "text": "What original language, translation, volume and page or recording timestamp identifies this passage?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "quotation-and-version-integrity-q01" }, { "text": "Must OCR, translation or excerpt boundaries be checked before this passage can be quoted accurately?", "kind": "action", "id": "quotation-and-version-integrity-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "outcomes-and-reception", "name": "Outcomes and reception", "description": "Separate adjudicated results, sentence enforcement and later uses of Nuremberg's authority.", "rationale": "A verdict, its practical implementation and a later claim about its significance answer different questions.", "layers": [ { "id": "judgments-and-enforcement", "name": "Judgments and enforcement", "description": "Represent outcomes at the defendant-and-count level and follow subsequent sentence events.", "findings": [ { "id": "verdict-sentence-and-execution", "name": "Verdict, sentence and execution", "description": "Record convictions, acquittals and other dispositions separately from sentences and their implementation or modification.", "questions": [ { "text": "What disposition did the judgment reach for each defendant on each count?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "verdict-sentence-and-execution-q01" }, { "text": "What sentence was imposed, and which documented later decisions or events changed what was served?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "verdict-sentence-and-execution-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "legal-and-public-reception", "name": "Legal and public reception", "description": "Connect later principles and interpretations to specific originating materials.", "findings": [ { "id": "attributed-legacy", "name": "Attributed legacy", "description": "Represent later formulations and interpretations as attributed relationships, including the ILC's formulation of Nuremberg principles, rather than silently inserting them into original judgments. [ILC formulation](https://untreaty.un.org/ilc/texts/7_1.shtml)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which specific judgment passage or tribunal instrument supports the claimed later principle or influence?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attributed-legacy-q01" }, { "text": "Should an agent describe this connection as express adoption, interpretive influence or a contested historical claim?", "kind": "action", "id": "attributed-legacy-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This describes the historical proceedings; the supplied INF.MED classification may instead indicate a documentary work or other media object and should be checked.", "Usage varies: Nuremberg trials can denote the full series, while some accounts use the phrase primarily for the principal International Military Tribunal trial.", "This is a recall-based description; no sources were consulted." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Nuremberg trials this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The principal trial before the International Military Tribunal, 1945-1946", "The twelve subsequent Nuremberg trials before United States military tribunals, 1946-1949" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of Nuremberg trials this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "London Agreement and Charter of the International Military Tribunal, adopted by France, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom and the United States in 1945", "Control Council Law No. 10, issued by the Allied Control Council in 1945, providing a legal basis for subsequent prosecutions", "Military Government Ordinance No. 7, issued by the United States military government in Germany in 1946, establishing the tribunals for the subsequent trials" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of Nuremberg trials this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Establishing individual criminal responsibility for crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity", "Creating an extensive evidentiary record of Nazi persecution, mass murder and aggressive warfare", "Informing the development of international criminal law and later international criminal tribunals", "Supporting historical research, education and public remembrance", "Providing a major historical reference for professional accountability in medicine, law, government and industry" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Nuremberg trials this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Conflating the single International Military Tribunal trial with the twelve subsequent United States trials", "Treating indictments or prosecution allegations as equivalent to judicial findings", "Assuming every defendant was convicted or received the same sentence", "Confusing the Nuremberg trials with the Nazi-era Nuremberg Laws", "Attributing the Nuremberg Code to the principal trial rather than the subsequent Doctors' Trial" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Nuremberg trials this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The principal tribunal was jointly constituted by four Allied powers; the subsequent tribunals operated under United States authority in occupied Germany.", "Other Allied and national prosecutions of Nazi crimes took place elsewhere and are not ordinarily included under the geographical designation Nuremberg trials." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Nuremberg trials this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "International Military Tribunal", "difference": "The judicial institution that conducted the principal trial, rather than the proceedings collectively." }, { "name": "Doctors' Trial", "difference": "One of the twelve subsequent Nuremberg trials, focused on medical crimes, rather than the entire series." }, { "name": "Nuremberg Code", "difference": "Principles concerning human experimentation articulated in the Doctors' Trial judgment, rather than a trial or tribunal." }, { "name": "Nuremberg Laws", "difference": "Antisemitic legislation enacted by Nazi Germany in 1935, rather than the postwar prosecutions." }, { "name": "Tokyo Trial", "difference": "Proceedings before the International Military Tribunal for the Far East concerning Japanese wartime leadership." }, { "name": "Nuremberg trial records", "difference": "Documents, recordings and published editions recording the proceedings, rather than the historical proceedings themselves." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Nuremberg trials this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry's originating identifier confirm the historical proceeding complex, and why was it assigned INF / INF.MED?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already cover this concept, requiring a registry link instead of a separate publication?", "Should the authoritative scope include both the IMT trial and all twelve subsequent proceedings, or does registry provenance establish a narrower referent?", "Which archival holdings and published record series should serve as preferred references for each case, language and document type?", "How far should sentence enforcement and later legal reception extend within this model before responsibility passes to neighboring models?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 17, "questions": 27 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "work, medium or creative form", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a Nuremberg trials, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to identify the Nuremberg trials, distinguish their constituent proceedings, assess claims against their records, and present legally and historically qualified accounts.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted", "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Described in 88 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a Nuremberg trials, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says", "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "What is seen is a copy or a performance, not the work. Recognising the work means recognising the content through whatever is carrying it." ], "relatedModels": [], "standing": "Described in 88 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one Nuremberg trials from another, and a Nuremberg trials from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a Nuremberg trials, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a Nuremberg trials, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a Nuremberg trials is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a Nuremberg trials, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a Nuremberg trials, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a Nuremberg trials is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a Nuremberg trials sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a Nuremberg trials, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a Nuremberg trials, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a Nuremberg trials is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a Nuremberg trials from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a Nuremberg trials, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a Nuremberg trials, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a Nuremberg trials is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a Nuremberg trials passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a Nuremberg trials between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a Nuremberg trials, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a Nuremberg trials, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a Nuremberg trials is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a Nuremberg trials, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a Nuremberg trials is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a Nuremberg trials, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a Nuremberg trials, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a Nuremberg trials is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a Nuremberg trials says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a Nuremberg trials contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a Nuremberg trials, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a Nuremberg trials, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a Nuremberg trials is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a Nuremberg trials and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a Nuremberg trials, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a Nuremberg trials, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a Nuremberg trials is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "work-and-manifestation", "name": "Work, version and copy", "description": "Which level of Nuremberg trials a statement is about.", "rationale": "The work, the edition, the file and the copy in hand are four things; rights and content attach to different ones.", "layers": [ { "id": "levels", "name": "Levels of the thing", "description": "Work, expression, manifestation and item, in plain terms.", "findings": [ { "id": "level-rules", "name": "What belongs at each level", "description": "Which facts hold for the work and which only for one copy.", "questions": [ { "id": "level-rules-q01", "text": "For Nuremberg trials, which facts belong to the work itself, which to a version, and which to a single copy?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "level-rules-q02", "text": "What identifier exists at each level, and which one is being cited?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "versions", "name": "Versions, editions and variants", "description": "How versions differ and which is canonical to whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "version-record", "name": "Versions and canonicity", "description": "Differences that matter and who calls one authoritative.", "questions": [ { "id": "version-record-q01", "text": "Which versions or editions of Nuremberg trials exist, and how do they differ substantively?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "version-record-q02", "text": "Who treats which version as authoritative, and for what purpose?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "authorship-and-rights", "name": "Authorship, rights and permitted use", "description": "Who made Nuremberg trials and what may be done with it.", "rationale": "Rights are jurisdictional, time-limited and attached to a level, and an agent that ignores that will copy what it may not.", "layers": [ { "id": "authorship", "name": "Authorship and contribution", "description": "Who contributed what, and in what capacity.", "findings": [ { "id": "contribution-record", "name": "Contributors and roles", "description": "The people and bodies behind it, with their roles.", "questions": [ { "id": "contribution-record-q01", "text": "Who authored or contributed to Nuremberg trials, in what roles, and how is that attested?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "contribution-record-q02", "text": "Where authorship is disputed or anonymous, what is recorded instead?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "rights", "name": "Rights and permissions", "description": "Which rights subsist, where, until when, and what they permit.", "findings": [ { "id": "rights-record", "name": "Rights, term and permitted acts", "description": "The regime in force and what it allows.", "questions": [ { "id": "rights-record-q01", "text": "What rights subsist in Nuremberg trials, in which jurisdictions, and until when?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "rights-record-q02", "text": "Which acts are permitted without further permission, and which must an agent refuse?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a Nuremberg trials came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a Nuremberg trials and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a Nuremberg trials, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a Nuremberg trials, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a Nuremberg trials is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a Nuremberg trials is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a Nuremberg trials, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a Nuremberg trials, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a Nuremberg trials is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }