← Back to catalogue
Published

design

vr.tr.design · thing-q82604

Let an agent handle design by field, brief, process, evaluation and rights.

Thing Registry Activities and processes ACT.ACT

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions

Brief Goals.

Goals

Requirements.

Goals

Brief.

  1. What must the design achieve, for whom? definition
  2. Under which constraints? boundary

Field

Discipline.

Field

Design field.

  1. Which design field applies? definition
  2. Which specific entry fits? action
Process How design works.

Methods

Research and prototyping.

Methods

Methods.

  1. Which methods are used: research, sketching, prototyping? definition
  2. How many iterations? measurement

Collaboration

Stakeholders.

Collaboration

Collaboration.

  1. Who is involved in design decisions? provenance
  2. Are users included? boundary
Evaluation Testing.

Usability

User testing.

Usability

Usability.

  1. How was the design tested with users? provenance
  2. What did it find? provenance

Accessibility

Inclusion.

Accessibility

Accessibility.

  1. Does the design meet accessibility standards? boundary
  2. Who checked? provenance
Rights Protection.

Protection

Design rights.

Protection

Design rights.

  1. Is the design registered or protected? provenance
  2. In which territories? provenance

Credit

Attribution.

Credit

Attribution.

  1. Who designed it? provenance
  2. Is credit given? boundary

Classifiers Filled

Family
Thing Registry
Category
Activities and processes
Entry kind
thing
Plane
ACT
Domain
ACT.ACT
Other names and narrower kinds
garden room, borrowed scenery, Hilltowns in Italy, sonification, acoustic monitoring, data sonification, lighting design, strategic design, computational design, lofting, medical device design, processor design

What it is Filled

The planned process of conceiving and specifying objects, systems, spaces, interactions or services to meet goals within constraints, across fields such as product, graphic, architectural, landscape, interaction and sound design.

Why it exists Filled

Let an agent handle design by field, brief, process, evaluation and rights.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • Planned, goal-directed process
  • Iterative
  • Balances constraints
  • Protected by design rights

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Copy another designer's protected work and present it as original.
  • Design deceptive interfaces that trick people into choices they would not make.
  • Sign off a design that bears safety responsibilities without a qualified person.
  • Ignore accessibility requirements that exclude disabled users.

Only with a human decision

  • Approving a design for construction, manufacture or release.

May

  • Help draft, critique and document designs within a brief.
  • Check a design against stated requirements, accessibility and safety standards.

Moral aspects Filled

  • Design decides who can use a thing and who is left out.
  • Designers are owed credit for their work.

Who is affected

  • Users, including disabled users
  • Designers
  • People affected by what is built

Owners Filled

Steward

The designer or design team, with the client who commissions it.

Master systems

  • Design right and registered design registers

Links to other meta-models Filled

parent

  • Q104637332 - registry parent class
  • Q1519454 - registry parent class
  • Q1914636 - registry parent class

related

  • planned process - category
  • artefact and specification - outputs
  • usability testing - method
  • design right - law

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Vercy registry: vr.tr.design
  • Wikidata: Q82604 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q82604)

Direct properties not applicable Not applicable

Not applicable

Plane ACT: no invented physical properties.

Recognition optional Filled

  • Design briefs and specifications
  • Fields such as garden design or sonification
  • Design as the resulting pattern is a related sense
  • Sketches, models, prototypes, specifications and finished artefacts.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • write a design brief
  • prototype and test
  • evaluate with users
  • protect designs legally

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • Ignoring users and accessibility
  • Unclear briefs
  • Copying protected designs

Standards and interfaces required Filled

  • ISO 9241-210 human-centred design
  • EU design law
  • Accessibility standards

Context of use required Filled

  • Shaping how things work, look and are experienced.
  • product and industrial design
  • graphic and communication design
  • architectural and landscape design
  • interaction and service design
  • sound and data sonification design

Sources Filled

  1. Wikidata item Q82604: design - identity and sense of the item
  2. Wikipedia: Design - general description of the item

Open questions

  • Should design fields be separate entries?
  • How should design methods be linked?
  • How should design as pattern be split off?

Machine files

Provenance

thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed

Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q82604/spec.json