← Back to catalogue
Research draft

political divisions of Bosnia and Herzegovina

vr.tr.political-divisions-of-bosnia-and-herzegovina · PHY.PLC

Let an agent explain the political and administrative divisions of Bosnia and Herzegovina, relay the Dayton structure, entities, cantons and municipalities from official and reference sources with attribution, describe how the levels relate, and distinguish entities from cantons, municipalities and the Brcko District.

Thing Registry Physical world and living systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain the political and administrative divisions of Bosnia and Herzegovina, relay the Dayton structure, entities, cantons and municipalities from official and reference sources with attribution, describe how the levels relate, and distinguish entities from cantons, municipalities and the Brcko District.

The layered territorial organisation of Bosnia and Herzegovina under the 1995 Dayton Agreement, consisting of two entities, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, itself divided into ten cantons, and Republika Srpska, together with the self-governing Brcko District, with municipalities and cities as the local level in both entities and local communities as sub-municipal units; the arrangement reflects the post-war settlement and is the subject of continuing constitutional debate.

What it is for: Administering Bosnia and Herzegovina at several levels.

It can be explain the levels; relay the Dayton structure; describe relations between levels; distinguish unit types.

Distinguishing features

Two entities and a district

Cantons only in the Federation

Dayton origin

Ethno-territorial complexity

What it looks like

Not a visible object; divisions on maps.

Physical character

entities: 2 count - plus Brcko District

cantons in the Federation: 10 count

municipalities and cities: about 145 count - across the country

Dayton Agreement: 1995 year

How it is recognised

Entities, cantons, district, municipalities and cities of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina with cantons, Republika Srpska with municipalities and cities, Brcko District, local communities

The state is the sovereign unit; the entities are constituent units, not states

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

administrative territorial entity of a single country

was established by - in 1995

Dayton Agreement

includes - as an entity

Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina

includes - as an entity

Republika Srpska

In practice

Families and kinds

the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and its cantons

Republika Srpska and its municipalities and cities

the Brcko District

municipalities and cities of Bosnia and Herzegovina

local communities as sub-municipal units

historical divisions before 1995

Identifiers

ISO 3166-2 BA entities and district of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Standards and regulation

Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina as Annex 4 of the Dayton Agreement

Entity constitutions and laws on local self-government

ISO 3166-2 codes

Failure modes and hazards

Treating entities as sovereign states

Partisan framing of constitutional debates

Stale information on municipal status changes

Also called

city of Bosnia and Herzegovinamunicipality of the Republika Srpskamunicipality of Bosnia and HerzegovinaLocal communityadministrative territorial entity of Republika Srpskaadministrative subdivision of Republic of Srpskalocal administrative entity

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand The divisions.

Attribution.

Definition

Levels.

Definition

Definition.

  1. How is Bosnia and Herzegovina divided into entities, cantons, the Brcko District, municipalities, cities and local communities? definition
  2. Is the question about the divisions, the state or a political dispute? boundary

Units

Unit types.

Units

Units.

  1. What are the ten cantons, and how do municipalities and cities differ in each entity? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific unit? action
Govern Governance.

Regulation.

Powers

Powers.

Powers

Powers.

  1. What powers do the state, entities, cantons and municipalities hold under Dayton? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Debates

Constitutional debates.

Debates

Debates.

  1. What debates exist about reform of the Dayton structure, with positions from parties, the Office of the High Representative and international bodies attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral? boundary
History History.

Attribution.

Dayton

Dayton settlement.

Dayton

Dayton.

  1. How did the 1995 Dayton Agreement create the entities and district, as historians describe? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance

Earlier

Earlier divisions.

Earlier

Earlier.

  1. How was Bosnia and Herzegovina divided before 1992? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the history of Bosnia and Herzegovina? action
Context Data and comparison.

Context.

Data

Data.

Data

Data.

  1. Where are population and boundary data published, and how are codes assigned? provenance
  2. Which entry fits ISO 3166-2:BA? action

Comparison

Comparison.

Comparison

Comparison.

  1. How does the structure compare with other federal and consociational systems? provenance
  2. Which entry fits consociationalism? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should the entities and cantons be separate primary entries?
  • How should official sources be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming unit types of one entity; should they be split off?