← Back to catalogue
Research draft

Belarusian

vr.tr.belarusian · INF.MED

Let an agent explain the Belarusian language and its dialects, relay history, orthographies and status from linguistic sources with attribution, describe communities in Belarus, Poland and Ukraine, and distinguish Belarusian from Russian, Ukrainian and Polish, presenting language policy debates neutrally.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain the Belarusian language and its dialects, relay history, orthographies and status from linguistic sources with attribution, describe communities in Belarus, Poland and Ukraine, and distinguish Belarusian from Russian, Ukrainian and Polish, presenting language policy debates neutrally.

An East Slavic language spoken by about 5 to 7 million people, one of the two official languages of Belarus alongside Russian, with communities in Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania and Russia, standardised in the early 20th century with the Taraskievica and later Narkamauka orthographies, and comprising dialect groups such as Central, Northeastern and Southwestern Belarusian; its use in Belarus has declined relative to Russian, a topic of language policy debate that the model reports with attribution.

What it is for: Not applicable; a language.

It can be explain dialects and features; relay history and orthographies; describe status and communities; distinguish related languages.

Distinguishing features

East Slavic

Two orthographies

Co-official with Russian

Declining daily use

What it looks like

Not a visible object; speech and text in Cyrillic, historically also Latin script.

Physical character

speakers: about 5-7 million - estimates

official status: Belarus, since 1990; co-official with Russian since 1995 note

orthographies: Taraskievica 1918, Narkamauka 1933 list

home use in Belarus: about 26 percent - 2019 census

How it is recognised

East Slavic language of Belarus

Central, Northeastern and Southwestern dialects; Belarusian in Belarus, Poland and Ukraine

Russian and Ukrainian are sister languages; Polish is West Slavic; Trasianka is a mixed speech

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

East Slavic

is an official language of - with Russian

Belarus

is contrasted with - the other official language

Russian language

is written in - with a historical Latin alphabet

Cyrillic script

In practice

Families and kinds

standard Belarusian in Narkamauka and Taraskievica

Central Belarusian dialects

Northeastern Belarusian dialects

Southwestern Belarusian dialects

Belarusian in Poland and Ukraine

Trasianka mixed speech

Identifiers

ISO 639-1 be Belarusian

ISO 639-3 bel Belarusian

Glottolog bela1254 Belarusian

Standards and regulation

Belarusian law on languages

Minority language protection in Poland and Ukraine

ISO 639 codes

Failure modes and hazards

Partisan framing of language policy

Confusing Belarusian with Russian or Ukrainian

Treating one orthography as the only standard

Also called

Belarusian language in BelarusBelarusian language in UkraineBelarusian language in PolandBelarusian dialectCentral BelarusanSouthwest BelarusanNortheast Belarusan

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What Belarusian is.

Attribution.

Definition

Definition and classification.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is Belarusian, and how does it differ from Russian, Ukrainian and Polish, as linguists describe? definition
  2. Is the question about the language, a dialect, a community or policy? boundary

Dialects

Dialects.

Dialects

Dialects.

  1. What are the Central, Northeastern and Southwestern dialect groups, and what is Trasianka? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific dialect? action
Learn Grammar and orthography.

Practice.

Grammar

Grammar.

Grammar

Grammar.

  1. What are the main features of Belarusian phonology, grammar and vocabulary? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Orthography

Orthographies.

Orthography

Orthography.

  1. How do Taraskievica and Narkamauka differ, and what is the Belarusian Latin alphabet? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
History History.

Attribution.

Development

Development.

Development

Development.

  1. How did Belarusian develop from Old East Slavic and Ruthenian to the modern standard? provenance
  2. Which entry fits Ruthenian language? action

Policy

Language policy.

Policy

Policy.

  1. How have Soviet, post-1991 and current policies affected Belarusian, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral? boundary
Context Communities and culture.

Context.

Communities

Communities abroad.

Communities

Communities.

  1. How is Belarusian used in Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania and the diaspora? provenance
  2. Which entry fits Belarusians in Poland? action

Literature

Literature.

Literature

Literature.

  1. What are the major works of Belarusian literature? provenance
  2. Which entry fits Belarusian literature? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should Taraskievica and the dialect groups be separate primary entries?
  • How should linguistic sources be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming countries and dialects; should they be split off?