penis captivus

Qualifying event sequence

Record penetration, the reported inability to withdraw and the basis for calling it an inability as separate elements.

1. Does the account explicitly describe vaginal penetration before withdrawal became impossible? definition
2. What distinguishes physical inability to withdraw from pain, fear or a decision to remain still in this account? boundary

Alternative classification

Assess penetration difficulty, erection persistence and external constriction independently rather than treating them as synonyms for penis captivus.

1. Does the account describe only difficulty with penetration or a persistent erection without withdrawal failure? boundary
2. Is retention attributed to vaginal tissues, an external object or an unspecified obstruction? boundary

Account basis

Distinguish participant testimony, direct clinical observation, later recollection and secondhand narration without automatically accepting or rejecting any category.

1. Was the author present during the inability to withdraw, or did they learn of it afterward? provenance
2. What contemporaneous documentation supports the account, and how long after the event was it written? provenance

Independent evidence

Count underlying episodes separately from publications and preserve challenges to an account's authenticity.

1. Do apparently separate reports trace to the same episode or earlier text? provenance
2. Which details are independently corroborated, contradicted or introduced only in later retellings? provenance

Mechanism evidence

Treat muscular contraction and erectile state as separately evidenced variables rather than building either into an automatic causal conclusion.

1. What evidence supports muscular contraction during this episode, and was it observed or inferred? measurement
2. What penile state was documented during retention and at release? measurement

Temporal sequence

Record onset, persistence, state changes and release with the precision actually supported by the account.

1. Which observations bound the duration, and was that duration timed or recalled? measurement
2. Did release follow a documented muscular or erectile change, and what prevents attributing causation from timing alone? boundary

Ongoing status and symptoms

Record continued inability to separate and each participant's symptoms without requiring diagnostic certainty before seeking assessment.

1. Is withdrawal still reported as impossible, or is this a retrospective account of a resolved episode? measurement
2. What symptoms and ongoing difficulties need to be communicated to a clinician assessing the episode? action

Response and outcome attribution

Record reported actions and subsequent outcomes without converting an anecdotal sequence into a recommended treatment.

1. What actions preceded release, who performed them and what evidence supports any claimed effect? provenance
2. After withdrawal became possible, what pain, injury or other symptoms were documented for either participant? measurement
3. What follow-up was documented, and which outcomes remain unknown? action

Check these first

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these check these first hold for the sense of penis captivus this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Real-world use

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of penis captivus this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Failure modes and hazards

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of penis captivus this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of penis captivus this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance