← Back to catalogue
Published

support

vr.tr.support-4 · thing-support-4

Enable an AI agent to recognise a weight-bearing device, assess its suitability and condition for a particular supported thing, and identify actions permitted by the available evidence.

Thing Registry Physical world and living systems PHY.OBJ

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

5 bundles · 10 layers · 10 findings · 23 questions

Weight-bearing role Establishes what makes the candidate a support and identifies the extent of its responsibility.

Supported thing

Identifies what is borne and whether the bearing role is intended or incidental.

Bearing relationship

Record the supported thing, the bearing locations and the evidence for the support role.

  1. Which thing's weight is this device intended to bear, and at which locations? definition
  2. What documentation or observation establishes that weight-bearing role? provenance

Device boundary

Separates the support from neighbouring devices and from the receiving structure.

Support assembly boundary

Record which members, feet, pads and integral adjustment components constitute this support.

  1. Which components belong to this support, and which are separate anchors, foundations or supported objects? boundary
  2. Does the device also lift, transport or restrain the supported thing, and where are those roles represented? boundary
Load transfer and limits Relates the actual loading to the device's load path and applicable evidence of permissible use.

Applied load path

Tracks how weight enters the support and passes to other elements.

Load entry and exit

Record load application points, transfer members and receiving interfaces, including unresolved load sharing.

  1. Where does the weight enter this support, through which members does it pass, and where is it transferred onward? definition
  2. What forces and moments act in the proposed use, and how was this support's share established when several supports are present? measurement

Configuration-specific limits

Connects loading limits to the settings and conditions for which they are evidenced.

Applicable load evidence

Record the basis, applicability and gaps of any claimed loading limit.

  1. Which rating, test or assessment establishes permissible loading for this exact support and configuration? provenance
  2. Does that evidence cover the actual extension, orientation, load offset and any changing or impact loading? boundary
  3. What additional evidence is required before accepting a use outside the documented conditions? action
Bearing interfaces and adjustment Describes how the device fits the supported thing and retains its working geometry.

Contact compatibility

Examines the surfaces through which the supported thing's weight enters the device.

Bearing fit

Record actual contact, alignment and any pads, saddles or adapters needed for the bearing interface.

  1. What contact area, alignment and load offset exist between the supported thing and the bearing surface? measurement
  2. What evidence establishes that the bearing surface and any adapter are suitable for the supported thing? provenance

Working geometry retention

Identifies adjustable parts and how their selected positions are maintained.

Settings and locks

Record extension, angle and engagement of mechanisms that retain the load-bearing configuration.

  1. What are the current adjustable settings, and which pins, threads, clamps or other mechanisms retain them? measurement
  2. How is correct engagement verified, and what documented conditions govern adjustment while carrying weight? action
Installed stability Assesses the installed arrangement's resistance to unintended movement and its dependence on surrounding structures.

Receiving interface

Identifies the surface or structure receiving the support's load and the quality of engagement.

Base or attachment engagement

Record foot contact or attachment engagement and reference assessments of the receiving structure.

  1. Which floor, ground, wall or frame receives the load, and what contact or attachment is actually engaged? boundary
  2. What evidence establishes that the receiving interface can accept the transferred load in its current condition? provenance

Movement and restraint

Relates loading and placement to relevant modes of unintended displacement.

Stability assessment

Record assessment of applicable tipping, sliding, swinging or separation risks and dependencies on restraints.

  1. Which unintended movements are relevant to this arrangement, and what assessment covers the actual load position and restraints? provenance
  2. What slip, tilt, settlement or other movement has been observed under stated loading conditions? measurement
  3. Which changes to placement, supported load or restraint require stability to be reassessed? action
Bearing condition and intervention Connects observed deterioration and service evidence to decisions about continued bearing and intervention.

Load-carrying condition

Records defects and changes in the members and interfaces that carry weight.

Defects and deformation

Locate observed damage, wear, looseness and deformation, distinguishing observations from assessed acceptability.

  1. Where are cracks, corrosion, wear, looseness or deformation observed along the load path? measurement
  2. Which inspection or acceptance criteria determine the significance of these observations for continued weight-bearing? provenance

Service decisions

Records the evidence and prerequisites for loading, continued use, adjustment, repair or removal.

Intervention prerequisites

Make service decisions traceable and identify how the supported weight is handled during intervention.

  1. What recorded decision permits or restricts current use, and which configuration and inspection evidence does it cover? provenance
  2. Before adjustment, repair or removal, how will the supported weight be unloaded or transferred, and what verifies the alternative arrangement? action
  3. What checks are required before returning this support to weight-bearing service? action

Classifiers Filled

Family
Thing Registry
Category
Physical world and living systems
Entry kind
noun.artifact
Plane
PHY
Domain
PHY.OBJ
Tags
artifactdevice
Facets: substance
material
Facets: origin
manufactured
Facets: agency
inert
Facets: mobility
portable
Facets: scale
handheld
Facets: affordances
graspable, operable
Other names and narrower kinds
andiron, firedog, dog, dog-iron, angle bracket, angle iron, ankle brace, arch support, arm, armrest, atlas, telamon

What it is Filled

any device that bears the weight of another thing

In scope

  • The device's weight-bearing role and relationship to the thing it supports
  • Contact, attachment and load transfer through the support
  • Support geometry, adjustment and installed configuration
  • Evidence of permissible loading for the actual configuration
  • Stability, deterioration and readiness for continued use

Out of scope

  • The supported thing's internal construction, function and general condition
  • The ground, building or foundation as an independently assessed asset
  • Fasteners and anchors as independently specified products
  • Lifting machinery and transport equipment beyond their support interfaces
  • Detailed structural design calculations and certification processes

Why it exists Filled

Enable an AI agent to recognise a weight-bearing device, assess its suitability and condition for a particular supported thing, and identify actions permitted by the available evidence.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • Identify another thing whose weight the device is intended to bear; incidental contact alone does not establish a support role.
  • Trace how the supported thing's gravitational load enters and leaves the device; a component that only aligns or laterally restrains something may belong to a neighbouring model.
  • Establish whether the candidate is an identifiable device rather than merely terrain or an available surface.
  • Distinguish sustained weight-bearing from lifting or transport, recording multiple roles when one device performs more than one function.

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Remove or adjust a support while it is carrying a load.
  • Load a support beyond its rating or use an improvised support for heavy loads.
  • Leave people working under a load held only by a temporary or damaged support.

Only with a human decision

  • Returning a damaged support to service.
  • Removing supports from a structure.

May

  • Inspect supports for damage, overload and correct installation and report findings.
  • Check that a support is rated for the load before placing something on it.

Moral aspects Filled

  • When supports fail, loads fall on people; safety margins exist for that reason.

Who is affected

  • Workers below loads
  • Users of supported equipment
  • Bystanders

Owners Filled

Steward

The owner or operator of the equipment or structure it holds up.

Links to other meta-models Filled

parent

  • oewn-03187746-n - registry parent class

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Vercy registry: vr.tr.support-4
  • Open English WordNet: oewn-04366676-n

Direct properties required Filled

  • Supported thing: References to supported objects and their bearing locations
  • Support arrangement: Freestanding, attached, suspended, integrated, other or unresolved
  • Applied loading: Force in N and moment in N·m, with location, direction, operating condition and uncertainty
  • Permissible loading evidence: Referenced rating, assessment or test tied to a specified configuration; unknown if unavailable
  • Bearing geometry: Contact dimensions, footprint, height, extension and offsets in mm or m
  • Adjustment and locking state: Fixed, adjusted and verified locked, unlocked, partially engaged, not applicable or unknown
  • Receiving structure: Reference to ground, floor, wall, frame or other element receiving the transferred load
  • Observed displacement: Deflection, settlement or slip in mm and tilt in degrees, with load and observation time
  • Weight-bearing condition: Recorded defects, affected locations, inspection date and assessed service status

Recognition required Filled

  • A stand, bracket, prop, jack stand or frame carrying the weight of something else.
  • Load ratings marked on manufactured supports.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Match a support to a proposed supported thing using interface, loading and configuration evidence.
  • Record placement, attachment and adjustment for assessment before loading.
  • Compare observed use with documented limits and flag missing evidence.
  • Inspect bearing surfaces, load-carrying members, joints and locking mechanisms.
  • Identify whether repositioning, adjustment or removal requires unloading or an independently verified alternative support.
  • Recommend continued use, further assessment, repair or withdrawal according to documented criteria.

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • Collapse from overloading, corrosion or poor footing.
  • Tipping from uneven ground or off-centre loads.

Standards and interfaces required Filled

  • EN 1993-1-1, issued by the European Committee for Standardization, provides structural design rules applicable to steel supports within its scope.

Context of use required Filled

  • A support bears the weight of an object in buildings, machinery, furniture, storage systems and temporary installations.
  • It transfers that load to another component or the ground while maintaining the intended position of the supported object.
  • Suitability depends on the load, attachment, supporting foundation and conditions of use.

Sources Filled

  1. Open English WordNet 2024, synset oewn-04366676-n - sense and gloss of the concept
  2. Wiktionary: support - word senses and usage

Open questions

  • Does an existing Vercy world model already cover this concept and therefore need to remain its single source of truth?
  • How does the registry distinguish support devices from shelves, stands, brackets, hangers and integral structural members that also bear weight?
  • Which support families require specialised extensions for flexible suspension, compliant bearing or active height control?
  • Which authoritative sources establish configuration-specific loading evidence, inspection criteria and intervention rules for the support families included?
  • How should shared loading across multiple supports be represented when the distribution has not been measured or otherwise established?

Machine files

Provenance

thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed

Built from: models/things/publications/thing-support-4/spec.json