{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T08:39:46Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 24.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094c4-ef18-7753-83e5-33e7f928ac8e\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: choice\nSense to describe: the act of choosing or selecting\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 0", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 57.5, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094c4-ef27-74c3-8ca3-bee69ed1dc74\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: choice\nRegistry id: vr.tr.choice-act\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: the act of choosing or selecting\nNames folded into this entry" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:16:30+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T12:16:27+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: WordNet gloss", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-CHOICE-ACT", "registryId": "vr.tr.choice-act", "name": "choice", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/choice-act/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.choice-act", "name": "choice", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise an act of choosing, record how a selection was made, assess whether it is settled and authorised, and identify permissible next actions.", "definition": "Choice is the act of selecting an option from a set of alternatives, whether through explicit deliberation or a less reflective process, without necessarily implying freedom from constraint or subsequent execution.", "scope_statement": "This model owns choice as an act of selecting among alternatives, including the chooser, the alternatives understood to be available, the basis and conditions of selection, and its commitment status; it does not equate selection with preference, deliberation, or execution.", "in_scope": [ "The chooser and any authority to choose for another party", "Alternatives considered, perceived as available, excluded, or selected", "The selection rule, expressed reasons, and relevant uncertainty", "Constraints, pressure, defaults, and opportunities to decline", "Evidence that selection occurred and whether it remains provisional", "Confirmation, revision, withdrawal, and handoff to implementation" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Preferences and values considered independently of a particular choice", "Deliberation or evaluation that produces no selection", "Execution of the selected action and its downstream outcomes", "Consent as a distinct act with its own validity requirements", "The design and governance of systems that present choices", "Mathematical choice functions considered independently of choosing acts" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "An instance must identify what was selected, or explicitly record that evidence of selection is unresolved; considering alternatives alone is insufficient.", "A preference ranks or favours alternatives, whereas a choice selects one or more for a particular occasion; the selected alternative need not be the most preferred.", "An available option is something that could be chosen, whereas this entry concerns the act that selects it.", "Selection and execution can occur separately: an unimplemented selection can still be a choice.", "An imposed outcome or an automatically applied default does not by itself demonstrate that the affected party chose it." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Chooser attribution", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Selecting person, group, or system; represented party where applicable; unresolved attribution", "why_it_matters": "Separates who performed the selection from who requested it or bears its consequences." }, { "name": "Alternative availability", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "For each alternative: perceived available, verified feasible, unavailable, disputed, or unknown", "why_it_matters": "A chooser's understood alternatives may differ from the alternatives actually accessible." }, { "name": "Selection cardinality", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Number of selected alternatives, interpreted against the permitted minimum and maximum", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes selecting one, selecting several, and explicitly selecting none." }, { "name": "Selection basis", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Examples: comparative evaluation, habit, rule, random procedure, explicit default acceptance, mixed, or unknown", "why_it_matters": "Records how selection occurred without assuming every choice involved deliberation." }, { "name": "Choice status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Unresolved, provisional, confirmed, withdrawn, or superseded", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether an agent should seek clarification, request confirmation, or use the selection." }, { "name": "Pressure and restriction", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Documented constraints, threats, incentives, dependencies, and ability to decline", "why_it_matters": "Supports assessment of freedom to choose without reducing it to an unsupported binary label." }, { "name": "Revision window", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Deadline or remaining duration in seconds, minutes, or days; unrestricted, unavailable, or unknown", "why_it_matters": "Indicates when a selection can still be changed and when further action would foreclose alternatives." } ], "affordances": [ "Elicit the intended selection and clarify whether selecting none or deferring is allowed.", "Compare perceived alternatives with feasible alternatives and expose relevant omissions.", "Check whether a recorded selection satisfies its stated selection rule.", "Distinguish direct evidence of choosing from an inference based on behaviour or defaults.", "Confirm or revise a selection within the chooser's authority and applicable revision conditions.", "Pass a confirmed selection to an execution process when separate action authority is established." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Record how a choice was made, who made it and what options were considered.", "Present options and their trade-offs to a person so they can choose." ], "must_not": [ "Make a choice that belongs to a person without their authority.", "Manipulate a person's choice with deceptive design, pressure or hidden defaults.", "Treat a choice made under coercion as free and binding.", "Remove options from a person without telling them." ], "requires_human": [ "Acting on a choice that significantly affects another person's rights, health or money." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Respecting people's choices is the core of autonomy, yet choices are shaped by power and circumstance.", "Automated systems increasingly nudge or make choices on people's behalf." ], "affected_parties": [ "The person choosing", "People affected by the choice" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The person who makes the choice answers for it.", "master_systems": [] }, "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Dark patterns that steer people against their interests.", "Choices assumed rather than confirmed." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "Choice occurs when a person or agent selects among alternatives in everyday activities, planning, purchasing or collective decisions.", "Recording a choice helps distinguish the selected option from options still under consideration and supports subsequent coordination.", "A selection can occur under constraints and does not by itself establish authorization or execution." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "interfaces": "No single standard, law or official classification applies to choosing in general, because applicable requirements depend on the decision and jurisdiction.", "recognition": "An act of choosing has no intrinsic visual appearance and must be inferred from communication or behavior in context." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "oewn", "title": "Open English WordNet 2024, synset oewn-00162063-n", "url": "https://en-word.net/id/oewn-00162063-n", "what_it_supports": "sense and gloss of the concept", "url_status": "live", "checked_by": "http 200" }, { "id": "wiktionary-en", "title": "Wiktionary: choice", "url": "https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/choice", "what_it_supports": "word senses and usage", "url_status": "live", "checked_by": "http 200" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "choice-occurrence-and-attribution", "name": "Choice occurrence and attribution", "description": "Establishes whether choosing occurred and who performed it.", "rationale": "A selected outcome alone cannot establish the occurrence or authorship of a choice.", "layers": [ { "id": "selection-evidence", "name": "Selection evidence", "description": "Distinguishes an act of selection from consideration, preference, and observed outcomes.", "findings": [ { "id": "identifiable-selection", "name": "Identifiable selection", "description": "Record the selected alternative and the evidence supporting the claim that an act of choosing occurred.", "questions": [ { "text": "What was selected, and what statement, interaction, or behaviour indicates selection rather than mere consideration?", "kind": "definition", "id": "identifiable-selection-q01" }, { "text": "Does the evidence directly record choosing, or is choosing inferred from an outcome that could have another explanation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "identifiable-selection-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "chooser-and-representation", "name": "Chooser and representation", "description": "Locates the selecting actor and separates selection from representation and implementation.", "findings": [ { "id": "attributed-chooser", "name": "Attributed chooser", "description": "Record who selected, on whose behalf they acted, and any uncertainty about collective or delegated authorship.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who made the selection, and who merely advised, communicated, or implemented it?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "attributed-chooser-q01" }, { "text": "If the chooser acted for another person or group, what establishes the extent of their authority to select?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attributed-chooser-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "alternatives-and-selection-rule", "name": "Alternatives and selection rule", "description": "Records what the choice was between and what constituted an admissible selection.", "rationale": "The meaning of a selection depends on its alternatives and whether the task permitted one, several, or no selections.", "layers": [ { "id": "available-alternatives", "name": "Available alternatives", "description": "Separates presented, perceived, and feasible alternatives at the time of choosing.", "findings": [ { "id": "alternative-set", "name": "Alternative set", "description": "Record the alternatives known to the chooser and relevant differences between apparent and actual availability.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which alternatives did the chooser understand to be available when selecting?", "kind": "definition", "id": "alternative-set-q01" }, { "text": "Which alternatives were infeasible, hidden, excluded, or discovered only after the selection?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "alternative-set-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "admissible-selection", "name": "Admissible selection", "description": "Specifies the permitted selection form and the meaning of nonselection.", "findings": [ { "id": "cardinality-and-declining", "name": "Cardinality and declining", "description": "Record whether the chooser could select one, several, or no alternatives, and distinguish declining from failing to respond.", "questions": [ { "text": "How many alternatives could be selected, and were any combinations incompatible?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "cardinality-and-declining-q01" }, { "text": "Was declining or deferring an explicit alternative, and how is that distinguished from silence or an incomplete choice?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "cardinality-and-declining-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "selection-basis-and-freedom", "name": "Selection basis and freedom", "description": "Records how selection occurred and the conditions affecting the chooser's ability to select otherwise.", "rationale": "Identical selections can arise through different reasons, procedures, information, or pressure and therefore warrant different assessments.", "layers": [ { "id": "reasons-and-procedure", "name": "Reasons and procedure", "description": "Captures the reported basis of selection without assuming optimisation or conscious comparison.", "findings": [ { "id": "basis-of-selection", "name": "Basis of selection", "description": "Distinguish the chooser's stated reasons, the procedure used, and any explanation inferred by an observer.", "questions": [ { "text": "What reasons or procedure does the chooser identify as producing this selection?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "basis-of-selection-q01" }, { "text": "What information or uncertainty did the chooser report as relevant when selecting?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "basis-of-selection-q02" }, { "text": "Was the selection deliberate, habitual, randomised, rule-governed, or insufficiently documented to classify?", "kind": "definition", "id": "basis-of-selection-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "constraints-and-defaults", "name": "Constraints and defaults", "description": "Examines restrictions and default mechanisms that affect selection or its attribution.", "findings": [ { "id": "ability-to-select-otherwise", "name": "Ability to select otherwise", "description": "Record concrete barriers, pressure, and default behaviour before assessing whether the selection was freely made.", "questions": [ { "text": "What practical barriers, threats, or dependencies affected the chooser's ability to select another alternative or decline?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "ability-to-select-otherwise-q01" }, { "text": "If a default took effect, what evidence shows that the chooser actively accepted it?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "ability-to-select-otherwise-q02" }, { "text": "What clarification or additional opportunity to choose is needed before relying on this selection?", "kind": "action", "id": "ability-to-select-otherwise-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "commitment-revision-and-handoff", "name": "Commitment, revision, and handoff", "description": "Tracks when a selection becomes usable, how it can change, and what it authorises next.", "rationale": "A tentative or superseded choice should not be treated as a current instruction, and selection alone may not authorise execution.", "layers": [ { "id": "confirmation-and-revision", "name": "Confirmation and revision", "description": "Identifies the current selection and its conditions for confirmation, withdrawal, or replacement.", "findings": [ { "id": "current-commitment", "name": "Current commitment", "description": "Record whether the choice is provisional or confirmed and retain the relationship between revised selections.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence establishes whether this selection is provisional, confirmed, withdrawn, or superseded?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "current-commitment-q01" }, { "text": "Until when, and under what conditions, may the chooser revise or withdraw it?", "kind": "action", "id": "current-commitment-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "selection-to-execution", "name": "Selection to execution", "description": "Defines the handoff from a chosen alternative to a separately authorised implementation.", "findings": [ { "id": "action-authority", "name": "Action authority", "description": "Record what the selection permits an agent to do and whether further approval is required before implementation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does this choice authorise implementation, or only identify the alternative the chooser currently selects?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "action-authority-q01" }, { "text": "What confirmation, authority, or prerequisite remains necessary before acting on the selection?", "kind": "action", "id": "action-authority-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This is a recall-based account; no sources were consulted.", "Economics often operationalises choice through observed selection, while philosophical accounts may require intention or agency; the boundary around automatic behaviour is unsettled.", "The listed kinds overlap rather than form an exhaustive taxonomy; experimental measurements require explicit rules for recording selection, deferral and nonresponse." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of choice this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Individual choice", "Collective choice", "Deliberative choice", "Habitual choice", "Choice under risk, with specified outcome probabilities", "Choice under uncertainty, without fully specified outcome probabilities" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of choice this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Consumer selection among products, services or purchase alternatives", "Selection of actions in planning and everyday problem solving", "Voting and other procedures for collective selection", "Behavioural experiments examining preferences and responses to alternatives", "Selection among treatment options through shared decision making" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of choice this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Choice proportion for a specified option across observed trials", "typical_range": "0-1", "unit": "dimensionless" }, { "quantity": "Response time from presentation of alternatives to recorded selection", "typical_range": "Task-dependent; no universal typical range", "unit": "milliseconds or seconds" }, { "quantity": "Number of available alternatives", "typical_range": "Two or more in standard multiple-option tasks", "unit": "count" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of choice this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Framing, defaults and presentation order can influence selection.", "Incomplete information or misunderstood probabilities can produce selections poorly aligned with the chooser's aims.", "Coercion and manipulative presentation can undermine meaningful freedom of choice.", "Large or complex option sets can sometimes increase deferral, difficulty or dissatisfaction; these effects depend on context.", "Inferring stable preferences directly from observed choices can overlook constraints, mistakes and context." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of choice this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The roles of individual autonomy, family consultation and collective obligation vary across social and cultural settings; country boundaries are imperfect proxies.", "Institutional and legal settings affect which alternatives are available and who has authority to select them." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of choice this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Decision", "difference": "Decision can encompass forming a judgment or commitment; choice specifically concerns selection among alternatives, although usage overlaps." }, { "name": "Preference", "difference": "Preference is an evaluative ordering or inclination; choice is a selection that may also reflect constraints or error." }, { "name": "Deliberation", "difference": "Deliberation is consideration of reasons or alternatives; it may precede choice but need not yield one." }, { "name": "Action", "difference": "Action is broader: selecting an option is an act, but carrying out the selected option is a further act that may never occur." }, { "name": "Free will", "difference": "Free will concerns the freedom or control involved in agency; identifying a selection as a choice does not settle whether that freedom exists." }, { "name": "Choice set", "difference": "A choice set is the collection of available alternatives, rather than the act of selecting among them." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of choice this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "What minimum evidence should qualify habitual or nonconscious behaviour as choosing rather than an observer's interpretation?", "Should cases with only one feasible alternative count as choices, and how should perceived alternatives affect that classification?", "Under what conditions should automated selection be attributed to a system, its operator, or a delegating person?", "How should collective choice be individuated when voting, aggregation, and ratification involve different actors and times?", "Which domain-specific criteria distinguish constrained choice, coerced choice, and an imposed outcome?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 15, "questions": 25 } }