{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T08:47:47Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 19.2, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094cc-4a82-78b1-896b-f335a518cfb7\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: commitment\nSense to describe: a message that makes a pledge\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch ", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 57.0, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094cc-4a8f-70c1-b9ce-c1b238ec0d6e\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: commitment\nRegistry id: vr.tr.commitment-communication\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: a message that makes a pledge\nNames folded " } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:11:00+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T12:16:27+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: WordNet gloss", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-COMMITMENT-COMMUNICATION", "registryId": "vr.tr.commitment-communication", "name": "commitment", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/commitment-communication/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.commitment-communication", "name": "commitment", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise a pledge-making message, identify what its issuer undertakes, assess its communicative state, and determine appropriate follow-up.", "definition": "A commitment is a message through which a speaker or sender undertakes to perform a future action or ensure a future state of affairs, presenting that undertaking as a pledge to others.", "scope_statement": "This model owns commitment as a message that makes a pledge, including its attributed issuer, intended recipient, undertaking, qualifications, communication evidence, and links to later clarification or disposition; it does not own the resulting obligation or its performance.", "in_scope": [ "The message content and contextual evidence that it makes a pledge", "The issuer, any represented principal, and the intended recipient or audience", "The promised action or restraint, its timing, conditions, and qualifications", "Evidence of issuance, delivery, receipt, and interpretation", "Relationships to clarifications, amendments, withdrawal messages, and reported outcomes" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Private resolve, psychological attachment, or dedication without a pledge-making message", "The social or legal obligation potentially created by the message", "Contracts and agreements comprising multiple terms and acts of assent", "Execution of the promised activity and its operational resources", "The communication channel, document carrier, or recording as an independently managed object" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "The message presents its issuer or represented principal as undertaking something, rather than merely predicting an outcome.", "An expression of intention qualifies only where its wording and context support a pledge; future tense alone is insufficient.", "A request directs another party to act, whereas a commitment attributes an undertaking to the issuer or represented principal.", "A quotation or report of someone else's promise records a commitment without necessarily making a new one.", "A commitment can be communicated without forming a complete contract; contractual enforceability is a separate assessment." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Pledge interpretation", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "supported | ambiguous | disputed | unsupported", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an intention, prediction, or courtesy phrase from being treated automatically as a pledge." }, { "name": "Issuer and represented principal", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Links to the message issuer and, where claimed, the party on whose behalf the pledge is made", "why_it_matters": "Separates the person communicating from the party presented as undertaking performance." }, { "name": "Intended recipient or audience", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Named recipient | bounded group | public audience | unspecified, with party links where available", "why_it_matters": "Identifies to whom the pledge is addressed without assuming that every reader is a beneficiary." }, { "name": "Undertaking content", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Action | restraint | outcome | mixed | unclear, accompanied by the relevant wording", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes promising to attempt an action from promising that a result will occur." }, { "name": "Performance timing", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Fixed deadline | interval | recurring schedule | event-relative | unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Supports follow-up while preserving unresolved dates and temporal expressions." }, { "name": "Pledge qualifications", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Express condition | effort qualification | exception | duration limit | none stated | unclear", "why_it_matters": "Keeps qualifications attached to the undertaking instead of strengthening it through paraphrase." }, { "name": "Communication evidence state", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Draft only | issuance evidenced | delivery evidenced | receipt evidenced | disputed | unknown", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes preparation, communication, and recipient awareness." }, { "name": "Subsequent message relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Clarifies | reaffirms | proposes amendment to | purports to withdraw | reports fulfilment of | disputes", "why_it_matters": "Connects later messages without assuming that they effectively alter or discharge an obligation." } ], "affordances": [ "Extract a proposed undertaking together with its exact supporting wording and qualifications.", "Identify the issuer, represented principal, and audience, flagging uncertain attribution or authority.", "Request clarification of ambiguous pledge force, scope, conditions, or timing.", "Schedule follow-up against stated deadlines or triggers while preserving unresolved interpretations.", "Link subsequent messages and performance evidence to the original pledge.", "Route questions of enforceability, release, or breach to the relevant obligation or agreement model." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Record commitments a user makes or receives and remind them of due dates.", "Make commitments on a user's behalf only within the authority they have given." ], "must_not": [ "Make a commitment for a person or organization without their authority.", "Present a vague statement as a firm commitment, or a firm one as non-binding.", "Break or quietly drop a commitment it made without telling those relying on it.", "Extract commitments from people through pressure or deception." ], "requires_human": [ "Committing a person or organization to obligations, payments or dates.", "Withdrawing from a commitment others rely on." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Others plan their lives around commitments; broken ones cause real harm.", "Commitments made by agents blur who is actually responsible." ], "affected_parties": [ "People who rely on the commitment", "The person or organization committed" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The speaker or sender who made it.", "master_systems": [] }, "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Unauthorized commitments can bind people to obligations they did not agree to.", "Unclear wording leads to disputes over what was promised." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "Commitment messages occur in conversations, correspondence, negotiations and public statements when a sender pledges a future action or outcome.", "They support coordination by identifying what others can expect from the sender and under which stated conditions.", "Recording the undertaking helps track fulfillment, clarify responsibility and determine appropriate follow-up." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "interfaces": "No single standard, law or official classification applies to all pledge-making messages, because legal and formal requirements depend on context and jurisdiction.", "recognition": "A message's status as a commitment depends on its meaning and context rather than any intrinsic visual feature." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "oewn", "title": "Open English WordNet 2024, synset oewn-06697128-n", "url": "https://en-word.net/id/oewn-06697128-n", "what_it_supports": "sense and gloss of the concept", "url_status": "live", "checked_by": "http 200" }, { "id": "wiktionary-en", "title": "Wiktionary: commitment", "url": "https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/commitment", "what_it_supports": "word senses and usage", "url_status": "live", "checked_by": "http 200" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "pledge-recognition", "name": "Pledge recognition", "description": "Determine whether the message makes a pledge and locate the content that supports that interpretation.", "rationale": "Commitment must be distinguished from nearby forms of communication before an agent treats it as an undertaking.", "layers": [ { "id": "communicative-force", "name": "Communicative force", "description": "Examine how the message presents the issuer's stance toward future conduct or an outcome.", "findings": [ { "id": "undertaking-versus-expectation", "name": "Undertaking versus expectation", "description": "Record whether the wording and context support a pledge rather than an intention, forecast, aspiration, or polite reassurance.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which words and contextual cues present the issuer or principal as undertaking the stated conduct or outcome?", "kind": "definition", "id": "undertaking-versus-expectation-q01" }, { "text": "What alternative interpretation would make this an intention, prediction, or reassurance rather than a pledge?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "undertaking-versus-expectation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "pledge-bearing-content", "name": "Pledge-bearing content", "description": "Locate the pledge within a message and distinguish its issuance from its quotation or repetition.", "findings": [ { "id": "original-pledge-and-representations", "name": "Original pledge and representations", "description": "Preserve the relevant passage or segment and identify whether the material makes, reports, quotes, or reaffirms a pledge.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which passage, utterance, or recorded segment carries the pledge, including its qualifications?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "original-pledge-and-representations-q01" }, { "text": "Does this instance make a pledge, reaffirm an earlier pledge, or merely reproduce someone else's words?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "original-pledge-and-representations-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "pledging-parties", "name": "Pledging parties", "description": "Identify who communicates the pledge, who is presented as undertaking it, and whom it addresses.", "rationale": "A pledge cannot be interpreted reliably when speaker, principal, recipient, and beneficiary are conflated.", "layers": [ { "id": "issuer-and-principal", "name": "Issuer and principal", "description": "Separate message authorship or transmission from the party represented as making the undertaking.", "findings": [ { "id": "attribution-and-representation", "name": "Attribution and representation", "description": "Record attribution evidence and any claim to pledge on behalf of another party without treating claimed authority as established authority.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who issued the message, and what evidence supports that attribution?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attribution-and-representation-q01" }, { "text": "If the issuer speaks for another party, what authority is claimed and what evidence supports it?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attribution-and-representation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "recipient-and-beneficiary", "name": "Recipient and beneficiary", "description": "Identify the addressed audience and distinguish it from parties expected to benefit.", "findings": [ { "id": "direction-of-pledge", "name": "Direction of pledge", "description": "Record whom the pledge addresses, who may benefit, and whether either role remains unspecified.", "questions": [ { "text": "To whom is the pledge addressed: a named party, a bounded group, or a public audience?", "kind": "definition", "id": "direction-of-pledge-q01" }, { "text": "Are the intended recipients also the beneficiaries, or does the message distinguish these roles?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "direction-of-pledge-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "undertaking-boundaries", "name": "Undertaking boundaries", "description": "Represent exactly what is pledged and the limits under which the pledge is expressed.", "rationale": "Agents need to avoid expanding a qualified or limited undertaking into an unconditional promise of success.", "layers": [ { "id": "promised-performance", "name": "Promised performance", "description": "Identify the action, restraint, effort, or outcome stated in the pledge.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-success-criteria", "name": "Content and success criteria", "description": "Separate the expressed undertaking from inferred expectations and record any stated criteria for assessing performance.", "questions": [ { "text": "What action, restraint, effort, or outcome does the message expressly undertake?", "kind": "definition", "id": "content-and-success-criteria-q01" }, { "text": "What observable criteria, if any, does the message provide for determining whether the undertaking has been met?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "content-and-success-criteria-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "conditions-and-timing", "name": "Conditions and timing", "description": "Preserve triggers, dependencies, deadlines, recurrence, exceptions, and duration limits.", "findings": [ { "id": "qualified-pledge-scope", "name": "Qualified pledge scope", "description": "Attach each qualification to the part of the undertaking it governs and retain ambiguity where its effect is unclear.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which stated conditions, exceptions, or effort qualifications limit the undertaking, and which clause does each govern?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "qualified-pledge-scope-q01" }, { "text": "What deadline, interval, recurrence, or triggering event is stated, and what context is needed to resolve it?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "qualified-pledge-scope-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "communication-and-follow-through", "name": "Communication and follow-through", "description": "Track evidence that the pledge was communicated and connect it to later messages and outcome reports.", "rationale": "An agent must distinguish message history from the status of any resulting obligation and avoid treating unilateral statements as settled changes.", "layers": [ { "id": "issuance-and-uptake", "name": "Issuance and uptake", "description": "Distinguish a prepared pledge from one issued, delivered, received, or interpreted by its audience.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-of-communication", "name": "Evidence of communication", "description": "Record evidence for each communication stage without inferring assent or shared interpretation from receipt alone.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence shows that the pledge left draft status and was issued, delivered, or received?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "evidence-of-communication-q01" }, { "text": "Does any recipient response acknowledge receipt, interpret the undertaking, accept a proposal, or dispute the pledge?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "evidence-of-communication-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "later-disposition", "name": "Later disposition", "description": "Link clarifications, proposed changes, withdrawal statements, and performance reports while preserving the original message.", "findings": [ { "id": "changes-and-outcome-claims", "name": "Changes and outcome claims", "description": "Represent what later messages claim about the pledge and link external evidence or determinations needed to assess their effect.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which later messages clarify, reaffirm, propose changing, purport to withdraw, or report fulfilment of this pledge?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "changes-and-outcome-claims-q01" }, { "text": "What clarification, performance evidence, or external determination is needed before the agent treats the undertaking as changed or fulfilled?", "kind": "action", "id": "changes-and-outcome-claims-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This description concerns the communicative pledge, not psychological dedication or the continuing obligation resulting from it.", "The listed kinds are overlapping descriptive distinctions, not a universal formal taxonomy.", "Whether a particular message creates a binding obligation depends on its wording, context, authority and applicable institutional or legal rules." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of commitment this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Unconditional pledge", "Conditional pledge", "Public pledge", "Private pledge", "Individual pledge", "Organisational pledge" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of commitment this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Promising delivery of work or services", "Announcing organisational commitments to stakeholders", "Making campaign pledges", "Pledging donations or other support", "Recording agreed actions after negotiations or meetings" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of commitment this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Ambiguous wording leaves the promised action, responsible party or deadline unclear.", "The sender lacks authority or capacity to fulfil the pledge.", "Unstated conditions lead recipients to misunderstand the undertaking.", "A pledge is made without an intention to fulfil it.", "Non-fulfilment undermines trust and can create disputes over accountability." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of commitment this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Conventions for expressing and recognising pledges vary across languages and cultures, including the use of explicit promise formulas and indirect wording." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of commitment this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Promise", "difference": "A promise is a central form of commitment in this sense; the terms overlap substantially rather than defining reliably separate message categories." }, { "name": "Statement of intention", "difference": "It reports a plan or desire without necessarily undertaking responsibility to others for carrying it out." }, { "name": "Prediction", "difference": "It asserts what is expected to happen without necessarily pledging to bring it about." }, { "name": "Offer", "difference": "It proposes an action or arrangement for acceptance; it does not necessarily constitute an unconditional pledge to perform." }, { "name": "Obligation", "difference": "It is a duty or normative relationship, whereas the commitment described here is the message that may create or acknowledge one." }, { "name": "Contract", "difference": "It is an agreement with legal significance, whereas a pledge message need not form a contract or be legally enforceable." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of commitment this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which contextual and linguistic criteria should establish pledge force for indirect expressions such as 'I will try' or 'you can count on us'?", "Does this registry entry include nonverbal pledge-making messages and private messages addressed to oneself, and how should they be distinguished from uncommunicated resolve?", "Under which relevant communicative conventions does recipient uptake affect whether a pledge has been made?", "When should repetition, translation, collective issuance, or reaffirmation count as a distinct commitment message rather than another representation of the same pledge?", "Which neighbouring models should own determinations of authority, enforceability, amendment, release, fulfilment, and breach?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 14, "questions": 22 } }