{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T09:13:47Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 20.4, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094e3-f92f-7480-927b-78293d4fe6f0\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: dislike\nSense to describe: a feeling of aversion or antipathy\nDomain code: SOC.PER\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batc", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 64.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094e3-f91e-75d2-8f90-4305cf573b99\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: dislike\nRegistry id: vr.tr.dislike\nPlane / domain: SOC / SOC.PER\nRegistry definition: a feeling of aversion or antipathy\nNames folded into this entry" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T11:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:12:50+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T12:16:27+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: WordNet gloss", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-DISLIKE", "registryId": "vr.tr.dislike", "name": "dislike", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "SOC.PER" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/dislike/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.dislike", "name": "dislike", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise, record and respond proportionately to a person's aversion or antipathy without treating it as a prohibition, diagnosis or objective property of its target.", "definition": "Dislike is a negatively valenced feeling or attitude of aversion or antipathy toward a particular person, object, activity, or idea, which may motivate avoidance without necessarily involving disgust, anger, or hatred.", "scope_statement": "This model owns dislike as a person's situated feeling toward an identifiable target, including its intensity, persistence, reported basis, expression and relevance to permitted actions.", "in_scope": [ "The person experiencing dislike and the specific target or aspect disliked", "Dislike experienced in a particular situation or reported as a continuing disposition", "Intensity, persistence and changes in dislike", "Self-reported reasons, expressions and uncertain behavioural indications", "Accommodation preferences and explicitly authorised responses" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Properties or quality assessments of the disliked target independent of the person's feeling", "Fear, disgust, hatred and contempt as separately modelled experiences", "Moral judgments, beliefs and ideological disagreement apart from accompanying dislike", "Consent, refusal and enforceable boundaries as independent decisions", "Discriminatory conduct, harassment and interpersonal conflict as actions or relationships", "Clinical conditions and their diagnosis or treatment" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Dislike requires evidence of aversion or antipathy; indifference or lack of enthusiasm alone does not establish it.", "Ranking one option below another does not establish dislike of the lower-ranked option.", "Disagreement concerns a proposition or judgment; record dislike separately only when aversion toward an identifiable target is also supported.", "Avoidance may indicate dislike, but practical constraints, fear or other explanations must remain possible unless clarified.", "A report of dislike does not by itself establish disgust, hatred, refusal or withdrawal of consent." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Experiencing person", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Reference to the person whose feeling is being recorded", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an observer's judgment or another person's preference from being attributed to the wrong person." }, { "name": "Target and disliked aspect", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Target reference plus specified aspect, such as taste, conduct, style or interaction", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes dislike of one feature or behaviour from dislike of the whole thing or person." }, { "name": "Intensity", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Person-reported rating with recorded scale and anchors; unknown when unreported", "why_it_matters": "Supports proportionate accommodation without assuming ratings are comparable across people." }, { "name": "Temporal form", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Current episode; recurring in specified circumstances; reported continuing disposition; unclear", "why_it_matters": "Prevents a passing reaction from becoming a permanent preference." }, { "name": "Applicable context", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Situations, activities, settings or conditions in which the dislike is reported", "why_it_matters": "Constrains generalisation beyond the circumstances actually described." }, { "name": "Evidence basis", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Direct self-report; attributed report; observed expression; behavioural inference; disputed", "why_it_matters": "Separates the feeling as reported from uncertain interpretations of conduct." }, { "name": "Reported basis", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Person's stated reason or trigger; unstated; unknown; disputed attribution", "why_it_matters": "Supports clarification while keeping explanations distinct from established causes." }, { "name": "Current record status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Currently affirmed; historical; revised; retracted; current applicability unknown", "why_it_matters": "Makes later corrections and preference changes actionable." }, { "name": "Requested accommodation", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Explicit request linked to the dislike, or no request recorded", "why_it_matters": "Separates a negative feeling from permission to filter, avoid, substitute or intervene." } ], "affordances": [ "Ask the person to clarify the target, disliked aspect and circumstances.", "Record self-reported dislike while marking inferred dislike as uncertain.", "Offer alternatives or reduce unwanted recommendations within the person's stated preferences.", "Distinguish expressions of dislike from refusals, boundaries and requests for action.", "Revisit, correct or retire a dislike record when the person updates it." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Recognize and report a user's stated dislikes to tailor help they have asked for.", "Explain the psychology of dislike and how it differs from hatred or disgust." ], "must_not": [ "Infer a person's dislikes from private data and use them against them.", "Amplify dislike of groups into contempt or hatred.", "Disclose a person's dislike of someone to that person or others without consent." ], "requires_human": [ "Using recorded dislikes in decisions about a person, such as matching or ranking." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Dislike of people can grow into prejudice when it attaches to groups." ], "affected_parties": [ "People who express dislike", "People who are disliked" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody owns it; each person holds their own feelings.", "master_systems": [] }, "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Prejudice when dislike is generalized to groups.", "Manipulation through profiling of preferences." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "Dislike occurs in everyday preferences, relationships and responses to activities, objects or ideas.", "Recognising a person's expressed dislike helps guide recommendations, communication and choices without assuming that the feeling is permanent or constitutes a prohibition." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "interfaces": "No generally applicable standard, law or official classification governs dislike as an everyday feeling or attitude.", "recognition": "Dislike is an internal feeling or attitude that cannot be reliably identified from visual appearance alone." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "oewn", "title": "Open English WordNet 2024, synset oewn-07516784-n", "url": "https://en-word.net/id/oewn-07516784-n", "what_it_supports": "sense and gloss of the concept", "url_status": "live", "checked_by": "http 200" }, { "id": "wiktionary-en", "title": "Wiktionary: dislike", "url": "https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dislike", "what_it_supports": "word senses and usage", "url_status": "live", "checked_by": "http 200" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "target-and-affective-boundary", "name": "Target and affective boundary", "description": "Establish whose dislike is represented, what it concerns and whether the evidence supports aversion.", "rationale": "A negative evaluation, lower preference or dislike of one aspect must not become an unsupported claim of general antipathy.", "layers": [ { "id": "person-and-target", "name": "Person and target", "description": "Locate the feeling in a person and identify its target at the supported granularity.", "findings": [ { "id": "disliked-aspect", "name": "Disliked aspect", "description": "Record the target and the particular feature, behaviour or encounter involved without expanding the attribution.", "questions": [ { "text": "Whose dislike is being described, and what precisely is its target?", "kind": "definition", "id": "disliked-aspect-q01" }, { "text": "Does the person dislike the target generally, one aspect of it or a particular encounter with it?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "disliked-aspect-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "negative-feeling-boundaries", "name": "Negative feeling boundaries", "description": "Separate dislike from neighbouring feelings, judgments and preference relations.", "findings": [ { "id": "aversion-versus-other-negativity", "name": "Aversion versus other negativity", "description": "Require support for aversion or antipathy while allowing other feelings or judgments to coexist.", "questions": [ { "text": "What supports calling this dislike rather than indifference, disappointment or a lower comparative preference?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "aversion-versus-other-negativity-q01" }, { "text": "Are fear, disgust, hatred or disagreement also reported, and should they be represented separately?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "aversion-versus-other-negativity-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "felt-strength-and-persistence", "name": "Felt strength and persistence", "description": "Represent how strongly dislike is experienced and how far it extends over time.", "rationale": "The practical significance of mild momentary dislike differs from repeatedly affirmed antipathy.", "layers": [ { "id": "felt-intensity", "name": "Felt intensity", "description": "Capture intensity in the person's own terms or on an explicitly described scale.", "findings": [ { "id": "intensity-with-anchors", "name": "Intensity with anchors", "description": "Keep a person's intensity report distinct from the loudness or visibility of its expression.", "questions": [ { "text": "How strongly does the person report disliking the target, and what do the rating or descriptive terms mean to them?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "intensity-with-anchors-q01" }, { "text": "Is the intensity directly reported or inferred from an expression such as criticism, silence or avoidance?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "intensity-with-anchors-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "duration-and-revision", "name": "Duration and revision", "description": "Distinguish episodes, recurring reactions and continuing dispositions while preserving updates.", "findings": [ { "id": "temporal-applicability", "name": "Temporal applicability", "description": "Record when dislike was expressed and what supports its continued applicability.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is this dislike limited to a recent encounter, recurring under stated conditions or described as continuing?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "temporal-applicability-q01" }, { "text": "What later affirmation, qualification or retraction changes how the record should be used?", "kind": "action", "id": "temporal-applicability-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "context-and-reported-basis", "name": "Context and reported basis", "description": "Capture circumstances and explanations without inventing causes or generalising beyond the report.", "rationale": "Dislike of an experience under particular conditions need not apply to every encounter with its target.", "layers": [ { "id": "situational-conditions", "name": "Situational conditions", "description": "Identify when and where the person reports dislike and any stated exceptions.", "findings": [ { "id": "conditional-dislike", "name": "Conditional dislike", "description": "Keep contextual limits and exceptions attached to the attribution.", "questions": [ { "text": "Under which circumstances does the person report disliking the target?", "kind": "definition", "id": "conditional-dislike-q01" }, { "text": "Are there situations or versions of the target that the person accepts or enjoys?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "conditional-dislike-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "reasons-and-triggers", "name": "Reasons and triggers", "description": "Separate stated reasons, immediate triggers and explanations supplied by others.", "findings": [ { "id": "attributed-explanation", "name": "Attributed explanation", "description": "Preserve who offered an explanation and avoid presenting it as a demonstrated cause.", "questions": [ { "text": "What reason or triggering experience, if any, does the person give for the dislike?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attributed-explanation-q01" }, { "text": "Which explanations come from the person, and which are interpretations by an observer or agent?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attributed-explanation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "expression-and-evidence", "name": "Expression and evidence", "description": "Represent how dislike became known and how confidently it can be attributed.", "rationale": "Statements, interface reactions and avoidance provide different evidence and can be misread.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-and-observed-signals", "name": "Reported and observed signals", "description": "Preserve the original report or observable act separately from its interpretation.", "findings": [ { "id": "signal-meaning", "name": "Signal meaning", "description": "Treat a negative reaction or 'dislike' button as an observed signal whose intended meaning requires context.", "questions": [ { "text": "What statement, report or observable reaction supports the attribution, and when was it obtained?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "signal-meaning-q01" }, { "text": "Could the signal indicate disagreement, irrelevance, humour or another meaning instead of felt aversion?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "signal-meaning-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "ambiguity-and-correction", "name": "Ambiguity and correction", "description": "Handle uncertain or conflicting indications without claiming privileged access to a person's feelings.", "findings": [ { "id": "qualified-attribution", "name": "Qualified attribution", "description": "Make uncertainty, disagreement and the person's corrections visible in the record.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the person affirm, reject or qualify the attribution of dislike?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "qualified-attribution-q01" }, { "text": "What clarification is needed before using an uncertain attribution to alter recommendations or interactions?", "kind": "action", "id": "qualified-attribution-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "accommodation-and-action-boundaries", "name": "Accommodation and action boundaries", "description": "Connect dislike to requested responses while keeping feeling, choice and permission distinct.", "rationale": "An agent needs to respond usefully without turning antipathy into automatic exclusion or intervention.", "layers": [ { "id": "preferred-response", "name": "Preferred response", "description": "Identify whether and how the person wants their dislike accommodated.", "findings": [ { "id": "accommodation-request", "name": "Accommodation request", "description": "Link concrete preferences for alternatives, reduced exposure or unchanged participation to the person's request.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the person want an alternative, less exposure, an opportunity to discuss the dislike or no change?", "kind": "action", "id": "accommodation-request-q01" }, { "text": "How broadly and for how long should the requested accommodation apply?", "kind": "action", "id": "accommodation-request-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "feeling-versus-authorisation", "name": "Feeling versus authorisation", "description": "Prevent dislike from substituting for explicit decisions or permission affecting others.", "findings": [ { "id": "independent-action-authority", "name": "Independent action authority", "description": "Record refusals, disclosure permissions and consequential action requests separately from the feeling.", "questions": [ { "text": "Has the person actually refused or set a boundary, or only expressed dislike?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "independent-action-authority-q01" }, { "text": "What explicit request or applicable authority permits sharing this dislike or taking action that affects another person?", "kind": "action", "id": "independent-action-authority-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The listed kinds distinguish targets of dislike, not an established diagnostic or exhaustive psychological taxonomy.", "Dislike may denote a momentary feeling or a relatively enduring attitude; research should specify which is being measured.", "The nine-point hedonic scale is commonly used in sensory evaluation; its interpretation should not be generalized automatically to interpersonal dislike." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of dislike this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Interpersonal dislike", "Dislike of objects or sensory experiences", "Dislike of activities", "Dislike of ideas or positions" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of dislike this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Studying interpersonal attraction, rejection, and social relationships", "Assessing consumer preferences and product acceptability", "Recording user feedback for recommendation systems", "Investigating avoidance and evaluative learning" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of dislike this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Self-reported liking versus disliking", "typical_range": "Instrument-dependent; a common hedonic scale runs from 1, dislike extremely, to 9, like extremely", "unit": "Ordinal rating" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of dislike this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Inferring dislike from avoidance when avoidance may instead reflect fear, constraints, or indifference", "Treating a dislike-button response as a direct measurement of felt antipathy", "Conflating ordinary dislike with disgust, hatred, or a mental disorder", "Generalizing dislike of an individual to a social group, contributing to prejudice or exclusion", "Ignoring context, ambivalence, or changes in evaluation over time" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of dislike this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Cultural norms affect how openly dislike is expressed, particularly toward authority figures or within close relationships.", "Languages differ in how their terms distinguish dislike, aversion, disgust, and hatred." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of dislike this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Indifference", "difference": "Indifference involves little concern or evaluative investment; dislike involves a negative evaluation or feeling." }, { "name": "Disgust", "difference": "Disgust characteristically involves repulsion and rejection, often associated with contamination; dislike need not involve that response." }, { "name": "Hatred", "difference": "Hatred generally involves more intense and enduring hostility; dislike can be mild and involve no hostile intent." }, { "name": "Anger", "difference": "Anger commonly responds to perceived offense, obstruction, or wrongdoing; dislike requires none of these triggers." }, { "name": "Fear", "difference": "Fear concerns perceived threat or danger; dislike concerns negative evaluation without requiring a threat." }, { "name": "Preference", "difference": "Preference ranks alternatives; preferring one thing over another does not establish dislike of either." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of dislike this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which researched distinctions between dislike, aversion, antipathy, disgust and hatred are useful across languages without forcing a universal intensity hierarchy?", "Which intensity measures, if any, support reliable comparison across time, targets or people, and what limits must accompany them?", "What evidence is sufficient to represent dislike as a continuing disposition rather than a contextual episode?", "How should mixed liking and disliking of the same target be represented without collapsing ambivalence into a single score?", "What retention and disclosure practices should apply when dislike records reveal sensitive interpersonal judgments?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 17, "questions": 27 } }