{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T10:01:28Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 20.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0950f-82ed-7ab1-a219-73cead1a8923\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: goal\nSense to describe: the state of affairs that a plan is intended to achieve and that (when achieved) terminates behavior intended to achieve it\nDoma", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 71.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0950f-82e5-7481-999b-2c9020ff6493\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: goal\nRegistry id: vr.tr.goal\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.KNW\nRegistry definition: the state of affairs that a plan is intended to achieve and that (whe" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:15:45+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "owners" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T12:16:27+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: WordNet gloss", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-GOAL", "registryId": "vr.tr.goal", "name": "goal", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.KNW" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/goal/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.goal", "name": "goal", "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify an intended state of affairs, assess whether it has been achieved, and determine which goal-directed actions should continue, change, or terminate.", "definition": "A goal is a represented state of affairs that a plan or course of action is intended to bring about, whose achievement supplies the completion condition for behavior directed toward it.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the goal as an intended state of affairs, including its adoption, satisfaction conditions, relationships to plans and other goals, and the implications of its status for behavior directed toward achieving it.", "in_scope": [ "The intended state of affairs and its applicable context", "Who holds or adopts the goal and who may revise it", "Conditions and evidence for judging achievement", "Relationships to plans, subgoals, dependencies, and competing goals", "Goal status and termination of behavior directed toward its achievement" ], "out_of_scope": [ "The internal sequence, scheduling, and resource allocation of a plan", "Execution records and mechanics of individual actions", "General preferences or values that have not become adopted goals", "Metrics and observations considered independently of goal satisfaction", "Sporting scores or scoring events, including a drop goal" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "A goal describes a state to bring about; a plan describes how to bring it about.", "A goal is adopted as an intended outcome; a prediction describes an expected outcome without requiring that intention.", "A goal has conditions under which it counts as achieved; an ongoing activity may have no achievement condition.", "A metric or numerical target represents a goal only when its attainment is itself the intended state or a justified test of that state.", "Under the registry definition, achievement terminates the corresponding pursuit; an indefinite obligation to preserve a condition requires an explicit boundary with maintenance behavior." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Intended state", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "A proposition describing the desired state, with affected entities and context", "why_it_matters": "Identifies what must become true without prescribing a particular method." }, { "name": "Goal holder", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Agent or collective that adopts the intended state", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes an adopted goal from an externally attributed wish or expectation." }, { "name": "Revision authority", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Actor or decision process authorized to revise, suspend, or withdraw the goal", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an executing agent from silently changing the intended outcome." }, { "name": "Satisfaction rule", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Explicit conditions, thresholds, tolerances, and their logical combination; unresolved where unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Determines what counts as achievement and exposes ambiguous completion claims." }, { "name": "Temporal condition", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Deadline, qualifying interval, required duration, or explicitly unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes reaching a state once from reaching it on time or sustaining it for a bounded period." }, { "name": "Pursuit status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Proposed, adopted, active, suspended, closed, withdrawn, or superseded", "why_it_matters": "Records commitment and activity separately from whether the intended state is true." }, { "name": "Satisfaction assessment", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Satisfied, unsatisfied, unknown, or disputed, at a stated assessment time", "why_it_matters": "Avoids equating cessation of effort with successful achievement." }, { "name": "Achievement evidence", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Observations or assessments linked to particular satisfaction conditions", "why_it_matters": "Makes achievement judgments inspectable and permits conflicting evidence to remain visible." }, { "name": "Means and goal relationships", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Pursued by plan; contributes to, requires, conflicts with, or is an alternative to another goal", "why_it_matters": "Supports plan replacement and goal coordination without treating all related goals as interchangeable." }, { "name": "Distance to satisfaction", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Goal-specific units where a justified measure exists; otherwise undefined", "why_it_matters": "Supports progress assessment without inventing a universal percentage-complete scale." } ], "affordances": [ "Clarify the intended state and expose missing satisfaction conditions.", "Assess achievement against evidence while preserving unknown or disputed judgments.", "Compare or replace plans while retaining the same intended outcome.", "Decompose a goal and test whether the proposed subgoals actually support its achievement.", "Identify conflicting goals and seek an authorized priority or tradeoff decision.", "Terminate the corresponding pursuit after confirmed achievement, or record a distinct reason for stopping without achievement." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Help a user state, plan and track their own goals.", "Report progress toward a goal set by its principal honestly." ], "must_not": [ "Pursue its own goals against or beyond what its principal set.", "Hide failures or game metrics to appear to meet a goal.", "Set goals for a person without their agreement.", "Pursue a goal by means that harm people outside the task." ], "requires_human": [ "Changing or dropping a goal that others depend on." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Agents chasing a goal can cause harm to people the goal ignores.", "People's goals belong to them and should not be manipulated." ], "affected_parties": [ "Users", "Third parties affected by goal pursuit" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody owns the concept; whoever sets a goal answers for it.", "master_systems": [] }, "what_it_is_for": [ "Goals are used in planning, task assignment and autonomous behavior to represent the state that actions should achieve.", "They support progress assessment and decisions about whether to continue, revise or terminate a course of action." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "An ambiguous completion condition can cause premature termination or indefinite activity.", "A poorly specified goal can encourage behavior that achieves a stated target while harming people or property.", "Conflicting goals can produce inconsistent decisions or prevent an agent from completing its task." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "interfaces": "No universal standard or legal classification applies to a goal as an abstract intended state independently of its application.", "recognition": "A goal is an abstract represented state and has no intrinsic visual features." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "oewn", "title": "Open English WordNet 2024, synset oewn-05989760-n", "url": "https://en-word.net/id/oewn-05989760-n", "what_it_supports": "sense and gloss of the concept", "url_status": "live", "checked_by": "http 200" }, { "id": "wiktionary-en", "title": "Wiktionary: goal", "url": "https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/goal", "what_it_supports": "word senses and usage", "url_status": "live", "checked_by": "http 200" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "intended-state-and-adoption", "name": "Intended state and adoption", "description": "Establishes what is intended and whose commitment makes it a goal.", "rationale": "A desirable or predicted state is not sufficient to identify an adopted goal.", "layers": [ { "id": "outcome-meaning", "name": "Outcome meaning", "description": "Separates the intended state from activities, methods, and verbal shorthand.", "findings": [ { "id": "state-to-be-achieved", "name": "State to be achieved", "description": "Record what must become true, for which entities, and within which context.", "questions": [ { "text": "What state of affairs is the plan intended to achieve?", "kind": "definition", "id": "state-to-be-achieved-q01" }, { "text": "Which parts of the stated goal describe the outcome, and which merely prescribe a method?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "state-to-be-achieved-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "adoption-and-authority", "name": "Adoption and authority", "description": "Identifies commitment to the goal and authority over its meaning.", "findings": [ { "id": "adopted-intention", "name": "Adopted intention", "description": "Record the goal holder, evidence of adoption, and who can authorize a change.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who adopted this intended state, and what instruction or decision establishes that adoption?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "adopted-intention-q01" }, { "text": "Who may change the intended state or withdraw the commitment to pursue it?", "kind": "action", "id": "adopted-intention-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "satisfaction-and-evidence", "name": "Satisfaction and evidence", "description": "Makes the distinction between achieving the goal and merely appearing to make progress explicit.", "rationale": "Achievement must be judged against the intended state before it can justify terminating pursuit.", "layers": [ { "id": "achievement-conditions", "name": "Achievement conditions", "description": "Defines the conditions whose fulfillment constitutes achievement.", "findings": [ { "id": "completion-rule", "name": "Completion rule", "description": "Record necessary conditions, alternative sufficient conditions, tolerances, and temporal qualifications.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which conditions must hold together, and which alternatives would independently count as success?", "kind": "definition", "id": "completion-rule-q01" }, { "text": "Must the state occur before a deadline, throughout an interval, or for a minimum duration?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "completion-rule-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "achievement-assessment", "name": "Achievement assessment", "description": "Connects satisfaction judgments to observations and distinguishes direct evidence from proxies.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-for-satisfaction", "name": "Evidence for satisfaction", "description": "Record what supports each completion condition and where evidence remains inadequate or contested.", "questions": [ { "text": "What observations would establish each completion condition, and how current must they be?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "evidence-for-satisfaction-q01" }, { "text": "Could the chosen indicator meet its target while the intended state remains unachieved?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "evidence-for-satisfaction-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "plans-and-subgoals", "name": "Plans and subgoals", "description": "Connects the goal to proposed means and supporting outcomes.", "rationale": "An agent must be able to change its approach and assess decomposition without confusing means with ends.", "layers": [ { "id": "plan-support", "name": "Plan support", "description": "Records which plans aim at the goal and why they are expected to achieve it.", "findings": [ { "id": "means-to-outcome-link", "name": "Means to outcome link", "description": "Represent the assumptions connecting a plan to the intended state without reproducing the plan's execution details.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which plan is intended to achieve this goal, and what assumptions connect its execution to the outcome?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "means-to-outcome-link-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence would justify replacing the plan while leaving the goal unchanged?", "kind": "action", "id": "means-to-outcome-link-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "subgoal-sufficiency", "name": "Subgoal sufficiency", "description": "Distinguishes required supporting outcomes from optional contributions and alternative routes.", "findings": [ { "id": "decomposition-logic", "name": "Decomposition logic", "description": "Record whether subgoals are necessary, jointly sufficient, alternative, or merely helpful.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which subgoals are required, and which provide alternative ways to achieve the parent goal?", "kind": "definition", "id": "decomposition-logic-q01" }, { "text": "Could every listed subgoal be achieved while the parent goal remains unsatisfied?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "decomposition-logic-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "compatibility-and-pursuit-limits", "name": "Compatibility and pursuit limits", "description": "Locates the goal among competing outcomes and limits on acceptable pursuit.", "rationale": "Adopting a goal neither resolves conflicts with other goals nor authorizes every means of achieving it.", "layers": [ { "id": "goal-conflicts", "name": "Goal conflicts", "description": "Identifies incompatible outcomes and competition between otherwise compatible pursuits.", "findings": [ { "id": "conflict-and-priority", "name": "Conflict and priority", "description": "Distinguish logical incompatibility from resource or timing conflicts, and record authorized priorities.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which other goals cannot be satisfied alongside this one, and which only compete for time or resources?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "conflict-and-priority-q01" }, { "text": "What authorized priority or tradeoff rule governs a conflict between these goals?", "kind": "action", "id": "conflict-and-priority-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "acceptable-pursuit", "name": "Acceptable pursuit", "description": "Connects pursuit to applicable constraints and authority limits.", "findings": [ { "id": "limits-on-means", "name": "Limits on means", "description": "Record constraints on pursuing the goal and distinguish those constraints from conditions defining success.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which conditions define successful achievement, and which separately restrict acceptable ways to pursue it?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "limits-on-means-q01" }, { "text": "When the available means exceed authority or violate a constraint, who may revise the goal or authorize another approach?", "kind": "action", "id": "limits-on-means-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "pursuit-and-termination", "name": "Pursuit and termination", "description": "Separates the truth of the intended state from the lifecycle of commitment and activity.", "rationale": "The registry definition makes achievement a termination condition, while pursuit may also stop for reasons other than success.", "layers": [ { "id": "pursuit-state", "name": "Pursuit state", "description": "Tracks whether the goal is being pursued and why its status changes.", "findings": [ { "id": "commitment-versus-achievement", "name": "Commitment versus achievement", "description": "Record adoption, activity, suspension, withdrawal, and replacement independently of satisfaction.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is this goal currently adopted and actively pursued, suspended, withdrawn, or superseded?", "kind": "definition", "id": "commitment-versus-achievement-q01" }, { "text": "What decision or event explains its current pursuit status, and was achievement assessed separately?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "commitment-versus-achievement-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "achievement-triggered-stop", "name": "Achievement-triggered stop", "description": "Identifies the behavior whose achievement-directed purpose ends when the goal is satisfied.", "findings": [ { "id": "termination-boundary", "name": "Termination boundary", "description": "Specify which pursuit should end and whether subsequent verification, maintenance, or renewed pursuit has a separate basis.", "questions": [ { "text": "Once satisfaction is established, which actions directed toward achieving this goal should terminate?", "kind": "action", "id": "termination-boundary-q01" }, { "text": "If the achieved state later ceases to hold, does renewed pursuit require reactivation, a new goal, or an existing maintenance commitment?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "termination-boundary-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This is recall-based content; no sources were consulted.", "Goal taxonomies differ across psychology, philosophy, planning, and management; the listed distinctions overlap.", "Achievement supplies a logical completion condition, but actual behavior may continue because recognition is delayed, habits persist, or another goal remains active." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of goal this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Terminal goals pursued for their own sake", "Instrumental goals pursued as means to further goals", "Subgoals within a larger plan", "Individual goals", "Collective goals" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of goal this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Artificial intelligence planning represents goals as conditions that a resulting state must satisfy.", "Project planning uses goals to orient activities and define successful outcomes.", "Psychological accounts of self-regulation examine how people select goals, monitor progress, and adjust effort.", "Organizational coordination uses shared goals to align decisions and allocate resources.", "Control systems can represent desired states through reference values and stopping conditions." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of goal this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Goal satisfaction under an explicit binary criterion", "typical_range": "0 or 1", "unit": "dimensionless" }, { "quantity": "Time to achievement", "typical_range": "Nonnegative; no universal typical range", "unit": "Time units appropriate to the task" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of goal this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Ambiguous completion conditions make achievement difficult to establish.", "Mutually incompatible goals prevent all intended outcomes from being achieved together.", "Optimizing a proxy measure can satisfy the metric while failing to achieve the intended state.", "An infeasible goal can sustain effort without a reachable completion condition.", "Failure to recognize achievement can prolong behavior after its purpose has been fulfilled." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of goal this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Plan", "difference": "A goal specifies the intended state; a plan specifies how to reach it." }, { "name": "Intention", "difference": "An intention involves commitment to action or an outcome; a goal identifies the outcome toward which action is directed." }, { "name": "Desire", "difference": "A desire can concern an outcome without organizing a plan or behavior to achieve it." }, { "name": "Objective", "difference": "Often synonymous with goal; conventions that reserve objective for a more specific or measurable outcome are context-dependent." }, { "name": "Maintenance goal", "difference": "A maintenance goal requires a condition to remain true over time; the requested achievement sense is completed when its target condition is attained." }, { "name": "Drop goal", "difference": "A drop goal is a scoring event in certain sports, not a subtype of the abstract intended state described here." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of goal this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry treat a desired state adopted before any plan exists as a goal, or require an explicit plan relationship?", "Does the achievement-terminates-behavior clause describe the goal's intended control role, or require evidence that pursuit actually stopped?", "How should indefinite maintenance goals be represented under a definition centered on achievement and termination?", "When satisfaction conditions are revised, what distinguishes clarification of the same goal from replacement by a different goal?", "What establishes adoption and an authoritative satisfaction judgment for a collective whose members disagree?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 16, "questions": 26 } }