{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T10:47:02Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 18.5, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09539-2ea5-7cf0-ac62-3779f19833ae\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: knife money\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: PHY.OBJ\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 reg", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 75.5, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09539-2eab-7fd1-b065-693ddb628d18\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: knife money\nRegistry id: vr.tr.knife-money\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.OBJ\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\n" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:50:01+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "standards_and_regulation", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:25+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q1069036", "registryId": "vr.tr.knife-money", "name": "knife money", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.OBJ" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q1069036/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.knife-money", "name": "knife money", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise knife money, assess the evidence for its monetary identity and attribution, and decide how a specimen may be documented, examined and conserved.", "definition": "Knife money is a class of cast bronze currency shaped like knives, issued and circulated in parts of ancient China during the Eastern Zhou period.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the diagnostic properties and assessment requirements of knife-shaped monetary objects associated with historical Chinese coinage under vr.tr.knife-money, distinguishing the registered kind, attributed varieties and individual specimens.", "in_scope": [ "Knife-shaped monetary identity and boundaries against tools, charms and replicas", "Blade, handle and terminal morphology used in variety identification", "Inscriptions, casting evidence, composition and metrology", "Evidence for issuing authority, chronology and monetary use", "Specimen authenticity, completeness and conservation constraints" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Working knives and their cutting performance", "Spade money and ordinary round coinage as independent currency kinds", "Complete histories of issuing states and monetary systems", "Knife-shaped charms or replicas as independently modelled object kinds", "Coin-market pricing and investment recommendations", "Museum collection administration beyond links needed to establish specimen evidence" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Require a supported monetary attribution in addition to a knife-like outline; resemblance alone does not distinguish currency from a tool or imitation.", "Compare the blade profile, handle ridges and terminal structure as a combination, allowing documented variation and missing parts rather than requiring one universal silhouette.", "Separate knife money from spade money by its knife-derived body plan rather than treating all tool-shaped currencies as interchangeable.", "Distinguish original monetary production from later charm use or imitation; museum classifications can overlap, as illustrated by the [British Museum coin, knife-money and charm record](https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_1975-0809-1).", "Treat forms combining knife and round-coin features as a boundary requiring explicit attribution; the [British Museum bronze knife coin description](https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/bronze-knife-coin-inlaid-with-gold/1AEaYOGcHYTRFw?hl=en) documents such a combination." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Monetary identity assessment", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "supported knife money | possible knife money | imitation | other object | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Prevents silhouette or a seller's label from establishing monetary identity." }, { "name": "Attributed variety", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Reference to a named numismatic variety and its diagnostic catalogue entry, with confidence", "why_it_matters": "Connects recognition to inspectable comparisons rather than an unsupported type name." }, { "name": "Blade and handle configuration", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Recorded tip profile, curvature, blade-handle transition, ridges and terminal form; unknown where obscured", "why_it_matters": "Captures the combined outline features needed to compare candidate varieties." }, { "name": "Specimen dimensions", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Overall length, maximum blade width, thickness and terminal opening dimensions in mm", "why_it_matters": "Supports comparison while exposing distortion, missing parts and inconsistent measurements." }, { "name": "Surviving mass", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "g, with completeness and attached deposits recorded", "why_it_matters": "Allows metrological comparison without equating damaged or encrusted mass with original issue weight." }, { "name": "Inscription record", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Linked face-specific images, sign locations, diplomatic transcription, proposed readings and references", "why_it_matters": "Preserves visible marks independently of disputed readings or historical interpretations." }, { "name": "Material composition", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Elemental mass percentages where measured, with method, sampling location and surface limitations", "why_it_matters": "Supports material comparison without assuming that a surface reading represents the original alloy." }, { "name": "Issue attribution", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Proposed authority, production region and date interval linked to supporting evidence", "why_it_matters": "Keeps issuer, manufacture location and findspot distinct." }, { "name": "Authenticity assessment", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "unassessed | supported | disputed | indeterminate | demonstrated modern reproduction", "why_it_matters": "Makes the assessment revisable and prevents age, patina or catalogue resemblance from acting as automatic proof." }, { "name": "Physical integrity", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Complete or fragmentary; mapped losses, cracks, joins, deformation, deposits and suspected active corrosion", "why_it_matters": "Determines which measurements and readings remain reliable and which handling actions require specialist review." } ], "affordances": [ "Compare a specimen with documented knife-money varieties and explain matches and contradictions.", "Capture scaled images of both faces, edges, blade tip and terminal before transcribing marks.", "Measure surviving geometry and mass with explicit allowances for losses and deposits.", "Build competing inscription readings and historical attributions with linked evidence.", "Flag possible replicas, altered inscriptions or composite specimens for specialist examination.", "Select supported handling and examination actions that protect fragile terminals, blades and diagnostic surfaces." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Describe a piece of knife money from documented evidence such as provenance, inscriptions and analysis.", "State the uncertainty when attribution to a state or period is not supported." ], "must_not": [ "Authenticate or value a specimen from photographs alone as if that were conclusive.", "Assist in selling or exporting pieces that may come from looting or illicit excavation.", "Present replicas or cast copies as ancient originals.", "Recommend cleaning or treating a specimen in ways that destroy its patina or evidence." ], "requires_human": [ "Deciding on conservation treatment of a specimen.", "Accepting or rejecting a specimen into a collection or sale where provenance is incomplete." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Ancient Chinese bronzes are often looted, and trade can fund destruction of archaeological sites.", "Forgeries mislead buyers and distort the historical record." ], "affected_parties": [ "Source communities and states", "Collectors and museums", "Researchers" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The museum, collector or institution holding the specimen; export rules of the country of origin apply.", "master_systems": [ "Museum collection catalogues", "National cultural property registers" ] }, "visual_identification": [ "A cast bronze object shaped like a knife, with a curved blade, a handle and usually a ring at the end.", "Cast characters on the blade naming a mint or value.", "Green or brown corrosion patina; a too-uniform or painted patina suggests a copy." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Forged or recast copies are common and can be sold as originals.", "Harsh cleaning removes patina and destroys evidence of age.", "Undocumented trade can launder looted material." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property (1970), UNESCO." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "Knife money served as currency in parts of ancient China during the Eastern Zhou period.", "Surviving specimens are studied in archaeology, numismatics and museums to investigate exchange, regional authority and casting practices.", "Documentation and conservation depend on evidence such as inscriptions, provenance, material condition and archaeological context." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q1069036: knife money", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1069036", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Knife money", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knife_money", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "monetary-identity", "name": "Monetary identity", "description": "Establish whether the knife-shaped object belongs to this registered monetary kind.", "rationale": "Knife shape alone cannot establish currency status or distinguish an original issue from an imitation.", "layers": [ { "id": "currency-boundary", "name": "Currency boundary", "description": "Test monetary identification against neighbouring object kinds.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-of-monetary-form", "name": "Evidence of monetary form", "description": "Record the evidence connecting the object to recognised knife-money issues rather than merely to knives.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which documented monetary issue shares this object's morphology and marks?", "kind": "definition", "id": "evidence-of-monetary-form-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence distinguishes it from a working knife, miniature tool or knife-shaped ornament?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "evidence-of-monetary-form-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "original-purpose-and-later-use", "name": "Original purpose and later use", "description": "Separate manufacture as money from subsequent reuse and reproduction.", "findings": [ { "id": "monetary-charm-and-replica-status", "name": "Monetary, charm and replica status", "description": "Allow original function, subsequent use and present classification to differ.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does evidence support original monetary manufacture, later charm use, manufacture as a charm, or modern reproduction?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "monetary-charm-and-replica-status-q01" }, { "text": "Which contextual records support that interpretation rather than a classification based only on appearance?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "monetary-charm-and-replica-status-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "knife-form-and-metrology", "name": "Knife form and metrology", "description": "Describe the geometry and surviving mass used to recognise and compare knife-money varieties.", "rationale": "The diagnostic unit is the combination of blade, handle and terminal features, interpreted with specimen condition.", "layers": [ { "id": "diagnostic-geometry", "name": "Diagnostic geometry", "description": "Locate and describe the knife-derived parts without assuming every variety has identical features.", "findings": [ { "id": "blade-handle-terminal-pattern", "name": "Blade, handle and terminal pattern", "description": "Record tip shape, body curvature, ridges and terminal geometry as observed features.", "questions": [ { "text": "What blade-tip profile, curvature, handle ridges and terminal form are actually visible?", "kind": "definition", "id": "blade-handle-terminal-pattern-q01" }, { "text": "Which apparent shape differences could result from breakage, bending, wear or repair?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "blade-handle-terminal-pattern-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "measured-comparison", "name": "Measured comparison", "description": "Compare dimensions and mass with specimens of the proposed variety.", "findings": [ { "id": "condition-qualified-metrology", "name": "Condition-qualified metrology", "description": "Retain measurement conventions and condition qualifications with every comparison.", "questions": [ { "text": "What are the surviving mass and dimensions, and how were length and thickness measured on the curved object?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "condition-qualified-metrology-q01" }, { "text": "How does it compare with documented specimens of the proposed variety after accounting for missing metal and deposits?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "condition-qualified-metrology-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inscriptions-and-attribution", "name": "Inscriptions and attribution", "description": "Connect visible signs and comparative evidence to qualified readings and issue assignments.", "rationale": "An uncertain sign reading can propagate into an incorrect issuer, date or denomination.", "layers": [ { "id": "sign-documentation", "name": "Sign documentation", "description": "Preserve marks as observed before normalising or interpreting them.", "findings": [ { "id": "face-specific-inscription-evidence", "name": "Face-specific inscription evidence", "description": "Associate each visible mark with its location, orientation and image evidence.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which marks occur on each face, handle or edge, and which are partly obscured or missing?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "face-specific-inscription-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Which proposed readings reproduce visible signs, and which depend on reconstruction from comparison pieces?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "face-specific-inscription-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "historical-assignment", "name": "Historical assignment", "description": "Evaluate issuer, place and chronology as distinct attribution claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "supported-issue-assignment", "name": "Supported issue assignment", "description": "Record competing assignments and the evidence discriminating between them.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which sources support the proposed issuing authority, production region and date interval?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "supported-issue-assignment-q01" }, { "text": "Does the inscription interpretation concern a place, authority, value or another meaning, and what alternatives remain?", "kind": "definition", "id": "supported-issue-assignment-q02" }, { "text": "Has a reported findspot been incorrectly treated as proof of the place of manufacture?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "supported-issue-assignment-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "manufacture-and-authenticity", "name": "Manufacture and authenticity", "description": "Assess material and production evidence against the proposed knife-money attribution.", "rationale": "A plausible outline and inscription require corroboration from manufacture, material and documented history.", "layers": [ { "id": "production-evidence", "name": "Production evidence", "description": "Document metal composition and traces of forming and finishing.", "findings": [ { "id": "alloy-and-casting-traces", "name": "Alloy and casting traces", "description": "Treat composition, seams, feed-point traces and surface detail as evidence requiring contextual interpretation.", "questions": [ { "text": "What material analyses exist, and do their sampling methods distinguish surface alteration from underlying alloy?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "alloy-and-casting-traces-q01" }, { "text": "Which observable traces support the proposed production method, and how do they compare with documented examples?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "alloy-and-casting-traces-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "alteration-and-imitation", "name": "Alteration and imitation", "description": "Evaluate features that may have been reproduced, modified or assembled.", "findings": [ { "id": "authenticity-evidence-balance", "name": "Authenticity evidence balance", "description": "Maintain an explicit assessment without making patina or a single technical result decisive.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence supports or challenges the age and originality of the blade, handle, terminal and inscription?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "authenticity-evidence-balance-q01" }, { "text": "Are there indications of recutting, artificial surface treatment, copied damage or joined components?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "authenticity-evidence-balance-q02" }, { "text": "Which additional non-destructive examination would best resolve the leading authenticity uncertainty?", "kind": "action", "id": "authenticity-evidence-balance-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "monetary-context-and-care", "name": "Monetary context and care", "description": "Preserve evidence of monetary use while governing examination of the surviving object.", "rationale": "Circulation claims depend on context, and interventions can erase the surfaces and associations needed to assess them.", "layers": [ { "id": "circulation-context", "name": "Circulation context", "description": "Distinguish observed associations from inferred value and circulation.", "findings": [ { "id": "find-associations-and-value-claims", "name": "Find associations and value claims", "description": "Link monetary interpretations to documented assemblages, texts and comparative studies.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the specimen associated with a recorded hoard, excavation context or other currency forms?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "find-associations-and-value-claims-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence supports any claimed denomination or exchange relationship rather than inferring it from size or mass?", "kind": "definition", "id": "find-associations-and-value-claims-q02" }, { "text": "Can evidence distinguish circulation from burial deposition, ritual use or later collecting?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "find-associations-and-value-claims-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "diagnostic-surface-preservation", "name": "Diagnostic surface preservation", "description": "Determine handling and examination constraints from fragile geometry and evidence-bearing surfaces.", "findings": [ { "id": "knife-money-handling-decisions", "name": "Knife-money handling decisions", "description": "Protect the blade-handle junction, terminal and inscriptions during documentation and care.", "questions": [ { "text": "Where do cracks, thin sections, joins or suspected active corrosion make the blade or terminal vulnerable?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "knife-money-handling-decisions-q01" }, { "text": "What support and imaging arrangement will expose both faces without loading a fragile terminal or bending the blade?", "kind": "action", "id": "knife-money-handling-decisions-q02" }, { "text": "Would proposed cleaning or sampling remove inscription detail, casting traces or deposits needed for assessment?", "kind": "action", "id": "knife-money-handling-decisions-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This account is based on recall rather than consulted sources.", "Chronology, mint attribution and inscription readings should be checked for each series; typological names do not always identify a single issuer.", "Dimensions, mass and alloy composition vary by series and specimen, so no universal measurement range is supplied." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of knife money this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Qi knife money", "Ming knife money", "Pointed-tip knife money", "Straight knife money" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of knife money this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Served as currency in parts of ancient China before the Qin imperial monetary unification.", "Provides archaeological evidence for regional monetary systems, exchange networks and inscription practices.", "Collected and catalogued as ancient Chinese coinage." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of knife money this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Thin blades and projecting features can fracture or become bent.", "Burial corrosion can obscure inscriptions and alter the surviving surface.", "Chloride-driven bronze disease can cause progressive deterioration.", "Modern counterfeits and altered inscriptions can mislead identification and valuation.", "Aggressive cleaning can remove original surfaces and archaeological evidence." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of knife money this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Knife currencies are particularly associated with northern and northeastern ancient China, including the states of Qi and Yan.", "Qi knife money and the Ming knife series associated with Yan differ in form and inscriptions; their circulation was not necessarily confined to state boundaries." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of knife money this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Knife", "difference": "An ordinary knife is a cutting implement; knife money is a monetary object whose shape resembles a knife." }, { "name": "Spade money", "difference": "Both are ancient Chinese cast currencies, but spade money takes a spade-like rather than knife-like form." }, { "name": "Chinese round cash coin", "difference": "Round cash has a circular body, typically with a central square hole, rather than a blade-shaped body and handle." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of knife money this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does this registry entry include later knife-and-round-coin hybrid issues, or should it link to a narrower neighbouring model for those issues?", "Which scholarly typology and terminology should anchor variety names, including conflicting inscription readings and historical attributions?", "What reference populations establish meaningful dimensional, mass and alloy comparisons for each included variety?", "Which archaeological and textual evidence supports circulation areas, chronology and value relationships for the included issues?", "Which authenticity and conservation assessments require specialist examination before an agent can recommend further intervention?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 16, "questions": 30 } }