{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T11:21:01Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 18.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09558-38e9-7cd1-994e-a587d18fc792\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Mirabilia Urbis Romae\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 044", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 79.5, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09558-38e9-7943-ba83-51d7c66fcb1b\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Mirabilia Urbis Romae\nRegistry id: vr.tr.mirabilia-urbis-romae\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into t" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:45:15+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "revisions": [ { "at": "2026-10-08T18:45:47+00:00", "engine": "codex", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "definition", "distinguishing_features", "in_scope", "out_of_scope", "owners", "purpose", "scope_statement", "visual_identification" ], "answering_review": "fe7eadbfed832ce2ec4e7850e58122af4614e43bb4eb7f188e04d3bcd6286b3d" } ], "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-08T18:54:35+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q1108828", "registryId": "vr.tr.mirabilia-urbis-romae", "name": "Mirabilia Urbis Romae", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q1108828/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.mirabilia-urbis-romae", "name": "Mirabilia Urbis Romae", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to identify and compare works in this medieval Latin travel literary genre, assess evidence for genre membership, distinguish individual works and their versions, and evaluate descriptions of Rome for quotation or interpretation.", "definition": "Mirabilia Urbis Romae, in the supplied sense, is a travel literary genre in medieval Latin literature concerned with descriptions of Rome's monuments, wonders and associated historical or legendary narratives for visitors, including pilgrims.", "scope_statement": "This model covers the genre-level identity of Mirabilia Urbis Romae under vr.tr.mirabilia-urbis-romae in INF / INF.MED, its literary conventions, membership criteria and relationships to related genres; individual works, recensions, translations and witnesses provide evidence without being treated as a single textual work.", "in_scope": [ "Genre identity, terminology and evidence for including particular works are in scope.", "The genre's historical development and attribution hypotheses concerning constituent works are in scope when supported by evidence.", "Shared conventions and differences among works, including evidence from recensions, translations and adaptations, are in scope.", "Descriptions of Roman monuments, topographical references and associated narratives are in scope as features of the genre.", "Relationships to manuscript witnesses, printed editions, critical texts and digital representations are in scope as evidence for constituent works and genre conventions.", "Evidence quality and conditions governing quotation, comparison and reuse are in scope." ], "out_of_scope": [ "Rome as a city and the independent histories of its monuments are outside scope.", "Physical conservation, ownership and valuation of individual manuscripts or printed copies are outside scope.", "Complete textual histories of individual works are outside scope except where they inform genre membership or development.", "Church indulgences and station calendars are outside scope except where their relationships to travel literature inform genre boundaries.", "Modern visitor navigation and recommendations are outside scope.", "Comprehensive biographies of proposed authors, scribes, editors and translators are outside scope." ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Genre membership requires evidence about literary form, subject matter, function and scholarly classification rather than a shared title alone.", "The genre can encompass distinct works without implying that they descend from a single source text.", "A related description such as Master Gregory's work requires an explicit assessment of genre membership rather than automatic inclusion or exclusion based on its separate work identity.", "A translation, expanded guide or excerpt retains its relationship to a particular work while also providing possible evidence about genre conventions or reception.", "A statement made by a constituent text about a Roman monument is distinguishable from an independently verified statement about that monument." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Textual entity level", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "work; recension or expression; edition or manifestation; individual witness or item; digital surrogate", "why_it_matters": "Prevents the date, extent, ownership or condition of one copy from becoming a property of the entire work." }, { "name": "Membership in the textual tradition", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "supported; provisional; disputed; excluded; unassessed", "why_it_matters": "Controls whether a similarly titled text can contribute evidence to this registered work." }, { "name": "Composition or revision date", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "CE year interval, attached to a specified textual stage and evidence", "why_it_matters": "Separates proposed composition dates from dates of copying, printing and later revision." }, { "name": "Responsibility attribution", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "person or institution linked to a specified role, textual stage, attribution source and confidence", "why_it_matters": "Keeps proposed authorship distinct from scribal, editorial and translational responsibility." }, { "name": "Language and derivation", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "language of an expression; translated-from, adapted-from or excerpted-from relationship", "why_it_matters": "Supports comparison without assuming that a vernacular version preserves every Latin passage." }, { "name": "Passage function", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "monument enumeration; spatial description; naming explanation; historical narrative; legendary narrative; mixed; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Determines how a passage can be used as evidence about medieval representations of Rome." }, { "name": "Topographical identification", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "secure; probable; competing identifications; unidentified", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an uncertain medieval place-name from becoming an unjustifiably precise map location." }, { "name": "Text availability and verification", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "catalogue record only; image available; transcription available; checked against witness; critically edited", "why_it_matters": "Shows whether an agent can inspect and quote the text or only report its documented existence." }, { "name": "Reuse basis", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "applicable rights or permission statement linked separately to text, translation, apparatus, transcription and images", "why_it_matters": "Avoids transferring the reuse status of the medieval work to modern editorial or photographic material." } ], "affordances": [ "Identify a candidate Mirabilia text from its title, opening and closing words, contents and scholarly descriptions.", "Select and cite a particular witness or edition for a claim about the work.", "Align passages across recensions or translations and identify additions, omissions and changed monument names.", "Link a textual place reference to candidate Roman sites while preserving competing identifications.", "Distinguish what the text narrates from what external evidence supports.", "Prepare quotations or annotated extracts after checking textual accuracy, attribution and reuse conditions." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Describe the genre, its constituent works and its role in medieval travel and pilgrimage from scholarly sources.", "Distinguish legends in constituent works from verified history of Rome's monuments." ], "must_not": [ "Present legends in constituent works as historical fact.", "Conflate genre membership with identity as a version of one work.", "Misattribute manuscripts or editions.", "Damage or handle manuscripts without the holder's permission." ], "requires_human": [ "Publishing reproductions of manuscripts requires human review." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Medieval guides shaped how pilgrims understood Rome.", "Manuscripts are fragile heritage." ], "affected_parties": [ "Readers and scholars", "Libraries holding manuscripts" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The literary genre has no owner; scholars and catalogue stewards are responsible for documented classifications, and libraries steward manuscripts in their custody.", "master_systems": [ "Library manuscript catalogues document witnesses of constituent works." ] }, "visual_identification": [ "A manuscript or printed page may represent a work associated with the genre, but appearance alone cannot establish genre membership.", "Descriptions or illustrations of Roman monuments can support identification when considered alongside textual and scholarly evidence." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Legends taken as fact spread misinformation.", "Manuscripts can be damaged by handling." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "Mirabilia Urbis Romae is encountered in medieval Latin studies, manuscript research and the history of travel and pilgrimage to Rome.", "Its descriptions of monuments and associated legends support research into medieval interpretations of the ancient city.", "Comparing its textual versions helps researchers distinguish shared traditions, later additions and differences between manuscript witnesses." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "interfaces": "No specific standard, law or official classification applies to this medieval literary tradition itself independently of a particular manuscript, edition or reproduction." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q1108828: Mirabilia Urbis Romae", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1108828", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Mirabilia Urbis Romae", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirabilia_Urbis_Romae", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-textual-boundaries", "name": "Identity and textual boundaries", "description": "Recognises the registered work within a family of Roman descriptions with overlapping titles.", "rationale": "A title match can conflate the original textual tradition, later adaptations and independent works.", "layers": [ { "id": "identification-evidence", "name": "Identification evidence", "description": "Tests candidate texts against inspectable textual and scholarly evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "title-plus-text", "name": "Title plus textual correspondence", "description": "Record the supplied title alongside opening words, closing words, characteristic passages and the authority supporting identification.", "questions": [ { "text": "What textual evidence identifies this candidate as Mirabilia Urbis Romae beyond its catalogue title?", "kind": "definition", "id": "title-plus-text-q01" }, { "text": "Which inspected witness, edition or scholarly description supports that identification?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "title-plus-text-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "related-work-separation", "name": "Related-work separation", "description": "Distinguishes textual descent from thematic resemblance and shared transmission.", "findings": [ { "id": "membership-boundary", "name": "Membership boundary", "description": "Treat translation, adaptation, excerpting and independent composition as distinct relationships requiring evidence.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is this candidate a version of the registered work, an adaptation requiring a separate work identity, or an independent description of Rome?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "membership-boundary-q01" }, { "text": "Could its identification have been confused with Master Gregory's description or another similarly titled Roman text?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "membership-boundary-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "composition-and-transmission", "name": "Composition and transmission", "description": "Separates hypotheses about the work's origin from evidence about its subsequent textual development.", "rationale": "Chronology and responsibility must attach to particular textual stages rather than to an undifferentiated tradition.", "layers": [ { "id": "origin-hypotheses", "name": "Origin hypotheses", "description": "Maintains dated and attributed composition proposals with their evidential limits.", "findings": [ { "id": "dated-attribution", "name": "Dated attribution", "description": "Record composition intervals and proposed responsibility as sourced hypotheses, distinguishing internal clues from later testimony.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence bounds the composition date of the earliest recoverable textual stage?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "dated-attribution-q01" }, { "text": "What supports each proposed author or compiling institution, and which textual stage does the attribution concern?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "dated-attribution-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "recensions-and-translations", "name": "Recensions and translations", "description": "Represents textual changes without assuming a settled genealogy.", "findings": [ { "id": "version-relationships", "name": "Version relationships", "description": "Record evidenced relationships among Latin versions, translations and adaptations; multilingual and derivative transmission is discussed in [Poucet's study](https://bcs.fltr.ucl.ac.be/fe/24/Mirabilia/Mira_01.htm).", "questions": [ { "text": "Which additions, omissions or reordered passages distinguish this version from its proposed source?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "version-relationships-q01" }, { "text": "Is the proposed derivation supported by textual comparison, editorial argument or merely a catalogue assertion?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "version-relationships-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "rome-in-the-text", "name": "Rome in the text", "description": "Connects monument names, spatial descriptions and narratives to their precise textual settings.", "rationale": "The work's representations of Rome require both passage-level interpretation and cautious identification of their referents.", "layers": [ { "id": "topographical-references", "name": "Topographical references", "description": "Preserves medieval names and spatial relationships before linking them to modern identifications.", "findings": [ { "id": "place-identification", "name": "Place identification", "description": "Keep the text's wording, candidate referents, identification evidence and uncertainty together.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which monument or place might this passage identify, and what alternative identifications remain?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "place-identification-q01" }, { "text": "Does the passage supply a spatial relationship, an enumeration or a route instruction, and what mapping action does that support?", "kind": "action", "id": "place-identification-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "narrative-and-historical-evidence", "name": "Narrative and historical evidence", "description": "Separates reported stories, explanations and observations from external corroboration.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-status", "name": "Claim status", "description": "Represent a monument's narrated origin or significance as a claim made in a specific passage before evaluating its historical support.", "questions": [ { "text": "What exactly does this passage claim, and does it present the claim as observation, inherited account or explanation?", "kind": "definition", "id": "claim-status-q01" }, { "text": "Which independent evidence supports, contradicts or leaves unresolved the claim about the monument?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "claim-status-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "witnesses-and-editorial-evidence", "name": "Witnesses and editorial evidence", "description": "Makes each textual claim traceable to a particular surviving or edited representation.", "rationale": "Agents must distinguish readings actually attested in a witness from editorial reconstructions and transcription errors.", "layers": [ { "id": "witness-context", "name": "Witness context", "description": "Locates the Mirabilia component within its manuscript or printed surroundings.", "findings": [ { "id": "component-extent", "name": "Component extent", "description": "Record repository identifiers and folio or page boundaries; neighbouring works remain separately identifiable. A [Freiburg catalogue record](https://dl.ub.uni-freiburg.de/diglit/mirabilia1509) illustrates a Mirabilia printing bound after an Indulgentiae text.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which shelfmark and folios or pages contain the relevant Mirabilia text?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "component-extent-q01" }, { "text": "Are adjacent indulgence lists or church calendars part of this textual version, separate works, or later binding companions?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "component-extent-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "reading-verification", "name": "Reading verification", "description": "Assesses the reliability and editorial mediation of the wording an agent will use.", "findings": [ { "id": "attested-versus-edited-reading", "name": "Attested versus edited reading", "description": "Distinguish manuscript or print readings from expanded abbreviations, normalised spelling, conjectures and OCR output.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which witness readings and editorial interventions underlie the wording quoted here?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attested-versus-edited-reading-q01" }, { "text": "What must be checked against an image or critical apparatus before this passage can support a comparison?", "kind": "action", "id": "attested-versus-edited-reading-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "interpretation-and-responsible-reuse", "name": "Interpretation and responsible reuse", "description": "Governs claims about the work's historical use and the practical reuse of its available representations.", "rationale": "Modern labels such as pilgrim guide and modern access conditions must be evaluated at the relevant textual or material level.", "layers": [ { "id": "audience-and-use", "name": "Audience and use", "description": "Tests proposed functions against evidence from particular versions and witnesses.", "findings": [ { "id": "function-evidence", "name": "Function evidence", "description": "Treat pilgrimage, antiquarian description, civic representation and other proposed uses as interpretations whose support may differ across the tradition.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence supports the claimed audience or use of this particular version?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "function-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Does describing it as a pilgrim guide fit the passages and witness context under discussion?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "function-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "quotation-and-reuse", "name": "Quotation and reuse", "description": "Selects an appropriate textual representation and checks its reuse basis.", "findings": [ { "id": "usable-extract", "name": "Usable extract", "description": "An extract should identify its version, edition or witness, stable locator, editorial treatment and applicable reuse conditions.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which Latin text or translation should supply this extract, and how will readers locate and verify it?", "kind": "action", "id": "usable-extract-q01" }, { "text": "What reuse conditions apply separately to the selected translation, apparatus, transcription and manuscript images?", "kind": "action", "id": "usable-extract-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The precise composition date and proposed authorship require verification; anonymity is safer than asserting an attribution.", "The boundaries among the earliest text, later recensions and related guides should be checked against a critical edition.", "No specific manuscript shelfmark or authority-record identifier is asserted here." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Mirabilia Urbis Romae this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Library manuscript shelfmark", "value_or_pattern": "Holding institution, collection and manuscript designation", "note": "Identifies a manuscript witness containing the text, rather than the work as a whole." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Mirabilia Urbis Romae this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "IFLA Library Reference Model, issued by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, provides distinctions among work, expression, manifestation and item relevant to cataloguing the text and its witnesses." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of Mirabilia Urbis Romae this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Guidance for medieval visitors encountering Rome's monuments.", "Evidence for medieval interpretations of ancient Roman buildings and ruins.", "Research into Rome's legendary topography and cultural memory.", "Textual scholarship comparing manuscript witnesses, revisions and translations." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Mirabilia Urbis Romae this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating legendary explanations of monuments as reliable accounts of ancient Roman history.", "Conflating the medieval work with a particular manuscript, printed edition or translation.", "Assuming all textual witnesses preserve identical content.", "Treating historical monument identifications as equivalent to modern archaeological identifications." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Mirabilia Urbis Romae this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The Latin text circulated beyond Rome, and vernacular adaptations extended its reception across linguistic communities." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Mirabilia Urbis Romae this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Mirabilia literature", "difference": "The broader category includes writings about wonders and remarkable places; Mirabilia Urbis Romae is a particular Rome-focused textual tradition." }, { "name": "Pilgrimage itinerary", "difference": "An itinerary principally orders destinations or routes; this work also describes monuments and supplies historical or legendary explanations." }, { "name": "Modern archaeological guide to Rome", "difference": "A modern archaeological guide interprets remains through archaeological evidence; this medieval work documents interpretations current in its own textual tradition." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Mirabilia Urbis Romae this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry intend the earliest Latin work specifically or a broader textual family, and does an existing Vercy world model already cover that identity?", "Which critical edition and recension terminology should anchor passage alignment and version identification?", "What composition interval and authorship or institutional attribution are best supported for the earliest recoverable text?", "Where should materially expanded adaptations cross the boundary from expressions of this work to separately identified related works?", "Which disputed monument identifications and audience interpretations require competing scholarly accounts to remain explicit?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 17, "questions": 27 } }