{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T10:46:17Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 18.1, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09538-57b3-77d1-b0d1-68f264a5d566\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: king asleep in mountain\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 0", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 84.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09538-57b9-7c00-a848-ebe9ee60c936\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: king asleep in mountain\nRegistry id: vr.tr.king-asleep-in-mountain\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded in" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:47:52+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "owners" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:25+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q1131291", "registryId": "vr.tr.king-asleep-in-mountain", "name": "king asleep in mountain", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q1131291/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.king-asleep-in-mountain", "name": "king asleep in mountain", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise, compare and responsibly interpret versions of the king-asleep-in-mountain motif by recording the sleeper, concealed refuge, suspended agency and anticipated return.", "definition": "The king asleep in the mountain is a folkloric motif in which a legendary ruler or hero remains alive in supernatural sleep or concealment, often within a mountain and accompanied by retainers, awaiting a future return when needed.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the narrative motif registered as vr.tr.king-asleep-in-mountain, its recognition criteria and relationships among attested variants; it treats sleep and return as narrative claims rather than historical facts.", "in_scope": [ "Criteria for identifying the motif in a particular narrative version", "The sleeping ruler or hero, accompanying figures and community awaiting return", "The concealed resting place and conditions governing access", "Suspended life, awakening conditions and the anticipated consequences of return", "Version-specific evidence, classification disagreements and attributed interpretations" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Complete biographies of rulers or heroes associated with the motif", "Geological descriptions and physical management of associated mountains or caves", "Sleep physiology, coma and medical suspended animation", "Complete models of individual legends, literary works or religious traditions", "General theories of monarchy, messianism or national identity" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Test whether prolonged sleep or comparable suspended existence preserves a ruler or hero's capacity to act again; ordinary overnight sleep is insufficient.", "Test whether a mountain interior or functionally comparable concealed refuge houses the sleeper; record departures from the literal mountain setting as boundary cases.", "Test whether awakening connects to renewed public or collective action; awakening merely to discover elapsed time is insufficient by itself.", "Distinguish continued hidden existence from a narrative explicitly requiring death followed by resurrection.", "Treat a sleeping army without an identified ruler or hero as a related motif requiring separate classification justification." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Classification assessment", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "candidate | supported instance | disputed instance | related motif | excluded", "why_it_matters": "Allows an agent to preserve uncertain boundaries without treating every supernatural sleeper as an instance." }, { "name": "Sleeper role", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "king | other ruler | cultural hero | other | unspecified; retain the source's designation", "why_it_matters": "Makes departures from the entry's literal royal wording explicit." }, { "name": "Suspended existence", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "explicit sleep | enchanted suspension | hidden survival without stated sleep | death | ambiguous", "why_it_matters": "Separates the central sleeping figure from adjacent survival and resurrection narratives." }, { "name": "Resting-place form", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "mountain interior | cave | underground chamber | other concealed refuge | unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Supports comparison while retaining uncertainty about non-mountain variants." }, { "name": "Accompanying company", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Links to named companions, attendants or an army; alone | unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes the individual sleeper from collective military suspension." }, { "name": "Awakening condition", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "collective danger | appointed time | omen | deliberate summons | accidental disturbance | unspecified; multiple values allowed", "why_it_matters": "Records the narrative condition that can restore the sleeper's agency." }, { "name": "Return status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "anticipated | conditional | attempted | temporarily awakened | fulfilled | frustrated | denied | unstated", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes a promise of future action from an awakening that occurs within the story." }, { "name": "Community and expected consequence", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Links between the sleeper, the affected community and an attributed expected benefit or harm", "why_it_matters": "Identifies whom the return concerns without assuming every version promises rescue." }, { "name": "Attestation basis", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "inspected narrative | collector's summary | scholarly classification | modern adaptation | unverified attribution", "why_it_matters": "Controls how confidently an agent can classify a version or compare its details." } ], "affordances": [ "Assess a candidate narrative against explicit motif criteria and explain uncertain matches.", "Compare versions through their sleepers, refuges, awakening conditions and return outcomes.", "Trace each asserted narrative detail to an inspected passage and distinguish it from interpretation.", "Link related sleeping-army, hidden-hero and resurrection motifs without merging their boundaries.", "Identify missing evidence and select targeted research questions before accepting a classification." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Describe the motif and its versions in different cultures from folklore sources.", "Explain how it has been used in national and political imagery." ], "must_not": [ "Use the motif to promote violent nationalist or messianic movements.", "Present legends as historical fact.", "Mock the beliefs or traditions of communities that hold the legend." ], "requires_human": [ "Using the legend in public campaigns or political messaging." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Sleeping-hero legends have been used to stir nationalist feeling, sometimes against neighbours.", "Folk traditions belong to the communities that tell them." ], "affected_parties": [ "Communities that hold the legends", "Readers and students" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody owns the motif; folklorists and the communities that tell it keep it alive.", "master_systems": [] }, "what_it_is_for": [ "This motif occurs in legends about rulers or heroes whose concealed sleep ends with an anticipated return.", "Folklorists and historians use it to compare narratives of deferred rescue, political restoration and collective hope.", "An agent may encounter it in oral traditions, literary adaptations and heritage interpretation, where versions need attribution to their communities and sources." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Presenting a legend as verified history can mislead audiences about people, places and events.", "Combining distinct traditions without attribution can erase cultural differences and misrepresent communities.", "Using return narratives to legitimize exclusionary political claims can reinforce hostility toward other groups." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "interfaces": "No technical standard or regulation applies to the narrative motif itself.", "recognition": "The motif is an abstract narrative pattern whose identification requires story content rather than visual cues." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q1131291: king asleep in mountain", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1131291", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: King asleep in the mountain", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_asleep_in_the_mountain", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "motif-identity-and-boundaries", "name": "Motif identity and boundaries", "description": "Establish what qualifies as this motif and where classification becomes disputed.", "rationale": "The name combines a royal figure, sleep and a mountain, but a usable model must explicitly adjudicate variants that alter one of these elements.", "layers": [ { "id": "recognition-core", "name": "Recognition core", "description": "Identify the narrative relationship among suspended existence, concealment and future agency.", "findings": [ { "id": "sleep-linked-to-return", "name": "Sleep linked to return", "description": "Record evidence connecting the concealed sleeper to anticipated renewed action. A classification starting point is [Thompson motif D1960.2](https://folkmasa.org/motiv/motif.php?mishtane=D1960.2), which associates the sleeping king with future aid to his people.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which passage establishes sleep or suspension, concealment and the prospect of renewed action?", "kind": "definition", "id": "sleep-linked-to-return-q01" }, { "text": "Does the version explicitly connect awakening with aid to a community, or is that connection supplied by a classifier?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "sleep-linked-to-return-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "adjacent-motif-tests", "name": "Adjacent motif tests", "description": "Evaluate resemblance without assuming that related motifs are interchangeable.", "findings": [ { "id": "inclusion-and-exclusion-rationale", "name": "Inclusion and exclusion rationale", "description": "Record why a candidate belongs here rather than only to prolonged sleep, hidden survival, resurrection or sleeping-army narratives.", "questions": [ { "text": "Would the candidate still qualify if its sleeper were not a king or its refuge were not a mountain, and whose definition permits that?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "inclusion-and-exclusion-rationale-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence distinguishes this candidate from ordinary enchanted sleep or a returning figure who was never asleep?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "inclusion-and-exclusion-rationale-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "sleeper-and-awaiting-community", "name": "Sleeper and awaiting community", "description": "Describe the figure whose agency is suspended and the people connected to the expected return.", "rationale": "The motif's significance depends on who can return, their claimed authority and whom their return affects.", "layers": [ { "id": "sleeper-identity", "name": "Sleeper identity", "description": "Separate the figure represented in the narrative from any historical namesake.", "findings": [ { "id": "role-and-person-continuity", "name": "Role and person continuity", "description": "Record the sleeper's source-given identity, royal or heroic role and whether the returning actor is understood to be the same individual.", "questions": [ { "text": "How does this version identify the sleeper and establish their authority or exceptional capacity?", "kind": "definition", "id": "role-and-person-continuity-q01" }, { "text": "Is the promised actor the original sleeper, a successor or an ambiguous embodiment of the figure?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "role-and-person-continuity-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "company-and-constituency", "name": "Company and constituency", "description": "Identify companions and the community for whom awakening matters.", "findings": [ { "id": "shared-suspension-and-public-stakes", "name": "Shared suspension and public stakes", "description": "Record who sleeps alongside the principal figure, who awaits them and whether return promises assistance, domination or another consequence.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which companions or forces share the suspension, and what role would they play after awakening?", "kind": "definition", "id": "shared-suspension-and-public-stakes-q01" }, { "text": "Who expects or fears the return, and where does the version identify that group?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "shared-suspension-and-public-stakes-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "concealed-refuge-and-encounter", "name": "Concealed refuge and encounter", "description": "Model the resting place as a narrative location with conditions of concealment and access.", "rationale": "The refuge makes the absent figure locatable within the story, while access episodes can supply evidence of continued existence.", "layers": [ { "id": "resting-place", "name": "Resting place", "description": "Capture the source's location and the function it serves in preserving or hiding the sleeper.", "findings": [ { "id": "refuge-form-and-localisation", "name": "Refuge form and localisation", "description": "Distinguish a named physical landmark from the chamber or concealed realm asserted by the narrative.", "questions": [ { "text": "What refuge does this version describe, and is it inside, beneath or merely associated with a mountain?", "kind": "definition", "id": "refuge-form-and-localisation-q01" }, { "text": "Which source connects the sleeper to the named landmark, and does it support that particular localisation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "refuge-form-and-localisation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-witness", "name": "Access and witness", "description": "Record encounter episodes when present without requiring them of every instance.", "findings": [ { "id": "entry-evidence-and-restrictions", "name": "Entry evidence and restrictions", "description": "Capture how a visitor reaches the sleeper, what they observe and what conditions govern their departure or re-entry.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does a witness encounter the sleeper, and what observed details establish identity and continued suspension?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "entry-evidence-and-restrictions-q01" }, { "text": "What actions permit, prohibit or terminate access to the refuge within the narrative?", "kind": "action", "id": "entry-evidence-and-restrictions-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "suspension-awakening-and-return", "name": "Suspension, awakening and return", "description": "Represent the narrative states and conditions through which unavailable power may become active again.", "rationale": "The distinction between ongoing sleep, momentary disturbance and consequential return is necessary to judge a version's narrative state.", "layers": [ { "id": "suspended-time", "name": "Suspended time", "description": "Determine what continues or stops while the figure is unavailable.", "findings": [ { "id": "life-status-and-elapsed-time", "name": "Life status and elapsed time", "description": "Record whether the text specifies sleep, enchantment, survival or an unresolved condition, together with any stated passage of time.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the source distinguish sleeping from being dead, absent or magically preserved?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "life-status-and-elapsed-time-q01" }, { "text": "What duration, interval or visible sign of elapsed time is stated, and is it exact or symbolic?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "life-status-and-elapsed-time-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "return-transition", "name": "Return transition", "description": "Distinguish conditions for awakening from the outcome attributed to return.", "findings": [ { "id": "trigger-and-readiness", "name": "Trigger and readiness", "description": "Record the stated trigger, who may activate or recognise it and whether a disturbance constitutes the appointed awakening.", "questions": [ { "text": "What event, sign, time or action is said to awaken the sleeper?", "kind": "definition", "id": "trigger-and-readiness-q01" }, { "text": "Can someone summon the figure, and what does the narrative say happens if the attempt is premature or mistaken?", "kind": "action", "id": "trigger-and-readiness-q02" } ] }, { "id": "promised-versus-narrated-return", "name": "Promised versus narrated return", "description": "Separate future expectation from an awakening or intervention that the version actually narrates.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does return remain anticipated, occur within the story, fail or become explicitly impossible?", "kind": "definition", "id": "promised-versus-narrated-return-q01" }, { "text": "Which consequences are narrated events and which are predictions made by characters or narrators?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "promised-versus-narrated-return-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "attestation-variation-and-interpretation", "name": "Attestation, variation and interpretation", "description": "Keep classification and interpretation accountable to particular versions and evidence.", "rationale": "Combining details from unrelated retellings can manufacture an unattested version and obscure competing understandings of the motif.", "layers": [ { "id": "version-evidence", "name": "Version evidence", "description": "Anchor sleeper, refuge and return claims to inspectable attestations.", "findings": [ { "id": "attestation-and-transmission", "name": "Attestation and transmission", "description": "Record the inspected text or recording, its available collection context and any documented relationship to other versions.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which inspected passage supports each defining element, and who authored, recorded, translated or edited it?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attestation-and-transmission-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence distinguishes an independently recorded version from a retelling dependent on an earlier publication?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attestation-and-transmission-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "attributed-meaning-and-use", "name": "Attributed meaning and use", "description": "Separate narrative content from interpretations by tellers, audiences, scholars and later adapters.", "findings": [ { "id": "interpretive-position-and-reuse", "name": "Interpretive position and reuse", "description": "Record supported interpretations of deferred rescue, authority or collective identity with their proponents and context, without assigning one universal meaning.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who interprets the sleeper's return as rescue, restoration, threat or something else, and what evidence supports that reading?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "interpretive-position-and-reuse-q01" }, { "text": "When classifying a later adaptation, which changes to the sleeper, refuge or return condition must an agent disclose?", "kind": "action", "id": "interpretive-position-and-reuse-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This describes a folklore motif, not an activity, despite the supplied ACT.ACT domain code.", "Exact motif-index or tale-type identifiers should be checked; none are asserted here.", "Sleep, location, companions and conditions of return vary between tellings; related returning-ruler traditions should not automatically be treated as exact instances." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of king asleep in mountain this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "A solitary sleeping ruler or hero", "A sleeping ruler with an army or court", "A hidden ruler whose return is promised without an explicit sleep" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of king asleep in mountain this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Expressing hopes for national restoration or deliverance in legend", "Connecting local mountains, caves and ruins with legendary history", "Providing plots and imagery for literature and fantasy", "Supporting regional heritage storytelling" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of king asleep in mountain this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating a legendary survival or promised return as an established historical event", "Assuming similar legends necessarily derive from one original narrative", "Conflating supernatural sleep, concealment, resurrection and reincarnation", "Presenting one regional version as the definitive form of the motif" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of king asleep in mountain this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "German traditions associate Frederick Barbarossa with the Kyffhäuser and a future awakening.", "British traditions include accounts of Arthur surviving in concealment or sleeping with his warriors until his return.", "Portuguese Sebastianism concerns the anticipated return of King Sebastian; it is related to the returning-ruler theme but does not necessarily involve sleep inside a mountain." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of king asleep in mountain this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Returning king", "difference": "A returning king need not have survived through supernatural sleep or concealment." }, { "name": "Sleeping army", "difference": "The dormant military host is central; a king or individual ruler need not be present." }, { "name": "Seven Sleepers", "difference": "The sleepers awaken after a long interval, but their story does not centre on a ruler returning to rescue a polity." }, { "name": "Messianism", "difference": "Expectation of a future deliverer does not require a historical or legendary ruler sleeping in a hidden place." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of king asleep in mountain this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Should this registry entry follow a narrow sleeping-king-in-mountain definition or admit nonroyal sleepers and non-mountain refuges, and which classification authorities justify each boundary?", "Is anticipated collective rescue required for membership, or can threatening, frustrated or unspecified returns remain instances of the same motif?", "Which inspected attestations establish the range of variants without relying on modern summaries that combine details from different sources?", "Does the authoritative catalogue already contain a world model covering this motif that this registry entry should reference?", "How should the assigned ACT / ACT.ACT placement be reconciled with modelling a narrative motif, while preserving the registry's authoritative granularity?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 17, "questions": 28 } }