{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T09:07:17Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 15.4, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094de-348c-7500-9ac4-28344c9c585c\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: detail\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: XCT.REL\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 register", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 52.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094de-349d-71c2-920e-6b7efe2e5b2f\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: detail\nRegistry id: vr.tr.detail\nPlane / domain: XCT / XCT.REL\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContext fo" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T13:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:52:32+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "owners" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q1201081", "registryId": "vr.tr.detail", "name": "detail", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "XCT.REL" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q1201081/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.detail", "name": "detail", "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify a detail relative to a specified whole, assess its significance and evidential status, and decide whether to preserve, inspect, elaborate or omit it.", "definition": "A detail is an individual feature, constituent part, or particular item of information considered in relation to a larger whole, often at a finer level of description.", "scope_statement": "This model provisionally treats detail as a particular feature, part or item of information distinguished within a larger whole at a stated level of attention or description; it owns that contextual relationship rather than the whole itself.", "in_scope": [ "The whole or context relative to which something counts as a detail", "The particular feature, part or information item being singled out", "Granularity, visibility and inclusion at different levels of description", "A detail's relevance to a task, interpretation or decision", "The distinction between observed, reported, inferred and invented detail" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Complete models of the object, event or work containing the detail", "General theories of physical composition and part-whole relations", "Specifications and requirements governing an entire system", "Attention and perception as cognitive processes", "Detail meaning a personnel assignment or assigned group" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "A candidate detail must have an identifiable containing whole or descriptive context; being small by itself is insufficient.", "A detail may be a property, circumstance or informational particular without being a detachable component.", "Calling something a detail does not establish that it is unimportant; its significance must be tested against a task.", "A particular detail can be pointed to or stated, whereas 'level of detail' describes the granularity of a representation.", "Adding particulars increases elaboration but does not establish that those particulars accurately describe the subject." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Referent whole", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Identified object, event, work, account or other contextual whole", "why_it_matters": "Establishes what the detail is a detail of." }, { "name": "Detail role", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Part; feature; circumstance; informational particular; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Prevents every detail from being treated as a physical component." }, { "name": "Contextual locator", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Position, time interval, passage, region or other traceable location within the whole", "why_it_matters": "Allows another agent to recover the same particular." }, { "name": "Recognition threshold", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Minimum discriminating resolution or granularity, with domain-specific units and conditions", "why_it_matters": "Records when the detail becomes distinguishable and when it is lost." }, { "name": "Task significance", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Decisive; supporting; incidental; distracting; unknown, relative to a named task", "why_it_matters": "Guides inspection and omission without equating detail with triviality." }, { "name": "Evidence status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Observed; source-reported; inferred; deliberately invented; disputed; unknown", "why_it_matters": "Separates specificity from factual support." }, { "name": "Representation treatment", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Explicit; aggregated; omitted; obscured; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Tracks how a particular survives or disappears in an account." } ], "affordances": [ "Locate and isolate a particular while retaining its connection to the whole.", "Expand a description to expose finer particulars.", "Compare versions to detect altered, added or missing details.", "Trace a stated detail to its observation, source or inference.", "Assess whether omitting a detail changes a specified interpretation or decision.", "Preserve consequential details when summarising or changing scale." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Extract, summarise and cite details from a source, keeping their link to the whole.", "Ask for missing details before acting on an instruction that depends on them." ], "must_not": [ "Invent details to fill gaps and present them as fact.", "Take a detail out of context so that it changes the meaning of the whole.", "Reveal personal details about a person beyond what the task needs.", "Drop safety-relevant details when summarising instructions." ], "requires_human": [ "Publishing details about an identifiable person." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Small details can identify people or change outcomes, so they deserve care.", "Selective details can mislead as surely as false ones." ], "affected_parties": [ "People described", "Readers relying on the summary" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody owns the concept; the author of a source answers for its details.", "master_systems": [] }, "what_it_is_for": [ "A detail is encountered when inspecting an object, document, event or account more closely than casual observation allows.", "Details support comparison, interpretation and verification when a small feature matters to understanding the larger whole." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Overlooking a significant detail can lead to an incorrect assessment or missed defect.", "Giving an incidental detail excessive weight can distort conclusions about the whole.", "Preserving sensitive details without appropriate controls can expose private information." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "interfaces": "No standard, law or official classification applies to a detail independently of its subject and use.", "recognition": "A detail is a relational concept with no universal visual appearance that distinguishes it from other features." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q1201081: detail", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1201081", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "detail-and-whole", "name": "Detail and whole", "description": "Establishes which particular is being singled out and the context that makes it a detail.", "rationale": "Detail is treated here as a contextual status, so neither identity nor scope can be established from the particular alone.", "layers": [ { "id": "anchoring-the-particular", "name": "Anchoring the particular", "description": "Connects a candidate detail to a recoverable whole and location.", "findings": [ { "id": "recoverable-detail-anchor", "name": "Recoverable detail anchor", "description": "Record the whole and enough locating information to distinguish the intended particular from nearby alternatives.", "questions": [ { "text": "What exactly is this a detail of, and where can it be recovered within that whole?", "kind": "definition", "id": "recoverable-detail-anchor-q01" }, { "text": "What distinguishes this particular from adjacent or similar details?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "recoverable-detail-anchor-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "kind-of-particular", "name": "Kind of particular", "description": "Separates constituent parts from features, circumstances and particulars of an account.", "findings": [ { "id": "detail-role-and-sense", "name": "Detail role and sense", "description": "Record whether the term identifies something in the subject, something in its representation, or a relationship between them.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the detail a constituent part, an attribute, a circumstance or an item in a description?", "kind": "definition", "id": "detail-role-and-sense-q01" }, { "text": "Does this use concern a particular detail, descriptive granularity, or a different sense of the word?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "detail-role-and-sense-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "granularity-and-discrimination", "name": "Granularity and discrimination", "description": "Records the conditions under which a detail can be separated from its surroundings.", "rationale": "A detail can disappear through aggregation, limited resolution or a change in descriptive scale.", "layers": [ { "id": "recognition-conditions", "name": "Recognition conditions", "description": "Identifies the resolution and access needed to recognise the particular.", "findings": [ { "id": "discrimination-threshold", "name": "Discrimination threshold", "description": "Record what must be visible, available or explicitly stated for this detail to be distinguished.", "questions": [ { "text": "At what spatial, temporal, semantic or descriptive granularity can this detail first be distinguished?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "discrimination-threshold-q01" }, { "text": "What observation conditions or contextual information are required to recognise it?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "discrimination-threshold-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "changes-of-scale", "name": "Changes of scale", "description": "Tracks the same particular across coarser and finer accounts.", "findings": [ { "id": "detail-survival-across-scale", "name": "Detail survival across scale", "description": "Record whether changing scale retains the particular, merges it with others or removes it from view.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which coarser description contains or aggregates this detail, and which finer particulars elaborate it?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "detail-survival-across-scale-q01" }, { "text": "What distinction would be lost if the representation were made less detailed?", "kind": "action", "id": "detail-survival-across-scale-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "significance-and-selection", "name": "Significance and selection", "description": "Assesses why a detail deserves attention or inclusion for a particular purpose.", "rationale": "Selection requires a reason tied to the task; physical size and descriptive prominence do not settle importance.", "layers": [ { "id": "task-relative-consequence", "name": "Task-relative consequence", "description": "Connects the particular to the interpretation or decision it may affect.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-of-changing-a-detail", "name": "Consequence of changing a detail", "description": "Record the expected effect of altering or removing the particular, distinguishing tested consequences from conjecture.", "questions": [ { "text": "For which named task could this detail change recognition, interpretation or action?", "kind": "definition", "id": "consequence-of-changing-a-detail-q01" }, { "text": "What comparison or omission test would show whether it makes a consequential difference?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "consequence-of-changing-a-detail-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "inclusion-and-omission", "name": "Inclusion and omission", "description": "Supports deliberate choices about retaining, emphasising or dropping particulars.", "findings": [ { "id": "justified-detail-selection", "name": "Justified detail selection", "description": "Record why a detail is included or omitted and what misunderstanding that treatment could produce.", "questions": [ { "text": "Should this detail be retained, emphasised, deferred or omitted for the intended audience and task?", "kind": "action", "id": "justified-detail-selection-q01" }, { "text": "Would omitting or emphasising it distort the whole, and what supports that assessment?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "justified-detail-selection-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-representation", "name": "Evidence and representation", "description": "Separates particulars supported by evidence from those introduced through inference or elaboration.", "rationale": "A highly specific account can contain unsupported details, while an accurate summary can intentionally omit supported ones.", "layers": [ { "id": "support-for-specificity", "name": "Support for specificity", "description": "Traces support at the level of the individual particular.", "findings": [ { "id": "detail-level-evidence", "name": "Detail-level evidence", "description": "Record the evidence for the exact particular claimed, including whether its precision exceeds what the evidence supports.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which observation, passage or inference supports this exact detail?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "detail-level-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Does the detail assert a precision or specificity that its supporting evidence cannot establish?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "detail-level-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "detail-transformations", "name": "Detail transformations", "description": "Tracks particulars through transcription, summarisation, translation, editing or imaginative elaboration.", "findings": [ { "id": "retained-and-introduced-particulars", "name": "Retained and introduced particulars", "description": "Record which details a transformation preserves, changes, removes or introduces and whether additions are presented as factual.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which details were added, altered or lost between the source and this representation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "retained-and-introduced-particulars-q01" }, { "text": "Which changes require correction, qualification or an explicit indication of invention?", "kind": "action", "id": "retained-and-introduced-particulars-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "With no recorded sense, this description assumes the general relational concept rather than specialised senses such as an architectural detail drawing or a personnel assignment.", "The listed kinds are ordinary contextual distinctions, not an exhaustive or standardised taxonomy.", "What counts as a detail depends on the whole under discussion, the purpose of the description, and its scale; no universal quantitative threshold is asserted." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of detail this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Visual detail", "Descriptive detail", "Technical detail" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of detail this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Describing particular features of objects, events, or situations.", "Specifying construction or implementation particulars in technical documentation.", "Analysing how individual features contribute to an artwork or narrative.", "Choosing how much information to include in a representation or explanation." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of detail this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Omitting a consequential detail can make an account misleading or a specification incomplete.", "Excessive detail can obscure the main point or overwhelm the intended audience.", "Treating a detail as inherently unimportant confuses descriptive scale with significance.", "Presenting fine detail unsupported by evidence can create false precision." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of detail this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "part", "difference": "A part is a constituent of a whole; a detail can instead be a feature or a particular piece of information about that whole." }, { "name": "property", "difference": "A property characterises something; calling it a detail additionally places it within a broader descriptive context." }, { "name": "example", "difference": "An example illustrates a category or claim; a detail specifies a particular aspect of what is being described." }, { "name": "granularity", "difference": "Granularity is the degree of subdivision or descriptive fineness; a detail is an individual particular distinguished at some granularity." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of detail this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does vr.tr.detail intend a contextual particular, descriptive granularity, a specialised sense, or several senses, given the missing registry definition?", "Which reference traditions distinguish detail as a part of a subject from detail as information in a representation, and where do their definitions conflict?", "Should level of detail belong to this entry or to a neighbouring model linked to individual particulars?", "Which domains provide defensible measures of detail granularity, and where must assessment remain qualitative?", "How should the identity of a detail be maintained when different observers or representations divide the same whole differently?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 13, "questions": 21 } }