{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T08:30:37Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 19.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094bc-21b6-79d0-9c42-d363fb786e69\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Celtic Rite\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: XCT.QLT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 reg", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 85.5, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094bc-21c2-7ff0-adea-2de29ebf8920\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Celtic Rite\nRegistry id: vr.tr.celtic-rite\nPlane / domain: XCT / XCT.QLT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\n" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:39:46+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:25+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q127150", "registryId": "vr.tr.celtic-rite", "name": "Celtic Rite", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "XCT.QLT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q127150/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.celtic-rite", "name": "Celtic Rite", "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify, compare and responsibly interpret liturgical practices attributed to the Celtic Rite while distinguishing historical evidence, scholarly classification and modern reconstruction.", "definition": "Celtic Rite is a conventional collective designation for the diverse liturgical practices of early medieval Celtic-speaking Christian communities, particularly in Ireland and Britain, rather than a single uniformly codified rite.", "scope_statement": "This model owns vr.tr.celtic-rite as a contested designation for historical Christian liturgical usages associated with Celtic-speaking regions and connected communities, recording attribution at the level of particular practices, witnesses, places and periods rather than presupposing one uniform rite.", "in_scope": [ "Definitions of Celtic Rite and competing interpretations of its unity", "Manuscript and narrative evidence for attributed liturgical practices", "Witness-specific forms of Mass, baptism, prayer offices and ministry to the sick", "Regional variation, chronology and relationships with other Western liturgical traditions", "Evidence supporting or limiting modern reconstructions of historical usages" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Celtic Christianity as a whole, including its complete theology and institutional history", "Pre-Christian Celtic religion and contemporary pagan ritual", "General models of Christian sacraments and the Roman or Gallican liturgical traditions", "Manuscript conservation, ownership and physical collection management", "Modern denominations claiming Celtic identity, except their claims about historical liturgical continuity" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Require an identifiable Christian liturgical text, action or usage; Celtic language, imagery or geographical association alone does not establish membership.", "Test whether Celtic Rite denotes a particular local usage, a family resemblance or an asserted unified rite, and record whose classification is being used.", "Compare attributed features with Roman and other Western parallels before treating them as distinctively Celtic.", "Distinguish evidence about Easter reckoning or tonsure from evidence for the actual order and wording of worship.", "Require traceable historical witnesses for reconstructed practices; a modern Celtic label alone does not establish continuity." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Interpretation of the rite designation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Unified rite asserted; family of local usages; historiographical umbrella; modern appropriation; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Determines what can legitimately be grouped under the registry entry." }, { "name": "Attributed liturgical community", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Named community or institution, locality and supporting attribution", "why_it_matters": "Prevents practices attested in one community from becoming claims about all Celtic-speaking Christians." }, { "name": "Historical date interval", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "CE year range, separately for manuscript production, textual composition and inferred use", "why_it_matters": "Separates the age of a surviving witness from the age of the practice it may preserve." }, { "name": "Liturgical function", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Mass; baptism; prayer office; communion or anointing of the sick; other evidenced function", "why_it_matters": "Keeps evidence for one service from being treated as evidence for a complete rite." }, { "name": "Witness coverage", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Explicit rubric; prayer text; service sequence; fragment; external description", "why_it_matters": "Determines which aspects of historical performance can be recovered." }, { "name": "Attribution confidence", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Supported; plausible; disputed; rejected; unassessed, with reasons", "why_it_matters": "Makes contested manuscript origins and liturgical affiliations operationally visible." }, { "name": "Relationship to comparison traditions", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Shared wording; shared sequence; possible borrowing; local adaptation; uncertain relationship", "why_it_matters": "Supports comparison without assuming either complete independence or simple derivation." }, { "name": "Reconstruction status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Direct transcription; editorial restoration; comparative inference; modern composition; mixed", "why_it_matters": "Controls how confidently an agent may describe or reuse a reconstructed service." } ], "affordances": [ "Assess whether a proposed text or practice belongs within the historical Celtic Rite designation.", "Compare local service sequences and identify shared, distinctive and uncertain elements.", "Trace a liturgical claim to a manuscript passage or attributed historical account.", "Construct a witness-bounded account of a service with explicit gaps and editorial additions.", "Evaluate a modern reconstruction's historical claims without conferring ecclesiastical authorization." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Describe the Celtic Rite from historical and liturgical scholarship, noting the gaps in evidence.", "Distinguish documented early practice from later revivals and modern reconstructions." ], "must_not": [ "Present modern reconstructions or romantic legends as proven early medieval practice.", "Mock the faith or worship of communities who use or revive these traditions.", "Claim the rite for a modern group or cause without evidence.", "Handle or reproduce manuscripts against the holding library's terms." ], "requires_human": [ "Advising a congregation on the authenticity of liturgy it plans to use." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Liturgy is sacred to worshippers and must be treated with respect.", "The rite has been used in nationalist and denominational arguments, which can distort history." ], "affected_parties": [ "Worshipping communities", "Historians and liturgists", "Keepers of manuscripts" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody owns it; holding libraries keep the surviving manuscripts.", "master_systems": [] }, "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Overstated claims about a distinct Celtic church spread historical myths.", "Careless handling damages fragile early manuscripts." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "The term Celtic Rite is used in historical and liturgical scholarship when discussing worship practices of early medieval Celtic-speaking Christian communities.", "It helps frame comparisons of surviving service books, prayers and ritual customs from Ireland, Britain and related monastic networks.", "Its use requires attention to local variation and the distinction between surviving historical evidence and modern reconstruction." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "interfaces": "No single official standard or regulation governs this retrospective collective designation for diverse historical liturgical practices.", "recognition": "This historical category cannot be identified visually, since individual manuscripts or ritual objects do not establish membership without contextual evidence." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q127150: Celtic Rite", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q127150", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Celtic Rite", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celtic_Rite", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "rite-designation-and-boundaries", "name": "Rite designation and boundaries", "description": "Determine what the label Celtic Rite means in each attribution and how much historical unity it asserts.", "rationale": "The singular registry name must not silently turn diverse evidence into a standardized liturgical system.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-conceptions", "name": "Competing conceptions", "description": "Record definitions and their scholarly or ecclesiastical holders.", "findings": [ { "id": "unity-of-the-rite", "name": "Unity of the rite", "description": "Test the designation rather than assume its strict applicability: the New Catholic Encyclopedia rejects a distinct Celtic rite in the strict sense. [Celtic Rite](https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/celtic-rite).", "questions": [ { "text": "Which authors treat Celtic Rite as a distinct rite, and which treat it as a collective name for local usages?", "kind": "definition", "id": "unity-of-the-rite-q01" }, { "text": "What shared texts, service orders or institutions would justify each author's proposed degree of unity?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "unity-of-the-rite-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "historical-membership", "name": "Historical membership", "description": "Set inclusion criteria for regional usages and distinguish adjacent religious phenomena.", "findings": [ { "id": "inclusion-without-ethnic-shortcuts", "name": "Inclusion without ethnic shortcuts", "description": "Require practice-specific evidence when associating a community, text or ceremony with this designation.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence connects this usage to a particular Irish, British, Breton or connected continental community?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "inclusion-without-ethnic-shortcuts-q01" }, { "text": "Is inclusion based on liturgical evidence, or only on language, ancestry, geography or a modern Celtic identity?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "inclusion-without-ethnic-shortcuts-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "liturgical-witnesses", "name": "Liturgical witnesses", "description": "Organize the textual evidence through which attributed Celtic usages can be assessed.", "rationale": "A manuscript's association with a place or tradition does not establish the origin, date or representativeness of every text it contains.", "layers": [ { "id": "manuscript-attribution", "name": "Manuscript attribution", "description": "Separate manuscript production, textual ancestry, later custody and evidence of use.", "findings": [ { "id": "stowe-bangor-bobbio-assessment", "name": "Stowe, Bangor and Bobbio assessment", "description": "Assess these witnesses individually; the scholarly history of the Bobbio Missal includes an Irish-origin hypothesis that requires examination rather than automatic acceptance. [The Bobbio Missal](https://assets.cambridge.org/052182/3935/excerpt/0521823935_excerpt.htm).", "questions": [ { "text": "For each candidate witness, what supports its place of production, intended community and liturgical affiliation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "stowe-bangor-bobbio-assessment-q01" }, { "text": "Which dates belong to the surviving copy, its corrections and the proposed earlier textual material?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "stowe-bangor-bobbio-assessment-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "passage-level-support", "name": "Passage-level support", "description": "Connect each proposed practice to the precise evidence and its limits.", "findings": [ { "id": "text-rubric-and-performance", "name": "Text, rubric and performance", "description": "Distinguish a surviving prayer from an instruction for performing it and from evidence that a community actually used it.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which folio, rubric or edited passage supports the proposed words, sequence or gesture?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "text-rubric-and-performance-q01" }, { "text": "Does the witness establish prescribed practice, actual performance or only the availability of a text?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "text-rubric-and-performance-q02" }, { "text": "Which gaps must remain unknown rather than be filled from another manuscript?", "kind": "action", "id": "text-rubric-and-performance-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "service-forms-and-ritual-actions", "name": "Service forms and ritual actions", "description": "Model attributed worship through particular service sequences, texts, participants and ritual instructions.", "rationale": "Recognition requires concrete liturgical comparisons rather than a general description of Celtic spirituality.", "layers": [ { "id": "mass-sequence", "name": "Mass sequence", "description": "Describe the Eucharistic order supported by each witness without composing a universal Celtic Mass.", "findings": [ { "id": "eucharistic-order-and-variants", "name": "Eucharistic order and variants", "description": "Record the positions and wording of readings, prayers, Eucharistic material, fraction and communion wherever attested.", "questions": [ { "text": "What sequence of readings, prayers and communion actions does this particular witness support?", "kind": "definition", "id": "eucharistic-order-and-variants-q01" }, { "text": "Which elements differ from selected Roman or Gallican comparators, and which are shared?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "eucharistic-order-and-variants-q02" }, { "text": "Where fraction or communion instructions survive, what actions and interpretations are explicit rather than reconstructed?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "eucharistic-order-and-variants-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "office-and-pastoral-services", "name": "Office and pastoral services", "description": "Assess prayer offices, baptism and care of the sick independently of Mass evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "service-specific-recoverability", "name": "Service-specific recoverability", "description": "Determine which prayers, rubrics, participant roles and service structures can be recovered for each function.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which witnesses support baptism, prayer offices or ministry to the sick, and how complete is each service?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "service-specific-recoverability-q01" }, { "text": "Do surviving hymns, antiphons and collects establish a daily office arrangement or only individual components?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "service-specific-recoverability-q02" }, { "text": "Which ministers, recipients, materials and actions may be included in a service description without supplementing the witness?", "kind": "action", "id": "service-specific-recoverability-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "variation-transmission-and-reconstruction", "name": "Variation, transmission and reconstruction", "description": "Track differences across communities and periods, and constrain claims made from later adaptations.", "rationale": "Neither regional adoption of a custom nor modern revival of a text establishes continuity of an entire rite.", "layers": [ { "id": "regional-change", "name": "Regional change", "description": "Evaluate local changes in worship separately from changes in disciplinary customs.", "findings": [ { "id": "calendar-custom-and-liturgical-change", "name": "Calendar custom and liturgical change", "description": "Treat Easter computation, tonsure and the adoption of service texts as separate developments unless evidence connects them.", "questions": [ { "text": "What locality and date range does each report of changed Easter reckoning or worship practice actually cover?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "calendar-custom-and-liturgical-change-q01" }, { "text": "Does an account of a council or controversy demonstrate a change in service texts, or only in the disputed custom?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "calendar-custom-and-liturgical-change-q02" }, { "text": "What evidence supports borrowing or replacement rather than coexistence and local adaptation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "calendar-custom-and-liturgical-change-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "modern-reconstruction", "name": "Modern reconstruction", "description": "Evaluate contemporary presentations of Celtic liturgy against their claimed historical foundations.", "findings": [ { "id": "reconstruction-disclosure", "name": "Reconstruction disclosure", "description": "Make translations, restorations, combinations of witnesses and newly composed material distinguishable.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which components of the proposed Celtic service derive from identified historical passages, and which are modern additions?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "reconstruction-disclosure-q01" }, { "text": "Does the reconstruction combine witnesses from different periods or communities, and how is that choice disclosed?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "reconstruction-disclosure-q02" }, { "text": "Should an agent present the result as a transcription, a hypothetical reconstruction or a contemporary adaptation?", "kind": "action", "id": "reconstruction-disclosure-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The term's scope and the degree of liturgical unity it implies require checking against specialist scholarship.", "The Antiphonary of Bangor and the Stowe Missal are relevant surviving witnesses, but their dates, contents, and representativeness should be assessed separately.", "With no recorded sense, the historical liturgical designation is assumed; modern groups may use the same name differently." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Celtic Rite this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Historical celebration of the Eucharist, daily prayer, and other Christian rites in Irish and British communities.", "A category used in liturgical history to compare surviving texts and practices with Roman and other Western traditions." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Celtic Rite this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating a retrospective collective label as evidence of one standardized liturgy or an institutionally unified Celtic Church.", "Assuming that a surviving manuscript represents practice throughout Ireland and Britain.", "Confusing distinctive Easter calculations or monastic customs with a complete, separate liturgical rite.", "Presenting modern reconstructed Celtic worship as an unchanged survival of medieval practice." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Celtic Rite this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Irish and British evidence reflects local diversity rather than a securely reconstructable common rite.", "Irish-associated monasteries in continental Europe transmitted practices that interacted with local Western liturgical traditions.", "Adoption of Roman practices occurred unevenly across communities and periods." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Celtic Rite this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Celtic Christianity", "difference": "Celtic Christianity encompasses institutions, spirituality, learning, and religious life; Celtic Rite concerns liturgical practices." }, { "name": "Roman Rite", "difference": "The Roman Rite is the liturgical tradition associated with Rome; Celtic Rite labels regional practices whose relationships to Roman usage varied historically." }, { "name": "Gallican Rite", "difference": "Gallican Rite designates historical liturgical traditions of Gaul, although their practices and texts share features with evidence described as Celtic." }, { "name": "Celtic Easter computation", "difference": "Easter computation determines the date of Easter; it is a calendrical practice, not a complete order of worship." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Celtic Rite this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which definitions and comparative criteria best justify retaining Celtic Rite as a single umbrella without implying historical uniformity?", "How should disputed witnesses, especially the Bobbio Missal, contribute to the model without predetermining their regional affiliation?", "Which practices are demonstrably distinctive rather than shared Western usages or artifacts of uneven manuscript survival?", "How far can evidence associated with Irish communities support conclusions about Britain, Brittany or connected continental foundations?", "Which service sequences and historical transitions remain unrecoverable, and where have modern reconstructions concealed those gaps?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 13, "questions": 26 } }