{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T08:31:38Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 21.1, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094bd-42ce-74e0-8c99-52f692532120\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: cerebral crus\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: PHY.LIV\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 r", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 72.5, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094bd-42bb-7361-b7be-8c63e53bf2e4\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: cerebral crus\nRegistry id: vr.tr.cerebral-crus\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.LIV\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:44:48+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:25+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q12738044", "registryId": "vr.tr.cerebral-crus", "name": "cerebral crus", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.LIV" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q12738044/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.cerebral-crus", "name": "cerebral crus", "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify a cerebral crus, assess evidence about its descending fibers and tissue state, and determine which observations or specialist review are warranted.", "definition": "The cerebral crus (crus cerebri) is the paired ventral white-matter portion of the midbrain, lying anterior to the substantia nigra and carrying descending corticospinal, corticobulbar and corticopontine fibres.", "scope_statement": "This model owns vr.tr.cerebral-crus as an anatomical structure in PHY / PHY.LIV, including its boundaries, laterality, local fiber organization and observed condition; human anatomy is the initial reference, with species explicitly recorded.", "in_scope": [ "Identification of an individual left or right cerebral crus and its relationship to the paired crura", "Boundaries within the ventral midbrain and separation from adjacent substantia nigra", "Local course and organization of descending cortical fibers", "Crus-specific morphology, imaging observations and tissue integrity", "Localization of abnormalities and evidence supporting their functional interpretation" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Taxonomy, habitat and conservation of the organism containing the structure", "The entire cerebral peduncle or midbrain", "Substantia nigra nuclei and their intrinsic circuitry", "Complete corticospinal, corticonuclear and corticopontine pathways outside the crus", "Whole-patient diagnosis, prognosis and treatment planning" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "The term identifies the anterior motor-tract-bearing portion of the cerebral peduncle. [NLM MeSH](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68065843)", "A candidate region must be checked against the substantia nigra boundary; a label encompassing adjacent gray matter requires clarification of the anatomical convention.", "It denotes a region containing multiple fiber populations, so a corticospinal tract label alone does not establish the full crus boundary.", "A cerebellar peduncle label does not establish cerebral crus identity; the parent structure and anatomical course must agree.", "The meaning of basis pedunculi must be checked in each source because anatomical conventions differ over inclusion of substantia nigra. [IFAA terminology notes](https://ifaa.unifr.ch/Public/EntryPage/TA98%20Tree/TA98%20EN/14%20TA98%20EN.htm)" ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Laterality", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "left | right | bilateral aggregate | unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Prevents measurements or lesions from being attributed to the wrong crus." }, { "name": "Species and developmental context", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "organism or specimen reference with species and age or developmental stage", "why_it_matters": "Constrains which atlas, tissue expectations and comparisons apply." }, { "name": "Anatomical boundary convention", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "named terminology or atlas, edition and explicit inclusion rules", "why_it_matters": "Prevents inconsistent cerebral peduncle and basis pedunculi terminology from changing the modeled region." }, { "name": "Measurement level", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "rostrocaudal landmark, section orientation and coordinate reference", "why_it_matters": "Crus measurements require comparable locations and section planes." }, { "name": "Cross-sectional area", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "mm² with segmentation method and measurement level", "why_it_matters": "Supports reproducible assessment of asymmetry or change in size." }, { "name": "Local fiber assignment", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "corticospinal | corticonuclear/corticobulbar | corticopontine | other supported assignment | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Separates a proposed tract identity from identification of the crus as a whole." }, { "name": "Observed tissue condition", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "no abnormality detected | signal abnormality | volume loss | distortion | tissue disruption | indeterminate, with method and date", "why_it_matters": "Records what was observed without treating an appearance as a settled diagnosis." }, { "name": "Lesion overlap", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "mm³ or percentage of the defined crus region, with registration uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes direct involvement from an abnormality merely adjacent to the crus." } ], "affordances": [ "Annotate a left or right cerebral crus in an image, section or specimen using explicit anatomical landmarks.", "Compare crus size and appearance across sides or time points with matched measurement methods.", "Link local fiber assignments to pathway models while retaining uncertainty about tract boundaries.", "Quantify overlap between an abnormality and the crus separately from neighboring midbrain structures.", "Request better imaging, anatomical adjudication or specialist interpretation when the evidence cannot resolve the crus boundary or condition." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Explain the anatomy of the cerebral crus in general terms.", "Advise a person with sudden weakness or eye movement problems to call emergency services." ], "must_not": [ "Interpret a person's brain scan as a diagnosis.", "Predict recovery for a specific patient.", "Disclose a person's neurological records without consent.", "Present unproven therapies as able to repair damage." ], "requires_human": [ "Treatment decisions after stroke or brain injury." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Brain injury affects identity and independence; families need honest information.", "Fast action in stroke saves function, so warning signs must not be downplayed." ], "affected_parties": [ "Stroke patients", "Families and carers", "Clinicians" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody owns it; it is part of each person's body.", "master_systems": [] }, "visual_identification": [ "Two thick columns of white matter on the front of the midbrain, diverging upward toward the hemispheres." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Strokes here can cause weakness on the opposite side of the body.", "Brain swelling can push tissue against it and cause paralysis." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "The cerebral crus is studied in midbrain anatomy, neuroimaging and examination of nervous tissue.", "Its descending motor pathways help specialists relate the location of tissue damage to disturbances of movement." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "Terminologia Anatomica, issued by the Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminology, standardizes the anatomical name crus cerebri." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q12738044: cerebral crus", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q12738044", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Cerebral crus", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerebral_crus", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "crus-identity-and-boundaries", "name": "Crus identity and boundaries", "description": "Establish which anatomical region a cerebral crus label denotes.", "rationale": "Terminological overlap with cerebral peduncle and basis pedunculi can silently expand or contract the modeled structure.", "layers": [ { "id": "terminology-and-reference", "name": "Terminology and reference", "description": "Anchor the registry concept to a declared anatomical convention.", "findings": [ { "id": "crus-term-resolution", "name": "Crus term resolution", "description": "Record the source label, its definition and whether it identifies the crus alone or a broader peduncular region.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the source use cerebral crus or crus cerebri for the anterior tract-bearing region?", "kind": "definition", "id": "crus-term-resolution-q01" }, { "text": "Which terminology edition or atlas establishes what cerebral peduncle and basis pedunculi include here?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "crus-term-resolution-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "side-and-spatial-limits", "name": "Side and spatial limits", "description": "Define the individual crus and its limits within the examined midbrain.", "findings": [ { "id": "landmark-bounded-region", "name": "Landmark-bounded region", "description": "Identify laterality, the substantia nigra interface and the rostral and caudal limits used for annotation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which side and rostrocaudal extent does this annotation represent?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "landmark-bounded-region-q01" }, { "text": "Which visible landmarks separate the crus from substantia nigra and adjoining fiber regions?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "landmark-bounded-region-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "descending-fiber-organization", "name": "Descending fiber organization", "description": "Represent evidence about the cortical projection fibers traversing the crus.", "rationale": "Identifying the crus does not by itself resolve which fiber populations occupy an observed subregion.", "layers": [ { "id": "pathway-membership", "name": "Pathway membership", "description": "Connect local fibers to named descending pathways without modeling their entire courses.", "findings": [ { "id": "supported-fiber-identities", "name": "Supported fiber identities", "description": "Record proposed corticospinal, corticonuclear and corticopontine assignments alongside the evidence supporting each.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which descending fiber populations are supported in this crus region, and by what anatomical or imaging evidence?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "supported-fiber-identities-q01" }, { "text": "Where does the modeled local segment end and the linked whole-pathway model take over?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "supported-fiber-identities-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "local-topography", "name": "Local topography", "description": "Qualify claims about fiber positions within a particular section of the crus.", "findings": [ { "id": "tract-position-confidence", "name": "Tract position confidence", "description": "Treat atlas sectors and tractography assignments as evidence-dependent estimates rather than fixed boundaries visible in every specimen.", "questions": [ { "text": "At this rostrocaudal level, what evidence supports the proposed relative positions of the fiber groups?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "tract-position-confidence-q01" }, { "text": "How much spatial uncertainty or overlap accompanies each local tract assignment?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "tract-position-confidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "crus-observation-and-comparison", "name": "Crus observation and comparison", "description": "Make measurements and comparisons interpretable for this small midbrain region.", "rationale": "Section orientation, unresolved boundaries and acquisition differences can mimic crus asymmetry or change.", "layers": [ { "id": "boundary-visibility", "name": "Boundary visibility", "description": "Assess whether the observation method resolves the intended crus region.", "findings": [ { "id": "segmentation-support", "name": "Segmentation support", "description": "Record modality, resolution, orientation and the evidence used to draw the crus boundary.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which image contrast, stain or dissection feature supports the crus-substantia nigra boundary?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "segmentation-support-q01" }, { "text": "What resolution, partial-volume effect or deformation limits confidence in the segmented crus?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "segmentation-support-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "matched-morphometry", "name": "Matched morphometry", "description": "Compare the two crura or repeated observations using equivalent anatomical extents.", "findings": [ { "id": "interpretable-size-comparison", "name": "Interpretable size comparison", "description": "Attach size differences to matched landmarks, methods and specimen context before interpreting them.", "questions": [ { "text": "What are the crus area or volume and uncertainty under the stated segmentation protocol?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "interpretable-size-comparison-q01" }, { "text": "Are side-to-side or longitudinal measurements matched for anatomical level, orientation and processing?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "interpretable-size-comparison-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "crus-involvement-and-response", "name": "Crus involvement and response", "description": "Connect observed abnormalities to the crus while constraining functional and action claims.", "rationale": "An abnormality near the crus may involve adjacent structures, and a local observation alone cannot establish cause or clinical consequence.", "layers": [ { "id": "abnormality-localization", "name": "Abnormality localization", "description": "Separate direct crus involvement, displacement and neighboring abnormalities.", "findings": [ { "id": "crus-tissue-involvement", "name": "Crus tissue involvement", "description": "Record the side, extent, timing and observed appearance of an abnormality without substituting a disease label for localization.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the abnormality overlap crus tissue, displace it, or remain confined to adjacent structures?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "crus-tissue-involvement-q01" }, { "text": "What measured extent and temporal evidence support the recorded crus tissue state?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "crus-tissue-involvement-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "functional-interpretation-and-review", "name": "Functional interpretation and review", "description": "Determine which pathway implications and follow-up actions the available evidence supports.", "findings": [ { "id": "bounded-pathway-interpretation", "name": "Bounded pathway interpretation", "description": "Link possible descending-pathway involvement to independent examination and pathway evidence, retaining alternative localization explanations.", "questions": [ { "text": "What independent evidence supports attributing the observed functional deficit to fibers affected within this crus?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "bounded-pathway-interpretation-q01" }, { "text": "Would further imaging, comparison with prior studies or specialist review resolve the uncertainty affecting interpretation?", "kind": "action", "id": "bounded-pathway-interpretation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This description assumes the registry name denotes crus cerebri; no registry definition was supplied.", "Usage of cerebral peduncle, crus cerebri and basis pedunculi varies between anatomical sources.", "No sources were consulted; precise tract boundaries, dimensions and formal ontology identifiers require verification." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of cerebral crus this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Terminologia Anatomica", "value_or_pattern": "Crus cerebri", "note": "Latin anatomical name; plural crura cerebri." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of cerebral crus this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Terminologia Anatomica, maintained by the Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminology (FIPAT), standardizes anatomical nomenclature." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of cerebral crus this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Landmark for identifying midbrain anatomy on MRI and anatomical sections.", "Helps localize lesions affecting descending motor pathways.", "Relevant to planning procedures near the ventral midbrain." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of cerebral crus this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Damage to corticospinal fibres within a cerebral crus can cause weakness on the opposite side of the body.", "Damage involving corticobulbar fibres can impair voluntary control of facial and bulbar muscles.", "Compression of a cerebral crus against the tentorial edge during brain herniation can produce a Kernohan notch and misleading motor localization." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of cerebral crus this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Cerebral peduncle", "difference": "Often denotes a broader midbrain structure that includes the crus; some sources use the terms synonymously, so the source's anatomical convention matters." }, { "name": "Substantia nigra", "difference": "A neuronal nuclear complex immediately dorsal to the crus, whereas the crus consists predominantly of descending white-matter fibres." }, { "name": "Midbrain tegmentum", "difference": "Lies dorsal to the substantia nigra and contains nuclei and multiple pathways; the crus lies ventral to the substantia nigra." }, { "name": "Posterior limb of the internal capsule", "difference": "Carries descending motor fibres within the cerebral hemisphere, upstream of their passage through the midbrain crus." }, { "name": "Crus of the fornix", "difference": "A component of the hippocampal fibre system, anatomically distinct from the descending motor pathways of the cerebral crus." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of cerebral crus this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which anatomical terminology and atlas should govern the registry boundary when sources use cerebral peduncle or basis pedunculi differently?", "Does the registry intend a human reference concept or a comparative anatomical concept spanning specified species?", "How reliably can the principal descending fiber populations be localized within the crus at different rostrocaudal levels using available primary anatomical evidence?", "Which measurement protocols and reference populations support interpretation of crus asymmetry or volume change across development and aging?", "What primary evidence resolves local vascular supply and distinguishes direct crus injury from secondary degeneration in a particular observation?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 14, "questions": 22 } }