{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T10:47:53Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 19.0, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09539-edc3-7b42-8a93-aa8072333559\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Koolhoven F.K.58\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: PHY.OBJ\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 100", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 77.7, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09539-edca-76a2-b7f4-e6ae0f550653\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Koolhoven F.K.58\nRegistry id: vr.tr.koolhoven-f-k-58\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.OBJ\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry:" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:54:58+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:26+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q1369689", "registryId": "vr.tr.koolhoven-f-k-58", "name": "Koolhoven F.K.58", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.OBJ" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q1369689/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.koolhoven-f-k-58", "name": "Koolhoven F.K.58", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to identify the Koolhoven F.K.58 aircraft type, distinguish its configurations, and assess what evidence supports claims about its capabilities and service condition.", "definition": "The Koolhoven F.K.58 was a Dutch-designed, single-seat, single-engine, low-wing fighter aircraft developed by Koolhoven in the late 1930s for French military service.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the type-level identity and configuration distinctions of Koolhoven F.K.58 within registry entry vr.tr.koolhoven-f-k-58, PHY / PHY.OBJ, including associated variant designations; individual airframes supply evidence but retain their own identity and condition records.", "in_scope": [ "Recognition of the F.K.58 design and its distinction from superficially similar contemporary fighters.", "Prototype, production and proposed configurations, with explicit evidence of which were actually built.", "Relationships between variant designation, engine installation, airframe configuration and reported performance.", "Type-specific requirements for interpreting equipment completeness, serviceability and historical acceptance.", "Evidence linking the aircraft type to manufacturing, delivery and operational use." ], "out_of_scope": [ "Generic aerodynamic principles and the general category of fighter aircraft.", "Complete design and maintenance models of the engines, propellers and weapons fitted to the aircraft.", "Individual airframe ownership, location and maintenance histories except as evidence for type-level claims.", "Institutional histories of Koolhoven, purchasing authorities and operating units.", "Campaign histories, aerial combat tactics and weapon employment procedures.", "Scale models, fictional representations and replicas as instances of the original aircraft type." ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Require documentary identification connecting an aircraft to Koolhoven F.K.58; a radial-engine fighter silhouette alone is insufficient.", "Check the combination of a single-seat cockpit, single radial engine and monoplane layout against identified F.K.58 references. [Type overview](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koolhoven_F.K.58)", "Use retractable main undercarriage as a discriminator from the similar Fokker D.XXI, while corroborating identity with markings or construction records. [Historical comparison](https://earlyflightera.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/albumschatzki9p.pdf)", "Treat Hispano-Suiza and Gnome-Rhône installations as configuration evidence requiring a matching designation and date; do not classify an otherwise unidentified aircraft from engine family alone. [Configuration overview](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koolhoven_F.K.58)" ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Configuration identity", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Source-recorded designation; prototype, production, proposed or unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Prevents prototype specifications and unbuilt proposals from becoming universal F.K.58 properties." }, { "name": "Installed powerplant", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Engine manufacturer, family, exact suffix and supporting installation record", "why_it_matters": "Engine differences affect identification, performance interpretation and support requirements." }, { "name": "Reference geometry", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Span, length and height in m; wing area in m²; configuration and measurement source required", "why_it_matters": "Provides dimensional checks for identification without assuming all published figures describe the same configuration." }, { "name": "Mass and loading basis", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "kg, classified as empty, equipped, test-loaded or maximum permitted", "why_it_matters": "Performance comparisons are misleading when mass definitions or equipment loads differ." }, { "name": "Engine power rating", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "kW with original hp or metric horsepower notation, altitude and rating duration retained", "why_it_matters": "Prevents incompatible engine ratings and horsepower conventions from being merged." }, { "name": "Conditioned flight performance", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Speed in km/h, altitude in m, climb time in min and range in km, each with test conditions", "why_it_matters": "Separates measured capability from estimates, publicity and results belonging to another installation." }, { "name": "Equipment completeness", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Documented complete, documented incomplete, modified or unknown, by configuration and date", "why_it_matters": "A delivered airframe need not have possessed its intended operational equipment." }, { "name": "Acceptance and use evidence", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Dated manufacturer, purchasing authority, acceptance record and operating-unit record", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes an order from a completed aircraft and a delivered aircraft from one used operationally." }, { "name": "Serviceability evidence", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Documented serviceable, restricted, unserviceable, incomplete or unknown at a stated date", "why_it_matters": "Supports a dated assessment without assigning a single condition to the entire aircraft type." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify a document, photograph or airframe claim as an F.K.58 candidate and identify the evidence still needed.", "Resolve a reported variant against engine, serial and date evidence while retaining conflicting designations.", "Compare performance claims only after aligning configuration, loading and test conditions.", "Determine whether records establish ordering, construction, delivery, acceptance or actual service use.", "Identify missing manuals, inspections or configuration records before supporting a restoration or serviceability assessment." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Identify photographs or records as this late-1930s fighter built for French service.", "Describe its brief service in 1940 from historical sources, noting gaps." ], "must_not": [ "Invent combat records or attribute victories without evidence.", "Present a related design as this type.", "Misrepresent the nationality of the people who flew it." ], "requires_human": [ "Attributing artefacts or remains to this type." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Its story spans several nations and the people who flew it in a desperate campaign.", "Fabricated details distort a thinly documented history." ], "affected_parties": [ "Historians", "Descendants of pilots" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The museum or owner of any surviving example or remains; the state for items in public collections.", "master_systems": [] }, "visual_identification": [ "Single-seat, low-wing monoplane with a radial engine.", "Few were built, so period photographs are the main evidence.", "French or Dutch markings of 1939-1940." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Production delays and missing equipment limited its readiness.", "Combat at the time of the 1940 campaign was deadly for crews." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "This late 1930s fighter type is encountered in accounts of Dutch aircraft development and French military aviation before and during the early Second World War.", "Historical research uses production records, photographs and service documents to distinguish configurations and assess claims about performance and operational employment." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "The Harmonized System nomenclature issued by the World Customs Organization places complete aeroplanes under heading 8802, providing a modern customs classification rather than a historical airworthiness approval." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q1369689: Koolhoven F.K.58", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1369689", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Koolhoven F.K.58", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koolhoven_F.K.58", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "type-identity-and-variants", "name": "Type identity and variants", "description": "Establish what belongs to the registered F.K.58 type and how its internal configurations are distinguished.", "rationale": "The registry names a particular aircraft design, while references may use its name for the family, an engine variant or an individual prototype.", "layers": [ { "id": "recognition-and-boundary", "name": "Recognition and boundary", "description": "Connect physical recognition to documentary identity.", "findings": [ { "id": "corroborated-type-identification", "name": "Corroborated type identification", "description": "An identification should combine a traceable designation with visible configuration evidence, especially when distinguishing the F.K.58 from the Fokker D.XXI.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which marking, caption, drawing or manufacturing record explicitly identifies this aircraft as a Koolhoven F.K.58?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "corroborated-type-identification-q01" }, { "text": "Which visible features support that identification, and which exclude a Fokker D.XXI or another contemporary fighter?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "corroborated-type-identification-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "designation-and-build-status", "name": "Designation and build status", "description": "Separate named variants, actual installations and proposals within the single registry entry.", "findings": [ { "id": "variant-evidence", "name": "Variant evidence", "description": "Preserve source wording for F.K.58 and F.K.58A and map it to documented configurations rather than silently normalizing disputed labels.", "questions": [ { "text": "What designation does the contemporary source use, and which exact engine installation does it associate with that designation?", "kind": "definition", "id": "variant-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Does the evidence establish a completed aircraft, a modification, an order or only a proposed configuration?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "variant-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "airframe-and-retractable-undercarriage", "name": "Airframe and retractable undercarriage", "description": "Capture the structural and geometric evidence needed to recognize the F.K.58 and interpret its physical condition.", "rationale": "External resemblance to other fighters cannot establish structural equivalence or justify importing their inspection assumptions.", "layers": [ { "id": "structural-configuration", "name": "Structural configuration", "description": "Associate component construction and dimensions with a documented F.K.58 configuration.", "findings": [ { "id": "construction-and-geometry-record", "name": "Construction and geometry record", "description": "Record wing, fuselage and covering construction from drawings or technical descriptions, distinguishing original construction from later reconstruction.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which drawings or technical descriptions establish the materials and structural arrangement of the wing and fuselage?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "construction-and-geometry-record-q01" }, { "text": "What span, length, height and wing area are documented, and to which prototype or production configuration do they apply?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "construction-and-geometry-record-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "undercarriage-and-control-state", "name": "Undercarriage and control state", "description": "Represent the evidence needed to assess the retractable landing gear and flight controls.", "findings": [ { "id": "configuration-specific-mechanisms", "name": "Configuration-specific mechanisms", "description": "Require F.K.58-specific documentation for actuation, locking, indication and control arrangements; do not infer these mechanisms from contemporary aircraft.", "questions": [ { "text": "What source establishes the main-undercarriage actuation, locking and position-indication arrangements?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "configuration-specific-mechanisms-q01" }, { "text": "Which documented checks would be necessary before moving the landing gear or flight controls on an attributed airframe?", "kind": "action", "id": "configuration-specific-mechanisms-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "powerplant-and-performance", "name": "Powerplant and performance", "description": "Bind propulsion and flight-performance claims to the F.K.58 configuration that produced them.", "rationale": "Different engine installations make a single unqualified power, speed or climb figure an unreliable description of the registered type.", "layers": [ { "id": "engine-installation", "name": "Engine installation", "description": "Identify the installed engine and its airframe interfaces.", "findings": [ { "id": "installation-specific-identity", "name": "Installation-specific identity", "description": "Capture engine suffix, propeller and associated installation evidence without assuming interchangeability between Hispano-Suiza and Gnome-Rhône configurations.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which record establishes the exact engine suffix and propeller fitted to the configuration under discussion?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "installation-specific-identity-q01" }, { "text": "Which cowling, mounting or equipment differences are documented between those installations?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "installation-specific-identity-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "performance-claim-conditions", "name": "Performance claim conditions", "description": "Separate tested results, design estimates and operational observations.", "findings": [ { "id": "comparable-performance-evidence", "name": "Comparable performance evidence", "description": "A performance value is usable only with its configuration, loading, altitude and evidential status.", "questions": [ { "text": "At what mass, altitude, engine rating and equipment fit was the reported speed or climb result obtained?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "comparable-performance-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Was the value measured in a flight test, calculated, advertised or reported retrospectively?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "comparable-performance-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "equipment-and-serviceability", "name": "Equipment and serviceability", "description": "Distinguish intended fighter equipment from documented fit and dated readiness.", "rationale": "An F.K.58 specification, delivery record and serviceability report answer different questions about what an aircraft could actually do.", "layers": [ { "id": "intended-and-installed-equipment", "name": "Intended and installed equipment", "description": "Track configuration-level completeness of armament, instruments and communications.", "findings": [ { "id": "equipment-fit-evidence", "name": "Equipment fit evidence", "description": "Represent intended, installed, absent and unknown equipment separately, without treating a catalogue specification as proof of an individual fit.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which armament, sighting, radio and instrument equipment was specified for this F.K.58 configuration?", "kind": "definition", "id": "equipment-fit-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Which dated inspection, inventory or photograph establishes what was actually installed?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "equipment-fit-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "support-and-condition", "name": "Support and condition", "description": "Connect serviceability judgments to installation-specific support and inspection evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "documented-readiness-limits", "name": "Documented readiness limits", "description": "Record reported defects, missing supplies and restrictions at the date observed; distinguish these from general aging risks or assumptions about the engine family.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which F.K.58 maintenance or service records document a defect, equipment shortage or operating restriction?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "documented-readiness-limits-q01" }, { "text": "Which manuals, consumable specifications and inspection records are missing before a supported serviceability judgment can be made?", "kind": "action", "id": "documented-readiness-limits-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "production-acceptance-and-service", "name": "Production, acceptance and service", "description": "Trace the difference between procurement intentions and demonstrated aircraft use.", "rationale": "Small production totals, variant changes and interrupted deliveries require explicit counting rules and dated evidence.", "layers": [ { "id": "manufacturing-and-delivery", "name": "Manufacturing and delivery", "description": "Link production claims to identifiable aircraft and milestones.", "findings": [ { "id": "reconciled-production-account", "name": "Reconciled production account", "description": "Keep ordered, started, completed, delivered and accepted aircraft as separate quantities, with prototypes explicitly included or excluded.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which serial or construction-number records support the number of completed F.K.58 aircraft?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "reconciled-production-account-q01" }, { "text": "Does each published total count prototypes, incomplete airframes and subcontracted construction on the same basis?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "reconciled-production-account-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "acceptance-and-operational-attribution", "name": "Acceptance and operational attribution", "description": "Establish who accepted or used the aircraft and what the records actually demonstrate.", "findings": [ { "id": "dated-service-claims", "name": "Dated service claims", "description": "Attribute acceptance and operational claims to specific authorities, units and dates, distinguishing pilot affiliation from aircraft ownership.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which authority accepted the aircraft, under what documented requirements or restrictions?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "dated-service-claims-q01" }, { "text": "Which unit record establishes actual F.K.58 use, and does it demonstrate assignment, readiness or a flown sortie?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "dated-service-claims-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This description is based on recall, without consulted sources.", "Exact engine subtypes, performance figures, production totals and delivery totals require verification.", "Operational assignments and the extent of combat activity should be checked against service records." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Koolhoven F.K.58 this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "F.K.58: variant powered by a Hispano-Suiza radial engine", "F.K.58A: variant powered by a Gnome-Rhône radial engine" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of Koolhoven F.K.58 this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Manufacturer aircraft type designation", "value_or_pattern": "Koolhoven F.K.58", "note": "Identifies an aircraft design, not an individual airframe; F.K.58A denotes an engine variant." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Koolhoven F.K.58 this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Acquired for French military aviation before the German invasion of France in 1940.", "Used for air defence in France during 1940, including by Polish pilots serving alongside French forces." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Koolhoven F.K.58 this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Fighter aircraft", "difference": "The broader functional class; the F.K.58 is one specific manufacturer's aircraft design within it." }, { "name": "Individual Koolhoven F.K.58 airframe", "difference": "A particular manufactured aircraft has its own serial number and service history; this entry describes the type." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Koolhoven F.K.58 this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which contemporary documents conclusively map F.K.58 and F.K.58A designations to exact engine suffixes, given inconsistencies among later accounts?", "Which proposed alternative-engine configurations reached installation or flight, and which remained orders or design intentions?", "What configuration-specific dimensions, masses and measured performance can be recovered from original drawings and flight-test reports?", "Can construction, delivery and acceptance records reconcile production totals while separating prototypes and incomplete airframes?", "Which original maintenance manuals, acceptance requirements and service records survive, and what do they establish about equipment completeness, defects and actual operational use?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 15, "questions": 25 } }