{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T10:03:21Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 20.1, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09511-09bf-7623-8a8a-0e2a0a410bce\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Gossamer Condor\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: PHY.OBJ\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 85.1, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09511-09cf-7773-a8d3-2fbbaf590642\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Gossamer Condor\nRegistry id: vr.tr.gossamer-condor\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.OBJ\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:50:27+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:26+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q1417056", "registryId": "vr.tr.gossamer-condor", "name": "Gossamer Condor", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.OBJ" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q1417056/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.gossamer-condor", "name": "Gossamer Condor", "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify the Gossamer Condor, distinguish its documented configurations, assess evidence about its condition and performance, and determine appropriate research, handling or conservation actions.", "definition": "The Gossamer Condor is a human-powered experimental aircraft developed by Paul MacCready and his team that, piloted by Bryan Allen in 1977, became the first aircraft to complete the course required for the first Kremer human-powered flight prize.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the registered Gossamer Condor aircraft design and its configuration-specific characteristics, linking historical test configurations and the preserved artifact without treating them as interchangeable or creating separate registry entries.", "in_scope": [ "Identity and boundaries of the Gossamer Condor design, historical configurations and surviving artifact", "Human-powered propulsion and the relationship between pilot effort, aircraft mass and flight performance", "Lifting geometry, control arrangements and demonstrated maneuverability", "Lightweight construction, repairs and configuration changes", "Kremer Prize flight evidence and the distinction between historical flight capability and present artifact condition" ], "out_of_scope": [ "The Gossamer Albatross and its English Channel crossing", "Human-powered aircraft as a general class", "Biographies of Paul MacCready, Peter Lissaman and Bryan Allen", "The Kremer Prize as an institution and its complete competition history", "The documentary film The Flight of the Gossamer Condor", "Museum-wide collection management and general aviation regulation" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Check for documented identification with the aircraft flown by Bryan Allen on August 23, 1977, to win the Kremer Prize over a figure-eight course; resemblance alone is insufficient. [Smithsonian exhibition record](https://www.si.edu/exhibitions/gossamer-condor%3Aevent-exhib-5075)", "Distinguish it from the Gossamer Albatross, which made the 1979 English Channel crossing. [Smithsonian Albatross record](https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/maccready-gossamer-albatross/nasm_A19810428000)", "Check documented construction against thin aluminum tubing, Mylar covering and stainless-steel wire bracing, while allowing explicitly recorded modifications. [AeroVironment history](https://www.avinc.com/images/uploads/news/Gossamer_Condor_Use_Case.pdf)", "Require provenance to distinguish an original Condor component or configuration from a replica, scale model or documentary depiction." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Configuration reference", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Dated drawing, photograph, test record or artifact record", "why_it_matters": "Prevents dimensions, controls and performance from different development stages being combined." }, { "name": "Representation status", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Design description | historical configuration | preserved artifact | replica | scale model | depiction | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Establishes what the evidence actually describes." }, { "name": "Wing geometry", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Span in m; area in m²; configuration and measurement method required", "why_it_matters": "Supports identification and assessment of the lifting area available at human power levels." }, { "name": "Aircraft mass basis", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "kg; distinguish empty aircraft, equipped aircraft and aircraft with pilot", "why_it_matters": "A mass without its loading basis cannot support meaningful performance comparisons." }, { "name": "Pilot mechanical output", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "W over a stated duration; measured or estimated; measurement location specified", "why_it_matters": "Connects the human power budget to propulsion demand without assuming constant output." }, { "name": "Propulsion transmission", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Configuration-specific pedal, transmission and propeller arrangement; unresolved where undocumented", "why_it_matters": "Identifies how pilot effort becomes thrust and which components require inspection." }, { "name": "Control arrangement", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Pilot input linked to actuated surface or deformation and observed aircraft response", "why_it_matters": "Makes maneuverability assessable without assuming conventional airplane controls." }, { "name": "Flight conditions", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Airspeed and wind in m/s; height above ground in m; duration in s", "why_it_matters": "Separates demonstrated performance under recorded conditions from an inferred operating envelope." }, { "name": "Structural and covering condition", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Component-level observations of tubing, bracing, joints and film; inspected | uninspected | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Supports handling and conservation decisions for a lightly built airframe." }, { "name": "Permitted intervention", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Display | inspect | handle | conserve | test, each with authorizing evidence or unknown", "why_it_matters": "Historical flight success does not establish present permission or fitness to operate." } ], "affordances": [ "Match a candidate aircraft, component or image to a documented Gossamer Condor configuration.", "Compare development configurations to identify changes in mass, geometry, controls and repair strategy.", "Assess whether a performance claim specifies pilot effort, loading, conditions and supporting observations.", "Trace the prize-winning flight claim to records of the course, pilot, date and adjudication.", "Prepare an evidence-based inspection or conservation request for identified components.", "Flag proposed handling or operation when present condition or authorization is unresolved." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Identify the original aircraft, replicas and images from documented features.", "Describe its record flight and design approach from historical sources.", "Record the condition of the preserved aircraft for its custodians." ], "must_not": [ "Present a replica or a later related aircraft as the original.", "Handle or move the fragile original without the custodian's authority.", "Misattribute the achievement among the people who designed and flew it.", "Encourage untrained people to fly copies without proper safety measures." ], "requires_human": [ "Any physical handling, loan or conservation of the original aircraft." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "A celebrated achievement should credit the whole team accurately.", "Fragile historic objects belong to public memory and can be lost to careless handling." ], "affected_parties": [ "Museum custodians", "The design team and pilot", "Visitors" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The museum that holds the original; the public as heritage.", "master_systems": [] }, "visual_identification": [ "Very large, slender wing with a thin transparent covering and wire bracing.", "A forward canard surface ahead of a small pilot gondola.", "A single large pusher propeller driven by pedals." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "The ultralight structure is easily damaged by wind, handling or impact.", "Human-powered flight close to the ground leaves little margin in gusts.", "Ageing covering materials degrade with light and time." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "The aircraft was developed to demonstrate controlled human-powered flight and complete the course required for a human-powered aviation prize.", "It is encountered in aviation history, engineering education and museum conservation as evidence of lightweight construction and low-speed flight design." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "The Code of Ethics for Museums, issued by the International Council of Museums, provides professional standards for museum stewardship and conservation of the aircraft." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q1417056: Gossamer Condor", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1417056", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: MacCready Gossamer Condor", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacCready_Gossamer_Condor", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-configuration", "name": "Identity and configuration", "description": "Establish which Gossamer Condor configuration or representation a claim concerns.", "rationale": "An experimental aircraft's name can conceal changing hardware and later preservation work.", "layers": [ { "id": "registered-design-boundary", "name": "Registered design boundary", "description": "Keep the Condor distinct from related aircraft and representations.", "findings": [ { "id": "condor-identification", "name": "Condor identification", "description": "Recognition requires an explicit link to the Condor design rather than a generic human-powered-aircraft description.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which document or identifying feature establishes that this subject is the Gossamer Condor?", "kind": "definition", "id": "condor-identification-q01" }, { "text": "Does the record describe the Condor, the Albatross, a replica or a depiction?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "condor-identification-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "dated-hardware-configurations", "name": "Dated hardware configurations", "description": "Associate observations with a traceable stage of development or preservation.", "findings": [ { "id": "configuration-consistency", "name": "Configuration consistency", "description": "Dimensions, photographs and flight results should be combined only when their configuration relationship is established.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which dated drawing, photograph or test log identifies the hardware described?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "configuration-consistency-q01" }, { "text": "Which components changed between this configuration and the prize-flight configuration?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "configuration-consistency-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "human-power-and-flight-balance", "name": "Human power and flight balance", "description": "Relate pilot effort, propulsion, lifting geometry and loading.", "rationale": "The Condor must sustain flight within a human power budget, making mass and efficiency central to its interpretation.", "layers": [ { "id": "pilot-to-propeller", "name": "Pilot to propeller", "description": "Describe the configuration-specific path from physical effort to thrust.", "findings": [ { "id": "power-budget-evidence", "name": "Power budget evidence", "description": "Pilot output, transmission losses and propeller demand require separate evidence rather than a single unexplained power figure.", "questions": [ { "text": "How did the documented pedal and transmission arrangement drive the propeller in this configuration?", "kind": "definition", "id": "power-budget-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "What pilot power and duration were measured or estimated, and at which point in the drive system?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "power-budget-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "lift-mass-and-speed", "name": "Lift, mass and speed", "description": "Capture the quantities needed to interpret flight at limited available power.", "findings": [ { "id": "configuration-specific-performance", "name": "Configuration-specific performance", "description": "Wing geometry, loaded mass and flight speed must share a stated configuration and observation basis.", "questions": [ { "text": "What were the wing span, wing area and aircraft-plus-pilot mass for the flight being assessed?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "configuration-specific-performance-q01" }, { "text": "Is the reported speed airspeed or groundspeed, and what wind and flight height accompanied it?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "configuration-specific-performance-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "control-and-course-performance", "name": "Control and course performance", "description": "Connect control mechanisms to evidence of maneuvering and prize-course completion.", "rationale": "Sustaining lift alone does not explain the Condor's achievement; controlled course flight must be demonstrated.", "layers": [ { "id": "control-response", "name": "Control response", "description": "Identify how pilot inputs affected attitude and turning.", "findings": [ { "id": "documented-control-mechanisms", "name": "Documented control mechanisms", "description": "Record actual surfaces, flexible geometry and linkages before assigning conventional pitch, roll or yaw labels.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which surfaces or structural deformations did each pilot control actuate in the prize-flight configuration?", "kind": "definition", "id": "documented-control-mechanisms-q01" }, { "text": "Which tests establish the resulting turn response and any coupling between pitch, roll and yaw?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "documented-control-mechanisms-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "kremer-demonstration", "name": "Kremer demonstration", "description": "Separate recorded achievement from inferred general capability.", "findings": [ { "id": "prize-flight-evidence", "name": "Prize-flight evidence", "description": "The Smithsonian records Bryan Allen completing the required figure-eight flight on August 23, 1977. [Smithsonian exhibition record](https://www.si.edu/exhibitions/gossamer-condor%3Aevent-exhib-5075)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which contemporary rules and adjudication records establish the required course, clearance and completion conditions?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "prize-flight-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Which observed results support course completion, and which broader performance claims remain untested?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "prize-flight-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "lightweight-structure-and-iteration", "name": "Lightweight structure and iteration", "description": "Describe the airframe's materials, load-bearing relationships and repair-driven development.", "rationale": "Construction and repair choices affect both flight behavior and the identity of successive configurations.", "layers": [ { "id": "airframe-and-covering", "name": "Airframe and covering", "description": "Distinguish structural members, bracing and aerodynamic covering.", "findings": [ { "id": "material-and-load-path-map", "name": "Material and load-path map", "description": "AeroVironment describes aluminum tubes, Mylar covering and wire bracing; component-specific construction still requires drawings or inspection. [AeroVironment history](https://www.avinc.com/images/uploads/news/Gossamer_Condor_Use_Case.pdf)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which members, joints and bracing wires carry loads in the documented configuration?", "kind": "definition", "id": "material-and-load-path-map-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence records film damage, tube deformation or bracing changes and their effects on geometry?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "material-and-load-path-map-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "repair-and-design-change", "name": "Repair and design change", "description": "Track repairs as possible changes to aerodynamic and structural behavior.", "findings": [ { "id": "iteration-history", "name": "Iteration history", "description": "AeroVironment identifies rapid modification and repair as central to Condor development. [AeroVironment history](https://www.avinc.com/images/uploads/news/Gossamer_Condor_Use_Case.pdf)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which repair or modification followed each recorded damage event or control problem?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "iteration-history-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence would be needed to show that a repaired configuration retained its intended mass, alignment and control response?", "kind": "action", "id": "iteration-history-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "preserved-artifact-and-intervention", "name": "Preserved artifact and intervention", "description": "Connect the historical aircraft to custody, material authenticity and present intervention decisions.", "rationale": "A preserved experimental aircraft requires judgments different from those made during flight development.", "layers": [ { "id": "artifact-continuity", "name": "Artifact continuity", "description": "Trace retained and replaced material into the museum object.", "findings": [ { "id": "historical-to-museum-provenance", "name": "Historical-to-museum provenance", "description": "AeroVironment reports donation to the Smithsonian in January 1978; the surviving component history requires collection documentation. [AeroVironment history](https://www.avinc.com/images/uploads/news/Gossamer_Condor_Use_Case.pdf)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which accession and conservation records connect the preserved aircraft to the prize-flight hardware?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "historical-to-museum-provenance-q01" }, { "text": "Which components are original, development replacements, conservation replacements or display supports?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "historical-to-museum-provenance-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "condition-and-permitted-actions", "name": "Condition and permitted actions", "description": "Determine what current evidence permits an agent to propose.", "findings": [ { "id": "intervention-basis", "name": "Intervention basis", "description": "Present handling, conservation or testing decisions require current condition evidence and custodian authorization.", "questions": [ { "text": "What dated inspection documents the condition of the covering, joints, bracing and support points?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "intervention-basis-q01" }, { "text": "Which handling or conservation actions has the custodian authorized, and what further assessment is required before any mechanical test?", "kind": "action", "id": "intervention-basis-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This entry concerns a named experimental aircraft design, not a general machine class or commercial product line.", "Dimensions and mass are approximate recalled values; a researcher should verify the configuration and whether quoted mass excludes the pilot.", "Kremer competition requirements are not aircraft certification standards; no particular certification status is asserted here." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Gossamer Condor this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The Royal Aeronautical Society administered the Kremer prize competition, whose prescribed flight course and clearance requirements governed the prize-winning demonstration." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of Gossamer Condor this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Demonstrating sustained, controlled flight powered by a single person's pedalling.", "Investigating lightweight structures, low-speed aerodynamics and efficient propulsion.", "Serving as a museum artifact documenting the development of human-powered aviation." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Gossamer Condor this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Wingspan", "typical_range": "Approximately 29", "unit": "m" }, { "quantity": "Aircraft mass without pilot", "typical_range": "Approximately 32", "unit": "kg" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of Gossamer Condor this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Its exceptionally lightweight structure and thin covering are vulnerable to handling damage.", "Wind and gusts can compromise control at its low operating airspeed.", "Pilot fatigue or interrupted pedalling reduces available propulsive power.", "Low-altitude operation leaves little height for recovery from loss of control." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Gossamer Condor this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Human-powered aircraft", "difference": "This is the broader aircraft category; Gossamer Condor names a particular experimental design." }, { "name": "Gossamer Albatross", "difference": "This later aircraft from MacCready's team crossed the English Channel in 1979; Gossamer Condor achieved the earlier Kremer course demonstration." }, { "name": "Glider", "difference": "A glider normally flies without propulsive power; Gossamer Condor used a pedal-driven propeller." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Gossamer Condor this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which authoritative drawings and test logs establish the exact prize-flight geometry, mass, transmission and control arrangement?", "How do documented early configurations differ from the prize-winning configuration and the preserved artifact?", "What do contemporary Kremer rules and adjudication records specify beyond the summarized figure-eight requirement?", "Which performance figures were directly measured, which were estimated, and under what loading and weather conditions?", "What are the artifact's current component authenticity, condition, handling restrictions and intervention permissions?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 16, "questions": 26 } }