{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T11:48:29Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 17.4, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09571-6b82-7ec0-b81c-2f75a5cf5bdb\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: orthopraxy\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 044: 1001 regi", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 75.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09571-6b82-73e3-8aa3-58cf158213ec\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: orthopraxy\nRegistry id: vr.tr.orthopraxy\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nCo" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:45:36+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "owners" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:26+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q1427367", "registryId": "vr.tr.orthopraxy", "name": "orthopraxy", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q1427367/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.orthopraxy", "name": "orthopraxy", "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify claims of right practice, establish whose standards apply, and assess conduct or proposed action without treating contested religious judgments as universal facts.", "definition": "Orthopraxy is conformity to practices regarded as correct within a religious or ethical tradition, often contrasted with orthodoxy to emphasize right conduct or ritual performance rather than correct belief.", "scope_statement": "For vr.tr.orthopraxy, this model owns the meanings, standards, enactments and attributed judgments through which practice is considered religiously right, including disputes over its relationship to belief; it proposes research structure rather than settled findings about particular traditions.", "in_scope": [ "Definitions of orthopraxy and the scholars or communities using them", "Standards of correct ritual performance and ethical conduct", "Authorities, participants and circumstances determining which standards apply", "Evidence connecting prescribed practice with actual enactment", "Disputes, exceptions and recognized responses to incorrect practice" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Doctrinal truth and orthodoxy except where they condition judgments of practice", "Complete descriptions of individual rituals and their material equipment", "General moral philosophy and independent judgments of ethical rightness", "Religious institutions and membership systems beyond their role in evaluating practice", "Ordinary habits, technical competence and procedural compliance without an evidenced orthopraxy interpretation" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "A candidate instance must connect conduct to an attributed standard of right practice; repetition or popularity alone does not establish orthopraxy.", "Separate judgments about what someone does from judgments about what someone believes, while recording any explicit dependence between them.", "A ritual occurrence becomes relevant through criteria for correct performance; merely identifying it as a ritual is insufficient.", "Separate a claim that an act conforms to religious requirements from a claim that its consequences are beneficial.", "Distinguish an individual performance judged correct from a broader position that gives right action particular religious importance." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Meaning of orthopraxy", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Correctness of practice; position on the importance of action relative to faith; comparative scholarly classification; other attributed usage", "why_it_matters": "Prevents different senses of the concept from being assessed as though they describe the same phenomenon." }, { "name": "Practice domain", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Ritual or liturgical; ethical or interpersonal; combined; locally specified", "why_it_matters": "Determines which forms of conduct and criteria require investigation." }, { "name": "Normative standpoint", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Links to the community, interpreter, practitioner or scholar making the judgment", "why_it_matters": "Makes clear whose account of right practice is being recorded." }, { "name": "Applicable prescription", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Links to evidenced texts, oral instruction, exemplars or recognized customary rules", "why_it_matters": "Provides the grounds against which conduct can be assessed." }, { "name": "Applicability conditions", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Locally specified role, initiation, occasion, place, capacity and exemption conditions", "why_it_matters": "Prevents applying obligations to people or situations they do not govern." }, { "name": "Role of belief and intention", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Required; relevant but insufficient; explicitly irrelevant to this judgment; disputed; unknown", "why_it_matters": "Prevents outward performance from being treated as complete evidence when additional conditions matter." }, { "name": "Attributed assessment", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Accepted; deficient; invalid; excused; disputed; unassessed, with local terminology retained", "why_it_matters": "Separates different judgments and preserves disagreement between assessors." }, { "name": "Observed observance", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Count or proportion of applicable observed occasions meeting a specified criterion, with denominator and observation period", "why_it_matters": "Supports bounded empirical assessment without inventing a universal orthopraxy score." } ], "affordances": [ "Identify the sense of orthopraxy used in a source and attribute it to its author or community.", "Compare rival judgments of the same performance under their respective standards.", "Assess proposed conduct against documented requirements and applicable exceptions.", "Identify missing evidence before classifying a performance as correct or deficient.", "Present documented correction or consultation options appropriate to the relevant tradition." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Explain the idea of orthopraxy and how it is used to describe different traditions.", "Describe a tradition's practices as its own members and scholars present them." ], "must_not": [ "Rank traditions as better or worse according to whether they stress practice or belief.", "Judge whether a particular person practises their religion correctly.", "Infer a person's religion or devotion from their observed practices and record it without consent.", "Mock rituals or prescribe religious practice to anyone." ], "requires_human": [ "Giving guidance on religious practice, which belongs to a tradition's own authorities." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Religious practice is part of people's identity and deserves respect.", "Labels of correct and incorrect practice can be used to exclude or persecute." ], "affected_parties": [ "Members of religious communities", "Religious minorities" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody owns the concept; each tradition's own authorities define its practice.", "master_systems": [] }, "what_it_is_for": [ "Orthopraxy is used in religious studies and ethical discussion to describe emphasis on conduct regarded as correct within a tradition.", "Communities may invoke it when evaluating ritual observance, everyday duties or participation in communal life.", "Its meaning depends on which community, authority and historical setting define the expected practice." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Treating one community's practices as universally correct can misrepresent other traditions and internal disagreements.", "Rigid enforcement of claimed correct conduct can support coercion, exclusion or discrimination.", "Inferring belief or moral worth from outward observance can produce inaccurate judgments about individuals.", "Agents may misattribute religious authority when they treat an unofficial interpretation as binding." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "interfaces": "Orthopraxy has no universal standard or regulatory classification because the criteria for correct conduct depend on the particular tradition and authority.", "recognition": "Orthopraxy is an interpretive concept whose presence cannot be established visually without knowing the relevant norms and context." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q1427367: orthopraxy", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1427367", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Orthopraxy", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthopraxy", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "meanings-of-right-practice", "name": "Meanings of right practice", "description": "Establish the concept being invoked and its relationship to belief.", "rationale": "Correct performance, the religious importance of action and classifications of traditions require different evidence.", "layers": [ { "id": "attributed-definitions", "name": "Attributed definitions", "description": "Record definitions alongside their holders and intended applications.", "findings": [ { "id": "correctness-or-priority", "name": "Correctness or priority", "description": "Distinguish practice judged correct from a theological position giving action importance comparable to faith; Collins records both senses. [Collins Dictionary](https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/orthopraxy)", "questions": [ { "text": "Does this source mean correct conduct, a position on the importance of conduct, or a classification of a community?", "kind": "definition", "id": "correctness-or-priority-q01" }, { "text": "Which author or community uses this meaning, and what passage establishes it?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "correctness-or-priority-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "practice-belief-boundary", "name": "Practice and belief boundary", "description": "Investigate how the selected account connects action, doctrine and inward commitment.", "findings": [ { "id": "dependence-on-belief", "name": "Dependence on belief", "description": "Record whether correct belief or intention is a condition of right practice rather than assuming action and belief are mutually exclusive.", "questions": [ { "text": "Can a performance count as right practice under this account when the performer does not affirm the associated doctrine?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "dependence-on-belief-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence establishes whether intention, sincerity or belief affects the assessment?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "dependence-on-belief-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "grounds-of-correctness", "name": "Grounds of correctness", "description": "Identify the prescriptions and authorities invoked in judging conduct.", "rationale": "An agent cannot assess orthopraxy without knowing how right practice is established and whose interpretation it is applying.", "layers": [ { "id": "prescriptive-basis", "name": "Prescriptive basis", "description": "Connect expectations about practice to accessible evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "rule-and-interpretation", "name": "Rule and interpretation", "description": "Separate the wording or demonstration of a prescription from interpretations that turn it into performance criteria.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which text, oral teaching, exemplar or customary practice supports the requirement?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "rule-and-interpretation-q01" }, { "text": "How does the cited prescription establish what is required, permitted or prohibited in this case?", "kind": "definition", "id": "rule-and-interpretation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "interpretive-authority", "name": "Interpretive authority", "description": "Locate judgments within relationships of recognition and disagreement.", "findings": [ { "id": "recognized-and-rival-assessors", "name": "Recognized and rival assessors", "description": "Record who claims authority to judge practice, who recognizes that authority and which interpretations compete.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who recognizes this assessor's authority over the practice and participants concerned?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "recognized-and-rival-assessors-q01" }, { "text": "Which rival interpretation would change the judgment of the same conduct?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "recognized-and-rival-assessors-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "requirements-of-enactment", "name": "Requirements of enactment", "description": "Specify what right practice asks someone to do and when those expectations apply.", "rationale": "Orthopraxy needs actionable criteria without reducing all religious conduct to a uniform ritual checklist.", "layers": [ { "id": "performance-criteria", "name": "Performance criteria", "description": "Identify the components of conduct relevant to correctness.", "findings": [ { "id": "ritual-and-ethical-requirements", "name": "Ritual and ethical requirements", "description": "Investigate requirements concerning sequence, words, timing, materials, restraint, treatment of others or outcomes, as specified by the relevant account.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which observable actions or omissions distinguish acceptable practice from a deficient performance here?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "ritual-and-ethical-requirements-q01" }, { "text": "Does correctness depend on prescribed form, ethical conduct, intended consequences or a stated combination?", "kind": "definition", "id": "ritual-and-ethical-requirements-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "obligation-and-exemption", "name": "Obligation and exemption", "description": "Determine the circumstances under which a prescription governs a participant.", "findings": [ { "id": "situated-applicability", "name": "Situated applicability", "description": "Record role-specific obligations and evidenced exemptions before interpreting an omission as nonobservance.", "questions": [ { "text": "For which participants, occasions and circumstances is this practice required or permitted?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "situated-applicability-q01" }, { "text": "What documented exemption, substitution or dispensation applies when the expected performance is impracticable?", "kind": "action", "id": "situated-applicability-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-assessment", "name": "Evidence and assessment", "description": "Connect accounts of actual conduct to explicit and limited judgments.", "rationale": "Prescription, self-report, observation and an assessor's verdict establish different things.", "layers": [ { "id": "enactment-evidence", "name": "Enactment evidence", "description": "Establish what is known about conduct rather than inferring it from teaching or affiliation.", "findings": [ { "id": "observed-versus-professed-observance", "name": "Observed versus professed observance", "description": "Separate reported commitment from witnessed performance and delimit the occasions actually assessed.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the evidence a prescription, participant report, observation or judgment by an assessor?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "observed-versus-professed-observance-q01" }, { "text": "Which applicable occasions were observed, and which criteria could actually be evaluated?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "observed-versus-professed-observance-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "bounded-verdicts", "name": "Bounded verdicts", "description": "Express the assessment at the level supported by the evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "correctness-without-overreach", "name": "Correctness without overreach", "description": "Keep performance judgments separate from unsupported conclusions about sincerity, overall religious identity or every member of a tradition.", "questions": [ { "text": "Under whose criteria is this performance accepted, deficient, invalid or unresolved?", "kind": "definition", "id": "correctness-without-overreach-q01" }, { "text": "What additional evidence would be needed to extend this judgment from one act to a pattern of observance?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "correctness-without-overreach-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "variation-and-response", "name": "Variation and response", "description": "Represent contested practice, changing expectations and available responses to deficiency.", "rationale": "Useful guidance must distinguish permitted variation from violations and avoid inventing remedies.", "layers": [ { "id": "accepted-and-contested-variation", "name": "Accepted and contested variation", "description": "Locate variations in practice within their communities and historical settings.", "findings": [ { "id": "variant-or-deviation", "name": "Variant or deviation", "description": "Determine whether a different performance is recognized as an alternative, criticized as incorrect or left disputed.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who accepts this variation, who rejects it, and on what grounds?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "variant-or-deviation-q01" }, { "text": "Would the assessment change in another locality, period or interpretive community?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "variant-or-deviation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "correction-and-consequences", "name": "Correction and consequences", "description": "Identify attributed effects of incorrect practice and supported next steps.", "findings": [ { "id": "recognized-remedy", "name": "Recognized remedy", "description": "Investigate whether repetition, restitution, instruction, consultation or no further action is prescribed, distinguishing claimed consequences from observed ones.", "questions": [ { "text": "What consequences are claimed for this deficiency, and which consequences are independently observed?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "recognized-remedy-q01" }, { "text": "What response is documented, who may authorize it, and what would establish that the deficiency has been addressed?", "kind": "action", "id": "recognized-remedy-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "No sense is recorded; this account assumes the religious-studies and theological meaning.", "Ritual and ethical orthopraxy are useful distinctions, not a universally standardized taxonomy.", "A researcher should identify whose standard defines correct practice and whether the term is a community's self-description or an external analytical category." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of orthopraxy this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Ritual orthopraxy", "Ethical orthopraxy" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of orthopraxy this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Scholars of religion use the concept to examine how prescribed practices establish and maintain religious belonging.", "Religious communities evaluate ritual performance and everyday conduct against their own authoritative traditions.", "Some Christian theological discussions use orthopraxy to emphasize enacted faith, including commitments to justice." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of orthopraxy this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating orthopraxy and orthodoxy as mutually exclusive obscures traditions in which practice and belief are interdependent.", "Calling an entire religion orthopraxic can conceal differences among communities, historical periods and individual practitioners.", "Equating correct practice with frequent observance overlooks intention, context and competing interpretations of correctness.", "Presenting an authority's prescribed practices as descriptions of actual behaviour confuses normative expectations with lived religion." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of orthopraxy this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Comparative accounts often emphasize orthopraxy in Jewish, Islamic and Hindu traditions, but the relevant practices and authorities differ substantially within and across these traditions.", "In some Latin American liberation theology, orthopraxy emphasizes socially transformative Christian action rather than primarily ritual correctness." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of orthopraxy this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Orthodoxy", "difference": "Orthodoxy concerns correct belief or teaching; orthopraxy concerns correct practice, although communities often require both." }, { "name": "Praxis", "difference": "Praxis denotes practice or action, often informed by reflection; orthopraxy additionally judges that practice against a norm of correctness." }, { "name": "Ritual", "difference": "A ritual is a patterned practice; orthopraxy concerns whether practices meet authoritative expectations and can also encompass nonritual conduct." }, { "name": "Orthop thopathy", "difference": "Orthopathy concerns right feeling or affective disposition; orthopraxy concerns right action." }, { "name": "Observance", "difference": "Observance denotes following religious requirements or customs; orthopraxy foregrounds their correctness and sometimes their priority relative to belief." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of orthopraxy this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which scholarly schools and practitioner communities distinguish orthopraxy as correctness of conduct from orthopraxy as an emphasis on action, and where do their definitions conflict?", "How adequately does the orthodoxy-orthopraxy distinction represent the traditions to which scholars apply it, especially when participants use different concepts?", "Which accounts include ethical or transformative action beyond ritual observance, and how do they adjudicate conflicts between correct form and harmful consequences?", "Which research operationalisations distinguish observance, intention and institutional recognition without imposing a universal scale of religious correctness?", "Does the registry intend to include established secular uses of orthopraxy, and what evidence would justify their inclusion within this entry?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 16, "questions": 26 } }