{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T09:55:34Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 21.1, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0950a-3bf4-7c92-bc0f-ecfe144076a0\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: fuseki\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: XCT.QLT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 register", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 63.6, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0950a-3be8-7ac0-bb8a-4ca95bc373da\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: fuseki\nRegistry id: vr.tr.fuseki\nPlane / domain: XCT / XCT.QLT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContext fo" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:38:45+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:26+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q1471749", "registryId": "vr.tr.fuseki", "name": "fuseki", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "XCT.QLT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q1471749/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.fuseki", "name": "fuseki", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise, assess and develop a Go whole-board opening by relating early stone placement to strategic options, local obligations and the conditions of the game.", "definition": "Fuseki is the opening phase of a game of Go, and the whole-board deployment of stones during that phase, in which players establish positions balancing territory, influence, and prospects for subsequent fighting.", "scope_statement": "This draft interprets vr.tr.fuseki as the Go concept: the whole-board opening, including its developing positions, move sequences and strategic organisation; the registry's intended meaning remains to be confirmed. The interpretation follows [Omoyo's fuseki glossary](https://omoyo.app/glossary/fuseki/).", "in_scope": [ "Identification of an opening position or sequence as an instance of fuseki.", "Relationships among early corner, side and centre developments.", "Recognition of named opening patterns and materially different variants.", "Whole-board consequences of local sequences and playing elsewhere.", "Contextual comparison of opening continuations and the evidence supporting those comparisons." ], "out_of_scope": [ "The complete rules, scoring procedure and move-legality model of Go.", "Standalone joseki dictionaries and exhaustive local tactical analysis.", "Full middlegame fighting and endgame calculation.", "Player identity, ranking and tournament administration.", "Apache Jena Fuseki software and its operation as an RDF server." ], "distinguishing_features": [ "An analysis must relate opening choices to the board as a whole; an isolated corner sequence is insufficient to describe the fuseki.", "An instance must identify an early-game position or sequence, while an unrestricted whole-game strategy can continue beyond the opening.", "A named formation requires a supported pattern match; an opening can still be modelled when it has no established name.", "A proposed continuation must account for remote stones and alternative areas of play, rather than relying solely on a locally satisfactory result.", "The subject concerns stones and strategic development in Go, rather than a software service sharing the name." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Referent form", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "opening phase | concrete position | move sequence | named pattern | strategic prescription", "why_it_matters": "Separates what is being recognised from a general claim about how openings should be played." }, { "name": "Game conditions", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Linked board dimensions, ruleset, komi in points, handicap setup and player to move", "why_it_matters": "Opening comparisons require the conditions under which the position is played." }, { "name": "Opening position and history", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Board coordinates, stone colours, initial setup and ordered moves linked to a game record", "why_it_matters": "Makes a claimed instance reproducible and permits move-order comparisons." }, { "name": "Opening progress", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "opening development | transition disputed | middlegame underway; with justification", "why_it_matters": "Avoids imposing an unsupported fixed move number for the end of fuseki." }, { "name": "Pattern correspondence", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "exact under stated symmetry | attributed variant | partial resemblance | unnamed | uncertain", "why_it_matters": "Prevents a familiar-looking arrangement from being assigned an unjustified name." }, { "name": "Strategic role of a placement", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "territory-oriented | influence-oriented | enclosure | approach | extension | invasion | reduction | mixed; with position-specific explanation", "why_it_matters": "Records what a move is intended to achieve without treating intent as a guaranteed result." }, { "name": "Local response obligation", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "response assessed as urgent | playing elsewhere assessed as viable | unresolved; with supporting variations", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether whole-board development can continue without accepting an excessive local cost." }, { "name": "Continuation assessment", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Estimated score in points or win probability in percent, with perspective, evaluator, settings and uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Allows numerical comparisons while keeping their assumptions and provenance visible." } ], "affordances": [ "Reconstruct an opening instance from a game record and identify missing context.", "Compare a position with documented opening patterns under explicitly allowed board symmetries.", "Explain how a corner choice supports or conflicts with stones elsewhere.", "Propose candidate opening moves and examine plausible opponent replies.", "Assess whether to answer locally or play elsewhere using concrete continuation branches.", "Revise an opening recommendation when game conditions, analytical evidence or the position change." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Explain fuseki principles and well-known openings to learners.", "Record and analyse opening moves of games with the players' consent." ], "must_not": [ "Relay opening advice to a player during a game where outside help is forbidden.", "Present a single engine line as the only correct opening.", "Misattribute an opening or game record to a player who did not play it." ], "requires_human": [ "Ruling on suspected cheating in a competition." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Fair play in Go depends on players choosing their own moves.", "Go openings carry a long cultural tradition in East Asia that deserves accurate credit." ], "affected_parties": [ "Players", "Organizers and referees", "Go teachers" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody owns the concept; each player answers for their own opening.", "master_systems": [] }, "visual_identification": [ "The first stones of a game spread across the board, often on the corners and sides.", "Few or no stones yet captured and few close fights." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "Fuseki is studied and played during the opening phase of Go to coordinate early positions across the board.", "Players and game analysis agents use it to compare territorial prospects, influence and the relationship between local moves and overall strategy." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "The Japanese Rules of Go, issued jointly by the Nihon Ki-in and Kansai Ki-in, govern legal play and scoring in games conducted under those rules, including their openings." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Following memorized opening sequences without considering the actual board can produce weak groups or inefficient positions.", "Applying analysis under the wrong rules or handicap assumptions can lead to misleading evaluations.", "Using automated opening advice during a competition that prohibits assistance can violate fair play requirements." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q1471749: fuseki", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1471749", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Fuseki", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuseki", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "fuseki-identity-and-boundaries", "name": "Fuseki identity and boundaries", "description": "Establishes which sense of fuseki is being modelled and what makes the selected material an opening instance.", "rationale": "A phase, a formation and a prescription need different evidence even when all are called fuseki.", "layers": [ { "id": "term-and-referent", "name": "Term and referent", "description": "Connects the registry concept to its intended Go usage.", "findings": [ { "id": "intended-fuseki-sense", "name": "Intended fuseki sense", "description": "Record whether the referent is a whole-board opening phase, position, sequence or named formation, preserving the terminology of the consulted authority.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence identifies this registry entry with Go fuseki?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "intended-fuseki-sense-q01" }, { "text": "Does the consulted authority use fuseki for a phase, a formation, a sequence or a broader strategic practice?", "kind": "definition", "id": "intended-fuseki-sense-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "opening-transition", "name": "Opening transition", "description": "Locates the instance within the development of the game.", "findings": [ { "id": "opening-boundary-judgment", "name": "Opening boundary judgment", "description": "Record why opening development remains the relevant frame or why sustained fighting has shifted the analysis toward the middlegame.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which features of the position justify treating it as opening development?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "opening-boundary-judgment-q01" }, { "text": "What position change would cause the agent to hand the analysis to a middlegame model?", "kind": "action", "id": "opening-boundary-judgment-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "opening-instance-and-pattern", "name": "Opening instance and pattern", "description": "Makes the board state reproducible and separates pattern identity from superficial resemblance.", "rationale": "Opening advice cannot be transferred reliably when setup, move order or pattern-defining stones are missing.", "layers": [ { "id": "board-context", "name": "Board context", "description": "Records the concrete conditions and history of an opening.", "findings": [ { "id": "reconstructible-opening", "name": "Reconstructible opening", "description": "Link the opening to a board position, move history, player to move and game conditions, distinguishing setup stones from played moves.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which initial setup and ordered moves reproduce this position?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "reconstructible-opening-q01" }, { "text": "What board size, komi, handicap and ruleset govern the comparison?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "reconstructible-opening-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "formation-recognition", "name": "Formation recognition", "description": "Tests named opening matches and their variants.", "findings": [ { "id": "supported-pattern-match", "name": "Supported pattern match", "description": "Record the source-defined stones and relationships that support an opening label, permitted rotations or reflections, and deviations that may change its interpretation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which documented arrangement defines the proposed opening name?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "supported-pattern-match-q01" }, { "text": "Do move order, opponent placements or displaced stones make this a variant rather than the documented pattern?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "supported-pattern-match-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "whole-board-coordination", "name": "Whole-board coordination", "description": "Explains how opening stones and local outcomes combine across the board.", "rationale": "The value of modelling fuseki lies in relationships that an isolated local sequence cannot capture.", "layers": [ { "id": "territory-influence-and-direction", "name": "Territory, influence and direction", "description": "Records intended development and the board relationships supporting it.", "findings": [ { "id": "placement-purpose-and-support", "name": "Placement purpose and support", "description": "Distinguish secured territory, prospective territorial frameworks and influence; explain which other stones support the intended development and where it remains vulnerable.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does this placement aim to secure or enable, and which existing stones make that aim plausible?", "kind": "definition", "id": "placement-purpose-and-support-q01" }, { "text": "Which opponent invasion, reduction or approach would test the claimed benefit?", "kind": "action", "id": "placement-purpose-and-support-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "local-sequence-integration", "name": "Local sequence integration", "description": "Relates corner and side choices to the rest of the opening.", "findings": [ { "id": "local-result-whole-board-fit", "name": "Local result and whole-board fit", "description": "Evaluate whether a proposed local result complements nearby and distant stones, including its effect on weak groups, development direction and the opportunity to play elsewhere.", "questions": [ { "text": "Why does this local continuation fit the actual surrounding position?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "local-result-whole-board-fit-q01" }, { "text": "What concrete continuation tests the cost of leaving the local sequence now?", "kind": "action", "id": "local-result-whole-board-fit-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "continuation-choice-and-evidence", "name": "Continuation choice and evidence", "description": "Supports defensible opening decisions and records the limits of their justification.", "rationale": "A familiar pattern or general opening maxim does not by itself establish the best next move.", "layers": [ { "id": "candidate-development", "name": "Candidate development", "description": "Compares opening moves through their consequences and opponent replies.", "findings": [ { "id": "conditional-opening-options", "name": "Conditional opening options", "description": "Record plausible moves in different areas, the goals they serve, expected replies and reasons to prefer or reject them in this position.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which candidate moves address the largest opportunities or most urgent obligations on this board?", "kind": "action", "id": "conditional-opening-options-q01" }, { "text": "Which opponent reply would most strongly challenge each candidate's strategic justification?", "kind": "action", "id": "conditional-opening-options-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "assessment-provenance", "name": "Assessment provenance", "description": "Separates instructional principles, observed play and analytical evaluations.", "findings": [ { "id": "traceable-opening-judgment", "name": "Traceable opening judgment", "description": "Attribute recommendations to an identified commentary, game corpus or engine analysis and preserve conditions, dates, uncertainty and disagreement.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which source or reproducible analysis supports the recommendation, and under what game conditions?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "traceable-opening-judgment-q01" }, { "text": "If evaluations disagree, do they use the same position, scoring perspective, komi and analytical budget?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "traceable-opening-judgment-q02" }, { "text": "What additional evidence would justify changing the preferred continuation?", "kind": "action", "id": "traceable-opening-judgment-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The Go sense is inferred because no sense was recorded; the registry's intended referent should be checked.", "Named openings are examples rather than an exhaustive or mutually exclusive taxonomy.", "Opening evaluations depend on the full position, rules, komi, and analytical method; no fixed move-count boundary or universal ranking is asserted." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of fuseki this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Chinese fuseki", "Mini-Chinese fuseki", "Sanrensei opening", "Nirensei opening", "Shusaku opening" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of fuseki this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Japanese terminology", "value_or_pattern": "布石", "note": "The Japanese term romanized as fuseki; this is a lexical designation, not a registry identifier." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of fuseki this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Planning the relationship between opening moves across the Go board.", "Teaching the tradeoffs between immediate territory and outward influence.", "Classifying opening patterns in game records and instructional literature.", "Reviewing opening decisions through professional commentary and Go AI analysis." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of fuseki this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Following a memorized opening pattern without adapting to the opponent's moves.", "Choosing a locally sound corner sequence that fits poorly with the rest of the board.", "Overconcentrating stones and allowing the opponent to develop more efficiently elsewhere.", "Treating outward influence as if it were already secure territory.", "Expanding too widely while leaving groups vulnerable to attack." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of fuseki this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "English-language Go literature commonly borrows the Japanese term fuseki; Chinese terminology uses 布局, commonly romanized as buju." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of fuseki this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Joseki", "difference": "A joseki is a recognized local sequence, commonly in a corner; fuseki concerns the opening position across the whole board." }, { "name": "Go middle game", "difference": "The middle game emphasizes developed fighting and interaction between groups; its boundary with fuseki is gradual rather than a fixed move number." }, { "name": "Apache Jena Fuseki", "difference": "Apache Jena Fuseki is software providing a SPARQL server, whereas the sense described here is a Go concept." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of fuseki this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the originating registry record confirm Go fuseki as the intended referent?", "Which authoritative usages distinguish fuseki as a phase, a named formation and whole-board opening strategy, and where do their boundaries differ?", "Which criteria should identify the transition out of fuseki when local fighting begins while substantial opening development remains?", "How should pattern recognition handle transpositions, opponent deviations and board symmetries without erasing strategically meaningful differences?", "Which opening prescriptions remain supported across board sizes, handicap conditions, komi values and different human or engine evaluation methods?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 15, "questions": 24 } }