{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T10:02:43Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 25.0, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09510-cc2a-7d02-bc43-d9ab096cedd8\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: gore film\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 regis", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 62.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09510-cc28-70a2-8985-24f6c5a3b8ff\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: gore film\nRegistry id: vr.tr.gore-film\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nCont" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:46:12+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "owners" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:26+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q1538137", "registryId": "vr.tr.gore-film", "name": "gore film", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q1538137/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.gore-film", "name": "gore film", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise a gore film, describe how explicit bodily damage functions within it, and assess which version is suitable for a proposed viewing or use.", "definition": "A gore film, commonly called a splatter film, is a film usually associated with horror that makes explicit depictions of bodily injury, bloodshed and bodily destruction a central aesthetic or sensational attraction.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the classification and assessment of a film whose sustained or foregrounded depiction of bodily damage is central to its intended effects, while keeping disputed genre boundaries and version-dependent evidence explicit.", "in_scope": [ "Evidence for classifying a film as gore, including competing uses of gore film and splatter film", "The explicitness, frequency and prominence of depicted bodily damage", "The narrative, tonal and aesthetic functions of gore", "How practical effects, digital effects and editing construct the depiction", "Differences between cuts and their implications for audience access and presentation" ], "out_of_scope": [ "General film metadata, authorship and ownership managed by a film-work model", "Horror conventions that do not depend on explicit bodily damage", "Real-world injury diagnosis or treatment", "Instructions for inflicting bodily harm", "Production-wide labour and stunt safety management", "Recordings of actual violence whose primary status is documentary evidence" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Ask whether explicit bodily damage is a sustained attraction or organising device; an isolated graphic scene is insufficient evidence by itself.", "Distinguish visible bodily damage from violence conveyed mainly through threat, off-screen action or aftermath without graphic detail.", "Assess gore independently of horror tone: comic, absurd or emotionally distancing presentation does not by itself exclude the classification.", "Distinguish gore emphasis from body horror centred on transformation or bodily identity; record overlap only where both have supporting evidence.", "Classify the identified cut rather than assuming every release of the same film contains equivalent gore." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Gore classification", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "supported | contested | insufficient evidence | unsupported", "why_it_matters": "Keeps genre assignment accountable to evidence instead of treating a marketing label as definitive." }, { "name": "Graphic explicitness", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "implied | visible but obscured | clearly depicted | sustained anatomical detail; assessed per sequence using a declared rubric", "why_it_matters": "Separates the visibility of bodily damage from the mere occurrence of violence." }, { "name": "Gore exposure duration", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "seconds and percentage of the identified cut's runtime, with an explicit inclusion rule", "why_it_matters": "Supports comparisons of sustained exposure while preserving uncertainty about what qualifies." }, { "name": "Gore distribution", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "isolated | clustered | recurrent | near-continuous", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes a brief graphic episode from a film organised around repeated bodily spectacle." }, { "name": "Gore function", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "shock | disgust | fear | comedy | spectacle | vulnerability | critique | other; multiple values with evidence", "why_it_matters": "Records what the depiction appears to do without assuming that all gore seeks the same response." }, { "name": "Depiction technique", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "practical | digital | combined | indeterminate; sequence-specific", "why_it_matters": "Supports aesthetic analysis without confusing a convincing effect with an actual injury." }, { "name": "Assessed version", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "link to an identified release or cut, including runtime and identifying evidence", "why_it_matters": "Anchors observations and access decisions to the material actually assessed." }, { "name": "Content assessment coverage", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "unreviewed | partially reviewed | fully reviewed | requires reassessment", "why_it_matters": "Prevents incomplete viewing notes from being presented as a comprehensive content assessment." } ], "affordances": [ "Assign or contest a gore-film label using explicit criteria and attributed evidence.", "Annotate graphic sequences with timecodes, exposure characteristics and interpretive uncertainty.", "Compare cuts for removed, shortened, obscured or restored gore.", "Generate version-specific content notices without reproducing graphic descriptions unnecessarily.", "Recommend a cut for a stated viewing context using audience preferences and applicable classification information.", "Route uncertain depictions or disputed genre assignments for further review." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Describe gore films, their history and critical reception.", "Give content warnings and age ratings when discussing them." ], "must_not": [ "Recommend or show gore films to children.", "Present real footage of violence or death as fiction, or fiction as real footage.", "Help distribute films that break obscenity or classification laws where they apply.", "Produce graphic depictions of injury aimed at real, identifiable people." ], "requires_human": [ "Showing such films in a public or shared space." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Graphic violence can distress viewers, especially those with trauma.", "Artistic freedom has to be weighed against protection of minors." ], "affected_parties": [ "Children", "Viewers with trauma", "Filmmakers" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The rights holder of each film; national film classification bodies rate them.", "master_systems": [] }, "what_it_is_for": [ "Gore films are encountered in horror cinema, specialist festivals, film collections and media studies.", "Their explicit depictions of bodily damage are used to provoke shock, disgust or horror and sometimes to support satire or exaggerated spectacle.", "Viewing and distribution decisions depend on the particular version, audience and applicable classification." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "The Classification Guidelines issued by the British Board of Film Classification assess violence, injury detail and other content when assigning age classifications to films submitted for UK classification.", "The Classification Guidelines issued by the Australian Classification Board assess violence and other classifiable elements in films within the Australian classification system." ], "visual_identification": [ "Repeated close views of blood, open wounds or dismemberment make bodily damage a prominent visual feature.", "Scenes often linger on injury effects rather than leaving violence off screen or showing only brief aftermath.", "Graphic injury functions as a recurring attraction, although an isolated graphic scene does not by itself establish the genre." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Explicit injury imagery can cause distress, disgust or trauma-related reactions in some viewers.", "Inadequate content information can expose children or unsuspecting viewers to unsuitable material.", "Using classification information for a different edit can lead to an unsuitable screening or distribution decision." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q1538137: gore film", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1538137", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Gore film", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gore_film", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "gore-identity-and-boundaries", "name": "Gore identity and boundaries", "description": "Establishes why a film should be treated as a gore film and where that classification remains disputed.", "rationale": "The model needs to distinguish gore as an organising feature from incidental graphic violence and neighbouring genre labels.", "layers": [ { "id": "classification-evidence", "name": "Classification evidence", "description": "Connects labels to attributed usage and observable features of the assessed cut.", "findings": [ { "id": "centrality-of-gore", "name": "Centrality of gore", "description": "Records the evidence that explicit bodily damage is central enough to support classification.", "questions": [ { "text": "What working definition of gore film is being applied, and does it require centrality, repetition, explicitness or a combination?", "kind": "definition", "id": "centrality-of-gore-q01" }, { "text": "Which viewed sequences and attributed critical or distributor descriptions support or challenge this classification?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "centrality-of-gore-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "neighbouring-forms", "name": "Neighbouring forms", "description": "Separates gore emphasis from overlapping horror, exploitation and violent-film categories.", "findings": [ { "id": "overlap-without-equivalence", "name": "Overlap without equivalence", "description": "Records where labels overlap without assuming they name the same category.", "questions": [ { "text": "In the sources used for this film, are gore film and splatter film equivalent, overlapping or explicitly distinguished?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "overlap-without-equivalence-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence distinguishes this film's gore emphasis from slasher plotting, body transformation or occasional graphic action?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "overlap-without-equivalence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "graphic-exposure-profile", "name": "Graphic exposure profile", "description": "Describes what bodily damage is made visible and how exposure unfolds over time.", "rationale": "A genre label alone cannot explain the nature, duration or concentration of graphic content.", "layers": [ { "id": "visibility-and-detail", "name": "Visibility and detail", "description": "Assesses the presentation of bodily damage using a reproducible observation rubric.", "findings": [ { "id": "explicitness-of-depiction", "name": "Explicitness of depiction", "description": "Records visibility, framing and obscuration separately from the implied severity of an event.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which observable cues separate implied harm, obscured damage and clearly visible anatomical detail in this assessment?", "kind": "definition", "id": "explicitness-of-depiction-q01" }, { "text": "How do shot distance, lighting, occlusion and shot duration affect the explicitness recorded for each sequence?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "explicitness-of-depiction-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "duration-and-distribution", "name": "Duration and distribution", "description": "Tracks how graphic material accumulates, clusters and recurs within the cut.", "findings": [ { "id": "exposure-pattern", "name": "Exposure pattern", "description": "Records qualifying intervals and their spacing without reducing intensity to runtime alone.", "questions": [ { "text": "Under the declared inclusion rule, how many seconds and what percentage of this cut contain visible gore?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "exposure-pattern-q01" }, { "text": "Is exposure isolated, concentrated in set pieces or recurrent, and where are the longest intervals without graphic material?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "exposure-pattern-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "gore-function-and-construction", "name": "Gore function and construction", "description": "Examines how graphic depiction produces meaning and how its audiovisual construction shapes interpretation.", "rationale": "Similar amounts of gore can serve different purposes and produce different experiences depending on tone and technique.", "layers": [ { "id": "narrative-and-tone", "name": "Narrative and tone", "description": "Relates bodily spectacle to character stakes, pacing and tonal framing.", "findings": [ { "id": "function-of-bodily-spectacle", "name": "Function of bodily spectacle", "description": "Separates proposed artistic functions from documented audience responses.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which sequences frame gore as frightening, comic, spectacular, distressing or critical, and what supports those interpretations?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "function-of-bodily-spectacle-q01" }, { "text": "Which claims about intended or experienced effects come from filmmakers, critics or audience research rather than the assessor's inference?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "function-of-bodily-spectacle-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "effects-and-presentation", "name": "Effects and presentation", "description": "Records how effects, editing and sound construct the apparent bodily event.", "findings": [ { "id": "constructed-damage", "name": "Constructed damage", "description": "Documents supported production techniques and their visible presentation without providing harmful procedures.", "questions": [ { "text": "What production evidence supports identifying the depicted damage as practical, digital or combined effects?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "constructed-damage-q01" }, { "text": "How do editing and sound intensify or soften the sequence relative to what its images alone show?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "constructed-damage-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "cuts-and-viewing-decisions", "name": "Cuts and viewing decisions", "description": "Connects gore assessment to identifiable versions, content notices and proposed uses.", "rationale": "Cuts can change graphic exposure, so an agent needs version-specific evidence before recommending or presenting a film.", "layers": [ { "id": "version-differences", "name": "Version differences", "description": "Identifies the assessed cut and establishes meaningful differences in graphic content.", "findings": [ { "id": "gore-edit-history", "name": "Gore edit history", "description": "Records verified removals, restorations and alterations alongside unresolved version claims.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which release identifiers and viewing evidence establish the exact cut assessed?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "gore-edit-history-q01" }, { "text": "Which graphic intervals differ between available cuts, and were those differences directly compared or reported by a source?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "gore-edit-history-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "contextual-presentation", "name": "Contextual presentation", "description": "Supports decisions about viewing and presentation without treating genre membership as an audience suitability verdict.", "findings": [ { "id": "version-specific-guidance", "name": "Version-specific guidance", "description": "Combines content observations, assessment coverage and applicable classification records for a stated context.", "questions": [ { "text": "What concise content notice is supported by the reviewed cut, and which unreviewed portions limit its completeness?", "kind": "action", "id": "version-specific-guidance-q01" }, { "text": "Given the audience's stated preferences, venue and applicable classification record, which cut can the agent recommend or flag for review?", "kind": "action", "id": "version-specific-guidance-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "No sense was supplied; this description assumes the cinematic genre label.", "Genre boundaries and subtype taxonomies are not standardized; splatter comedy also overlaps horror comedy.", "No sources were consulted; classification details should be checked against the relevant body's current guidance." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of gore film this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Splatter comedy" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of gore film this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) Classification Guidelines address violence, injury detail and other content when assigning UK age classifications.", "The Motion Picture Association (MPA) film rating system provides US audience classifications and content descriptors; it does not define gore as a formal genre." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of gore film this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Genre labels used in film criticism, scholarship, marketing and audience discussion.", "Practical makeup, prosthetics and visual effects used to stage graphic bodily damage.", "Explicit bodily imagery used to provoke disgust, shock, fear or dark laughter.", "Programming and distribution within horror festivals and specialist film collections." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of gore film this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Graphic imagery can cause distress or disgust, with substantial differences between viewers.", "Age classifications, required edits or distribution restrictions can differ between jurisdictions and release versions.", "Treating every film containing graphic violence as a gore film obscures whether gore is central or incidental.", "Fictional bodily injury can be mistaken for medically realistic representation." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of gore film this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The terms gore and splatter overlap, but their scope varies across critical traditions, languages and marketing contexts.", "National classification practices differ in their treatment of prolonged injury detail, sadistic violence and comic framing." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of gore film this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Horror film", "difference": "Horror encompasses films intended to evoke fear or dread without explicit bodily injury; gore films foreground its graphic display." }, { "name": "Body horror", "difference": "Body horror centres on bodily transformation, degeneration or loss of bodily autonomy; graphic bloodshed is neither necessary nor sufficient." }, { "name": "Slasher film", "difference": "Slasher identifies a narrative pattern involving a killer stalking and attacking victims; the amount and centrality of gore vary." }, { "name": "Splatter film", "difference": "Usually a synonym or near-synonym, with no consistently accepted boundary separating it from gore film." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of gore film this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Do relevant film reference works treat gore film and splatter film as synonyms, and how does usage vary by language or critical tradition?", "What defensible criteria establish gore as central to a film without imposing an arbitrary duration threshold?", "Which neighbouring Vercy models already own film identity, horror classification and release-level content assessment?", "How reliably can different assessors distinguish graphic explicitness from perceived intensity, especially when sound suggests more than the image shows?", "How should the model handle works that mix fictional effects with actual documentary injury footage?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 15, "questions": 23 } }